Noting that two years ago today, Bear Stearns collapsed, Chris Dodd released his financial regulatory reform bill at a press conference where he said confidently that the bill will pass this year.
Saying that there has been “no financial reform on the scale I’ve been proposing since the 1930s” and that the current laws are hopelessly inadequate, Dodd released a draft which includes proposals from both sides of the aisle, including Sens. Richard Shelby (R-AL) and Bob Corker (R-TN). He does not currently have a bipartisan co-sponsor for the legislation, but he said “we do need to act, and I will act.” Of the 11 titles in the act, Dodd said that 9 of them reflected a bipartisan consensus. The two where there are differences, he said, are in the consumer protection and corporate governance areas. “We’ll begin the markup next week and move forward,” Dodd said.
Saying that “legislating in anger” is not as advisable as getting the bill right, Dodd laid out three major goals for the legislation: to plug the gaps in regulation, to “look in the windshield” rather than the rear-view mirror and create an early-warning system, and to protect American consumers from predatory financial products.
Specifically, Dodd highlighted four major reforms:
1) End Too Big To Fail bailouts. “Taxpayers should not write a check because of an implicit guarantee,” Dodd said. The bill would discourage banks getting to this size through new capital requirements, he said. Banks which struggle would be shut down through bankruptcy or an orderly resolution. Senators Mark Warner and Bob Corker shaped this part of the bill.
2) Consumer Protection Agency. “A strong and INDEPENDENT consumer protection watchdog,” Dodd termed it, stressing the independent part of it. The CFPA would be housed in the Fed, but Dodd dismissed any concern with that, saying that the agency would have an independent director (nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate) and an independent budget, with autonomy to craft and enforce rules. The Fed would have “not one iota of authority over the budget,” Dodd said, adding that he housed the CFPA at the Fed because of the consideration of votes. The agency would not have specific rules over what nonbank entities it can regulate, because Dodd would rather have the regulators determine that process. But, he said, “we’re not regulating the butcher” with this agency. Where there are so-called “safety and soundness” conflicts between the rules and the needs of banks, there’s “an ability in these regulations to resolve those conflicts,” by a 2/3 vote of the systemic risk council.
3) Systemic Risk Council. Dodd termed this as an “early warning system” which would look out for the next crisis and make recommendations for how to proceed. The Treasury Secretary would head up the council.
4) Transparency and Accountability. This concerns what Dodd calls “exotic instruments” like hedge funds and derivatives. The legislation basically includes similar language in this area as Dodd’s original discussion draft. Senators Jack Reed and Judd Gregg are working on this section, and if they reach consensus, their deal would replace this part of the bill.
Dodd mentioned some other pieces of the legislation, including the “say on pay” effort to “rein in insane compensation packages” at big firms; a new program at the SEC to encourage whistleblowers; the crackdown on conflicts of interest at the Federal Reserve (the head of the NY Fed would be chosen by the President and not member banks, for example); and increased oversight of the credit ratings agencies.
There was a hint in Dodd’s speech of the effort to force Republicans to defend Wall Street banks. He stressed the urgency for new rules to cut off potential crises, and basically challenged Republicans to stand in the way. The labor movement is gearing up for a fight on that front as well, though their aims are a bit broader, seeking the “financial responsibility fee” outlined by the President a couple months ago.
Not all consumer advocates are happy with the Dodd draft, so he’ll have a battle from the left on this bill, in addition to the recalcitrance from the right.




33 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
“Not all consumer advocates are happy with the Dodd draft, so he’ll have a battle from the left on this bill, in addition to the recalcitrance from the right.” ; here we go again. Wonder what the Obama Admin will say about Dodd’s efforts; since Obama insists on Geithner staying, despite all the evidence for his complicity in the financial meltdown, one shouldn’t hold out any hope for real reform.
Interesting that input for the bill didn’t come from anyone like Warren or Schapiro.
Or Volcker for that matter.
Where’s the restoration of Glass-Steagall?
Surely Dodd doesn’t see anything wrong with the NYFed head being chosen by member banks. It worked out so well with Timmy. Why change now?
Looking forward-not back.
geez
Could have swore that the government in power had D’s beside their names. I must be getting senile. More Repub legislation. Oh boy. Can’t wait for the bandwagons to come out on this one.
Well, Wall Street, which relexively hates any and all effective regulation, clearly showed the extent of it’s fear of this bill today by rallying into the close after the bill was unveiled. It’s deja vu all over again, recalling how the health care stocks rallied through the health care debate. “Please, please don’t throw me into that briar patch.”
Thanks goodness Dodd is leaving the public sector, who wants to bet he winds up in the financial services industry?
I look forward to all the too big to fail banks getting grandfathered in…
Dodd like Barney Frank is a corporate whore. There is about as much real reform in this as there is humility in the likes of Lloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon. This is another case of the Democrats writing what is essentially a Republican bill, then having the Republicans hold their nose to the resulting POS. This is why Dodd can’t find a Republican sponsor but does get lots of Republican help writing it.
We won’t see reform until the next collapse, and maybe not even then.
Collapse, what collapse,,,,Members of Congress are getting PAID..
They should be required to walk around like a Nascar Driver with there corporate sponsors on their jackets…
We won’t see reform until the next collapse, and maybe not even then.
When, in your estimation, do things look likely to take another turn south – all things being equal, of course.
Thx.
Here is one small item to consider:
The shadow inventory of vacant housing is way more then what is being reported which will drive housing prices down another 20-30% off there already low values.
Prices have recently stabilized but what most people don’t realize is that was because of the 90 day moritorum on foreclosures..
For example, in January, metro Atlanta had 24,000 foreclosure filings…
At the end of January, Metro Brokers was reporting 69,154 homes actively listed in MLS…
So, lets say that those 24,000 homes hit the market (Total Homes Available (94K+/-), the published unemployment rate is 10.8% ( More Like 18-19% because of the Contract labor and self employed),,,
So, who in the world is going to buy those vacant homes??Prices will drop again..
So what does this have in common? People are getting smart and paying an appraiser $300 to help them appeal there Tax assessed house values,,which is lowering the tax digest, causing local, county and state budgets to explode.Now the elected officials have to make cuts and raise taxes,,everything from the local schools to roads go unfunded ,,,I could go on, but
It is really only starting…
Next time you are driving around, just look out the window and see if you see houses that look vacant but NOT for sale….Its really scarry
I took a quick look at this proposal. It is complex and hard to read without reference to existing law. Early reads are likely to be wrong.
Yes it is, and your analysis does not even speak to the issue of commercial space. I’m seeing plenty of “For Lease” signs on buildings these days.
ShotoJamf, there’s a saying that the markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent betting against them. Given our current corrupt corporatist leadership in both parties, I see us hitting the wall in 2011. It could be earlier (an exogenous shock like an Israeli attack on Iran) or later (2012). The only reason it hasn’t happened already is that the Fed has been pumping money into the system, i.e. it has been blowing bubbles. If it pulls back at all the bubbles will pop. Despite all the hoopla, the banks remain insolvent and short on cash. Everyone is cooking their books. Unemployment is high and will stay so. The foreclosure/underwater mortgage mess has never been addressed, largely to keep banks from having to declare the size of their losses. State budget shortfalls are in a downward spiral. Tax receipts go down. They cut. Tax receipts go down even further, and they cut some more. Debt remains high. Credit remains hard to get. The effects of the Obama stimulus are wearing off. Other one offs like inventory restocking have been here and gone. We have the same cast of crooks in government and Wall Street doing the same old same old. Abroad we see sovereign debt defaults and similar political and financial elites in denial.
I figure the Obama Administration will do what it can to keep things together until the election, but after that, the next Congress looks to be even more hopeless and corporatist than the present one. It is the combination of a bad situation, bad policy, bad leadership, and bad math that make the next collapse a certainty. They can deny and play games for a considerable length of time but the math will always win out.
Simon Johnson had a first take this morning…
Excellent, if grim, analysis. Thanks much.
Try that in your next IRS audit.
My favorite (no kidding) is the sign on a big commercial building just off the interstate near me: “Space Available! Below Market Rents!” Now that’s a sign things are really looking up.
There will be no financial reform.
3) Systemic Risk Council. Dodd termed this as an “early warning system” which would look out for the next crisis and make recommendations for how to proceed. The Treasury Secretary would head up the council.
The jokes write themselves.
Your headline contradicts the story you wrote. The headline says that the new agency will be “under the Fed” the story says it will be housed at the Fed with any independent director and budget. What’s the truth?
I have little faith that the Democrats, fresh off handing the bankers trillions and the insurance corporations a bailout, are going to take on reform of the financial sector in a way that greatly prioritizes the well-being of working people. I wonder what disaster they will produce next.
“Nobel Prize-winner Joseph Stiglitz said the Fed was “corrupt,” Elizabeth Warren said she wanted to fight for the CFPA until there were “blood and teeth” on the floor, and Robert Rubin said “virtually nobody” saw the crash coming.
“Which of these three things is not like the others?…
…”it would be necessary to conclude that Rubin’s living in an alternate reality where unpleasant facts never intrude, even when the world is burning all around him.”
Unfortunately, Rubin proteges Summers and Geithner, and apparently Dodd are his neighbors, and Obama has made an offer on a lovely 36-room cottage that backs up to the golf course.
The latest spin seems to attempt to confuse physically “housing” with administratively “housing” the CFPA at the Fed. Or maybe the MSM is just too lazy to research the difference. Again. Either way, they really, really think that we are as dumb as stumps.
http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010030904/stiglitzs-smackdown-elizabeth-warrens-teeth-and-robert-rubins-virtual-reality
Barney Frank is not a corporate whore and the bill the House passed that Frank crafted was quite good. The problem is the Senate more than Dodd. Nothing decent will pass the Senate without a massive PT effort on the part of the President, and that’s not gonna happen.
Dodd is a disgrace and an ass and has been part of all the problems, yet here is the man who is controlling what is crafted in the reform bill?
It makes Me sick to see that the same people who were in charge while the shit hit the fan aaaaare the same ones intrusted to try and fix it.
We are a sick people in a sick Country, and unwilling to fight to fix the Government we made.
More doom and gloom from the firedoglakers. Y’all need to get laid once in a while.
Bend over, s’il vous plait.
I simply can’t go on. Rich people will still be making money!!! It’s funny how on every issue, firedoglakers just know more than everyone else and if it isn’t what they agree with, there’s no way it can work and help the country. Get over yourselves.
Oh, and get laid.
I guess getting laid is your answer for everything. I do believe that’s a big part of how we got here. Have a great orgasm.
Getting laid would help alleviate the daily gnashing of teeth around here because the U.S. has not magically morphed into a socialist utopia while they were sleeping. Sleep less. Get laid more.
WE all been getting laid to much by Our Government, The Banks, All the big Money interests, Insurance Companies, and Heathcare providers, Big Phama, and our State and Local Governments.
All that screwin with no lovin, and we still want to get laid in answer to everything.
Maybe the Horse is an of course, for what we have been getting.
Fuck, fall asleep, and wake up in the morning to find that fascism has crept a little closer during the night. That’s what we’ve all been doing. The overlords approve.
Dodd’s Bill has “no teeth” based on the language of the bill, it’s the same convoluted BS that got us where we are today. This guy needs a brain transplant!