MSNBC just ran a gaggle with Joe Lieberman, and he made the oh-so-generous statement that, now that the public option is out and the Medicare buy-in is out, he’s now ready to vote for health care reform.
“Now that the so-called public option, government-run insurance program is out, and the Medicare buy-in, which I thought would jeopardize Medicare, would cost taxpayers billions of dollars over the long haul, increase out deficit, is out, and there are no other attempts to bring things like that in, then I’m going to be in a position where I can say, I’m getting toward that position where I can say what I’ve wanted to say all along, that I’m ready to vote for a health care reform,” Lieberman said generously.
Lieberman said that the basic core bill, expanding coverage and “bending the cost curve,” is solid enough for him to merit his vote. He used the same arguments about spiraling deficits and potential bailouts as a reason to reject the public option.
Lieberman claims that he didn’t change his position on the Medicare buy-in, despite running on such a program in two national campaigns and touting it as recently as three months ago. He said that the party platform had Medicare buy-in during the 2000 campaign, and he was just an innocent bystander who happened to be the Vice-Presidential nominee of the party with no control over its goals or principles (the last part is mine). He added that the bill on the floor would offer generous subsidies and lower the age rating – not enough subsidies to prevent people ages 55-64 from paying $5,000 a year more that their younger counterparts. He said that the September interview with the Connecticut Post occurred before the Senate Finance Committee reported the subsidies in their bill, which is completely nutty, as the subsidies were in all original drafts.
Lieberman closed by calling the bill he essentially authored by proxy “an historic achievement, health care reform such as we’ve not seen in this country for decades.” He sounded like nobody so much as Nate Silver.
Susan Collins, who was standing next to Lieberman during this exchange, praised her colleague for making the bill better, but termed it “too deeply flawed for me to support.”



4 Comments



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I don’t get Olberman with my Dish package, but if he hasn’t made this sonofabitch Worst Person in the World, he should.
Kill the individual mandate. Then we’ll have our half-a-half-a-loaf and he can be as smug as he wants.
I suspected Lieberman might accept the bill in the end…mostly because a totally neutered bill is the very worst outcome for progressives. Lieberman is all about the spite.
Now, the bill will go to a vote, pass the senate, probably go to conference where the CPC will do their dance and relent, pass the POS, and then the crappy bill will be signed into law.
O gets his “victory”. Clueless as ever, the WH staffers will be slapping backs and giving contratulatory high fives.
Forward to 2010 and 2012. Wingnuts, incensed at the mandate to buy junk insurance and fired up by the passage of this “socialist” bill will turn out in droves. Progressives, meanwhile, incensed at their feckless leaders and a mandate to buy junk insurance will either not vote or ally themselves with 3rd party candidates.
Republicans gain seats. JoeLie retires after switching to the R team for a while (his work as a spy, done), leaving progressives to claw their way back into some kind of position of power.
I suck at predictions. May this be totally, utterly wrong.
My psychological take on Joe Lieberman. He is a constant egomaniacal attention seeker
He will ultimately go down but doing severe damage to the nation until he goes.
Why we take it both amazes and frightens me?
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa