A major story out of Afghanistan, with implications for the US strategy in the region. The United Nations’ Electoral Complaints Commission has completed their work on the Afghan elections, tossing out so many fraudulent votes to bring Hamid Karzai under 50% in the first round of voting, necessitating a runoff. However, the UN commission must reconcile this result with a separate local election commission which backs Karzai:
“Now that we have the ECC orders, we expect the IEC (Independent Election Commission) to implement those orders with haste and move swiftly to issue the final certified results or the need for a runoff as required by Afghan electoral law,” said Aleem Siddique, a UN spokesman in Kabul.
Ahead of the announcement pressure had been mounting on Karzai to accept a possible second-round vote against his main rival, Abdullah Abdullah, or work out a deal to break the deadlock.
The ECC announcement, originally expected over the weekend, was delayed under pressure from the IEC, which is considered to back Karzai and is responsible overall for the Afghan election. The IEC is almost certain to challenge the ECC’s findings.
This sets up the possible “brick wall” approach feared by US officials, where Karzai and his election commission refuses to accept the UN results, throwing the country into an uncertain period. Without consensus from the IEC and the ECC, there is almost no way to move forward. And within two weeks, heavy snow in the mountainous regions of Afghanistan would make a runoff election impossible until the spring, leaving the country with no leader for several months. And with the White House signaling yesterday that they would not make a decision on troops until the electoral situation was settled, that could lead to a policy paralysis.
US officials are reportedly pushing Karzai to accept the runoff or share power with the second-place finisher, ex-foreign minister Abdullah Abdullah. Sen. John Kerry has been meeting with Karzai throughout the weekend.
29 Comments
Spotlight



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Advanced search
While US officials are reportedly pushing Karzai to accept the runoff, Karzi has been defending his actions by saying that he was only following the model of Bush/Cheney 2000.
Disproving our heartfelt concerns that America is no longer respected or followed for its stellar wisdom, faultless vision, and determined dedication to continuing to be a beacon of hope …
Let us hope that this mere trifle may soon be behind us, as any delay in prosecuting this particular endless (and “good”) war is decidedly costly …
(Any snark detected is for entertainment porpoises, only …)
The US is pushing this as an exercise in legitimation of an election so that they can continue to work their will on Afghanistan.
Put off the decision to fail. Why not, we’ve wasted 8 years so far and deciding when to insert more troops if we’re never going to leave is not a rush decision.
Best plan no elected Government no troops period.
Power sharing is good; there’s enough graft to go around and two Presidents have to be more effective than one.
It’ll be interesting to hear the linguistics used to justify troop increases for Obamas war.
Elections in Iraq & Afghanistan since the U.S. invasions have been nothing but farces. This new twist just adds another layer to the farce.
Doesn’t Peter W. Galbraith deserve credit for highlighting voter fraud?
He’s one of the outspoken officials to do that, but there were plenty of others who pointed it out right from the getgo. Can’t remember where I picked it up, perhaps democracynow, but even before the election Karzai jimmied the election by demanding local counts that couldn’t be audited, by delivering ballot boxes that were already stuffed, but were opaque, etc. I may not have the details right, so don’t quote me. The major point is that the rigging was so blatantly obvious, you’d have to have been a moron not to realize it. In that light, it’s amazing that Karzai “won” by so little.
Alternatively, they are looking for a face-saving way to get out. It could go either way. The Administration have already determined that we have no strategic interest there (unless lilke the Bush administration we were preparing for war with China). Karzai’s obstinacy gives them cover to wash their (and our) hands of the mess Bush made. Saves a lot of money, too. Win-win I would say.
Karzai has to be singing to the U.S.
Why do you build me up buttercup just to let me down
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYwnmjwhnHw
This is right. There were considerable concerns of voter fraud before the elections. Also the election was on August 20, 2009, two months ago, so this story has been around a while.
It gets very interesting. The US and NATO now have the cover to withdraw saying they cannot defend an illegitimate government. I know, I know. When has that ever stopped us in the past?
The first step for that has already been recommended by McChrystal–withdrawal to major cities. That could have mostly aleady occurred or take some time; it is the part of withdrawal that exposes troops most to attacks and IEDs. The second step is withdrawal to US- and NATO-occupied bases, likely sometime in the early spring. Flights out over Russian airspace to Germany for refueling and then to the US.
If Karzai wants to bluff his way into office, Senator Kerry should disabuse him of the notion that the US is obligated to stay.
At the moment, the situation is one of maneuvering, not one of strategy. Don’t expect any public statements in advance of actions. And my guess is that Obama has no intention of becoming the second coming of LBJ.
The reason why the story stays around for so long is because O was hoping that the U.S. puppet would slip back in and they the U.S. could surge the good war. So he refused to come to grips with the election fraud in a timely way. And so it drags on and on and on.
I suspect that the only way that Karzai could win the votes is if the Taliban stood down and decided to become a partner to win the Pashtun vote. There was a lot of early maneuvering that seemed to be trying to put that in place before the election. Or at least have one or two Taliban candidates on the slate. The “standing down” requirement was what killed that play.
If the totals were too high, the fraud would be noticeable given the reports about the opaque ballot boxes. With the narrow vote, the “both sides did it; I just did it better” argument should have held sway. And until Galbraith blew the whistle, it likely would have.
They have Diebold in Afghanistan too?
They’d better wind Afghanistan up real quick … the War on Christmas is about to start …
We don’t have Diebold to kick around anymore.
Ha, ha, ha.
Egad, Petro!
How right you are.
‘Tis the season …
And this one looks to be a long, grim, and despairing struggle for some.
When will Goldman’s bonuses be showered on the most-richly deserving?
That may offer the retail worriers some substantial “hope” to cover “losses” elsewhere.
(Do you more northerly types have those same traditions of excess and so on? I ask since there is so little exceptionalism distinguishing the nation that is right beneath you these days …)
Namaste, Petro
Will Glenn Beck et al being calling on Santa to stay away from the homes of libruls and other leftist dfhs? Will the teabaggers be calling for all good fundies to hunt down non-believers, particularly those brown folks that come from the Middle East? Will we see actors portraying Jesus pimping CDOs from BofA? Enquiring minds and all that, doncha know.
Our 5 major Banks are Crown Corporations, run by an Executive Board, so they get paid very well but not ridiculously so.
Canada’s real estate market is picking up pace but the lower Yankee Greenback might hurt our recovery. Prices at Malls are some of the lowest I’ve seen in a loong time. Most of us are going to have a simple, fun Christmas with lots of homemade goodies … but that’s usually how it is with my family.
Obama is teh Grinch who stole
Christian valuesChristmas … pass it on ! *g*Namaste SD !
Sorry that I missed you in real time, on bmaz’s thread last night.
But there is no money in getting out. Would Obama change course and do something that directly challenged the military industrial complex?
So who will the U.S. pick to run Afghanistan now?
Marcos@ 24: “Would Obama change course and do something that directly challenged the military-industrial complex?
He just MIGHT.
This gives him an excuse and a window to put any surge on hold.
Will he do that, and tell McChrystal to STFU and make do with the 100,000 troops; ours and NATO’s he’s already got, until this situation can be resolved. Needless to say, the “resolving” means waiting for the kind of Vietnam-clusterfuck-fatigue to continue to increase until it’s terminal with american voters.
Let’s hope.
Where the hell was the UN in 2000?
Also: “But there is no money in getting out.”
At about a billion-and-a-half a week, there isn’t any money in staying IN, unless you’re a “contractor/merc”. Can we outvote them? We need to find that out. :o)
Watch Obama and/or his team. If they start using words like “weighing”, and talking about “cost-effectiveness”, and tossing out some specific numbers about what it’s costing us, then we may be in for a sea change.
Hey, if it would make the warbots happy, he could do even do it Rumsfeld-style:
“Have we been in Afghanistan for 8 years? Certainly!
Are we winning? You betcha, but the parameters have yet be optimized. As soon as we snarf the goorple, will we have blueberry pie and ice cream for all the “defense” industries? Absolutamente! Should we stay the cakewalk, or leave, and risk our gains receding into the areas North, South, East, and West, of Kabul, somewhat…not to mention the chance of losing both houses of congress if we pull out and the shit hits the fan? There is “staying” and there is “staying” at a lesser lever of stayingsomeness.
To be or not to be; that is the question, in’t it? Without a doubt!”
Boy! Elections are the answer to everything aren’t they. We have them all the time, and have a Government full of people we elected. A government that doesn’t work, and has litterally made a mess our our country.
They sold us out, and have spent us into debt, not fixed one problem, and now are deciding what to give us for healthcare with our money.
They can’t afford to give us healthcare, but had no problem bailing out Wall Street, funding the wars, and never passing up a good earmark. All while excepting all they can get from evrry lobbist who has cash, or a gift to Them.
Ah! Voting is so great, lets do it more often.