There was a lot of talk in the health care debate about Democratic politicians getting “special deals” for their states or key stakeholders in their states, and criticism that this is simply the most craven, low-down thing that has ever happened in American lawmaking. But of course politicians trying to do best for their states is not only expected, it’s the norm. In that light, we can see Tennessee’s Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker going to bat for a major business in Tennessee.
Senator Bob Corker, who represents FedEx Corp.’s home state of Tennessee, said he will block legislation funding the Federal Aviation Administration because a provision may be added later making it easier for workers at the company to join unions.
Corker’s action extends a years-long fight in Washington between the mostly non-union FedEx and its unionized rival United Parcel Service Inc. over how workers at both companies should be treated under U.S. labor laws.
“We are supportive of the Senate FAA bill, but we have placed a hold until we can be assured that the controversial FedEx provision will not be included in the final legislation,” Laura Lefler Herzog, a spokeswoman for Corker, a Republican, said today in an e-mailed statement.
It’s openly stated that the FedEx wants to block unionization, and has their man in Washington, Corker, holding up bills in service to that. FedEx is among the largest employers in the state, and the world’s largest cargo airline. FedEx pilots already work under a union contract.
Mind you, Corker isn’t even holding the FAA funding over something IN the bill. He’s holding it because last year, the House passed a version of this funding that would have forced FedEx workers into the same labor standard as Teamsters-represented UPS employees, allowing their workers to join local unions rather than a national election.
FedEx spokesmen have taken to calling this a “UPS bailout,” but it would merely normalize labor law throughout the sector. FedEx is currently governed not under the National Labor Relations Act, like all other shipping companies, but the Railway Labor Act.
When such “special deals” were put in to placate Ben Nelson in the health care bill, remember, what got everyone up in arms was that he got substantial Medicare expansion funding for poor residents in his state. Corker and Alexander are just protecting the profits of a large Tennessee employer.
Somehow this gets viewed differently.
More at Think Progress.



28 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Corkhead strikes again (no pun intended).
If all these workers would join the IWW on their own FedEx would be unionized whether they or Corkhead liked it or not. Fait accompli.
YEah, nothing like using the government power to give an advantage to one employer over another. I wonder what Mitch and the HoF’er think about this? (Of course, they’re both probably for it and would look kindly on something that destroys unions, even when the union and its members are in their home state.)
Neoliberalism at its finest.
There you go again you old hippie socialist. *g*
Thanks for this post David. What I’m reading here is that 1 Senator has stopped a funding measure for the FAA? We are of course talking about the Federal Aviation Administration? The agency of the federal government that oversees commecial air traffic in this country? The stated sole purpose of this action is to ensure that FedEx continues to classify employees as railroad workers? Is that right?
Just wonderin here, how many trains does FedEx own?
Tennessee is a Right to Work State, which means that on the whole. the environment is extremely hostile to workers having representation anyplace. That’s one of the reasons FedEx is THERE. They certainly would not have put their center in Ohio, or Pennsylvania, or Illinois, or New York or New Jersey or anyplace else that does not have right to work laws on the books.
This is a classic case where it is up to the OBAMA administration to call these senators out. If the Obama administration made some noise about this then the media would get involved and people would start to see what was going on. But of course as we know the Obama admin is not willing to fight the hard fight. Just the Bull S@#t one.
The TSA is without a head right now because of the same issue. President Obama’s nomination for the TSA was held up by the G.O.P. because the nominee MIGHT (that’s right, MIGHT) allow TSA employees to unionize. The nominee finally gave up.
Apparently, the GOP considers unions to be a greater threat to America (at least, “the America we know and love” — red states) than Al-Queda.
Unionization is a bit like Thanksgiving. It’s supposed to be the ultimate experience, but doesn’t always deliver. In fact, it’s best when expectations are kept low. Finland has an 85% unionization rate and productivity is about the same as in the US. At the moment, a strike set off by one employer group’s decision to renege on a rehiring benefit for about 3,000 vested longshoreman union members has paralyzed several of Finland’s major industries.
Tennessee is a right to work for nothing state. There, fixed it for ya.
We are SOOooooooo overdue for a general strike, even a one-dayer, that would certainly raise my spirits.
That Corker and just about every other tool longs to return to actual (and not just economic) indentured servitude is something that the stenographers fail to report on.
Don’t back down, Dems. For once.
It’s not just the GOP that doesn’t like unions. Unions destroyed GM and they will destroy FedEx (and WalMart) if given the chance.
Unions should be banned in any governmental agency as well. In government there are no owners to have to be protected against. When union contracts are hammered out with the government, the unions get everything they ask for. The government doesn’t care since they aren’t obliged to make a profit.
An 85% unionization rate can’t describe a country. It could only describe hell.
The Ds will let Corkhead get away with this to please their corp sponsors who don’t like unions either. After all, unions don’t have anywhere else to go except begging to Ds.
Yeah those damn 40 hour work weeks, and all the other benefits we enjoy because of unions are going to be the destruction of the US.
Unions destroyed GM? That is a lovely talking point there Rush. The reality lies about 180 degrees from there.
It would appear viewing the world from inside one’s ass certainly gives one a weird perspective on reality.
People should quit unions to show gratitude to the Republics for working so hard to protect them from gay marriage.
I assume you’re being glib. My point is that that unionization is not, and should not be that big of a deal most of the time — except for political opportunists. Labor and capital work together pretty well when there is sufficient innovation in the mix. Nucor is non-union company in the US, but its innovation has made it a model for steelmaking globally. The Finnish phone-maker Nokia also remains highly successful thanks in part to a national insistence on a highly skilled and educated workforce, reasonable maternity and childcare policies and universal healthcare. If you want a mixed model, consider Dutch scientific and technical publishing.
S/he’s a reichwing troll who makes an appearance here now and again.
Sigh. Anonymous free speech is a great blessing, so the whole troll thing seems counterproductive, kind of like the demented kid in second grade that thought the most-funnest act in the world was to flush entire rolls of toilet paper down the john to watch it overflow and inconvenience everybody else. Thanks for the heads up.
Don’t blame the unions. If it wasn’t for unions American workers would probably be working for a little more than minimum wage minus the benefits. All people have to do is look at what is going on in New Jersey. The new Republican Gov. trying his best to charge unionize members as much money as he can get. Yet he won’t raise the taxes on his rich buddies making over $400,000. Can you say redistribution of wealth. All those teachers, policemen, and firemen who voted for this guy are regretting it now.
I think it was doubling down on the Hummer production, offering federal subsidies for them when we attacked Iraq had a lot more to do with it. Also, all those GM clones companies like Buick, Pontiac, Cadillac offering the same essentially the same cars with different labels. Expanding GMAC funding..
Did those unions make these decisions? If they did, you are right.
And what could be more American than Walmart? We need to watch out for walmart..
Unions are as overrated, as Dems are to Washington. Sure they are a fantastic idea, and have brought about many great labor laws. But they are also corrupt, fraudulent, and their leadership will do anything to hang onto power. Just like the mafia, and politicians.
And unions destroyed UPS. Well, no. In fact, when UPS went public, its employees got a lot of stock. They work extra hard because that will benefit them.
And don’t forget the looters at giant corporations, starting with the top brass.
The Democrats really need to figure out a why to win this one. Unionization of FedEx could be the start of a major movement in this country.
It’s not about the unions heirarchies, it’s about the right of the workers to have power in the work place.
You took the words out of my mouth. What weird deal was done to make that happen and who set it up that way? It had to have been before Corker.
Are Corker & Alexander going to accept full responsibility for any airplane crash (and deaths) due to lack of FAA funding? Are they going to take responsibility for the lack of jobs or just blame it on Obama for considering thinking about maybe suggesting to someone that they look into possibly adding an amendment?
It just continually amazes me that the Republicans are what they are. It isn’t normal human behavior.