According to the New York Times, executives at Blackwater tried to buy the silence of the Iraqi government by offering up to $1 million dollars in bribes after the Nissour Square massacre tarnished their image and threatened their expulsion from the country.
Blackwater approved the cash payments in December 2007, the officials said, as protests over the deadly shootings in Nisour Square stoked long-simmering anger inside Iraq about reckless practices by the security company’s employees. American and Iraqi investigators had already concluded that the shootings were unjustified, top Iraqi officials were calling for Blackwater’s ouster from the country and company officials feared that Blackwater might be refused an operating license it would need to retain its contracts with the State Department and private clients, worth hundreds of millions of dollars annually.
Four former Blackwater executives said in interviews that Gary Jackson, who was then the company’s president, had approved the bribes, and the money was sent from Amman, Jordan, where Blackwater maintains an operations hub, to a top manager in Iraq. The executives, though, said they did not know whether the cash was delivered to Iraqi officials or the identities of the potential recipients.
While Blackwater did finally lose their State Department contract in May 2009, they managed to hang on for nearly two years after the Nissour Square shootings. And many Blackwater mercenaries still operate in Iraq on an aviation contract. Some of them just changed the names on their shirts, moving from Blackwater to Triple Canopy, the new company guarding diplomats in Iraq.
Cofer Black, the former CIA and State Department official under Republican Administrations, was so incensed by the bribes that he resigned from the company.
There is an ongoing grand jury investigation into Blackwater happening in North Carolina, the home of its headquarters, and this bribery plan is apparently known to prosecutors. Federal law does have a place in this action, says the Times:
If Blackwater followed through, the company or its officials could face charges of obstruction of justice and violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which bans bribes to foreign officials.
Since the FBI was investigating the incident, Blackwater would be in violation of tampering with a federal investigation as well.
Jeremy Scahill, who perhaps knows more about Blackwater than anyone not currently working for the company, has much more. This is notable:
While the Bush administration certainly protected Blackwater after Nisour Square, part of the reason for the alleged or attempted bribes may be this: As the US and Iraq negotiated the Status of Forces Agreement and the Iraqi government attempted to impose more authority over private military companies, the stakes got higher for Blackwater. An official license to operate in Iraq, which Blackwater did not have and long believed was an unnecessary formality, became crucial for Blackwater in order to continue on as the State Department’s prime contractor. To many Iraqis, Blackwater’s continued presence was a stark symbol of the country’s lack of sovereignty. It is an incredible fact that Blackwater has remained as long as it has in the country given the severity and extent of its alleged crimes and the rhetoric from Iraqi political figures about the company.
The committees of jurisdiction in Congress to investigate this matter would probably be the Oversight committees. On the House side, I have a request in to the committee chair, Ed Towns (D-NY), for comment. On the Senate side, the chairman is Joseph I. Lieberman.



18 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Looking forward to learning what you’ll hear back from Towns and Lieberman. Glad you are pursuing this, David. Just one more metastized mess left from BushCo.
Blackwater’s blackguards were paying compensation to the citizens and citizenry adversely affected by their operations. Surely, they intended to violate no laws, at least none that applied to them or routinely to all Iraqis. It’s that sort of political exception that swallows the rule. It’s that sort of political deception that the US, too, has too often engaged in.
Who wants to see Blackwater’s contract to verify whether its reimbursement arrangement with the US includes or excludes punitive awards? If it includes them – or fails explicitly to exclude them – it suggests that the US anticipated, accepted and is willing to pay for such excesses. Just another bit of collateral damage in the war to keep us safe.
I get it we deprive ACORN of all federal contracts because a few employees allegedly exercised bad judgement. Blackwater however can unleash murderous thugs all over the world and we give them billions.
I am shocked! A company that would hire drug addled murders would stoop to committing bribery! Has Blckwater at long last, lost all sense of decency?
When I displayed my painting, “Private Contractors” at our peace vigil, (it’s a painting of a boy staring into the shot up interior of a car in which his relatives were murdered by private contractors who thought the car was too close.); I had a visit from a former Blackwater employee who told me that I did not know the facts. When I argued back that my painting was from an image and from a story in the New York Times, he made a U-turn and said, “I told those guys to throw cinderblocks in front of the cars instead of shooting.” And, when I asked him if THEY listened to him, he just shook his head. He was definitely upset that I was on the street with a big painting of a blood soaked car and he stood across the street from me for about an hour.
The painting is somewhere in the middle of the series: Just click on a photo number at the top of the Welcome page.
http://web.mac.com/ctb3
The deeper we dig ,the more crap we find , crap left over from the Bush years
I wonder what else we’ll learn about this murderous administration?
ACORN received about 52 million over a fifteen year period , and as far as I know they have never murdered anyone.
Here’s what Congress gets
Posted by aikanae on Wed Nov-11-09 12:05 AM
OPM – Federal Employee Benefits Plan http://www.opm.gov/insure/health /
“… As soon as members of Congress are sworn in, they may participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). The program offers an assortment of health plans from which to choose, including fee-for-service, point-of-service, and health maintenance organizations (HMOs). In addition, Congress members can also insure their spouses and their dependents.
“Not only does Congress get to choose from a wide range of plans, but there’s no waiting period. Unlike many Americans who must struggle against precondition clauses or are even denied coverage because of those preconditions, Senators and Representatives are covered no matter what – effective immediately.
“And here’s the best part. The government pays up to 75 percent of the premium. That government, of course, is funded by taxpayers, the same taxpayers who often cannot afford health care themselves.”
There’s a few more perks that aren’t part of the regular FEBP.
Read more: http://public-healthcare-issues.suite101.com/article.cfm/health_care_for_the_us_congress#ixzz0WWTCkEQP
And it seems they recently increased their own coverage:
“The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, enacted February 17, 2009, provides a new health insurance opportunity for former employees who were or are involuntarily terminated between September 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009. Under this new law, former Federal employees may request premium assistance for their temporary continuation of coverage (TCC) under the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program. Premium assistance means your former agency will make a Government contribution of 65 percent of the TCC premiums for your FEHB plan enrollment.”
WE pay for that while the rest of us get COBRA (but who can afford that on unemployment). Even the “no-more-government” sect would have a hard time arguing against repealing that.
FEBP plans are also allowed to negotiate lower rates for drugs while Medicare / Medicaid plans are not allowed to. Not even the drug companies would mind ending that provision. It appears the FEHBP includes retirees also, i.e. they have this plan for life.
Another article from The Senior Citizens League – Ask the Advisor: Congressional Health Care Benefits (2002)
http://www.tscl.org/NewContent/101421.asp
“… Members of Congress enjoy excellent health benefits under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). For 2002, Representative Hoeffel could choose from 11 different health care plans under FEHBP. All plans offer prescription drug benefits.
“The government (meaning taxpayers like you and me) pays 72% of the average premium but not more than 75%. Your Congressman saw the remaining 25% deducted from his $12,500 monthly paycheck (also paid for by you and me). This is similar to the amount the government pays under Medicare. Under Medicare, the government pays 75% of the Part B premium and the other 25% monthly premium is deducted from your Social Security check (which is much, much less than $12,500 per month).”
So why do (tax supported) millionaires pay so much less than those on Social Security benefits?
If nothing else, this health care plan is good enough to encourage more people to run for office. They could always do a Palin and quit halfway through. They’d keep their FEHBP medical benefits for life (including spouses and dependents).
can we read about that on drudge?
or
we get alot of stuff about the need to look more carefully at allowing or even ban muslims from the military after the Ft. Hood killings, but is there any talk about limiting the availability or tightening checks on cop-killer handguns?
not so much.
Blackwater: a corrupt gang of violent theocratic militaristic reactionaries? Who knew?
Didn’t you link to that a while back? I get the painting title but no image. Just a blank space. Your painting is Photo 6 and I’d love to see it. I’m thinking the images are viewable only on a Mac.
And they are not all Americans. Blackwater makes me feel ashamed.
Erik Prince and his goons paid “campaign contributions” (i.e. bribes) to the Rethugs in office at the time to get those contracts in the first place, so it’s just business as usual to them.
Blue Texan’s regularly schedule post is ready: “Robert Gates: George W. Bush Was No Ronald Reagan”
Hey, SD. Thanks for the feedback. Save the link and send to somebody who might be interested in the issue. If these painting are not visible to them too, I could sure use the feedback.
I do not think that I should say ‘Happy Veteran’s Day’ because it is pretty sad to be celebrating 40 years of not being able to stop any of our wars. I have your quote from Gandhi displayed at my desk.
Any information on the Civil Trial vs. Blackwater on this. It would seem that this information could blow that case wide open if Blackwater attempted to taint the avenues open to the victims in Iraq. Imagine that they now will have the right to compel the testimony of Cofer Black, Prince, other high officials of Blackwater, as well as former State Department officials who may have acted in Blackwater’s behest to stanch the investigation or charges.
This definitely also looks as if the acts were coordinated from the US at Blackwater’s HQ in North Carolina. How else would they have raised the money and why would the board be involved otherwise. That definitely makes these issues something that can be tried by US law.
As well, the claim may be that no bribes were paid…but the “offer” of bribes was USED to influence US Foreign policy…so the bribe did, in fact, have an effect. And what is the US Government intervening in a case to assist a potential criminal in achieving their ends through other means. That’s akin to conspiracy.
Nice piece. You have to think anytime these things come out that someone has an agenda. This one is trying to paint Cofer Black and Robert Richer as the “heroes” and “law abiding folk” in the piece, so that give a bit of insight into how the leak is being directed. If it looks like prosecutors have access to the info – the ex-CIA guys are going to get the pre-spin out.
With this new information it sounds like Prince needs to be questioned again. Since the Cheney/Bush admiration society thinks so highly of torture and is convinced of its legality, how about a little waterboarding for Mr. Prince? Since there is nothing wrong with the procedure, they couldn’t possibly object could they? Since it is also foolproof, it will yield the information we need. Sounds like a win-win situation.