After spending months putting the phrase “public option” into the national consciousness, House Democrats, according to The Hill, want to drop that term in favor of “Medicare Part E”.
Say hello to “Medicare Part E” — as in, “Medicare for Everyone.”
House Democrats are looking at re-branding the public health insurance option as Medicare, an established government healthcare program that is better known than the public option.
The strategy could benefit Democrats struggling to bridge the gap between liberals in their party, who want the public option, and centrists, who are worried it would drive private insurers out of business.
While much of the public is foggy on what a public option actually is, people understand Medicare. It also would place the new public option within the rubric of a familiar system rather than something new and unknown.
A couple things about this. First of all, this just seems so cynical, to toss out “Medicare Part E” right at the end like this. Wasn’t there a meeting on terminology a little earlier? Four months of “Medicare Part E” makes sense. One week of it before the final vote? Not so much. Second, recent polling shows a public option gaining in support. It’s not a broken-down horse that needs to be swapped out at this point.
And third, as Ron Wyden never tires of pointing out, the public option on offer wouldn’t be available to everyone. In fact, it would be closed to more than 90 percent of all Americans, along with everything else on the exchanges.
Now, if they wanted to do a true Medicare Part E, with automatic enrollment and universal availability, I’m right there. But this rebranding could get slippery the moment you have to explain that Medicare for Everyone isn’t for, well, everyone.



10 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
me LIKEY
Wyden rocks
Why re-brand when your old brand is polling 57% and climbing? Me no likey.
sounds like an ambitious aide or consultant belatedly catching on . . . and wanting to take credit
If it works, great.
As for it being cynical, who knew that was a possiblity in this Mother of All Political Battles?
This sounds like an evasive idea from the trigger happy Blue Dogs… looking to do the wrong things.
Call it what you want… but the robust public option criteria should be as far right as it gets without a resounding NO from we the people.
For the next round of rebranding…
ProCare!
I don’t like the idea of calling it Medicare Part E if it would not:
(1) be a choice open to everyone;
(2) Use Medicare rates;
(3) Use the Medicare provider network;
(4) Use Medicare’s Administration; and
(5) Have subsidies to make it affordable.
A few months ago I outlined a three-step strategy for getting something like this with the first step using reconciliation to open Medicare to everyone. It’s not Medicare for All because people under 65 would have to pay something for the insurance. But it’s much closer than other proposals. I think the House could go for it and have a lot stronger justification for calling it Medicare Part E than what they’re planning to do now.
Geezus this is Hacker’s Branding… It would have been much easier to start from his position but Noooo, its not that simple is it?
If its HACKER’s plan to the LETTER, then I’m all for changing the Title….
No matter what, we need as close to 100% coverage as possible and no delay in allowing people to buy into it. Jan 2nd 2010 should be the first day Medicare For Everybody would be open to enrollment. Would it be De Facto Single Payer, in the words of Sarah Palin, “You Betcha”
the single payer bill, hr 676, is “Expanded and Improved Medicare for All”
if there’s to be no change in policy, and only one in “branding” (which i’ve learn to understand is usually a specific kind of lying), then the assholes are feeling the latest heat from single payer activists (*) and once again attempting co-opt their rhetoric (which btw, they have been doing for over a year now — nyceve made that point in july of 2008) with “medicare for everyone.”
now, if we could only get them to co-opt the policy too. *g*
(*) links:
http://www.counterpunch.org/zeese10202009.html
http://mobilizeforhealthcare.org/
oh, yikes! so sorry mods, i did it again — too many links.