Sources tell FDL News that Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), a member of the Senate Banking Committee, will vote against Ben Bernanke’s nomination for a second term as Chair of the Federal Reserve.
Merkley said last week that he was “wrestling” with the decision on Bernanke, arguing that he has “completely missed the boat” on a range of issues, particularly with respect to consumer protection.
Bernanke just received Time’s Person of the Year honor this morning. The vote in the Senate Banking Committee is expected tomorrow. Despite Merkley’s opposition, most observers believe Bernanke has the votes to pass out of committee. However, at least five Senators have placed a hold on a Senate floor vote, with many of them blocking the nomination until they get a standalone vote on auditing the Federal Reserve.
Merkley is expected to release a statement shortly explaining his decision.
UPDATE: Here’s Merkley’s statement:
“Tomorrow, I will vote against confirming Ben Bernanke as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. The reason, in short, is that as Chairman, Dr. Bernanke failed to recognize or remedy the factors that paved the road to this dark and difficult recession. Following our economic collapse, it is also apparent that he has not changed his overall approach to prioritizing Wall Street over American families.
“My decision is based on my fundamental belief that our economy cannot recover if we do not put Main Street first.
“Our nation is just beginning to emerge from the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression, and there is no guarantee we will continue on the road to recovery over the long or short terms. Unemployment remains far too high, credit is unavailable to too many businesses, and families are plagued by falling home prices and high foreclosure rates. Even as we move forward with our efforts to get our economy back on track, it is critical we carefully examine what led us to this point.
“For too many years, federal regulators turned a blind eye to signs of an impending financial crisis. Tricks and traps proliferated in the credit card and consumer lending industries. Predatory mortgage loans exploded, fueling an unsustainable housing bubble. Regulators lifted rules requiring banks to keep adequate capital, and a laissez-faire approach to securitization, derivatives, and proprietary trading encouraged excessive risk-taking on Wall Street. As a member of the Board of Governors, Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, and then ultimately as Chairman of the Board of Governors, Dr. Bernanke supported each of these decisions, failing to take the necessary precautionary steps that could have averted or mitigated financial collapse.
“These failures are very relevant to the future. We need economic leaders who understand that the ultimate goal of economic policies and the key to meaningful economic recovery should be financially successful families, not oversized Wall Street profits.
“Indeed, it should be recognized that although Wall Street prospered in the short-term from reduced leverage requirements, securitization of faulty mortgages, and the explosion of derivatives, Americans did not. The expansion that occurred from 2002 to 2007 became the first economic expansion in which working families were worse off at the end than at the beginning. This is not a path that we can afford to travel again.”



14 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
What’s this shit about “wrestling” with the decision? WTF? It isn’t like there isn’t a bucket-load of other people (you could almost pick them at RANDOM) who couldn’t do the job better than the current idiot.
There’s nothing to “wrestle” with here! Dump the idiot like you or I would be dumped if we fucked up so badly at our jobs and be done with it. There’s nothing to “wrestle” with here! The decision makes itself and hurts no one but those who NEED to be hurt!
“However, at least five Senators have placed a hold on a Senate floor vote, with many of them blocking the nomination until they get a standalone vote on auditing the Federal Reserve.”; I’ll believe it when I see it.
You don’t suppose Republicans are united against Bernanke? That would be too good to be true. Although Obama’s just going to pick another Wall Street lackey if he can’t get this done.
What kind of spin are you trying to put on my senator?
Why don’t you knock off the ballistic rhetoric here? Merkley is being a diplomat. Do you get it?
Merkley is a kind and decent man. He is new to the Senate, and he fought a fearsome campaign here in Oregon. He is a PROGRESSIVE.
I’m afraid that one day he’ll become Wyden-ized, but he’s not there yet.
Your suggestions on who could replace Bernanke? Not defending Bernanke, just want to know your suggestions.
I’m not really trying to diss your Senator. I also just contacted him and told him that there really isn’t any “wrestling” necessary. This is easy-weasy-peasy. I’d get fired immediately if I were as off the reservation as Bernanke is. YOU would be fired immediately too. There is no decision to make here. No wrestling to do. This isn’t like voting “NO” on Bernanke is going to lead to 1000 children going hungry. It isn’t like a 1000 grannies are going to go without their SSN check for the month if Bernanke isn’t re-upped.
I simply encouraged him to stick to “NO” and that there really isn’t an issue here.
Aside from that, there really, objectively, isn’t anything to wrestle with here. I mean, for shit’s sake, what’s with the drama? This is NOT a hard decision at all. C’mon! Enough with the ‘staid and serious’ shit when you are actually dealing with a simple manpower issue: do you retain an incompetent and likely corrupt employee who has a clear history of fucking the poodle or do you demand a new candidate? Easy.
Emptywheel has a fresh cross-post already in progress: “Health Care on the Road to Neo-Feudalism”
Jeff puts out the issues. That is a very good thing. The problem is policy that does nto fix the economy, “It is the economy stupid” BC, not the bank/wall street profits. Without a bailout the banks would have to make correction stock losses not big bonuses. The blood suckers charging usury fees for credit 30%. Firedoglake needs to focus again on this central issue and tar the banksters until effective policy change is implemented. The recession/depression will not go away on its own. Hardships on a growing section of the people is OK with Wall street and the Senate. Where is Pelosi on this? Time for another call to action for our leadership.
Oh there are plenty of choices that would be far better than Bernanke: ANY economist that has railed about the bailouts would be a good start. If you want specific names here’s just a few fully qualified people: Joe Gagnon or Thomas M. Hoenig of the Kansas City Fed. He’s against the bank bailouts and all crap remotely related to big finance bailouts.
You could throw a rock in a mall parking lot and hit someone better set to be the Fed Chair than that asshole Bernanke. This is NOT rocket science. Economics isn’t even CLOSE to science so don’t get all up in a wad.
I wish the Republican Party would dump the teabaggers and then the Democratic Party would dump the socialists here and create a centrist party that could actually get shit done in this country. The socialists here are just as ignorant and just as childish as the teabaggers on the right.
Merkley also voted to boot Holy Joe from the caucus, I think.
Anybody who votes against the status quo these bankers have set up for themselves deserves the progressives adulation. He sure has mine. Bernanke is more of the same old shit.
Senator Merkley is doing great. I’m proud of him as well. He is one of the few to stand up with courage against what’s wrong with Congress.
How about Volker? How about Reich? Even Krugman? Kevin Phillips?