This is pretty smart, IMO. Blanche Lincoln put out an ad touting her success in “saving” 1,700 jobs at the Cooper Tire and Rubber Company plant in Texarkana, AR. Instead of a response by the Bill Halter campaign with some well-paid VO narrator intoning “Blanche Lincoln is wrong… in fact, the company’s own workers claim otherwise… Blanche Lincoln, wrong for Arkansas, wrong for America,” the Halter campaign highlighted this video of some Steelworkers effectively rebutting Lincoln’s claims.
It greatly concerns me of Sen. Lincoln’s recent ads, where she’s taking credit for helping save the Cooper Tire and Rubber Company plant in Texarkana, Arkansas, and 1,700 jobs, when indeed the members of that plant took $31 million dollars in concessions to keep that plant open. And it’s Sen. Lincoln’s trade record and her votes on NAFTA and CAFTA that actually have cost us thousands of jobs throughout the state as well as hundreds and thousands and millions of jobs across this country.
It’s simply more powerful to hear from the workers themselves, with their personal story of sacrifice, making Lincoln’s claim about “saving” the Cooper plant absurd.
While this rebuttal was not officially connected to the Halter campaign (though they blasted it on their Twitter feed), it’s their use of microtargeting, long used on the Republican campaign side, that could prove innovative and effective in toppling Lincoln.
“The Halter campaign is smart to do this,” said Brent E. McGoldrick, a microtargeting expert who works for Financial Dynamics, a business and financial communications company. “And the Lincoln campaign would be wise to [do] something similar.” McGoldrick, who has developed microtargeting and market segmentation business for political campaigns and corporate and public affairs clients, added, “This is exactly the kind of race where a campaign needs microtargeting.”
In Arkansas, voters don’t register their party affiliation, which makes microtargeting both more difficult and potentially more rewarding. Moreover, campaigns typically look to past election data as a model for what to expect, but the high-profile nature of this race means past voter turnout numbers offer limited guidance.
“That makes turnout hard to predict,” McGoldrick said. “In that context, how does a campaign identify the true liberals and the conservative Democrats? Microtargeting helps answer of all these unknowns.”
It’s good to see Democrats trying something new to reach voters. Essentially this is an echo of the “snowmobile voters” kind of targeting campaigns used by Karl Rove in the Bush years.
You can read some of Halter’s issue positions here.



14 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Hilary tried micortargeting it works if you have a message that resonates with voters. Blanche saving jobs resonates with voters too bad she was lying!
Double points for catching Blanche lying and being PC enough to point that out.
It seems to be politically Incorrect in Washington to call Republicans and Blue Dogs liars when they lie.
I think this is an example of how microtargeting can work. First find a message that a small or large group of voters like, everyone like jobs this election so I’m not sure if you can call that microtargeting, Macrotargeting maybe?
Second Don’t lie why because as Blanche has just found out its double points against you if you lie.
Third if the other person lies go after them betrayal is worse than neglect.
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen David Dayen and the Firepup freedom Fighters:
Really good post, Citizen Dayen, but what is more important than the technique is the content of the message. I have been troubled by the Clintons pushin’ back against the free clinics during the healthcare debate and I wondered why they would get out in front of the bus for Blanched Lincoln and I began ta think that the Clinton corporatist Democratic Party in Arkansas survives and, indeed thrives, on the canard that Arkansas workin’ forks are all right-wing racists who will only vote against their own interest not for a common purpose. These “microtargeted” ads identify working voters who speak to larger issues as causes of their suffering (NAFTA and CAFTA). This is just a step toward cuttin the anti-union choke chain and steppin across the racisim moat that is protectin’ the capitalist castle down there.
The forces of corporate slavery are very strong and run very deep everywhere thanks to the transfer of a trillion dollars ouit of the public treasury into the hands of the very forces that would institutionalize a pre-1860 economy. Gettin rid of Blanched Lincoln goez a long way toward blowin up the Clinton machine in Arkansas, that’s a good thing no matter who does it.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, THIS FIGHT WON’T END WITH AN ELECTION OR TWO!!
We need Progressives to point out when the GOP and Blue Dogs are lying and call them that to their face. Otherwise we let the Karl Rove’s John McCain has a Black Bastard style of who can tell the most Outrageous lies and be believed win.
Very smart of the Halter campaign. In the South, more than any other place, people like to identify with real people – ordinary people. They aren’t much impressed by the “suits” and just numbers.
We are going to get overwhelmed with “ordinary people” campaigns from the unfettered corporate spending.
Some people have a hard time being “ordinary” – which is one of the reasons I detest Blanche so much. Her arrogance comes shining through.
Jane has a fresh cross-post available: Tribal Loyalty and the Corporatist Agenda: It’s Not Just For Republicans Any More
This post illustrates one effective way to deal with this; point out the lies when they are lies.
It has been done in an effective manner in this case.
If the electorate begins to question the truth of what the corporate spending is saying, then that is an opportunity that allows the influence of money to be diminished.
Should say, “You can read here the things Halter thinks are the positions that are most likely to get him elected in the current political climate, and will later completely ignore that he ever held them; especially so when it really counts.”
Congratulations. You may have out-cynicaled even ME!
If any of you folk that made the video reads this, I would love to be able to buy a tire that clearly shows both the American flag and the names of each and every one of you that helped make the tire!
Meh. I don’t really think it’s all that cynical to understand that within American-style representative democracy the people it takes to win elections are highly-competitive people who typically display healthy doses of narcissism.
Deluding oneself into thinking those types of people are likely to also embody the altruism necessary to service the public trust seems outlandish to me.
That’s not to say that there aren’t benevolent altruistic people out there (a real cynic would deny their existence entirely), it’s just that our system precludes them from elected-office.
I have apparently been watching too many news reports on health care. I read the headline as “Hitler Campaign…”