During the Virginia Democratic primary for Governor, Creigh Deeds’ campaign didn’t take off until he secured the endorsement of the Washington Post, which is read in the Northern Virginia suburbs. Today he received the endorsement in the general election, which could inspire the same kind of resurgence to his campaign, which is currently behind Republican Bob McDonnell’s.
Rather than basing the endorsement on allegations about McDonnell’s college thesis or relative campaigning styles, the WaPo editorial board, not necessarily known for their rigor, justifies their selection on the basis of Deeds’ transportation policy. It’s an interesting and often-neglected argument for revenue to build and preserve the commons, one that Deeds really hasn’t even made himself.
But the central challenge facing Virginia and its next governor is the deficit in transportation funding projected at $100 billion over the next two decades — and only Mr. Deeds offers hope for a solution. Following a road map used successfully in 1986, he would appoint a bipartisan commission to forge a consensus on transportation funding, with the full expectation that new taxes would be part of the mix. Mr. McDonnell, by contrast, proposes to pay for road improvements mainly by cannibalizing essential state services such as education, health and public safety — a political non-starter. And rather than leveling with Virginians about the cost of his approach, as Mr. Deeds has done, Mr. McDonnell lacks the political spine to say what programs he would attempt to gut, or even reshape, in order to deal with transportation needs.
Mr. Deeds has run an enormous and possibly fatal political risk by saying bluntly that he would support legislation to raise new taxes dedicated to transportation. It is a risk that neither Mr. Kaine nor Mr. Warner felt they could take. But given that the state has raised no significant new cash for roads, rails and bridges in 23 years, Mr. Deeds’s position is nothing more than common sense. It is fantasy to think that the transportation funding problem, a generation in the making, will be addressed without a tax increase. A recent manifesto from 17 major business groups in Northern Virginia, calling for new taxes dedicated to transportation, attests to that reality.
Yet Mr. McDonnell, champion of a revenue-starved status quo, remains in denial. He professes to feel the pain of Virginians struggling with financial hard times. In fact his transportation policy, a blueprint for stagnation and continuing deterioration, would subvert the state’s prospects for economic recovery and long-term growth. And it would only deepen the misery of Northern Virginia commuters who already pay a terrible price — economic, personal and psychological — because of the state’s long neglect of its roads.
Essentially, the Post’s editorial boils down to the argument that one party believes America is worth paying for, and one party does not. It’s sadly unusual to see that expressed in our political campaigns these days.



9 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
dday! just stopped by to say hi! nice new blog!
When Deeds tell WaPo that in the interest of justice, the transportation funds ought to take the form of taxes on D.C. businesses, is there any precedent for recalling an endorsement? didn’t think so.
Nice touch, about WaPo not being known for rigor, is that your new renaming of ethix?
A reality-based Democrat isn’t met with derision by the reality-challenged WaPo. Is a new day dawning, or is this just a case of the blind pig finding an acorn?
100 billion… hey that’s like 6 or 8 cheap weeks of defense spending… How dare anyone want to spend that kind of money not killing or oppressing people!
Thanks skip!
Huh, I had been debating sitting this one out ever since my guy (Moran) lost in the primary (which would be the first election sat out EVER for me), and now my mind is made up.
If WaPo endorses him, I’m definitely not bothering to vote for him.
No more lesser of two evils for me Democrats. You want my vote from now on you’d best be a real fucking Democrat. And Creigh Deeds was by far the most Blue Dog Democrat of the three that ran in the primary.
No thanks, I’ll write in my own damned name. Screw voting for the lesser of two evils ANYMORE.
News Tip: My congressperson, Ed Perlmutter, is preparing an ammendment for paying for healthcare reform. TAXING STOCK TRANSACTIONS! He says we helped out Wall Street now it is time for Wall Street to help out America.
Lee Hochstadter writes the Virginia editorials for the post and unlike his boss, Fred Hiatt, Lee knows what he is talking about on Virginia and transportation issues.
Ruth, I think that you are either confused about the DC tax issue are just trying to make some mischief!
OldFatGuy, even a blind pig will find an occasional acorn and Creigh is far more progressive than you seem to realize; I can tell you from personal experience that Bob McDonnell is by far the greater of any other two evils that you might consider. Creigh is much in the mold of Gery Baliles and will be surprising a lot of people if he is elected governor. Besides, his name could have some coattails for House Democratic candidates in the rural areas of Virginia; don’t cut off your nose to spite your face!
repuglitards are more popular than Democrats
every day except election day
and
everywhere except in the voting booth
anybody else notice that