In an unexpected maneuver, Senate Democrats signaled that they would add the student loan reform bill to the reconciliation package being prepped for the health care bill. While the House may have to pass the Senate bill fully and have it signed by the President before moving to a reconciliation fix, this sweetener – providing college affordability for hundreds of thousands of students in their districts and ending subsidies for big banks – may make it worth their while to move forward.
The move would create a potential double victory for President Obama, who has championed both causes as among domestic priorities. And Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) said Thursday, “There was a stronger feeling for including” the education proposal. Some senators disagreed with the strategy, Durbin said, adding that a final decision has yet to be reached.
Under the student loan proposal, subsidies that now support private lenders would be shifted to other student assistance programs, including Pell Grants for families struggling to afford college tuition. “Some of the things accomplished here are really going to help a lot of people across America,” Durbin said.
Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) had been one of the chief opponents of the maneuver, for fear that it would provoke procedural challenges from Republicans. But he said the Senate parliamentarian had suggested in a preliminary ruling that combining the bills could work, provided Senate Democrats strike the right balance on cost.
“I’d say yes, we’re leaning toward it,” Conrad said.
There was a caveat, with Conrad saying that the bill “would have to be pared down” before moving forward. I don’t know quite what that means, but it could mean that the Sallie Mae counter-proposal would be included, not the original SAFRA bill. But the details would matter here; the Sallie Mae version might not even save the kind of money necessary for inclusion in reconciliation, while the SAFRA bill has already been scored. I’d call this a qualified victory for students at this point.
The House Budget Committee apparently will prep a reconciliation bill starting Monday, so things are moving forward pretty fast. The key element, of course: getting the votes.
UPDATE: Politico got a different sense of things, saying that the decision on student loans remained unsettled.




28 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
are the dems finally using their brains? Do they have a spine after all? Will the PO be included? Dare I hope. (I do know that the PO is unlikely)
Bribery. It’s a wonderful thing.
Wish someone would try to bribe me. I want to know what it feels like.
Heh. Many years ago I was fond of saying the same thing, only that I didn’t have any info or power worth bribing over.
John Amato at C&L is reporting that Bernie Sanders MAY introduce PO separately, which means it goes to a vote (i think). He quotes Greg Sargent from his blog here:
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/bernie-sanders-im-prepared-to-introduce-public-option-amendment/
Gotta say, it’s better than watching retired seniors spending money they don’t have on lottery tickets! I’d rather hope for bribery!
Back to my marathon read of Scarpetta.
If they were in any way serious about a public option, or anything resembling universal, it would have been done by now. This new reality sitcom has been going on forever. Not gonna happen.
I gotta bug about state lotteries. Stealing money from the poor to pay for the college ed of the middle & upper middle classes. What I hold against Halter, who thinks lotteries to benefit higher ed are the be-all & end-all of his political career.
OK. just updating the PO discussion.
Maloney, in her town hall last Sunday, said, like it was the most boring news evah, that there wasn’t gonna be a PO.
Well…I don’t mind except that govt always says “it’s for the kids” and then redirect the money elsewhere.
Still stealing money from the poor & desperate, no matter how it’s spent.
Lotteries are a shady dodge around the GOP’s “never raised taxes” pledge. Not wild about them myself; I wish someone would sit down with Halter and explain how non-progressive lotteries are.
A sliver of good news. It might help Democrats a bit with young people in November.
It’s the whole bored “didn’t you see that obituary?” approach they’ve tried to use all along. But Public Option is the zombie that will not die. Despite Villager dismissal of its chances of being in the bill.
It’s the ‘savvy’ approach — if you were better clued in, you’d know it died a long time ago, silly constituent.
Except it hasn’t.
DeGette’a office says PO “alive.”
OK, I know I’m kicking a hornet’s nest, but if people are going to gamble anyway?…
runs away…
Very good question this news if true would be Obama’s first win since Cash for Clunkers. Why is Politico disagreeing?
My tea leaves on the PO
Sanders threatens to bring it to a vote (which is like kryponite for corp. owned critters). Durbin runs to Nancy and says “you better deal with that guy or else we’re done for!!!” Nancy has words with Sanders (et al), deals are made and bob’s yer uncle. PO RIP.
If that happens, they are EFF’d at the ballot box. But they only think about getting EFF’d by their lobbyists.
And they’d play the numbers anyway and then who’d get the dough?
Hey, thanks for watching my back, bro.
eCAHN’s a heavy hitter. :)
Just a drive by, she can’t hit a moving target.
Heat seeking shoulder fired rocket… Watch out..
stinger, chaff out
wow…this escalated quickly! :o
God!! Lucy and the football again. Yes, the House must pass the evil Senate bill with its individual mandate, which will destroy this country. The HCR fiasco will then become law. All on the mere promise that all those Senators who have signed the Public Option letter will actually do what they’ve promised in the reconciliation. It won’t happen. Those votes will disappear. Just ask Dick Durbin and Harry Reid.
And, even if, in our fantasy dreams, the PO actually passed via reconciliation, are we guaranteed that Obama will not veto it. I can hear him now, saying we must not do all these things all at once. Let’s digest the first round of “reforms,” and then we’ll consider the P.O. Yeah, right, when the Congressional Democrats get a thumping at the polls in 2010 and 2012. There’ll be plenty of votes to spare for the P.O. then. S-u-u–u-r-e.
And the reform of the student loan fiasco is now going to be the sweetener. It, too, will die when the reconciliation fails to pass. Meanwhile this new promise will be enough to push a couple of wavering House members across the line on HCR, maybe enough for passage.
Give me a break!
The Senate health bill is frought with bribery, first by including special provisions to attract Landrieu and Nelson, then by including Stupak-like anti abortion language to appease anti-choce advocates, and then by leavingg out the PO and other public plans in order to please Obama, Conrad, Baucus and the like who respond to the needs of health insurers and other health lobbies first and foremost.
So with history fresh in our minds it is best to not be tempted or sidetracked by any inducement until the fundamental problems in the Senate health bill are corrected by the House and a firm commitment is made by the Senate to adopt those House corrections.
Student loan bank related rip offs are best handled separately.