The other night, a group of bloggers got to sit down with Richard Trumka, the newly elected President of the AFL-CIO, as part of the Building the New Economy conference. In the meeting he focused on how the economic engine of the last 30 years, essentially debt-financed consumer spending, asset bubbles and Wall Street casino gambling, hasn’t worked, and how we need to create a new model. He listed two key goals: 1) re-regulating the financial sector (and I’ll have more on that later, he basically thinks the current bills won’t work); 2) re-creating the manufacturing base of the economy, along with our R&D and technology sectors, which we’re losing at a rapid pace. Trumka said that the AFL-CIO will come out with a “progressive agenda” around the first of the year, something that can be used in the electoral cycle. This is part of the “political and economic narrative” he said that organized labor had to create, to find a way to talk about the economy that resonates with working people.
Marcy Wheeler and I caught up with Trumka after that meeting. We wanted to ask him about that report on Blue Dog PAC contributions plummeting recently, and how individual Blue Dogs still thrive on donations from organized labor. Luckily a Flip cam was nearby, and we captured the exchange.
A couple things are important here. Trumka says that often the local federations don’t have the greatest sense about how their lawmakers are selling them out in Washington, and shifting to “full-time campaign mode,” with their organizing arm Working America moving to a legislative map, will allow for much more voter education throughout the year and not just at election time.
I also found this part interesting:
ME: Do you see some protection at the state level, where they, the state labor feds say, “No, this is our guy, and they’ve helped us in the past,” and things like that? And then you see what happens when they get to Washington…
MW: With regards to the donations, the Blue Dog donations.
RT: Yeah, there’s probably some of that. But more what happens is, there was a place I remember about ten years ago, they had pet unions. And these politicians would all have a pet union. And they’d do everything they could for the pet union, and screw everybody else. And then when it came time for elections, they’d call on the pet union to try to help them. Hopefully we’re getting past that now, where we’re all going to stand together. I can tell you what, members of the AFL-CIO are pretty angry about what’s been happening lately, and I don’t think they’re in the mood. Now, some of them have actually pledged not to give any money until there’s a turnaround. Some of them have erected a few litmus tests and we’ll see if that follows up. We don’t have that policy right now. But that’s not to say that couldn’t happen. Because our executive council is really upset with what they’re doing.
I’ve seen a bit of this out in California. State and local councils operate as their own fiefdoms, and don’t always work together even if they exist under the same umbrella. Trumka says that’s changing.
Later on, we asked Trumka about health care, and the Senators who say they won’t vote for cloture.
You know, I think it’s Un-American, that’s what I think.
Not mincing words.
Trumka is basically vowing to have organized labor out in force across the country, getting involved in many races where they haven’t been before, and he ticked off lots of specific states: “Arkansas, Tennessee, Virginia, Connecticut.” So some politicians are on notice.





28 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Good on Trumka, you and Marcy, David. Heartening!
Seems that it will be more than ‘some’ that are on notice, they just don’t all realize it as yet.
Filibustering health care reform may be un-American, but Progressives should vote NO on this bill because it sucks.
I kind of agree. The more time I have to think about this, even the more progressive House bill sucks and it’s only going to get worse after they have to reconcile it with the extra-lousy Senate version.
Can anyone explain why we shouldn’t shift our focus now to just Killing the Bill like Uma Thurman with a samurai sword?
Take a look this posting and see what you think:
Where this PO really seems to fall down is that it’s not available on day one and only people who don’t currently have insurance can use it. So not really an “option,” more of an insurer of last resort. And I’ve no idea whether those serious structural issues can be fixed.
great reporting. thanks.
As flawed as the bill will likely be, it would save some lives and help many others. Shall we accept this toehold and vow to continue climbing, or return to the bottom and try to leap to the top of the mountain in a single bound?
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen David Dayen and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
“Oh shit,here they come now!!!” That’s what Custer said as the Sioux warriors of freedom came over the hill and that’s what the corporate fascists are sayin’ as they light their incense at the alter of St. Ronnie of Reagan. To those of you out there who have been wailin’ and whinin’ about corporate ownership of the Democratic Party and to the Mutant Ninja Naderites who have been howlin’ about how there’s not one dime’s worth of difference between the political parties…well, here comes the truth!! And the truth of a progressive and mobilzed union movement can force the Blue Dogs like Stupak of Michigan back into their kennels along with their anti-abortion bullshit.
Look for the SCOTUS to free up what’s left of the corporate TARP money this Spring but that will be too little too late when the reality of “one person one vote” meets the myth of “money equals free speech”. Rahm and the Clintons kept the unions divided against themselves and advanced the cause of NAFTA and Walmart for 8 years but the reality of unemployment and the collapse of the middle class have mobilzed the only force that can crack the coprorate rulin’ class wide open: organized and mobilized citizens!
Keep the red flags flyin’ and…
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, NOW WE HAVE A WAR WE CAN WIN!!
When Unions are not strong, the Democratic Party is not strong. Unions have been the heart and soul of the Party for as long as I can remember. Let’s help them all we can.
At the time of Reagan’s death, sickened by the undeserved accolades, I sent a letter to the local paper saying that Reagan’s actual accomplishment was that he made people feel good about America while undermining everything that IS good about America.
Reagan’s penchants for union-busting and deregulation unleashed destructive forces that continue to ravage our economy. Thanks to Trumka and everyone else working to turn the tide.
Citizen Twian:
Take a pill and pick up your blanket and bottle and jump back into your crib. The unions right now can put Blue Dogs like Stupak of Michigan back in their kennels with their anti-abortion threats on the healthcare bill…I been sayin’ for months now that the House of Representatives is where it’s at!
A little OT, but related. Just saw an ad here in IN that, among other things, quotes the Wall Street Journal as saying that the healthcare bill (framed as the public option, aka govt run healthcare) is “guaranteed” to raise the defict, then exhorting a call to Bayh to get him to vote against it.
yes David, great reporting.
ok Smart Kids/Inside Baseball types please weigh in:
from David’s report about CPC/WH Meeting – clearly the WH is still pushing Triggers
Trumka has been consistently against them.
How in the world does WH think they are going to get around that and have AFL-CIO help in 2010 ?
granted, I know Rahm is an arrogant prick, but does he just expect Labor to fold on this – when it is so very clear it is a new fucking day and Labor (at least AFL-CIO) aint foldin
really, how does WH think it’s going to finesse this to Triggers over the objections of this rather large immovable object ??
…and further more, the old chant of “worker-student alliance” has the power of truth behind it today!
Not surprising the WSJ would say that, we know who their masters are.
Not sure I know what you mean. I’m a little old for a crib and a bottle. Were you disagreeing with my belief that we need the Unions? Please explain.
Yes, because that’s what you do when you’re about to pass a bill that makes significant progress on an important issue. You kill it and start from scratch. Because that won’t delay health care reform another, oh, twenty years. And God knows nothing happens in politics unless it all happens right at once and just the way everyone wants it.
Jane has a new cross-post up: “Stupak Threatens to Block Health Care over Abortion, Planned Parenthood and NARAL Take a Nap”
That was a tad more bizarre than usual.
:)
Citizen Twain:
You lament the weakness of the unions at the moment that the unions are advancin’ behind the politics of economic justice…the unions in old workin’ class areas that have been divided by wedge issues like abortion are the only force that can break the old Reagan coalition and they will do it without any help from folks like you who wail about the weakness of organized labor.
Citizen ratfood:
Careful, Brother Rat, I can give ya some “bizarre”.
I did not say the Unions were weak. I said IF they are not strong we are not strong and they are certainly climbing out of a very deep hole that Reagan dug.
Citizen Twain:
Rahm tried ta finesse union support for corpoate healthcare “reform” by promisin’ EFCA legislation next year…but it won’t work and the power of anti-abortion politics in the Democratic Party will be broken by organized labor.
Looking forward to that ‘re-regulating the financial sector’ commentary.
And from what I can see of the current financial reform proposals, they aren’t going to be effective.
Plus, they fail to account for the fact that there were regulations in place that simply were not used — a problem that no legislation can fix.
Time to change the narrative.
People might have to shift from spending their time day trading to you know… ‘making stuff’ and providing services. What a concept, eh?
I’m afraid it will cost more lives than it saves. The Pharma gift of never-ending patents will make life-saving medicines completely out-of-reach for even more people and the weakened public option won’t provide any real competition to private insurers so we’ll end up seeing our premiums continue to rise — only now it will be against the law to not pay those exorbitant fees.
I fear the end result of this so-called reform will be a health care system that’s an even bigger disaster than what we’ve got now.
I pray we see some miraculous changes through amendments, but it’s really not looking good as far as I can tell.
But as I understood Jane’s post on “evergreen” patents and bills in Congress, it’s a separate bill, it’s not in the health insurance bill.
That’s not to say that it wouldn’t be a good idea bill something opposite to continual extension of patents, but it is a separate issue, and can be dealt with separately. In fact, this extension of patents meme has been ongoing for some years now; it’s not going to be easy to reverse the trend. For my part, it’s not worth cancelling everything good in the possible bill on that issue.
OTOH, if they make it based on triggers, that might be worth trashing the whole thing, because I think that would make it pretty useless.
I disagree. Especially if the Public Option is watered down even further, or not included in any meaningful way. If that is the case, all the bill will be remembered for is mandating coverage.
The current versions of the bills are horrible. Sure they do some good things, like making it illegal to deny coverage for a preexisting condition. Is it going to reduce costs? Is it going to cover everybody?
Unfortunately we don’t focus on fixing the obstacles to true reform; such as creating term limits and real campaign finance reform. If we would had spent all this time focusing on doing those things first, we wouldn’t be sitting here arguing about how to save the public option (which none of us really wanted anyways), but rather we would be arguing about how to best sell and implement a single payer system. But I digress…
If the public option is removed or even further watered down, I will be contacting my representatives and demanding that they either remove the mandate from the bill, or just vote it down.