Tom Perriello has decided to vote for the health care bill, per CNN. I had him as a lean Yes in my whip count. So that makes it 196-208, with still 204-211 with leaners. None of the true undecideds have announced today.
Again, if the Stupak side deal comes to pass, the whip count doesn’t matter as much, because there will be enough votes in hand to pass the bill and the only question will become who can be allowed to take a walk. My suspicion is that Pelosi and her leadership team would rather handle this another way. But with Stephen Lynch looking like a no and the Stupak gang expanding a bit in the final days, she may not have a choice.
UPDATE: If you want to understand what Stupak means by “enrollment corrections”, read this from David Waldman. He seems to think that he can get the enrollment correction inserted into the Senate bill before the President’s signature. It’s very weedy.
And don’t forget about the DeFazio complaint. That could really screw everything up, and it’s hard to see how they can offer a firm commitment to fix the Medicare geographic disparity in the future.
The numbers…
| Tuesday, 3/16/2010 | Voted | Retiring | Stupak | PVI | No | Leaning No | Unknown | Leaning Yes | Yes | ||
| Aye | Nay | ||||||||||
| Definite No (30): | |||||||||||
| 1 | Adler, John | X | R+1 | 1 | |||||||
| 2 | Barrow, John | X | D+2 | 1 | |||||||
| 3 | Boren, Dan | X | R+14 | 1 | |||||||
| 4 | Boucher, Rick | X | R+11 | 1 | |||||||
| 5 | Bright, Bobby | X | R+16 | 1 | |||||||
| 6 | Chandler, Ben | X | R+9 | 1 | |||||||
| 7 | Childers, Travis | X | R+14 | 1 | |||||||
| 8 | Davis, Artur | X | D+18 | 1 | |||||||
| 9 | Davis, Lincoln | X | R+14 | 1 | |||||||
| 10 | Edwards, Chet | X | R+20 | 1 | |||||||
| 11 | Herseth-Sandlin, Stephanie | X | R+9 | 1 | |||||||
| 12 | Holden, Tim | X | R+6 | 1 | |||||||
| 13 | Kissell, Larry | X | R+2 | 1 | |||||||
| 14 | Kratovil, Frank | X | R+13 | 1 | |||||||
| 15 | Marshall, Jim | X | R+10 | 1 | |||||||
| 16 | McIntyre, Mike | X | R+3 | 1 | |||||||
| 17 | McMahon, Michael | X | R+4 | 1 | |||||||
| 18 | Melancon, Charlie | X | R | R+12 | 1 | ||||||
| 19 | Minnick, Walt | X | R+18 | 1 | |||||||
| 20 | Peterson, Collin | X | R+6 | 1 | |||||||
| 21 | Ross, Mike | X | R+7 | 1 | |||||||
| 22 | Shuler, Heath | X | R+6 | 1 | |||||||
| 23 | Skelton, Ike | X | R+14 | 1 | |||||||
| 24 | Taylor, Gene | X | R+20 | 1 | |||||||
| 25 | Arcuri, Mike | X | R+1 | 1 | |||||||
| 26 | Costello, Jerry | X | S | D+3 | 1 | ||||||
| 27 | Donnelly, Joe | X | S | R+4 | 1 | ||||||
| 28 | Driehaus, Steve | X | S | D+1 | 1 | ||||||
| 29 | Lipinski, Dan | X | S | D+11 | 1 | ||||||
| 13 | Lynch, Stephen | X | D+8 | 1 | |||||||
| 30 | Stupak, Bart | X | S | R+3 | 1 | ||||||
| Potential No-Yes Flips (10): | |||||||||||
| 1 | Altmire, Jason | X | R+6 | 1 | |||||||
| 2 | Baird, Brian | X | R | D+0 | 1 | ||||||
| 3 | Boyd, Allen | X | R+6 | 1 | |||||||
| 4 | Kosmas, Suzanne | X | R+4 | 1 | |||||||
| 5 | Matheson, Jim | X | R+15 | 1 | |||||||
| 6 | Murphy, Scott | X | D+2 | 1 | |||||||
| 7 | Nye, Glenn | X | R+6 | 1 | |||||||
| 8 | Tanner, John | X | R | R+6 | 1 | ||||||
| 9 | Teague, Harry | X | R+6 | 1 | |||||||
| Potential Yes-No Flips (23): | |||||||||||
| 1 | Bean, Melissa | X | R+1 | 1 | |||||||
| 2 | Berry, Marion | X | S | R+8 | 1 | ||||||
| 3 | Cao, Joseph | X | S | D+18 | 1 | ||||||
| 4 | Carney, Chris | X | R+8 | 1 | |||||||
| 5 | Cuellar, Henry | X | S | D+0 | 1 | ||||||
| 6 | Dahlkemper, Kathy | X | S | R+3 | 1 | ||||||
| 7 | Ellsworth, Brad | X | S | R+9 | 1 | ||||||
| 8 | Foster, Bill | X | R+1 | 1 | |||||||
| 9 | Hill, Baron | X | R+6 | 1 | |||||||
| 10 | Kanjorski, Paul | X | D+4 | 1 | |||||||
| 11 | Kaptur, Marcy | X | S | D+10 | 1 | ||||||
| 12 | Kirkpatrick, Ann | X | R+6 | 1 | |||||||
| 13 | Michaud, Mike | X | D+5 | 1 | |||||||
| 14 | Mitchell, Harry | X | R+5 | 1 | |||||||
| 15 | Mollohan, Alan | X | R+9 | 1 | |||||||
| 16 | Ortiz, Solomon | X | R+2 | 1 | |||||||
| 17 | Owens, Bill | X | R+1 | 1 | |||||||
| 18 | Pomeroy, Earl | X | R+10 | 1 | |||||||
| 19 | Rahall, Nick | X | R+6 | 1 | |||||||
| 20 | Space, Zack | X | R+7 | 1 | |||||||
| Committed Votes | |||||||||||
| Democratic | 195 | ||||||||||
| Republican | 177 | ||||||||||
| TOTAL | 208 | 3 | 16 | 8 | 196 | ||||||




30 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
If Obama offered to make a signing statement that law would be enforced consistent with the Hyde Amendment, I wonder if that would peel off enough Stupakians.
As for Stupak, it sounded like on MSNBC that he was demanding the Senate agree to his language before he’d switch, and therefore a lost cause.
The problem with relying on double hearsay is like the game of broken telephone the details get lost. Not sure whether CNN missed the details or the listener got it wrong. But here is the detail: Perreillo announced to his hometown paper this afternoon that he would vote yes IF he got a letter signed by at least 50 senators committing to pass the house reconiliation bill. that is a major qualifier since no one right now is promising such a letter that I know of.
here is the story:
BREAKING NEWS: Perriello to vote for health care reform
If senators commit to voting for bill
Friday, March 19, 2010
By MICKEY POWELL – Bulletin Staff Writer
Fifth District U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello said Friday that he will vote in favor of the current health care reform legislation before Congress, but only if at least 50 Senators sign a letter saying they will support the legislation in its current form.
The House is expected to vote on the legislation Sunday, while the Senate is expected to vote on it sometime next week.
Perriello, D-Albemarle County, said he wants to see senators’ commitments because “we have to get … backroom deals out of this bill.”
He said the legislation in its current form is estimated to save a family of four with a total income of $60,000 a year between $1,000 and $2,000 on its annual health care costs. He also indicated that the legislation will enable small businesses to better afford to provide employees with affordable health insurance.
Ninth District U.S. Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Abingdon, was reading the legislation and had not yet formed an opinion on it, according to his press secretary, Courtney Lamie. She said he plans to issue a statement on his position sometime this weekend after he finishes reading the legislation.
For more coverage of this issue, see this page and the Martinsville Bulletin on Sunday.
It’s like watching the Titanic, but we all knew the captain ran into that glacier on purpose. And furthermore we will all be forced to buy a ticket.
Wow-
I guess this how you create “momentum”…any word on when Rep Perriello expects to hear from his “50 Senators”?
What ES said. But thank you, David and FDL for staying on top of this.
And now every labor group, every nominally progressive group that said they’d fight for me, for a PO, for real reform is throwing in with Trumka and backing the President’s POS legislation.
And the DCCC has the unmitigated gall to ask me for money because the Republicans are running bad, evil nasty attack ads against “HCR”.
I’m beginning to feel like _I’m_ the crazy and unreasonable one…
FunnyDiva
Anything to remain relevant and keep his fifteen minutes going for twenty…
Hi Funny… been missing you. Hope all is well (aside from the obvious collective dilemma).
Actually, the House leadership has been talking about this, and Reid is showing up at their conference with the President tomorrow morning, presumably to show them something like this.
we know just how much a senator’s signature at the bottom of a letter is worth: zero
Everyone is getting a signing bonus except for Kucinich…
Ordinarily, that “questioning your own sanity” effect is the result of interaction with someone diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder.
Maybe that’s what is really ailing congress?
I replied to an email from someone in Barbara Boxer’s office today, saying that even if I could afford to donate, I would not.
But, later today, I called and offered to work on Joe Hoeffel’s campaign for PA governor. I don’t think he’s been corrupted.
Thanks, ES
Haven’t been around much…the collective dilemma you mention being just too much for my mental health. And being unemployed is going from “sucks” to “desperate” rather rapidly.
But I have my health, and have found non-politics based internet byways to frequent.
But I do miss you all and still consider you my Best Friends in the Computer.
FunnyD
More like, the whole @#$! country seems to have borderline personality disorder…
or to be like a good friend of mine: so cynical she actively ridicules any discussion of corporate corruption of our gov’t “yeah, so what’s new? what was the point of _that_ article…”
Sometimes I just want to smack her. She’s allowed to not care, but she’s not allowed to tell the rest of us we’re stupid for doing so. Though I don’t wish on her the harsh realities that are probably coming for all because of thes !@#$! mess of a political-media-corporate-government complex that seems to be calling the shots.
Grrrrr!
FunnyDiva
The posters at HP are whupping it up. They see the passage of this “legislation” as the greatest victory since Social Security. And I thought just Republicans were nothing more than dumb lemmings.
I clicked over and read that piece by Waldman. The Irony was rich!
Why is it that the Democrats in the House under the Speakershiphood of “The Most Liberal Member of Congress” are having to kiss the those toes of anti-abortion-rights officials in order to move legislation?
Or, better:
Why is it that the Democrats in the House under her Magificent Liberal Highnesshood are kissing the toes of anti-abortionists in order to move a public policy disaster that does the coronation of the health insurance cartel at cost to their constituents and gain to few?
How did we get here? Anyone?
And the captain gets a golden lifeboat. Right.
That is a really smart move for Periello. Regardless of how he winds up voting, it puts pressure on the Senate not to screw up the deal.
And doing it publicly in the Charlottesville media is smart.
He has cultivated an image in the southern part of his district as a straight talker who might not always agree with all of his constituents but will consider their opinions and be honest about where he stands.
And you may ask yourself
Am I right?…Am I wrong?
And you may tell yourself
MY GOD!…WHAT HAVE I DONE?
They are partisans. ALL partisans are like that, left or right. Policy doesn’t matter, it’s all about the number of “D”s versus the number of ‘R”s. Lemmings are Lemmings, no matter the color of their fur.
My best guess is Rahm’s Big Tent. He likes to include some DINOs in the mix.
Anything but those filthy Liberal, Progressive, Socialist, Hippies. Rahm is like a Log Cabin Republican: A self loathing closet case with Stockholm Syndrome.
The Republicans merely feign opposition to this bill. They’re happy for their corporate friends in big pharma, AHIP and the insurance cartel. They’re just worried that the corporate gravy train just might be siphoned off to favor the Dems. Poetic justice for the Dems would be for the corporate money to ultimately favor the Repubs.
“HP”?
I’ve been away too long, clearly…
FunnyD
Kucinich is a dunce in addition to a traitor.
It would seem that traffic has really dropped at FDL in the last day or so. Everyone must have left for the victory parade. Feels a bit like how they must have felt at the Alamo.
Same as it ever was…Same as it ever was…Same as it ever was…
Same as it ever was…Same as it ever was…Same as it ever was…
Same as it ever was…Same as it ever was…
Everybody loves a winner effect. But, the bitter taste this non-victory is going to leave in many of these cowards mouths isn’t worth going to the parade friend.
I have a friend like that…”It’s always been this way. They’re not going to give us anything” I tell him that’s not true or he wouldn’t have his VA disability and I wouldn’t have my “crust of bread” from SS
But I gotta tell you. I ‘m getting a joint replacement in my hand before the “stimulus” expires in Sept and Medicaid gets cut to the bone (no pun intended) by my state.
Part of the reason I watch so close to what these “people” are doing…so I can figure out when to jump.
I guess alot of things are going to get even worse in this bill as Congress goes into their scrum.
No cost controls on insurance is insane. Borderline? For sure, or just plain sociopathic.
Psst. There is a minor basketball tournament going on.