Today the President spoke at the Middle Class Task Force about a series of initiatives he will propose at the State of the Union Address later this week. Here are some of these steps, from an Administration fact sheet:
1. Nearly Doubling the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit for middle class families making under $85,000 a year. This is accomplished by increasing their tax credit rate from 20% to 35% of qualifying expenses. The value of the tax credit nearly doubles for all families making under $85,000 a year, and every family that makes under $115,000 will see their tax credit increase.
Additionally, for families struggling to join the middle class, the administration will provide a $1.6 billion increase in child care funding, the largest one-year increase in 20 years, to help an additional 235,000 children.
2. Limiting a student’s federal loan payments to 10 percent of his or her income above a basic living allowance. This will lower payments for hundreds of thousands of students, who are struggling to make ends meet coming out of college.
3. Creating a system of automatic workplace IRAs, requiring all employers to give the option for employees to enroll in a direct-deposit IRA.
4. Expanding tax credits to match retirement savings and enacting new safeguards to protect retirement savings, making it easier for families to plan for retirement.
5. Expanding support for families balancing work with caring for elderly relatives, helping them manage their multiple responsibilities and allowing seniors to live in the community for as long as possible.
These are transactional checklist kind of things, which you hear about in a Presidential address and then check back in five years later to see if any of them actually makes it into law. But even on the level of a checklist there are concerns. Why exactly would anyone be interested in dumping money from their jobs, at a time of falling wages, into the Wall Street Casino through an IRA? The savings rate is actually increasing during this recession, so encouraging more saving only enriching investment fund managers and sucks more money out of the real economy. In addition, the child tax credit that everyone’s so excited about is nonrefundable and would only benefit a narrow amount of people, because those who don’t owe federal income tax would be ineligible.
There’s no question that Obama’s rhetoric is targeted correctly, around middle class security and creating that “new foundation for growth.” But the middle class is in a world of hurt right now, and basically, instead of small-ball and narrow-cast tax credits they need actual jobs.
In December, the House, with no assistance from Obama, narrowly passed a $154 billion jobs will, which also provides fiscal relief to the states and extends unemployment and health benefits for jobless workers. But the word from the White House is that Obama will not support that high a number, and will give more prominence to deficit reduction. So despite the rhetoric about Obama getting past the health-bill morass and emphasizing jobs, jobs, jobs, he hasn’t yet put his money (ours, actually) where his mouth is.
So on the signature issue that would actually respond to the jobs crisis, Obama is unlikely to support a measure that doesn’t even get near what’s required. And on the signature political issue, what the Congress and the White House have spent a year discussing, Obama continues to float airily above the debate, letting Congress sort out the details and talking about “letting the dust settle,” angering practically everyone in the Democratic coalition, including Congress, which is growing incredibly frustrated.
The modest aid for families olive branch in the State of the Union is nice, although unlikely to even be enacted. But the middle class needs a bit more than a nudge toward workplace IRAs; especially at this time, when there’s so much anxiety among workers.
No. 1: The middle class may never be the same again
The full effects of the crash of 2007-2008 on the lives of regular Americans has yet to be fully appreciated. For most members of the middle class, their sense of financial well-being was largely based on the size of their 401(k)s and their equity as homeowners. After the collapse of stock prices and with the steep drop in home prices, many may never feel the same way again, or spend their money as confidently.
Harvard Professor Elizabeth Warren, an emerging hero among progressives in her role as chair of the congressional bailout oversight panel, sees the latest series of blows as the unfortunate culmination of a crisis that started taking form a generation ago. For long stretches of time, the growth in the nation’s GDP has gone almost entirely to the top 1% or less of the population. That has resulted in a dramatic shift in wealth away from the middle class, made the economy more vulnerable to disaster and made the toll of such a disaster more catastrophic to all but the wealthiest Americans [...] She concludes: “America without a strong middle class? Unthinkable, but the once-solid foundation is shaking.”
That’s a must-read.
We’re on the road to a major economic stagnation, and the signals everyone is picking up is a withering from the challenge. That, more than any policy, is what is shedding voters right now.





26 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Thanks for this, David.
When speaking of the middle class, “narrow” gets narrower and narrower by the day, it seems.
I guess this goes to prove that Obama did not get the message after the Mass. defeat. His ideas do nothing to adress the actual cause of wage decline in the US. He sounds a lot like Bush on almost every policy now.
Save more in an IRA- like the middle class has the ability to save more and how will that help their wages? IRAs are totally a big business idea so they wouldn’t have to fund pensions anymore. They are Part of the “ownership society”, because we are supposed to feel vested in wall street.
Why doesn’t he work on these real middle class issues that would have a real effect:
1.Install tariffs, get rid of NAFTA and CAFTA.
2.Repeal the regressive tax cuts that have taken place since Ford.
3.Invest in rebuilding our infrastructure.
4.Install Single Payer
I realize that big corporations and the media have hammered this trickle down economics crap into our brains, so that this may not happen until our fascist government implodes, but we shouldn’t go down without a fight.
Yes, this should work out well. The electorate is clamoring for action yesterday and Obama responds with modest promises.
But let’s face it Obama has nothing much he can point to in his first year beyond Lily Ledbetter and stem cells, and this at a time when the economy is circling the drain. To paraphase Churchill, he better be humble because he has so much to be humble about. Still that’s not the reason he was elected. He was elected to do things, to bring change, good change, and he simply, flatly, unequivocally has not done that, worse he hasn’t even tried.
Hugh you’re right!
That is my biggest issue with Obama, he doesn’t even try. Although, this started before he was elected president, it has gotten worse.
Just wondering. Is the IRA thing part and parcel with cutting Social Security? Sort of a back door privatization thing?
Were we expecting too much?
Similar in that it will provide a slush fund like SS to the gov’t. The IRA’s will probably be required to be invested in ‘safe’ things like government debt. It’s a tax, essentially.
“As a rule of thumb, the worst possible time to convert lump sum savings into a fixed income annuity would be when interest rates are historically low.
Although products may vary, this is roughly equivalent to buying long term bonds at a time when interest rates are likely to increase, substantially reducing your principal in real terms, and eroding your fixed returns through inflation.
For some reason the Obama Administration is promoting the idea now that there should be some encouragement for Americans to start converting their 401K’s and IRA’s into annuities, to provide themselves with lifetime income.
The effort is being spear-headed by Mark Iwry of the Treasury and Phyllis Borzi of the Department of Labor. Here is a paper written on the subject by Mark Iwry when he was at the Brookings Institution.
The essence of this paper is that distributions from IRA’s and 401K’s would automatically be rolled into an annuity providing a monthly income by default.
This concept is known on the Street as the handling fees for meager returns pork barrel pigfest. The Fed likes it because they will undoubtedly get a two year rolling chunk of the people’s retirement cash to play with.[...]
My model for thinking about this annuitization is that the government wishes to appropriate your savings for a 2.0% return, ex fees and mispriced risk and inflation, as a source of funding for the bailouts of an oversized and insolvent FIRE sector (like AIG) and the imploding pretensions of a global financial elite.”
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2010/01/us-government-is-eyeing-your-401ks-and.html
The SOTU should be quite a comedy show. Nobody’s buying your line of shit anymore, Mr Obama.
I guess I’m a broken record on Obama, i.e.:
1. These changes seem very minor and inadequate.
2. His initiatives are bound to be viewed in the context of two very unpopular and unfinished first year issues–economic bail-out and HCR. He’s trotting out some new shiny ponies here, while last year’s shiny ponies languish, or have expired (bail out, HCR).
Well, laugh all you want, but the part about changing the student loan IBR formula is a step in the right direction, including the 20-year forgiveness proposal.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/Fact_Sheet-Middle_Class_Task_Force.pdf
My understanding is Arne Duncan already has the power to reduce the number of years to 20.
With the way mortgage workouts make all the headlines, it’s a travesty that other forms of debt aren’t looked at as well.
Problem is the Southerners all get nearly free college at State Universities that the North paid for years ago. So the Southern senators always cry about the government Student Loan program, which helps out the North, the West Coast, the Midwest. Sallie Mae (the private lender) is in Virginia, even Ben Nelson has one (Nellie Mae?) in Nebraska, and we all know that those Senators are bought and paid for by the big private lenders.
They don’t want government student loans out there at favorable terms, because it cuts into their business. It’s not part of their business model.
Why not fight back against the lenders with Pell Grants. Remember them?
Let’s observe that Obama is only saying he wants to do these things, and let’s also observe which ones actually get done, ok? As for me, I’m looking forward to him hopping around on one foot, making goofy faces and pulling his collar like Rodney Dangerfield.
This is supposed to be mot anyway, because of the student loan reform bill stuck dead in the Senate. The announcement here is a signal that the reform, ending the privatization of the student loan market, won’t happen.
Oh, yes! Pell Grants. Back in the days when people expected the government to hand your tax money back to you for education. Not just lend it back to you. Well, that generation already got its college, so they changed the rules . . .
You’re right. The President really only has the veto. It takes the 218 representatives and their corporate sponsors, and the 60 Senators, and theirs, to pass the law.
David, I think that one was Ben Nelson again, wasn’t it? Representative George Miller got it passed in the House, and then someone in the Senate decided to sit on it.
Especially with such a punk in the WH, I hear you. Did you know that the republicans haven’t had 60 or more senate seats since 1911?
Yeah, am I conflating with health insurance companies? But I think Nelson has a bunch of companies/banks that do huge student loan business in Nebraska.
Maybe impeaching Nelson and Baucus would get us back on the road….
I did not know it was 1911. I figured the Republicans had had 60 sometime in the Roaring (19)20′s.
But then again, “Republican” meant something wholly different in 1910 than in 2010. They were mostly in the North, and more liberal on social issues and government spending (“internal improvements”) than in the South.
I just remember something coming across the wire, that Ben Nelson was worried about losing jobs in Nebraska if Nellie Mae wasn’t allowed to service loans anymore.
So the first compromise to him was to have the government farm out the servicing of Direct Loans to Nellie in Nebraska. Nelson said it was better to have so-called private industry do this, but it really was just about keeping jobs in Nebraska.
(Never mind this point about how federally-backed student loans turns into some “private industry” anyhow.)
So Ben Nelson isn’t just about taking care of Mutual of Omaha. He’s for anything “gubment” if it means someone in his state can turn a buck off it. If he could get Medicare administered out of Nebraska, he’d be all for Medicare expansion.
This is what gets me.
When all the Obamabots chant “he’s only had a year,” or “things were so fucked up by Bush, how can you expect him to turn them around?,” I want to SCREAM: “I expect him to TRY.”
It’s this lack of trying at all that makes me so crazy.
Thanks for that, transparait.
The way the economy’s going, the starving masses are going to be shooting those shiny ponies and eating them.
And, despite all their denials, what lost the Massachusetts Senate seat. Many more to follow.
Welcome. Don’t trust them.
David Brooks’ column in today’s NYT conflates current American populism as “punishing the elites” — whereas it’s really the same as colonial American populism in ‘exposing and confronting EMPIRE’ with democracy.
Here’s how Obama could win a second term, or four like FDR (if it were still legal) and be as popular as George Washington for winning the Revolution against the British Empire, if he has the guts to level with the American people (and coincidentally save our democracy):
Here’s the single, seminal, and underlying ‘cause’ of all these problematic ‘issues’ that Obama has to level with the American people about to restore his credibility, and coincidentally save our democracy: —- its not health care, nor the economy, nor the wars, nor the hundred other distractive symptomatic ‘identity issues’ that are ALL caused by the exact same hidden metastasizing tumor of cancer.
It begins with an ‘E’, but “its not the Economy stupid” —- it’s EMPIRE.
In his “State of the (democratic) Union’ he should forcefully point out that today we’re almost totally controlled by a previously well hidden corporatist EMPIRE — now made more visible by the supreme court’s treason of literally handing over our country to the Empire overtly.
While this problem can not be solved by any quick legislative or other means, that he will actually ‘lead’ and solve this (and all our other problems caused by Empire) and he will do it by moving to the Green (independent) Party (which does not accept corrupting corporate Empire money), and then Obama should challenge all those he is addressing in Congress, who have the guts to represent us (and the U.S.) to follow him and shun the hopelessly corrupted and ‘bought’ Dem/Rep single corporate Empire’s two-faced phony party.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine