There was some concern a few weeks back that an amendment by Sen. Al Franken to the defense appropriations bill, which would prevent the government from working with defense contractors who deny court hearings to their employees over issues like discrimination, harrassment or assault because of binding arbitration process, would be gutted during the conference committee process. Thankfully, that does not appear to be the case.
Sen. Franken’s office tells FDL News that the amendment remains virtually intact, despite concerns from Senate appropriators and even the Defense Department about implementation and contractor exposure to lawsuits. Basically, two parts of the amendment were changed. One is that the language is exempted for contractors with contracts less than $1 million dollars. According to a Franken aide, that means that about 80% of all contractors would be subject to the conditions. The other change is that there is a “national security” waiver to the provisions, but they are far more stringent than what is customary. In this case, if the Pentagon wanted to exempt a contractor from the requirements of the Franken amendment, the Secretary of Defense would have to release a personal statement to Congress explaining why, and make that statement public.
The major provisions of the amendment, inspired by the horrifying story of Jamie Leigh Jones, a KBR employee who was allegedly raped and falsely imprisoned by colleagues and barred from seeking justice through the courts by a binding arbitration agreement, remain. The entire Title VII provision, which allows the individual to sue the employer and not just the perpetrator of the crime, is intact.
Sam Stein has a statement from Sen. Franken:
“I came to Washington to stand up for folks like Jamie Leigh, and stand up to the powerful interests that too often silence their voices,” Sen. Franken said in a statement. “I was gratified to see so many of my colleagues in Congress and so many national civil rights leaders join in this effort. The Jamie Leigh Jones amendment is on its way to becoming law thanks to their work, the work of Chairman Inouye, and the work of the White House. I’m pleased that together, we were able to find a solution that allows victims of assault and discrimination their rightful day in court.”
This amendment affects the fiscal year 2010 appropriation, but Sen. Franken plans to keep on this issue in future appropriations as well, says his aide. That could potentially go outside the defense contractor system.
The amendment vote, where 30 Republicans sided with defense contractors who deny justice for crimes to their workers, has caused significant consternation for those in the GOP who voted against it.
UPDATE: Casey Aden-Wansbury from Sen. Franken’s office gives further explanation on the Jamie Leigh Jones amendment:
The Jamie Leigh Jones amendment targeted the use of mandatory arbitration clauses for tort claims (assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, and negligent hiring claims) and Title VII claims. Title VII, part of our country’s workplace civil rights laws, protects people from discrimination based on their race, color, religion, sex, and national origin (and encompasses sexual harassment).
KBR fostered a totally lawless environment, in which sexual harassment was tolerated. When Jamie Leigh arrived in Iraq, she immediately complained of her unsafe housing conditions, and the constant sexual harassment she was subjected to. When she complained, her supervisor mocked her. KBR did nothing to get their workplace under control. Jamie Leigh’s case is simply the most egregious illustration of a much larger problem—employers using mandatory arbitration to prevent employees from exercising their right to their day in court, as guaranteed under federal law.
It’s important to note that the GOP’s stall tactic on the health care bill, forcing the reading of a 767-page amendment on the Senate floor, threatens the ability for the Senate to move to the DoD appropriations bill, where this amendment lies.



16 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Both of my useless POS Senators voted against it. Morons. (Well, that should go without saying, seeing as they’re Georgia Republicans.)
The Rape Caucus is not going to be happy. However, small scale rape operations will be able to continue their normal activities, and probably the bigger concerns will be able to spin off subsidiary units to handle cases where rape seems to be advised, so I don’t think that the national security will be seriously harmed.
I can’t imagine what national security concerns would ever require allowing companies to be shielded from rape lawsuits. We have some really sick monsters in our government.
some things are simply beyond comprehension: how any public official can vote against what, on the face and on the merits, ought to be indisputably right? paying these people to behave like savages out of the reach of what is considered civilized discourse, let alone law enforcement and to do so to their colleagues…forgive the rambling. i just don’t get this. these guys appear to be criminals getting paychecks and politicians think that is more important than any of the ideals we’re supposed to be embodying. let this gang of animals go out into the field and take it to the terrorists. at least they would have a place to focus this obscenity, though i’m doubting they will be nearly so tough with real bad boys.
Sometimes you have to rape an employee into optimize their effectiveness.
This is just unbelievable. Good for Senator Franken.
Sometimes you have to rape a country before they get pissed off enough to do anything about it.
I see that JohnEmerson has the same cynical thoughts as I do. Gotta rape problem? Spin out a smaller company to stuff all the rapists into it. If that isn’t practical then claim “national security” which is what the firms like Blackwater will do.
I’m so proud of Al. I consider him one of my Senators.
I bet he’ll vote to send our troops into the Afghan meat grinder, though.
If he does, than this amendment is a hollow political calculation, dressed in a deeply felt gestural flourish.
Of, course I may be wrong, but still….
The thing with Sen. Al is that he has always been okay with the Afganistan war. With the Iraq war he said, “I believed Colin Powell.” which he now regrets.
Since grading is en vogue these days, this former adjunct professor of communications grades Obama a too-gentlemanly C.
As for my weekends in the tall timber Senator Franken, A+.
I remember Al from RadioAmerica. A real dear and fully blinkered friend of Israel – always bothered me deeply. Otherwise a good man!(no snark)
Colin Powel’s reasons were patently obvious lies, if one cared to look. I believe that there will not be an anti ‘Arab’ campaign that Al will ever disagree with.
Hooray for Senator Al Franken!
We need more comedians in congress… why? Because comedy is much harder than drama. You have to be really, really smart, and have a good sense of timing to do comedy. Drama… not so much. Just look around us, where there’s lots of drama, and see how stupid most of it is.
I’m too old and uncredentialed to emigrate to another country. However, maybe I’ll consider moving to Minnesota. At least, I’d finally have a truly liberal Senator representing me. Not like in PA, where… oh, just forget it!
Something else ["uncontroversial" - Dick Durbin, demagoging on the bill for the "troops" (and citing as a parallel the WWI Christmas soccer game trench warfare 'truce') today in the Senate] that made it into the final FY 2010 Defense Appropriations Act conference report (PDF Page 140 of 161):
Why on Earth would it be necessary to exclude a contractor that has less than a million dollar contract?? WTH does that have to do with anything?!
And Americans weren’t the only ones raped, according to news reports. They were raping Iraqi women, as well, and Prince (Blackwater) knew about it and looked the other way.