A day before voting on the motion to proceed in the Senate, Ron Wyden has reached agreement with the leadership to get an amendment into the bill which would allow as many as 1 million additional individuals who get health care from their employers to participate on the insurance exchanges, including selecting the public option.
Wyden, who has been insistent on opening the exchanges to provide more choice for all Americans, had been holding out on supporting the bill without it moving in that direction. This agreement presumably secures some of that support. Here’s his statement:
“As I have long said, empowering Americans to choose the health insurance that works best for them and their family is the single best way to hold health insurance companies accountable,” said Wyden. “While this is just one step in the direction of guaranteeing choices for all Americans, it is a major step because – for the first time – it introduces the concept of individual choice to a marketplace where it has long been foreign. This is a significant step toward real reform.”
The amendment would allow Americans with employer-based coverage at a certain affordability level, where their premiums are between 8 and 9.8 percent of total income, to “convert their tax-free employer health subsidies into vouchers that they can use to choose a health insurance plan in the new health insurance exchanges,” says the release. A CBO score on this amendment said that over one million people would subsequently be covered by health insurance.
What’s more, this offers a step toward having individuals whose employers offer health insurance move over to the exchange, where they can choose from a variety of different plans, including the public option. It can lead to significant changes in the current health system by expanding the risk pool in the exchanges, strengthening them, and setting a precedent for moving away from the employer-based system.
At the end of the release, the trio of Wyden, Baucus and Reid promise the potential for more changes:
The Senators agreed to work together as the bill advances to find additional opportunities to guarantee that more Americans will be empowered to choose the health insurance that works best for them.
UPDATE: I completely forgot that Mary Landrieu signed a letter asking for a variant of Wyden’s Free Choice Amendment to be put into the bill. So this is probably a goodie for her as well.


10 Comments
Spotlight










Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Slippery slope.
Works for me.
I wonder what exactly the version of the Wyden amendment is.
It seems like this got into the bill too easily.
I should be very happy about this, I think, but instead I’m suspicious.
we need to figure out how to open up the PO to more people.. only way its going to work as a cost cutting measure. This amendment is a start, but I want more. We should begin with everyone who works for small business, maybe include students and recent grads, people between 55 and 60, etc., etc. I don’t care how access to it gets expanded, but without a broader scope, it will fail.
Another million. Good. Need more, but good.
I’ve been wondering where Howard Dean is lately; I’m of a mind that if he’s not visible, he’s very busy.
Thanks to David and others and all for keeping us up to speed on all the machinations on this HCR.
I’m with JOanne, I’m suspicious as hell.
Blub says it, and Kelly, yep, a million is more than we had yesterday, without a LOT of others to be included into the PO, it will be designed to fail.
Not to mention the start date needs to be 2010, no Stupak, no Eshoo, repeal of MacFerron whatever, has to have NO exclusions for pre existing, needs to cap premiums pricing on private side ASAP, enable import of foreign drugs to lower PhARMA costs, eliminate ‘D’ Donut Hole, and on and on.
You know, reform, not a fucking giveaway to corporate feudalist overlords.
I’m hittin the Merlot early, I MIGHT just have an attitude tonite about HCR, and oligarchy.
*G*
How to kill Health Care.
It’s our money. Trips to D.C. won’t do it, beating on the office doors won’t either.
Making a trip to our bank first thing in the morning will !
Withdraw all {day 2 day} bank accounts down to their minimum.
Take the funds in a Cashiers Check only (DO NOT CASH THEM)
Tell the banker “you might re-deposit” once Congress starts listening to the 85% of the people that don’t want this crap !
Otherwise, you might just have to work out of a shoe box for the next couple of years.
The bank isn’t paying me anything to use my money…..what less than 1%.
The bankers will be screaming their heads off and Congress will hear them, long before they even give you the time of day !
Get this out to your friends A.S.A.P. we need to get everyone to participate.
LET’S ROLL PATRIOTS DRAW THOSE ACCOUNTS TO THE MINIMUM FIRST THING IN THE MORNING “BEFORE THEY VOTE ON THIS BILL”
I don’t trust this a bit. When people give a percentage that acts as a “trigger,” I always assume that the next step is to jigger the numbers so that the shift in policy can never be triggered… if triggers were a bad idea for the whole public option, they are a bad idea for this component.
The potential for insurer bait-and-switch in the exchanges is grotesque.
The healthcare business doesn’t provide “50/20/10″ comparable coverage!
It’s a total crap-shoot what kind of association and coverage you get.
You would be totally gambling that saving $20 going with a new exchange,
would provide comparable coverage when you found out you have leukemia.
Then they’d send you to an association of only out of town med centers:
“Oh, I’m sorry, our policy is not to cover experimental cancer cures.”
Now you’ve got a pre-existing condition when you try to change coverage!
Your forked! It’s like playing Indian poker, when you’re the only Indian!
Ron Wyden has spent his entire career working on improvements in health care/pharma for seniors, as well as improving health care for all Americans.
Also, by beginning to divorce health insurance from jobs, it is a good systemic start for single payer.
Divorcing health care from employment should have been the foundation of HCR.