The battle for transparency at the Federal Reserve just ratcheted up a notch. Edolphus Towns, the chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, just issued a subpoena to the New York Federal Reserve Bank, asking for documents related to AIG and their counter-party payments. As we’ve been tracking, the NY Fed, then under the direction of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, advised AIG to hide information on counter-party payments from federal regulators, according to recently disclosed emails.
Here’s Towns’ statement, and note the use of the phrase “backdoor bailout”:
“To help the Committee’s investigation of payments made by AIG to its counterparties, I am issuing a subpoena today to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. This subpoena will provide the Committee with documents that will shed light on how and why taxpayer dollars were used for a backdoor bailout.”
The initial email disclosure came from the ranking member on the Oversight Committee, Republican Darrell Issa, so both parties are seeking answers in this case.
The Federal Reserve and its member banks have been notorious on the subject of secrecy during the financial crisis. Today, Bloomberg reported that they are seeking to block the release (through a Bloomberg FOIA request) of the identities of who received relief as part of their $2 trillion loan program. We’ll see how one of its member banks takes to a Congressional subpoena.
The Federal Reserve took in $45 billion dollars in profit last year, according to the Washington Post. But its balance sheet is still fraught with secrets and unknown liabilities, and the outstanding investments still risk an unknown level of losses in the future.
There is still no word on whether Treasury Secretary Geithner will appear before the Oversight Committee at hearings, which are expected next week.




20 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
It’s probably not a great idea to irritate our corporate masters in this manner, I mean, our government currently serves their interests over the needs of the people, to the near extinction of the US middle class.
Not only do the corporate special interests get whatever they need, they also get whatever they want, and of course, it’s up to the rest of us to foot the bill.
The military industrial complex wants war, we get war. They want fear to reign supreme in the “homeland”, we get a constant diet of fear, conveniently delivered fresh to our doors by the omnipresent corporate controlled media.
The people need health care, but that’s just too expensive, and we’re just too undeserving.
So, when I say that a subpoena and any investigation into their activities whatsoever will not please our corporate special interest masters, I mean it. They will punish us for our collective disrespect. This will not please Master.
I’m so happy that I voted for “change”, just think how bad things would be if we hadn’t.
We are all doomed by the way.
I don’t think Towns will get anywhere because of this:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/12/aig-bailout-emails-sec-or_n_419785.html
But why the SEC can’t change their mind is another question.
Reuters provides the story with a twist.
Surprisingly the politicians who recently have been saying they wanted to investigate Geithner were apparently unaware that Mary Schapiro had already cut them off at the knees last May. Transparency is just word that means even if you think know what I did you’ll never prove it. Transparent motivations, opaque government.
Before justice would be done, a DOJ employee will “botch” the prosecution.
I clicked the link in the “update” I get from Reuters and was surprised to see Bunning’s ugly mug and lots of copy detailing his “pursuit” of the Geithner/AIG link.
Way to go Obama administration. A two-fer: fuck-up by your “boy” and handing the Reps an issue on which to run.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60B44X20100112?feedType=nl&feedName=usbusinessafternoon
I think there is something unusual going on with the comment system, either that or I’m changing pages without clicking.
sorry Greg, but your pic made me go here
temptingfate – that full page ad running across the front page may have something to do with it – great for the Lake to collect the $$$ but can cause problems for some depending on their provider
The Executive part of the Government cannot conceal from Congress, because they are co-equal branches.
Well, Bunning is not running in ’10 (and a lot of his ‘peers’ think he’s nuckin’ futz anyway – which he is but that’s another point), so with him being the champion, it may not be considered THAT big of an issue for the Rs. I’m sure Mitch McConnell likes his bankster money as much as anyone.
The R’s wont take up the issue of FED secrecy, so don’t worry about this issue cutting against the D’s. The R’s have been as complicit in the FED book-cooking (if not more so) as the D’s to this point. Financing wars and bailouts tends to get expensive in the long run, so we just need to keep nudging this issue along. The weight of the FED’s incompetence is causing the pointing of many fingers.
Also, I think Ron Paul’s son is running for Bunning’s seat in KY.
Yes, against the current Secretary of State, Trey Grayson in the Republican primary.
Geithner appearing before the oversight committee…talking about a rock and a hard place.
Thanks, dakine. I was trying to remember if Bunning [I initially typed "Funning"] was going to run in 2010.
“They” have got to learn some new tricks when the old ones are so predictable.
I have noticed the same thing. Whole section of comments missing this morning.
Hi! I’m a broken record!
AIG = CIA
Secret (Insurance) Agent Men
http://articles.latimes.com/2000/sep/22/news/mn-25118
If I told you a year ago Erik Prince was CIA & Blackwater a CIA front, would you have believed me?
AIG has always been an intel gathering arm of the CIA, as well as a financial weapon in the black budget arsenal.
This move is just shy of declaring the emails a ‘matter of National Security.’
And now you know why.
Supposedly the SEC grants hundreds of these kinds of secrecy agreements. Can it be reversed?
By “This move is just shy of declaring the emails a ‘matter of National Security,’ I mean the SEC sealing of the emails.
Now, you might rightly ask, “If AIG really is CIA, wouldn’t somebody have told Ratigan, Spitzer, et al to go easy?”
To which I’d say, “Not if they want to perpetrate the myth that AIG is just like any ol’ global insurance biz. They’d want it to appear as though they were withholding (and eventually revealing to a select few) out of stupidity, hubris, fear, etc., rather than admit the role AIG has played for decades as a front company for The Company.”
Eliot Spitzer was just shown on the Daily Show, explaining how the Bonus Pool at Goldman Sachs is exactly equal to the amount AIG paid them (100 cents on the dollar) to bail GS out of its CDS junk paper. That TWELVE BILLION went from Us Taxpayers, to AIG, and directly on to GS, faster than Timmy G. could say “Jump!” As Jon Stweart commented, “That’s Eliot Spitzer telling us how we just spent a ton of money to get F**ked!” Ironic.
Now, Timmy was once Chief Toady at Treasury to Robert Rubin, who was once – what? – Chairman of Goldman Sachs. Another President of the NY Fed – Corrigan – is the present Chairman of Goldman Sachs. See how we got screwed? Spitzer, an expert on the topic, is absolutely correct. They should all be shot for the Sin of Gluttony.
A congressional subpoena trumps a confidentiality agreement that any agency enters into. That’s just a fact.