<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Health Care Tea Leaves From Harkin, Lincoln</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/10/16/more-health-care-tea-leaves-from-harkin-lincoln/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/10/16/more-health-care-tea-leaves-from-harkin-lincoln/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:05:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcos</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/10/16/more-health-care-tea-leaves-from-harkin-lincoln/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>marcos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=125#comment-329</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I still haven’t read ANYWHERE a reasonable explanation for why we need an “opt-out” for a system that is entirely an “opt-in” to begin with.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Political cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I still haven’t read ANYWHERE a reasonable explanation for why we need an “opt-out” for a system that is entirely an “opt-in” to begin with.</p></blockquote>
<p>Political cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmull</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/10/16/more-health-care-tea-leaves-from-harkin-lincoln/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>bmull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=125#comment-322</guid>
		<description>There is no reason why start-up costs for health care reform have to come from within the system. Under those rules most businesses would never get off the ground.

If the government wants to tax employer benefits it should let everyone cash out those benefits, like the Wyden plan suggested. A 40% tax on hard-won benefits is anti-union and discriminatory against older, sicker workers, and those in high cost areas.

The ongoing savings from health care reform should come from a more cost-effective system. Single payer and Medicare drug price negotiation would save hundreds of billions of dollars per year with negligible effect on patient care. Barring that, a public option paying Medicare+5% rates is the only idea left on the tablet which could generate enough savings to ensure affordability. Congress can go round and round trying to avoid this reality but they will not be able to escape it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no reason why start-up costs for health care reform have to come from within the system. Under those rules most businesses would never get off the ground.</p>
<p>If the government wants to tax employer benefits it should let everyone cash out those benefits, like the Wyden plan suggested. A 40% tax on hard-won benefits is anti-union and discriminatory against older, sicker workers, and those in high cost areas.</p>
<p>The ongoing savings from health care reform should come from a more cost-effective system. Single payer and Medicare drug price negotiation would save hundreds of billions of dollars per year with negligible effect on patient care. Barring that, a public option paying Medicare+5% rates is the only idea left on the tablet which could generate enough savings to ensure affordability. Congress can go round and round trying to avoid this reality but they will not be able to escape it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ratfood</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/10/16/more-health-care-tea-leaves-from-harkin-lincoln/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>ratfood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=125#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Hypothetical... I would bet that if we were trying to reform health care this year and we had NOT already squandered a couple trillion dollars on two wars, all the same people would still be complaining about the cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hypothetical&#8230; I would bet that if we were trying to reform health care this year and we had NOT already squandered a couple trillion dollars on two wars, all the same people would still be complaining about the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KellyCDenver</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/10/16/more-health-care-tea-leaves-from-harkin-lincoln/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>KellyCDenver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=125#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Concur, but I&#039;ll just add PAST time to pay the piper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concur, but I&#8217;ll just add PAST time to pay the piper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarenM</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/10/16/more-health-care-tea-leaves-from-harkin-lincoln/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>KarenM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=125#comment-311</guid>
		<description>So many, many, many tax breaks over the past decade or so to the very, very rich. Even while waging wars (on credit), losing jobs (to overseas tax havens), eroding the social contract and the safety net (because we could no longer &quot;afford&quot; them, with the add&#039;l defense spending, after all).

I think it&#039;s time for the elites to suck it up and pay the piper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many, many, many tax breaks over the past decade or so to the very, very rich. Even while waging wars (on credit), losing jobs (to overseas tax havens), eroding the social contract and the safety net (because we could no longer &#8220;afford&#8221; them, with the add&#8217;l defense spending, after all).</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s time for the elites to suck it up and pay the piper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldFatGuy</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/10/16/more-health-care-tea-leaves-from-harkin-lincoln/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>OldFatGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=125#comment-309</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Later in the call, Harkin gave a nod of support to the “opt-out” compromise,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh boy, more of THAT bullshit.

I still haven&#039;t read ANYWHERE a reasonable explanation for why we need an &quot;opt-out&quot; for a system that is entirely an &quot;opt-in&quot; to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Later in the call, Harkin gave a nod of support to the “opt-out” compromise,</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh boy, more of THAT bullshit.</p>
<p>I still haven&#8217;t read ANYWHERE a reasonable explanation for why we need an &#8220;opt-out&#8221; for a system that is entirely an &#8220;opt-in&#8221; to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.196 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 07:23:53 -->

