Comments on: I Have To Go

By: dakine01

dakine01 — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:47:53 +0000

I’m 57 years old and I don’t think I’ve ever seen any bill ‘improved’ in the Conference.

So I wouldn’t be holding my breath on this.

By: zapkitty

zapkitty — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:32:05 +0000

And Rahm will smirk and say

“Sure we’ll take it out in conference… as long as you touchy-feely assholes don’t get in the way of the corporate gravy train… er… our big win with your “strong public option” bullshit…”

This was deliberate and it signals that a bad bill is actually going to be much worse than even I thought. And that’s saying quite a bit.

By: fatster

fatster — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:26:19 +0000

Kudos to you, David. Many of ‘em!

By: Elliott

Elliott — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:48:28 +0000

Thank you so much David, incredible work.

By: solai

solai — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:22:39 +0000

I don’t want to go against the grain but from a strategical point of view, this might be okay (providing it gets removed later).

By: nonplussed

nonplussed — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:22:03 +0000

I don’t believe it…

By: foothillsmike

foothillsmike — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:16:37 +0000

Stupak Passing

By: misterbee

misterbee — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:01:59 +0000

oferchrissake, you mean I am gonna have to pay attention to C-SPAN?

By: foothillsmike

foothillsmike — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:58:11 +0000

VOTING

By: foothillsmike

foothillsmike — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:51:47 +0000

Dingel is up. Thanks David