Passengers seeking to board Northwest flight 253 might want to ask for a different flight number, given yet another incident today. This one seems to be far less serious, with a Nigerian passenger who experienced stomach sickness and locked himself in the toilet. In response, the TSA has banned all stomach sickness from every international flight.

Only slightly more reactionary than the responses to the thwarted attack by the underwear bomber is the predictable war fever from the likes of Joe Lieberman today from his favorite perch, Fox News Sunday:

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) Sunday said that Yemen could be the ground of America’s next overseas war if Washington does not take preemptive action to root out al-Qaeda interests there.

Lieberman, who helms the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said on “Fox News Sunday” that the U.S. will have to take an active approach in Yemen after multiple recent terrorist attacks on the U.S. were linked back to the Middle Eastern nation.

The Connecticut senator said that an administration official told him that “Iraq was yesterday’s war, Afghanistan is today’s war. If we don’t act preemptively, Yemen will be tomorrow’s war.”

First, note Lieberman hiding behind an “Administration official” as cover for his warmongering. Second, note the neglect of the fact that the US has been pre-emptively striking Yemen and killing the expected “30 Al Qaeda suspects”. Third, note the continued reliance on military solutions to non-military problems. Spencer sez:

Is it a mistake to respond to this with more than ridicule? Maybe, but if not: it’s a ludicrously blithe and cost-free assertion to say that we need to take preemptive action in Yemen. What the fuck does Joe Lieberman know about Yemen? What does anyone in the Washington policy community know about Yemen? Fucking nothing except that (a) there is an apparently growing al-Qaeda presence there; Abdulmutallab told investigators that he got hooked up with his botched explosive there; the USS Cole was bombed there; there’s an important port there; and… that’s it. What are the local dynamics in Yemen that a military strike would impact? What would the goals of such strikes be? What are the underlying political effects that have allowed al-Qaeda to establish itself in Yemen? What measures short of war might be better targeted to addressing those conditions? These are just a few of the many prior questions that have to be answered before such a thing is considered. Instead, Lieberman just gets to go on Fox and monger away, unchallenged. Such is life.

The suspect in the underwear bombing may have asserted a Yemeni connection, but that’s a thin reed on which to balance a series of military strikes. A better question than “how many sorties?” would be to consider why some wealthy Muslim scions educated abroad are turning to radicalism, or how to best sort out the fire hose through which intelligence information streams, or why impoverished nations are such fertile ground for extremist activities. But such analytical reactions aren’t a part of our politics so much as the exploitation of fear and the armchair glory of neoconservatives unconcerned with the impact of their policy preferences on human lives.

Meanwhile, Politico actually gets this right. The largest number of remaining Guantanamo detainees come from Yemen, about 80-90 of the 200 left. A pilot program aimed at releasing these detainees, the vast majority of them seen as innocent, to their home country, just started a couple weeks ago. But the conservative loudmouths exploiting this event will surely complicate efforts to return the rest of them.