About the only encouraging moments during the years-long budget disaster here in California have been the increasing campus radicalization against the draconian cuts to public education. For years now, students have sat on the front lines of the budget debate, with schools an inviting target for budget cutters and back-door taxes in the form of fee increases a preferred solution. The most recent 30% fee hike at the UC university system was something of a last straw. California, once a higher education model for the nation to follow, has seen that sadly pass. And the students want it back.
Yesterday, across all the UC campuses, students protested the cuts and demanded action on coming to grips with both the budget and the political crisis in Sacramento.
Several hundred students, faculty and staff rallied at the University of California at Berkeley, the 1960s hub of Vietnam war protests. Yoga students there held classes outside to avoid crossing picket lines.
A UC Santa Cruz radio broadcast advised the public to avoid that campus after protesters blocked a traffic entrance.
Robert Cruickshank, in a moving post at Calitics, explains this correctly as a reaction to the deliberate destruction of public education in the state. Congressman (and former Lt. Governor) John Garamendi explained it to me several months ago as a “decision, and it was a decision, not to invest in education. We have plenty of money to fund it, but we made the decision not to. The leadership has refused to use that wealth in the greatest resource we have, and that’s our education system.”
This decision to mortgage the future of students because the wealthy don’t want to give up their tax advantages has manifested itself in anger across campus. Cruickshank, who participated in protests in Monterey, explains it as part of a continuum of de-emphasizing education:
Students now understand what is happening to them and why. Their education is being gutted and their already meager financial resources are being stolen from them by a state government that believes corporations matter more than students. That propping up the failed status quo matters more than building California’s future. Most of the speakers I heard understood this very clearly, almost instinctively. It has been beaten into them these last two years.
In my own brief remarks to the rally at CSUMB, I noted that we had all been here before. In the late 1960s students protested against Governor Ronald Reagan’s fee hikes, but they happened anyway. In the early 1980s students protested against Governor Jerry Brown’s and Governor George Deukmejian’s fee hikes, but they happened anyway. In the early 1990s students protested against Governor Pete Wilson’s fee hikes, but they happened anyway. In the early 2000s students protested against Governor Gray Davis’s and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s fee hikes, but they happened anyway.
It is time to break that cycle with action.
The core goal for colleges and universities should be to restore the core pledge of the 1960 Master Plan – that a high quality public college education will be free to all Californians who qualify for it. The core goal for K-12 schools should be similar, that a high-quality public education will be free to all Californians, period. In pursuit of that goal, the movement must be willing to pursue actions and policy changes that will provide the new public funding that a restoration of truly affordable and quality public education requires.
There are campaigns at the state and national level to break this cycle. The Courage Campaign, where Cruickshank is a policy director, has joined the effort to finally have California tax the oil coming out of the ground (this is the only state in America without an oil severance tax) and funnel that money into higher education. Another national initiative would be to pass student loan reform, end the mass subsidies going to banks to manage federally-backed loans, take the savings from distributing government loan directly and transfer it into Pell Grants that would allow hundreds of thousands of students to better afford college. “Second Lady” and community college educator Jill Biden argued for that at the White House web site today.
Finally, putting the states on sound fiscal footing after the Great Recession eroded the tax base would help as well. California received, by some counts, $85 billion dollars through a variety of stimulus programs, and yet the budget shortfalls remain, creating a drag on economic recovery. Arnold Schwarzenegger likes to tout the stimulus in Washington while cutting education funding at home, canceling out the stimulative effects. This cannot happen anymore, and while the $25 billion in Medicaid help in the next Senate jobs bill would provide some relief to state budgets, it does not fill what is by some accounts a $140 billion dollar gap.
Overall, students are tired of being considered what amounts to second-class economic citizens, with their futures on the chopping block whenever the economy takes a downward turn. California’s budget problems are byzantine in their complexity, but in a broad sense it comes down to priorities, and students over the last several years have been put in the back of the line. Their willingness to stand up and protest this action is perhaps the one shining by-product of this sad time in the state’s history. Real activism and engagement from the bottom up can save the state, if channeled properly.



57 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
it is as if the powers that be want to keep us uneducated and malleable to whatever bullshit they decide is best for them.
one of the earlier protests (when the staff cuts came) included shouts to “Open the Books”.
The pay raises and bonuses of the Regents and other administrators is something that is incredibly underreported. That is one of the sparks of outrage: that while people are required to tighten their belts and kick in more $$$, the administrators pay themselves handsomely for having the gall to make those decisions. The unfairness is astounding. The Regents then deflect blame and anger to Sacramento. Yes, state govt deserves blame, but the administrators should be sharing some blame or sharing some of the suffering. But no!
While forcing its 180,000 employees to take unpaid days off and cutting $813 million from its budget, the UC Board of Regents last month quietly approved increases in pay and benefits for 28 executive positions.
http://www.dailycal.org/article/106229/uc_regents_approve_increases_in_executive_pay_and_
The “justification” is the same as the one given on Wall Street during the bailout. “We have to retain good people during a crisis” and this one is great! “Executives are taking on more work and deserve to be paid for that extra work”!
hahahahahaha. No double standard there!
Shouting USA #1 while turning us into a third world country. jerks.
Aren’t we all? I’m pissed that we continue to swallow the lies of these feudal lords that are only interested in stealing our money.
here’s a solution:
1. Legalize all drugs. Tax ‘em.
2. Empty the prisons. Cut the prison population.
Move the cut in crime expense from 1 & 2 to education.
AS for the budget stalement, we need a ballot initiave:
If a representative votes against a budget item, the representative’s district will get none of the money for that item. If the representative votes against the whole budget, all of the state money for the representative’s district will be cut from the budget.
Today’s students are clueless as to how much they are being scammed.
Once they have committed themselves to paying rent, they’ll soon find out upon graduation that there are no jobs to be had. Or that they’ll be competing against H1 visa holders whose education was most likely Gov. paid and who thus don’t need equally high wages.
Assholes all.
brain drain: with the rise in tuition and drop in quality/services in the UC system, high school junior punaisette is seriously considering out of state and/or private colleges. with merit scholarships some private schools get awfully close to the UC price tag. I’ve been writing increasingly bigger checks to UCSC for her big brother.
Are you saying they shouldn’t be getting an education? That it’s a waste of time?
I think fn is joining in my rant…i think.
Hey pun, we’ve run the same calculation as well.
Also, consider that CA’s public colleges are the highest in tuition compared to other states’ public colleges. I’m tired of these fake comparisons to Stanford and USC. Apples and oranges.
Out of state tuition is lower than Stanford. I don’t know what the point of that comparison is other than to tell us to STFU.
The other point people don’t realize is that the UC exists as the research arm of the State of California. That is its mandate. So there should be other forms of jacking up fees to other “consumers” of the UC other than the undergrads.
Scarecrow!
Next your recent summary of the status quo, this is a great development.Demonstrations worry the corporate masters Were effective in bringing issues to the public.
And without grads foriegn students will get the jobs.
Thank you, David.
As CBL shared on an earlier thread, one of our nieces was an organizer and the MC of the Oakland event yesterday. Yes, us old hippies are very, very proud.
Do you have shit for brains?
*gentle reminder*
disagree with the message but no flaming the messenger
Hey O, what’s the report from teh feet on the street?
Yes ma’am. Sorry. (hanging head in almost shame)
Great success!
More later.
Great! I look forward to hearing more. I’m trying to watch this story closely…thx.
So, Obama has two options, both less than great for him.
If he bails the students out he’ll be seen as having caved to protests, thus perhaps inviting more and larger protests. If he doesn’t, these protests will grow and form a gelling point for solidarity where liberals can finally tag onto, having failed to motivate themselves into action.
The Kakistocracy should be, by about now, starting to feel some discomfort about the trajectory of events.
are you old and slow?
Suppose you and me sit down for a beer and talk about exactly that?
” A small group of U.S. lawmakers unveiled legislation on Thursday to withdraw from the North American Free Trade Agreement in the latest sign of congressional disillusionment with free-trade deals.”
who’d have thunk?!
Rhambama must be livid with them.
gladly, – I am quite sure that you misunderstood my post, or that I failed to express myself clearly.
no harm, no foul, just interested in knowing what you thought i meant?
That mentality seems to be a core component of our brand of capitalism. I worked for a social services nonprofit whose CEO was way overpaid for what she did and compared to what everyone else paid. As funding got scarce, everyone who actually did the work under the contracts we were desperately trying to keep was being cut so fewer people had to do more work with little or no support staff. She never took any hit at all and she really believed that she deserved to keep getting paid that huge salary. I was middle management and mentioned without bringing her into it, that although our customers appreciated what a great job I was doing, whether they were happy with our agency had more to do with how the front line (lowest paid, by the way) people did their jobs day in and day out, so it was more important to keep enough good people there than to worry about me. Her opinion was that they could all be replaced but good management was what really made the difference. Insane! But it’s embedded in the culture from Wall St. to Main St. The higher up you go, the more it is a meritocracy and the workers are just replaceable widgets.
I actually asked an honest question that I wanted an answer to.
I was lurking today when you were way past shitty to a long time, highly regarded commenter here. You preach, posture, cajole and seek to intimidate and yet you have never, not one fucking time, offered anything that can be even remotely construed as a plan of action. Your pronouncements are all but drivel and I, in all honesty, want to know if you have anything, anything at all, other than pompous, holier-than-thou, empty bullshit to offer.
old and slow but in a spiffy shining armor tilting at windmills.
Are you in CA? We are trying to legalize marijuana and there is a movement to stop putting so much money into prisons. We already voted for rehab instead of incarceration for many drug offenses. It’s caused some warfare between law enforcement and mental health because there is money for respective budgets as well as ideology involved, but it’s still got good support.
jeez, knock it off youse guys!
FN: I took your remark as a “yeah the students are getting screwed and they only know a little part of how they are getting screwed. It’s actually worse than that.”
Is that close?
I do believe in higher education, but it’s priced out of reach for most people who are not going to Wall Street into “investment” banking. The question now is not “are your grades good enough” but “can you recoup the cost afterwards”? ie it is worth it anymore?
if only that money going to prisons was in anticipation of holding the banksters there. you know how they love their amenities.
close enough.
What do you know of windmills? You clearly were not born the first time I took to the streets.
For your edification, I am not old or slow. I am, as a matter of fact, a somewhat cantankerous, middle aged, fairly quick, hippie dirty biker. I suppose the armour comment, in your circles, would pass for wit but I am not impressed.
So what you are admitting here is that you only fuck with old people and women?
Hell, I’d raise my own taxes if that were the plan. And I’d be lobbying harder than the empty supermax towns lobbied for Gitmo guys to get them sent here instead of somewhere else. The banksters hanging out with the Mexican Mafia in a CA prison sounds like poetic justice to me.
don’t make suz pull the blog over…
Alright, time to wade in here…
My wife is a third year student at a community college here in Oakland, CA. As far as funding issues and budget cuts, we’ve felt absolutely NO repercussions. ZERO. I understand the issue at hand, as does she. They are limiting new enrollment and sign-ups for financial aid. Teachers are losing their jobs. It’s a shit situation.
However, we are also down the street from NUMMI. For those that are familiar with the situation there, it’s going to close this month. 5800 jobs. Even more in the surrounding support industries.
My point here is belts are tightening everywhere. And I can hear the responses ramping up with “Not at the corporate level!” but hold your tongue. I know that too. It’s fucking egregious. But what are we going to do about it?
Shutting down the Nimitz during rush hour and jumping off an overpass, or blocking the entrances to UC Santa Cruz are not the freaking answers. We had 139 protesters pulled off that freeway and sent directly to Santa Rita Jail last night. It obviously did not work.
Some may say “we’ve drawn attention to the issue.” but I think that’s mistaken. Like a dysfunctional, misbehaved child, these protesters and organizers seem to feel that negative attention is still attention, so it will suffice. I beg to differ. Our local news last night – well the 10 minutes I could stomach – focused not on the issue at hand but the fact that a 12 year old was handcuffed and a guy jumped off the freeway. It was all hinting at police brutality and mentioned as a footnote what the protests were about.
There are organizers here doing good work, work that needs to be done, but we need a damn solution. As I said earlier, belts are tightening everywhere. It’s a global epidemic, a massive economic clusterfuck, if you will. The schools can be a rallying point but we need a damn message.
Our only solutions here are through our elected officials. Rally outside their offices. Make phonecalls, hand out fliers. Propose new legislation and obtain the signatures to get it on the ballot. Then VOTE. Jumping off a freeway isn’t pulling a lever to get these damn people out of office.
Personally, I can’t wait until the current elected generation is out of office. Doting fools like John McCain who only contradict themselves because they can’t remember what they said last week (he can’t remember because he doesn’t fucking CARE). But supporting the viable candidates and nurturing the grassroots movement that this site was such a huge part of 2 years ago is the only way to do this. T
lol, sign me up for a donor’s plaque!
I got cut off, damnit. I’m long winded. Blame my Dad.
…
These protests are hurting our ideals and teaching our younger generation the wrong thing. Mass Media distorts the issue by not focusing on the successful, peaceful protests that took place yesterday. They focus on the bedlam. We need to eliminate the bedlam so they have no choice but to focus on the issue.
That is all.
A righteous rant and I agree with almost all of it.
I don’t think anyone is saying that will suffice. Indeed, I think dday suggested it was something to build on, as you do. I also despise media’s need to focus on the salacious, however minor it is to the issue at hand. they never discuss the deeper issue of why the budget is effed up.
I read (sfgate maybe?) that the leadership is diffused by design in order to keep focus on the issue and not on individuals. There are tradeoffs with that strategy, but I’ll bet the participants read the blogs and may take Sacto on eventually. Your suggestions are good ones and I wonder when we may expect new ballot measures statewide.
We had one pass narrowly that would raise our local property taxes for schools. Frankly, that’s unpopular at our house because we think everyone should share the cost. our prop taxes are already through the roof. I don’t mind paying taxes for education if everyone is carrying some of the load.
anyway, I hear ya. this is just the beginning.
In general, I agree that peaceful protests are called for. I don’t think it’s helpful to piss off a bunch of motorists who are also voters on the issues you want addressed. But you’re never going to “eliminate the bedlam” because you just can’t control everyone. And the media will always focus on the bedlam. So why not take the benefit of that? It’s good for the protesters to look pissed off and even a little crazy to the elites because they need to have the shit scared out of them. The process is all well and good, but they believe, and I have to fight hard not to believe, that they have the system so wrapped up that they don’t ever have to worry about that interfering with whatever it is they want to do now or at any time in the future. The kids who got out of hand only injured themselves. They weren’t holding hostages at gunpoint or anything. I wouldn’t have blocked the freeway or jumped off it, but they didn’t do anything that crossed the line to violence, which is the line I draw.
We need to NOT eliminate the bedlam because it is the unpredictability and the thought that they care enough to put themselves at risk that makes the people who are the problem focus on the issue and start weighing their alternatives. Unions, civil rights, FDR’s programs, none of it ever came from calmly asking for people to focus on those issues. MLK was nonviolent, but that didn’t mean there wasn’t some bedlam. The younger generation is being taught to stand up for what they believe in, not cry over injustice but keep doing the same things that enable it for fear of ruffling feathers or being looked down on as uncivil. That’s a good thing, IMO.
Once the idea gets out, there won’t be room enough to have a plaque. We’d have to cover every mile of CA highway/fwy with the names that would donate to that cause. But since you got in on the ground floor, you can choose which stretch you want your name on. The 405 is a good choice since people stay parked there for so many hours a day that they’d have time to read it and remember you.
Thanks for sayin that, dosido. He is a wonderfull husband, father and son.
yes, people who are for the status quo will active look for or make up reasons to marginalize the protesters.
I just teared up a little.
gtg. Ah’ll be bach.
Yes, and that’s one of the most insane parts of our current crisis. Actively destroying needed teaching jobs. I swear… Obama must have been sitting in class listening to George Bush read My Pet Goat.
What to do… protests, strikes, and of course we need to primary some of the crappier Democrats.
Given that corporations seem to be calling all the shots, targeted product boycotts may be useful. Want to give Blanche Lincoln the boot? Start a nationwide boycott of Wallmart.
Oh CRAP! Ahnold is checking into FDL now?
I was talking with a neighbor last week when we heard local K-12 budget is being cut nearly 25%.
He joked that we should just have all the kids line up the sidewalk, have them count off 1-2-3-4, 1-2-3-4. And then pick a number out of a hat, say “3″.
“OK, all you 3′s step forward.”
Go home. We don’t have room for you this year. See you next September. Better luck next year.
The rest of you, time for school.
How can a state that’s dead broke fund more ed spending?
Some 75% of state employees employed in the educational system never see a student. Cut the employees by about half. That would help.
Not everyone should go to college. Some should go to trade schools.
California is a great example of what happens when Democrats run things. California is now broke, because they don’t understand basic math and basic finance, and it is a great indicator of where the USA is headed.
No, California is an example of what happens when NOBODY can run things. We have requirement for supermajority to pass budgets in both houses of legislature, as well as pick our state nose.
Arnold, supposedly a Republican, thought he could elicit rational thought from Republicans and wrestle Democrats. He found he could reach compromises with Democrats, but the ideologues in the Republican caucus were literally hamstrung to compromise on anything with the word “tax” in it.
I’ve been to Sacramento a few times, had Don Perata visit our community a couple times for discussions. There’s a fundamental distinction between ideology and governance. The former is ivory tower theory, and the latter is pragmatic compromise among many choices, all of which are bad these days.
Care to take a guess on how many people and how much money that would be? I assert that’s a rounding error +/- 1.5% in the state school budget.
The average state funding per student was $8,964 last year, kids in my district got $6,367. Next year kids in my district will get $4,946. We’re below state ADA because of historic anomalies, and it gets worse. My cousin’s kids in New Jersey get well over the state average of $13,600. That’s right, our kids get 36% of what kids in New Jersey receive, yet we’re supposed to compete.
In our local district of about 10,000 kids, less than 5.5% of budget is for administration. Let’s get rid of every one of those people and we’re still 18.5% below last year’s budget. Instead of throwing out every 4th kid, we can throw out every 5.5th kid. I don’t know who will run the place, but we’ll let the kids figure it out.
As to “trade schools,” can you suggest any promising trades with programs? My son recently graduated HS, smart kid but unsure of his ambitions. Junior college classes are over enrolled, so he got into 1 of 5 classes for which he applied. The automotive program at JC was over enrolled, as budget cutbacks have hit classes. Aviation program has openings, but the A&P jobs are being shipped out of the country.
He applied to a union sponsored electrician school, but that was cut as most of the union electricians in area are out of work and not paying union dues. The neighbor kid joined the Marines and is now in Afghanistan. I suggested my son join the Coast Guard. We’ll still investigating what speciality he’ll get if he signs up for 3 years, 4 years or 4+4.
Of course, if my med device startup gets funded I’ll just send him to private college (yeah, that’s a freaking fantasy).
The state isn’t broke. The “government” is broke because it is spending so much money on prisons and other things instead of on education. The state has a lot of money and a population that values education. I agree that cuts in administration make a lot more sense than cuts in teachers, but advocating cutting employees as a general proposition rather than having a specific plan is counterproductive, to say the least. We got into this mess because government was being blunt and stupid. Some of our taxes are too high and some are too low. Some of our spending is too high and some is too low. Grown-ups who actually come up with plans that make it possible to grow our state economy and take care of the state’s priorities instead of the donors’ priorities are called for.
You obviously haven’t paid much attention to CA government. The Democrats do not run California. They outnumber Republicans in government, but they can’t run things because of laws that require a supermajority for budgets. When budget “compromises” have been made, they have been more Republican than Democratic because the Dems will cave in order to get a budget passed more easily than the Repubs will. So what you see in the mess that is CA is reflective of how anti-tax, anti-spend, pro-corporate, three strikes and you’re in prison for life Republicans run things.
Who are they and what can I do to support them? All that World Trade crap is at the bottom of so many of our economic problems (well, the problems that the banks aren’t at the bottom of anyway.)
But everyone who wants to go to college should be able to go.
California is broke because of crimes committed by Enron. People seem to forget that. The State of Calif. lost billions due to the FAKE energy crisis
ginned up by Enron. When Enron Corp. was done then the banks and financial institutions stole billions from people’s pension funds.
Go ahead, tell me more about why we have a deficit. It’s always the same thing-
CORPORATE CRIMINALITY and POLITICAL CORRUPTION. Period.