A federal judge has dropped all charges in the murder case of five Blackwater security guards accused of killing at least 17 civilians in Nissour Square, Iraq, in a massacre that outraged locals and the US military alike. The ruling cites errors by prosecutors in relying on testimony given to State Department investigators after the shootings, which violated the defendants’ Constitutional rights against self-incrimination.
“In their zeal to bring charges against the defendants . . . the government used compelled statements to guide its charging decisions . . . and ultimately, to obtain the indictment in this case,” the judge wrote in a 90-page opinion.
The efforts of prosecutors and investigators to show that their case did not hinge on compelled testimony “were all too often contradictory, unbelievable and lacking in credibility,” Urbina wrote.
Because the indictment was thrown out on legal grounds, the government could bring an appeal. It could also re-charge the guards, although a new prosecution could be difficult given the judge’s finding that the case was so thoroughly tainted.
You can read Judge Ricardo Urbina’s ruling here. The legal reasoning appears sound.
But that hasn’t stopped officials from the United States and Iraq from condemning the ruling. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), who has pending legislation to ban private military contractors from war zones, called the ruling disappointing and said that the Blackwater guards in this case “actually (got) away with murder”. She warned that the ruling would “fuel anti-American sentiment” in Iraq. A Kurdish lawmaker in Iraq said that “The message is these people are protected by the American administration.” A government spokesman threatened a lawsuit:
Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said the five men had committed a “serious crime” in the September 2007 shooting in Baghdad, which strained U.S.-Iraqi relations and became a symbol for many Iraqis of foreign disregard for local life.
Dabbagh said Iraq may sue the private security company, now known as Xe Services.
“The Iraqi government regrets and is disappointed by the U.S. court’s decision … We have our own investigations and they showed that Blackwater committed a serious crime in the killing of 17 Iraqi citizens,” Dabbagh said.
“The Iraqi government is considering other legal means through which it can sue the Blackwater company,” he added.
Interestingly, Gen. Raymond Odierno, commander of US forces in Iraq, was outspoken in his displeasure with the decision.
“Of course we’re upset when we believe that people might have caused a crime and they are not held accountable,” he told reporters in Baghdad, adding the dismissal might create a backlash against other security firms operating in Iraq.
Digby has some very good thoughts on all of this. It’s hard to explain how justice is equally applied when Blackwater guards can (rightly) get acquitted based on improper collection of evidence, but Iraqis can be abused in American prison camps, and other Muslims held indefinitely without charges, and nothing happens.



53 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I have no evidence but, I believe this incompetence is purposeful and Obama inspired.
Lies are like sand falling between one’s fingers and Obama has only offered more lies to hang onto.
So, as always manwithparachute it is President Obama fault, please don’t let us keep you from the tea bagger express. We need to investigate this DoJ person or persons that bungled the job. Someone got paid for this gift to black water. Follow the money.
But, when were the charges brought? Prior to Obama’s tenure? Just asking.
The many arguements describing why this ruling was inevitable are fully laid out in a previous thread or two on this subject, so I won’t bother to rehash.
But this shit was rigged from day one to fail. As surely as FISA and TARP were gamed.
And yes, our DOJ, State Department and our President are all in on it, start to finish.
This ain’t rocket science, bubba’s . . .
Wait, the Bush administration’s handpicked political appointees in the Department of Justice, holdovers from his administration who failed to resign as is traditional under a change of Executive, managed to bungle the prosecution of Dick Cheney’s company’s personnel? Who ever could have seen THAT coming?
So the Obama DoJ has found a way to hold Blackwater personnel above the law without admitting that that is what they are doing. Sweet!
So, exactly what are the options that an incoming president has if the appointees of his/her predecessor refuse to resign?
I can’t help but agree with you.
Thank you. I agree and I’m not a teabagger or a troll.
Where’s the statement from Obama to the people of Iraq apologizing for the senseless murders by mercenary private contractors. Is going to continue to hide, and smooth talk all over again? He has great teleprompter skills.
Emptywheel said this:
Wiki:
This was done in 2007. Can’t be blaming Obama.
Um, gang, this is the Bush DOJ that did this, sorry:
Obama wasn’t sworn in until a month later. The problems here stem from the Bush DOJ’s indictments.
Blaming Obama for this is like Rush Limbaugh’s blaming Bill Clinton for Ruby Ridge.
Why does the name Ted Stevens come to mind?
Thanks for that clarification. So two questions:
– Can charges be re-filed on a more solid legal footing?
– Can these assholes be extradited to Iraq?
IIRC, the American Service Personnel’s Protection Act (aka the Hague Invasion Act) only applies to extradition to the ICC.
Yup. I just want to know why these prosecutors aren’t under indictment.
The important part is that it was O’s DOJ who were responsible for the mistakes at trial, which seem pretty elementary, although IANAL. If there were no appropriately collected evidence coming from the prior admin, it would have been upstanding for O’s DOJ to state that, and withdraw the case.
So why didn’t O’s DOJ just drop the case?
So fucked up. Bush administration/Blackwater..Above the law.
Millions dead, hundreds of thousands injured, millions displaced. And these fucking murderers walk.
Let’s not forget the role played by Imperial Viceroy L. Paul “Jerry” Bremer, who eliminated the rule of law in Iraq in order to grease the skids for the new Free Market experiment. Neither Iraqi nor American law applies to the contractors, and so, even if the evidence hadn’t been Jack Bauered, they would likely had skipped accountability.
Let’s remember Jerry Bremer, and his little special something for the profiteers when the blwoback commences.
All the more reason why O should have placed the failure of being unable to prosecute it exactly where it belongs.
Oh. Wait. That would mean looking backward. O would rather fall on his face tripping forward on bad cases (among other things).
They had immunity from Iraqi laws at the time.
Oh boy. Panel of W has-beens on cspan3, gonna ‘splain how hard their job was on 9/11. Card’s up first. Not sure how long I can bear these turkeys.
Then I’d like to see Obama file new charges, e.g., under the War Crimes Act of 1996.
crystal ball says: substantial increase in attacks on Us Forces in Iraq.
Who wouldn’t?
Truth.
This Blackwater killing case legal outcome is part of Bush/Cheney regime debris field plume. SoS Rice was in on it. On site State officials may have speed keyed reaction and response in ways that closed off any viable prosecution ever being possible due to immunity being granted in helter skelter manner.
American Overrule of Iraq has from the very early days onward after March 2003 attack and move in occupation been one long story filled with poor decision making,poor policy choices and enough dumb as wood management conduct to earn being called a debacle in the largest sense of that term.
Problem here being planted soon after Blackwater thugs did the shoot up and Iraqis wanting some reaction from Americans.
The long range problem with Blackwater always being the deeper Bush/Cheney regimes choices for bringing in lots of contractors and putting in motion the circumstances that produced incidents over and over of wanton killing and shoot ups that Blackwater never seemed to suffer anything for.
Not doing so did not pass the smell test then. Does not now.
Iraqis ought to seek extradition of these trigger happy killers and put the point of Iraq’s sovereign status front and center. Of course WashingtonDC will have nothing to do with that idea but it would frame the foulup of justice that is taking place here. WashingtonDC needs to suffer for being so pathetic at game of imperialism.
Jingoism driven justice is the worst sort.
What is Medal of Honor winner Jerry doing these days?
I hope, for your tv’s sake, that you have rolled-up socks or koosh balls nearby.
Hammers = dangerous for all concerned.
Your upset at 6 young men action because thay feared for there lives.Do you think anything about the elected and appointed people that act on behalf of the goverments of Saudi Arabia,Pakistan, Afghanistan,Yemen and others to bomb suspected bad guys from 5000 ft.IF a civilian man woman or child gets blowned to peaces who pays for that crime.The 5 Black Water contractors are small targets.Makes it easy to clime on that pile like pack animals.
Here:
Still scamming along with Laura Schlessinger.
You’re dismissed.
But it’s been so very profitable for those who ginned it up since the “resolution” in the Clinton administration. Sure, it would have been even more profitable if the Iraqi public hadn’t been so adament about their opposition to invasion and occupation.
As Smedley Butler said so many years ago in a war as pointless as this has been, “War is a Racket.”
Proving my point. Thanks Loo Hoo!
This shooting was in a crowded square where there were how many witnesses and yet they had to rely on the defendants statements?
I hope the DOJ starts over with real prosecutors.
The DOJ bungled the case – yea, accidently on purpose. This is not the first case where they ‘messed up.’ It seems this ‘bungling’ is a pattern that is repeated over and over, whenever it would result in the actual bad guys being found guity and punished.
Your lazy.catch up on your history.Not slective history.
Assuming that BO really wants to get out of Iraq on schedule (big assumption, I know), this will help his case, given the expected Iraqi reaction to this ruling.
So when are we going to see someone called on the carpet as being responsible for murder?
It’s a great career path, where ‘bungling’ guarantees professional advancement.
“hard” to explain? how about “impossible,” or “deranged,” or more to point, “evil?”. Heckuva job, DOJ/MIC, let’s make another wave of terror(freedom)-fighters commit to the cause.
Smells an awful lot like the immunization given to North and company to compel their testimony in front of congress after Iran-Contra was exposed which was used as the basis for reversing the convictions of Abrams, Poindfexter, and other people.
This wasn’t a mistake.
That adds to the tally…every ounce of regained trust in the US since Obama’s election is now gone and you can even argue a new wave of despair is hanging here and among our allies and adversaries overseas. Despair brings more hate and more violence. Amen.
interesting, except for the fact that ALL the prosecutorial misconduct happened while Bush and Rove were running DOJ.
This is the same MO as the Ted Stevens prosecution – gather enough evidence to prove beyond a shadow, then commit such egregious misconduct that the defendant won’t face double jeopardy, thus guaranteeing they will be free and clear from all further prosecution.
I agree this legal escape hatch was put in place at the time, and I’m sure past (and current) leadership was aware of the likely outcome. Remember, before the indictments, there was a lot of Republican opposition to doing anything about this.
But it plays out as a big win win win for the bad guys — Blackwater’s gunsels get away with the dirty deeds, people’s confidence in the courts is reduced, and people’s support for illegal, result-oriented “tribunals” for those swept up in the “anti-terrorism” net is increased. The course of this case sure looks like part of the Republican Party’s war on the law and courts — the only time the rule of law comes to bear is when it relieves the right wing of liability and undermines political support for the rule of law. Meanwhile, the few new Obama appointees at the DOJ appear to have ruled out doing anything to interfere with the nuts and bolts of this partisan Republican agency. That is one of the reasons the Republicans are stalling Obama’s appointments there, but also one of the reasons he isn’t pushing on them.
The bigger picture is that Obama’s refusal to investigate or punish past Bush administration misconduct, despite his purported command that it won’t happen any more, ensures that the misconduct has not stopped and will not stop. Obama won’t take Cheney’s heat for the punishment of war criminal 2009 when he has given war criminal 2007 a pass. The same political calculations apply to the prosecution of war criminal 2009 as war criminal 2007, and surely the people doing this stuff are aware of it. Indeed, they may even believe that Obama is giving them license to keep doing it, while ensuring plausible deniability for himself.
Whatever people think Obama wants or believes in his heart, the current Departments of Justice and Defense are a continuation of the Bush administration.
But there is Ted Stevens who also got off the hook for the same reason.
Don Seigleman who won the election for gov of Alabama , I think, suddenly lost in the middle of the night. He spoke out against election fraud. bush put him in jail. Moved him all around the country. Put him in shackles in the court room.There has been no investigation of his case although it was clearly illegal.
Compare that to Tom Delay. Scooter Libby. You can see a pattern. Go along with the fascist plan for America or go to jail.The plan is right there in your face. Taking tax payer’s money and giving it to banks. ..while the US is being persecuted. NAFTA …predatory lending..filthy environment and food.
It would appear the US consumer is no longer needed.
After the revolution.
Meanwhile Ron Paul is on TV saying they are terroists because we are occupiers.
Ron Paul sounds logical it is that simple.
Hey P.W. – Seems as though nobody but you, “albatross”, “shootthatarrow” and me are connecting the dots on this one.
Under Bushie’s orders, the DoJ hired only graduates from the “christian law schools” Liberty and Regent Univ.
Bushie, Ashcroft and Rove wanted to seed the DoJ with religious right bible thumpers from these “Box-Top Law schools” who would embarass and then torpedo any efforts made by a democratic administration that might succeeded them. You know, Rove’s 1,000-year Riech – only for rethuglicons.
Looks like the Bushie talibangelical subversives and loyalists planted in the Obama/Holder DoJ can roll out the “Mission Accomplished” banner on protecting the Bush/Cheney hit squads.
If they have the balls, it’s time for the Obama administration to start the “purge” and take out the left over bible thumpin’ rethuglicon trash. If not, they are gonna continually suffer from planned incompetence, backed up by “plausible deniability”, that will continually make them look like the village idiots…
Blackwater is a danger to America, at some point it will turn on
our government in order to promote it’s religious beliefs.
Excellent response! Obama can’t win either way – with people that refuse to resign when he took office, to appointments held up in Congress, to botched legal briefs from Bush holdovers. Considering how fast Bush worked to mole his people into various agencies, I expect there is much more that could be found if the light were to shine. Just like the lady that works so hard to find some obscure stupidity someone made 2 decades ago, make it public and the people remove their name from consideration. Apparently there is more than one way to skin a cat, and the GOP could give lessons on the ‘dirty tricks’ on steroids.
One things about the Republicans that walk in lock-step – they could also go on over the ridge, is lured well enough.