Four Democrats seeking gubernatorial and Senate seats, including three incumbents, decided against running in 2010, which will surely launch dozens of “Democrats in disarray” stories. But a cold political calculation suggests that Democrats are probably in exactly the same electoral position today that they were yesterday, although they lose quite a bit in institutional Senate knowledge.
We knew early last evening about Byron Dorgan’s retirement. We now know that popular Republican Governor John Hoeven is expected to enter the race, effectively sealing that seat as a GOP pickup, in the same way that Mark Warner’s entry in 2008 sealed the pickup for Democrats in Virginia. I wouldn’t expect Democrats to even spend much money defending that open seat.
Late last night, news spread that Chris Dodd will not seek re-election in Connecticut. If Dorgan’s retirement was the worst possible news for Democrats, from a pure political perspective, Dodd’s retirement is the best possible news. He was damaged goods for re-election, for some reasons of his own doing, but mostly because of a series of coordinated, factually suspect smear campaigns, as well as the unfortunate situation of being thrown under the bus by the Obama Administration during the AIG bonus scandal. Regardless of the reasons why, Dodd, a good legislator with a distinguished record, wasn’t likely to come back in Connecticut without a major fight and some luck.
However, it is quite likely that the state’s popular Attorney General, Richard Blumenthal, will enter the race. And that could seriously improve the chances of retaining the seat in a blue state. Public Policy Polling, which is in the field in Connecticut as we speak, tweeted last night that Blumenthal would “make the seat uber safe for Dems.” Someone probably impressed this upon Dodd, and he took one for the team.
That wasn’t all. Rayne noted yesterday that Lt. Governor John Cherry has dropped out of the Michigan governor’s race, despite being among the front-runners on the Democratic side. A bevy of replacements have been floated, but with Michigan mired in double-digit unemployment, that’s going to be a tough seat to retain for Democrats (Gov. Jennifer Granholm is termed out).
Then, in Colorado, Governor Bill Ritter abruptly announced that he wouldn’t seek re-election. Ritter was elected in 2006, but was trailing former Rep. Scott McInnis in the polls, and the political environment is just bad for incumbents, especially incumbent governors. However, Democrats have some options in this race. Andrew Romanoff, the former state Speaker of the House who was challenging Sen. Michael Bennet in a primary, could switch to this seat. Better, popular Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper could enter the race.
So, after all that, really Democrats are in pretty much the same position: demonstrably worse in ND-Sen, demonstrably better in CT-Sen, a bit worse in MI-Gov, perhaps a bit better in CO-Gov. But the timeline of these retirements, coming all at once, will further a narrative about it being a Republican year and Democrats are running away from the fight.
Meanwhile, perhaps the biggest resignation yesterday was from Florida GOP Chair Jim Greer, signaling that Charlie Crist may not survive a primary with tea party champion Marco Rubio in the state. And Republicans still have more retirements in the Senate and in the House.
I think more than anything, this signals how bad a position incumbents are in this year. And it is a shame to lose Dorgan and Dodd, who both deserved a bit better than this.
UPDATE: The Hartford Courant reports that Richard Blumenthal is in for the US Senate seat being vacated by Dodd.
UPDATE II: Interesting. Ed Schultz is announcing on MSNBC that he was asked by local North Dakota leaders to run for the US Senate. He said that he hasn’t thought about it, but that he was honored for the ask. He did not reject it out of hand.




94 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Sorry to mess with your theory, David, but ND Dems have no intention of ceding the Dorgan seat without a strong campaign. The opportunistic Whooooooooooven??????????, best known for community appearances at events like Hostfest in his hometown of Minot, has been playing coy with running for months now. Expect to see him emerge as the Republican candidate.
As for winning, he’ll have to earn that, if he can.
The FL race is gonna be really interesting. Rubio has a loud, vocal following among the reichwingers but I’ve the feeling the support he thinks is his in the Latino community isn’t there. Additionally, there’s an undercurrent of dissatisfaction in the Rethugs for the economy, among other things, in the state, which started going south long before the housing bubble burst.
Rubio is Jeb’s boy. Jeb ain’t real popular here any more, outside of the reichwingers.
Indeed, Blumenthal is running
Message seems to be “a pox on all their houses.” Have to agree.
Part of me says, “How important is 60?” after the debacle on HCR?
Go get ‘em.
Sitting out here in California I can only hope and pray that a Repub doesn’t replace the Governator. And there needs to be an end to the two-thirds majority to pass taxes in this state or we’ll be officially bankrupt (although being 21 billion in debt again is pretty close to bankrupt, eh?).
What is the chance of repealing the 2/3?
60 isn’t important if you have 5-6 who are shaky and PUMA types on cloture.
As a practical matter, we probably need 65 or 66 (an FDR majority) to pass major legislation. We’ve gone from needing to win 7 to needing to win 8 and hold all the rest.
There are a lot of opportunities if the narrative of Democrats in defeat changes before November 2.
The GOP seems to be attacking its own much worse than we are doing. Florida should after a big GOP primary battle be easy pickings. Do we have an electoral vote count of the states we might lose vs the states the GOP might lose.
Any state were the GOP is facing a primary battle that they don’t have to fight between the GOP and the Tea Baggers is extra points because neither side will likely give up and such races will eat allot of cash, volunteer hours
and resources the GOP could use elsewhere.
Richard Blumenthal is a lock to win this election next fall….Living in CT, I have been listening to local talk radio all morning and the Republicans have a much different tune than when Chris Dodd was still there…..The only big criticism of Blumenthal is that his lawsuits filed on behalf of the citizens of CT have chased jobs away from the state along with the same old social issues.
Republican callers are now eating up Linda McMahon and admitting that Blumenthal will win walking away. It’s funny how Dodd was just being eating alive by these same Republicans in CT who now are not so confident running against the most popular politician in CT—-Richard Blumenthal–a former U.S. Marine.
But after Blumenthal gets elected, will he just be another tool of the hedge funds & medical insurance corps? After all, it’s CT.
You say that like it’s a bad thing. /s
i sorta object to the “PUMA type” characterization. as much as a i am not and was not a supporter of hillary clinton in the primaries (and i od’ed on the primaries more than 2 years ago), that’s not what is going on here. if history is any guide the rules are being manipulated to pretend the 60 votes for cloture represents an unassailable impediment to progressive legislation. just another round of moving the goal posts. don’t fall for it. the dems are doing exactly what the leadership wants to do.
Dodd’s U.S. Senate Resignation Announcement effective at the end of this term will be held at 12:00 Noon today from his home….
Atty, General Richard Blumenthal will announce his candidacy for the U.S. Senate at 2:30 p.m. this afternoon.
I am sure that Mr. Rahm Emanuel pushed Chris Dodd out looking at his dismal poll numbers to political nobodies……The White House is micromanaging the races across America…..Harold Ford is rumored to be in the running for Gillibrand’s seat in New York. The DLC Democrat who cannot win the Senate in his home state has to become a carpetbagger and run in New York. What a Party!
Remains to be seen……I’d have to look at his legal record and see who he has gone after in terms of corporate wrongdoing……
Then again, Holy Joe Lieberman was also an Attorney General and we know what his record has been.
It’s a moving target.
Dodd’s stepping down because in his mind he just couldn’t bear even the slightest possibility or even the idea of loosing what should be an absolute un assailable right to HIS seat. Just imagine how he would deal with such an unbearable loss in the wake of Lie-berman retaining his seat.
There are 58 Dems in the Senate right now, not 60 as is often said (Lieberme and Sanders are not in the Dem Party). Out of those 58, I consider 10 of them untrustworthy on a whole host of issues, so we’re not even close to 60.
FDR had Senate Dem numbers around mid to upper 60s and LBJ had up to 68 Dems when Medicare was passed for instance, and they both had some Repubs that would cross for them even on the really big issues. Obama has a very shaky 58 and no Repubs on anything no matter how much he sweetens the pot for them. Since this isn’t a dictatorship, and no matter how much people want to believe the fantasy that the “bully pulpit” can ram through any legislation, Obama and real Dems have a very difficult playing field.
Getting an actual 60 Dems and making more of them real Dems would help things tremendously, so let’s do it.
Good riddance Dodd. You are the embodiment of a hypocrite and in a crony capitalist. You have no character either and should have quit when it all came out, but your hubris and ego wouldn’t let that happen.
We have a system which encourages and coddles such unethical behavior. Dodd is one the posterboys for this, as is Dennis Hastert, who is visiting horror on us as a lobbyist. He should be in jail.
Throw every incumbent out ALL of them… every last one of them. Sweep the place clean.
The PUMA characterization — remember “party unity, my ass” — refers to Lieberman, Lincoln, Nelson, Landrieu, Conrad. These are members of the Democratic caucus who violated the principle of party unity on procedural votes. My reference to it had nothing to do with the slam against supporters of Hillary Clinton during the 2008 election.
As far as I know there was only one actual “Clinton PUMA”, who later proved not to be a supporter of Clinton at all. And the Republicans tried to capitalize on the pie fight by setting up a variety of websites to encourage Clinton supporters to break with the Democrats.
It was hateful then in reference to actual Clinton supporters. It is accurate now in reference to the Democratic caucus members who gelded even a severely compromised healthcare reform bill.
well gee. let me think….
they could have changed the senate rules at the beginning of the 110th congress so that only 58 (or 55) votes were needed for cloture.
or they could actually make the republicans (and dem allies) actually filibuster by having to make non-stop speeches on the senate floor. which, for popular legislation, would make the conservatives look like idiots if it lasted more than a few days, even the MSM might cover it by the second week. but that would be too much work as it would require the dems to actually spend time in the senate, so we can’t have that.
So what are Harry Reid’s chances?
thank you for the clarification/correction. it is much appreciated. i am still allergic to anything that reminds me of the primaries, but that should be my problem — not yours.
do wish we had some progressive senators though who were willing to do the same (if that is how the game is going to be played)
Not a bad idea. It needs to be repeated until it gains traction.
Joe Scarborough said this morning the Democrats have to “move back to the center,” and from “the left” of all places!!!!
I turned it off at that nutty point!!!!
If the Dems did come from the left, it would be a sight to behold unless I am so left of left, that I do not realize the “understandings of ‘liberal Washington” and what it really entails.
I guess the label of what passes for liberal in the common parlance does not fit my definition of a leftist.
I will not be voting for Blumenthal. My days of voting for Democrats at the National level are OVER!!!!
As I have been saying for the past few weeks and months, no true progressive or liberal would ever vote for these Democrats again.
The Democrats have lost my trust completely!
Please DO NOT and I ask DO NOT Utter the name of FDR, let alone, LBJ, in the same breath of these Republican-lite, Reagan wannabe Democrats led by Reagan clone wannabe-in-chief Barack Obama……Obama even prefers Reagan over Bill Clinton!!!!!
Obama is no FDR!!!!!
The Democrats are in the process of rolling back more and more progressive legislation and so, I never want to hear the name FDR uttered with these Democrats who are so unlike the New Deal president.
Bernie Sanders got additional funding for community primary care clinics that way.
The problem is that proponents of legislation are at the disadvantage in that gambit. They want to see something get through, which advantages those who don’t want to see anything get through. Which is how Republicans were able to leverage their minority through party unity.
If Democrats had been able to do the same thing (i.e. if there hadn’t been the incredible pressure from lobbyists and sell outs of the new Dems and Blue Dogs and a few progressives), a good bill would have been a slam dunk. But with that much lobbying money floating around, the leadership had little way to punish wayward members of the caucus.
If the Democrats offer no substantial candidate for the ND seat, this will provide evidence that Howard Dean’s 50-state strategy is dead.
That would feel good for a minute. You’d find them replaced by people with name recognition purchased by large corporations.
And replace them with whom?
You still would have two-thirds of the Senate left. Check that list, because they would become the new chairs and ranking members of committees that lost chairs. And they would be the exclusive institutional memory in the Congress.
On the House side, the learning curve would be very steep with even more dependence on staff (and probably lobbyists) to fill in the large freshman class about the technical ins and outs of the way government agencies operate and the nitty gritty of the issues facing the country.
This will probably help Lieberman in 2012. Don’t know what Ford is doing. His politics are not too different from Gillibrand. Very little chance he out primaries her in New York.
Depends on whether the state party organizations think it’s dead. That varies from state to state.
Considering how corrupt our current Congress, including many of the Dems, I don’t think that is as easy as it seems to us…sitting here…at our computers…
60 or more actual Dem votes really improves the chances of getting some good legislation through, just like FDR, LBJ, and others had when they did their big things, as was said earlier.
Okay. Bye.
na, na, na naa…na, na, na naa…hay, hay, good bye! Chris Dodd! Now if only Harry Reid would get a clue and throw in the towel. I don’t know who would replace him, but I hear Chuck Schumer would make a MUCH better majority leader. Maybe he could get those rascals in the Senate to tow the line.
You’re going to vote Republican, or hope for a third party? It’s too bad this country doesn’t have the brains to handle Instant Runoff Voting.
I will write in a candidate…..
only if they are determined to keep the lobbying money flowing towards them. otherwise they could have tried appealing to the american people — with the straight ahead truth instead of wish-washy campaign slogans. how many people know that as a country we’re already paying about what is needed to provide every single person with first dollar coverage (no deductibles, no copays, no coinsurance)? and then told them what it would take: change the financing from premium and out of pocket based to tax based (skipping for the moment that’s not even necessary), use the an expanded public medicare instead of private insurance companies and include the hodgepodge of other services (medicaid, chips, etc). something like 90% of the public would be far better off. most docs even like the idea (probably because they would have to spend less time, and office staff, on dealing with a multitude of insurance companies).
if they’d really tried that and lost, i’d have some respect for them.
I am in the Green Party anyhow.
I have friend that works at a community clinic. They are ecstatic with this potential funding thanks to Bernie, and want Obama to sign basically anything if it has this intact.
I don’t think very much of the public even knows these clinics exist, but unfortunately, many are finding out about them the hard way since they need to start using them once they lose their job. Numbers are way up.
Agree with your assessment of the sen situation.
didn’t say it was easy. just that they are bullshitting us (again) if they claim there is nothing they can do because of the 60 vote cloture rule.
i really didn’t get how clever (in a bad way) they were about manipulating the process (and rules) to pretend to try to do what they claimed they supported while actually doing the opposite until i watched the fisa debacle in as much gory detail as i was capable of. (in case you missed that and are
a masochistinterested, here is the house version: part 1, part 2, part 3)i just found my filibuster files from last year (although not my notes, damnit). am going to try to convince letsgetitdone that a simple rule change to limit debate is not the impediment.
If anything, liberals (not necessarily partisan Democrats) should be mostly thrilled with these developments. Dodd’s resignation from the Senate gives Democrats a key opportunity to replace a puppet of the financial industry with an actual progressive that (barring catastrophe) could hold the seat for a very long time. In Colorado, there is now an opening for a better Democrat to replace anti-labor Bill Ritter. In Michigan, the opportunity arises to break ties with the Granholm administration and start fresh (though, I’m willing to bet the GOP takes the race). Not to mention the death of moderate Republicanism that’s on display in Florida.
As a progressive, I can say I’m not concerned. Byron Dorgan is a disappointment, but if anything is left of Dean’s DNC, then we will be ready to take on Hoeven.
Don’t know what this would prove exactly but Obama, as candidate for President, killed the 50 state strategy when he summarily got rid of Dean and anyone associated with him. The 50 state strategy was dead a year ago.
Howard Dean is hated and loathed by Rahm Emanuel, James Carville and Paul Begala……..
The Democratic Party is playing dirty Chicago-style politics led by Obama and Emanuel in the White House and the Congress is in full compliance with it. But, politics is a dirty game to no end. Politics in many ways is a street fight and many people have no idea of this fact.
The Democrats play as dirty as the Republicans. Remember all those promises the Dems made when the GOP and Bush were in office? That the Dems, once in power and holding both chambers would undo all that Bush did? Are you happy?
And you wonder why I WILL NOT VOTE for the DEMOCRATS any longer? I have had enough with ALL DEMOCRATS…..
ITS DEEDS—-Not Words!
Ed Schultz was asked to run for Dorgan’s seat.
The real enemy of the STATUS QUO are real Progressives.
What we are witnessing is the roof being torn off the house that Bill Clinton Built.
Bush divided the USA electorate to the point of no return.
Obama and Rahm and the rest of the Dems in DC, have not come to grips with this fact.
There is no going back to 1994.
They can hate Howard Dean all they want. At the end of the Day the Howard Dean wing of the DEm Party will be the only wing standing.
Obama is a Trojan Horse the Status Quo used to squash the Progressive Movement in 2008. (perfect example Progressives talking about not voting in 2010? You know when you say you are not voting in 2010, you are buying the idea that Barrack Obama is a REAL PROGRESSIVE.)
Some times you have to admit, you have been had, and the other team beat you. Obama is NO PROGRESSIVE.
Progressives need to organize and run against every corporate Dem in congress.
Who do corporate Dem represent? NO ONE.
Corporate Dems are easy to beat, they have no base of support.
How many Dems are going to run around bragging about this HCR BILL, in front of real progressives? none.
If by suggesting “Dodd deserved better” you mean a jail cell for selling us out repeatedly to his wallstreet handlers, then yes, he deserved better.
Man, you are so left you’re right!
Well, now I have a headache.
Nice try, it is (soon to be was): Dodd (Banks – D)
His sweet low rate home loan aside, him saving 40K or whatever sweet deal he got is nothing compared to the money & support he sent to his pals.
pa dump pump.
He was so compromised… How compromised was he?
UPDATE II: Interesting. Ed Schultz
Pity, that likely means he shuts his mouth and minds his p’s and q’s until he decides.
On NPR this morning they were talking about the Razor Thin 60 seat majority the Dems had.
Funny the R’s had a razor thin majority as well – but it was 50 seats.
(That means the Dems have 20% more seats…but still razor thin)
Regarding Ed Schultz running [I commented on my Seminal diary also].
I may be proven wrong, but I really don’t think he will run. A whole lot of positive reasons for him to stay right where he’s at, and the buzz can’t hurt his ratings, now can it?
And a whole lot of negative reasons back here in North Dakota…you might say a flood of ‘em…why he won’t risk running. Take it from a Valley Girl. I don’t see it happening.
I thought FDL is suspicious of the lobbyist friendly congress critters,a nd Dodd is the worst of the bunch….your lamentable words above do a disservice to the site.
Hey dems…
Lets not play to our image and get all hysterical and start peeing our pants about how many seats the party is gonna loose.
Fuck the rethuglicants – Let them form the circular firing squads not us. It’s time we turned the tables and run strong, run hard and run dirty (but with class) from the git-go.
Just remember the old football saw – We’re not gonna take what they give us, we’re gonna take what we want!
Stop over-thinking the simple things already. Put down your lattes, quit pissing and moaning about what them “dirty repugs” are gonna do and cowboy up for running a no holds barred campaign everywhere. There’s not one race coming up in 2010 that dems can’t win – and WIN BIG!
“Corporate Dems are easy to beat, they have no base of support.”
Unfortunately, that’s not true. If it were, corporate conservadems such as Lieberman, Lincoln, Landrieu, and Nelson would have all been purged by now. The financial industry is just as friendly with the Democratic Party as it is with the GOP. For good reason too, Obama and his brand of pseudo-liberal politicians are giving the financial giants a better return than Bush could have ever dreamed of.
The best way to kill corporatism in the Democratic Party is to stop voting for it. Evil is evil, lesser is irrelevant. It may mean losing a lot of seats to the GOP, but at the end of it the party will be far more progressive than it was initially. Long story short, we need to start bailing on Democrats that don’t meet progressive standards. Don’t vote for them, don’t send them money, do nothing to aid what is the corporate takeover of an otherwise progressive party.
Zero if the Democrats and Labor don’t start an educational campaign to change public opinion.
On his show last night, Ed Schultz said he did not meet the residency requirements. Did something change?
This is different than the right ring residue that we’re seeing, as conservative policies have had a run for 30 years, while Americans voted in record numbers in 2008 and 2006 for candidates running on a progressive/liberal platform, and the Democrats have failed to deliver on their promises.
Dodd….victim of a factually suspect smear campaign?????
Did you keep a straight face while typing that?
I agree. Dodd had the chance of being an ethical legislator. But the home mortgage scandal was just stupid. And then he became like this Senator Foghorn caricature, all self-congratulatory on how he and his committee saved the country and the financial system when what was really going on was just another tawdry sellout by people’ whose understanding of the financial system was minimal.
Dodd is further proof that there are no liberals in the Senate, at least none that will vote their conscience.
Perhaps had the Democrats not run a milquetoaste real estate developer to replace the governor who had won a recall over a milquetoaste governor, they might have had a chance. But the Democrats, they never really learn.
Which they’re not doing, so, zero.
A lot of us here are progressives. Democrats not so much. I know the argument always is that Democrats are at least the lesser of two evils but this is no longer the case. Democrats are slashing Medicare in this healthcare bill and that’s something even the Republicans couldn’t get away with. At the same time, Democrats are selling out to Wall Street even more so than the Republicans. Nor is Obama going around appointing liberal judges. So really, who cares if the Democrats win if they govern like Republicans?
I would add that the failure to deliver on their promises to progressives and liberals has probably helped many Ds significantly as they seek lobbyist cash. Since Americans generally vote for the guy with the deepest cache of advertising dollars this is probably the strongest motivation for triangulation. Probably the reason that Dean was pushed out when Obama was nominated as well.
Republicans can only promise to fight liberals, Democrats can promise to neutralize them. There is probably a lot of money to made by the people who sheer the sheep.
So long as people vote as though it is a horse race the horse with the richest owner wins. Without deep lobbyist reforms we will just continue to watch from the sidelines. The guys on the gray train are not going to do the right thing because they feel guilty.
Who gives a rats ass what a southern republican thinks the democrats must or should do? Why anyone pays any attention to Joe, or O’REilly, or Hannity, or the rest is mystery to me. Who the hell are they? Joe is a has been Florida politician , O’Reilly is a NYC thug in an expensive suit, and Hannity is a blathering closet queen. I do not mention Beck because I have a soft spot for Special Olympians.
Love your attitude! You’re not the sterotypical hand wringing dem pee-pants that for sure.
I agree Obama is no FDR. But as for his preference to Reagan impact on the nation and Clinton I would be less inclined to condemn. I did not like Reagan and thought he extended the AIDS crisis for years and in so doing killed lots of people who did not have to die..but republicans like dying people so they can worry about death panels…sorry I digress…as for Reagan vs Clinton..well Clinton was a Democrat lite like Obama and somewhat worse who seems to walk around with wood in his pants and that is what he will go down..no pun intended…in history.
Right on larryv! Now that’s the way to start the 2010 campaign – by kicking some rethuglicon ass!
Mock them, make them out for the talibangelical fools and grifters they really are. “Real” Americans love it and will not vote for anyone that’s perceived as a bat-shit crazy girly man, a pervert, a whiner or a corporate shill…
“So what are Harry Reid’s chances?”
Hopefully less than zero with our help. He and Lieberman I hold personally responsible for the riduicule and failure of the Democratic party.
Dorgan achieved what Dean always knew was possible: that a good solid Democrat can be bold and successful in a red state, if they stood their ground.
Harry Reid made Dorgan and several other good Dems look like fools. If the Senate or the Dems hope to ever win another election again, if Obama and Pelosi stand any chance of improving anything – we need a new and stronger ML leader in the Senate.
are you confusing blue dawgs with “Puma” types? Most of the “Puma” types I know are farther to the left then Obama which is why they objected to him to begin with …
How about Herbert Hoover? Seems closer to moi
How about Harold Ford (with GS backing) moving up to NY to take on Gillibrand in the primaries? The current pack of corporatist dems that support monopolies are even primarying solid liberals.
I feel wha your saying Hugh but sorry to say you might be missing my point.
Progressives can successfully pressure any “moderate” or blue dogs dem that gets elected. They fold like cheap lawn chairs when someone in the party – like progressives – starts to lean on them.
Lets not win a Phyrric victory by getting only a handful of candidates that pass our “uber lefty” litmus test. Lets add to the dem majority everywhere in 2010 and then turn start turning the screws where needed.
Call this tactic anything you want – trianglulation, compromise, corporate ass kissing – but lets face it to get things done these days you gotta have more than a 60-vote majority.
WIN FIRST then reform people to the “progressive” way of thinking. Wish it worked the other way around but it doesn’t…
You may be naive in assuming they really want the 2/3s thing to go away. It gives them a convenient excuse for not doing their jobs.
“…although they lose quite a bit in institutional knowledge.” Isn’t that a good thing? Kinda like losing Herpes?
I feel That’s it’s good news with so many congressmen and women retiring or not running again. We need some fresh blood out there. I hope people will vote their conscience this election and we’ll have some good progressive candidates in every race. It’s OK if the Dems lose in this cycle as they do NOT deserve to win. This may put enough pressure on them to reform themselves before the general election in 2012. What do you think?
PS. Very interesting show on Democracy Now today. Here’s an excerpt and you can go to their web site too:
In an extended interview, award-winning journalist and activist Allan Nairn looks back over the Obama administration’s foreign policy and national security decisions over the last twelve months. “I think Obama should be remembered as a great man because of the blow he struck against white racism,” Nairn says. “But once he became president…Obama became a murderer and a terrorist because the US has a machine that spans the globe that has the capacity to kill, and Obama has kept it set on kill. He could have flipped the switch and turned it off, but he chose not to do so.” He continues, “In fact, as far as one can tell, Obama seems to have killed more civilians during his first year than Bush did in his first year, and maybe even than Bush killed in his final year.”
“It’s OK if the Dems lose in this cycle”…
Now that’s the losing attitude to show there ocean1. Nothing like defeatism to get the leftie base all worked up about not voting.
Like I said on another FDL post ocean1, you sure do sound like a rethuglican stooge that tries to plant seeds of discontent and dumb ideas on a progressive site in hopes that we’re stupid enough to buy into them. Like I said, we’re progressives, liberals and dems, not the village idiots.
PS: Limbaugh mentioned on his radio show that he was looking forward to your call-in report for a laugh on how you fucked with those latte drinking girlie men socialists today…
I don’t agree. I’m voting anti-war, anti-israel, anti-incumbant if the candidate isn’t better than a faux progressive.
I don’t care what party affiliation is. I’ll vote for a Republican against a corporate D incumbent to clean house for the next election.
It’d would be nice if you wouldn’t refer to people using epitaphs because you don’t agree with what they have to say. I think the goal here at FDL is to attempt to coalesce with others on issues outside the D/R constructs.
epithets, diminutive or offensive monikers – I meant to say.
just go away…now you’re sounding hilarious. I was listening to Amy Goodman at 8 and quoting her interview on all channels on behalf of Rush Limbaugh now? Calm down…You are making a mockery of free speech. Your posts aren’t worth my time any longer and won’t be answered.
good on you!
It’s hard to have perspective sometimes. Dodd had a long career, with both good parts and bad. His actions this session have mostly been negative, though. He let the banks screw us, then screwed us on health care – once again sending his erstwhile supporters self-congratulatory letters.
From my current vantage point, which lacks that perspective, I’d have to say it’s time for him to go. He’s not even close to the worst Senator in the party, but he’s up for election, and he’s forgotten who he works for.
Oh my feelings are sooo hurt…
Please stop shekissesfrogs please stop before I start crying.
PS: That’s a mock in case you missed it…
They won’t be answered? OH NO!
Please see shekissesfrogs@86 for what I really think of your hurtful, harsh and insensitive to my delicate feelings response.
It’s been fun sword fightin’ with you today ocean1 but AFM for now, gotta run so I can catch Beck-erheads radio show – maybe you’ll be one of the callers hey? Catch you on the rebound dude…
“they lose quite a bit in institutional Senate knowledge”
Don’t you mean “they lose quite a bit in institutional Senate corruption”? (Esp. w/Dodd)
Agree. Dodd- good riddance. So glad your presidential bid failed.
We don’t trust incumbants for a reason- we know you sold us out. Most retire with $$$ from it too- no doubt.
Byron Dorgan is a hero. He is not Dodd and must be disgusted with the Obama corporate DLC mainlining of the Democratic party. Witness today -Obama’s screwed up health care- yeah like we should endorse the senate bill and tax our own bargained insurance plans. Screw that and the friends you rode in with-Obamacare is disastrous for the American people. The real Obama goals are showing. No true liberal is going to want to work with the conservative Mr. Obama. No wonder Pelosi is starting to show her irritation and well she should as she represents us.
Dorgan is a real public servant- its too bad that they aren’t all like him.
David Bonior is an honorable guy and would move MI forward- in a progressive way,
Right on.