After a week of wrangling, the health insurance trade group AHIP announced that insurers would agree to covering all children regardless of pre-existing conditions, though they added in the same breath that they could have to increase rates to accommodate such a change. This exposes the poor drafting of this late-to-the-game regulation, because without some form of price rating health insurers can raise rates with virtual impunity, and may now feel they have an excuse to do so.
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius sent a letter to AHIP yesterday, attacking them for trying to alter the regulations passed by Congress within days of the bill becoming law. “Now is not the time to search for non-existent loopholes that preserve a broken system,” she wrote in the letter.
After the few days of bad publicity, AHIP appeared to retract their interpretation of the statute.
AHIP said de-linking the requirement to insure sick children from the law’s mandate that everyone buy health-insurance coverage, which goes into effect in 2014, could drive up prices in the meantime. But the group said it would do whatever HHS tells it to do.
In a letter responding to Ms. Sebelius Monday, Ms. Ignagi said her members recognized the “significant hardship that a family faces when they are unable to obtain coverage for a child with a pre-existing condition,” and pledged to fully comply with the regulations HHS is developing. The group is analyzing how much it would cost to take all comers under 19 years old.
You can pretty much figure out AHIP’s game here. With no restrictions on cost until 2014, the industry can raise their premium prices almost at will. Even the bad publicity suffered from that 39% rate hike of Anthem Blue Cross plan has not stopped that scheduled increase from taking effect in May. And when outrage is expressed by families facing double-digit rate hikes, AHIP will clear their throats and blame the pre-existing condition exclusion for children, forcing the poor insurance companies to take on a sicker risk pool and raise prices to survive.
Except covering kids is fairly cheap to begin with. And the universe of kids with a pre-existing condition who aren’t covered through SCHIP, Medicaid, or an employer plan is extremely small. So by making a big issue of this, AHIP potentially sets up large rate hikes in the 2010-2014 period that aren’t at all justified.
Though sicker children incur more health expenditures, additional costs to the industry were likely to be minimal as the number of children who would be affected by the broadest interpretation of the law could be relatively small. The Children’s Health Insurance Program is credited with extending coverage to about eight million low-income children who are not poor enough for Medicaid.
Roughly eight million children remain uninsured, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, but just 1% to 2%—or 80,000 to 160,000—have a health condition such as cystic fibrosis or cancer that would disqualify them from private insurance coverage, said Sara Rosenbaum, chairwoman of the health-policy department at George Washington University and a children’s health-care expert. Many of those children’s families were unaware they could qualify for Medicaid or CHIP assistance or enroll in an employer plan, she said.
They’re fighting this so hard to let everyone know that the rate hikes aren’t their fault. This has been their M.O. since February, since the Anthem Blue Cross mess. It hasn’t “worked” in the PR arena, but they’ve quietly gotten their rate hikes, and that’s really all that matters to them, I gather.




38 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
So sayeth Emperor Nero, “Let the games begin!”
The Dems deserve any blow-back from this farce. Makes me so angry.
It’s a beautiful day in the cherry picking price gouging neighborhood.
they added in the same breath that they could have to increase rates to accommodate such a change
I’m shocked, shocked!
How could we have ever seen this coming?
My thoughts exactly while reading this post.
Thanks David.
“now is not the time to find loopholes in a 1 week old law”… right, next week is everyone knows that.
Just please wait 1 week, and then start f’ing everyone over.
As for them raising rates to cover this…. well d’uh… what ya think all the fuss over a PO was?
One has to wonder how the good people at AHIP, and AHIP’s members, go to work every day.
Do any of them go to church? And listen? And comprehend sermons from the pulpit?
Well, what can we expect of profit-driven health insurance? It’s the nature of the beast (or parasite) to strive for the highest profit. It’s how they’re judged on Wall Street. And sucking people dry fiancially is how it’s done. Obama simply aided and abetted this, making it law.
Lambert has some thoughts on a post by Ian Welsh on how we’re in an almost pure rent-seeking economic system, where the government is used by corporations to establish the best rent streams. The fight is over who will control government to get the best terms for profit making.
Now, Obama decided this model had to be preserved, protected. That was his choice (or the choice he was presented with?). So, he threw away the chance for real patient-centered health CARE reform.
No Medicare (Improved!) for All was permitted to even be discussed. He got what he wanted. Or was told to get. The strongest parasites among the Big Health Industry Players (BHIP) got what they wanted.
AHIP is one of the big winners.
From the context it would seem you meant to say that the bad publicity hasn’t stopped the scheduled increase. Or are they actually backing down?
Pelosi: ‘We have to pass the bill so you can see what’s in it’
Get what you ask for.
We used to have a price rating board in MA, which wasn’t bad, but still couldn’t get the job done. This is an argument for single payer not rate setting boards, IMO.
Anything said between groups like this via letter is intended purely for public consumption. Full stop. The idea that AHIP leadership and HHS leadership have to communicate via carrier-pigeon is outlandish.
That said. How is it even possible for the HHS to regulate to the spirit-of-the-law. A court is only going to be interested in the letter of it, no?
No.
I was given the impression by a friend who’s a securities lawyer, another who sits on a commercial building regs panel, and bmaz that the Executive cannot regulate beyond the reach of the law. If the language of the bill is in fact ambiguous on this point, then doing as Sebelius says would be overreaching the statutory mandate, no?
Obama’s “brilliance” on health care reform is quickly being exposed as a sham. Single payer or a robust public option.
Short term, they’re going by their corporatist playbook.
Long term, not a smart strategy.
Your friend and bmaz are correct; however, you have taken them too “literally.”
There is quite bit of flex in the art of statutory construction.
Obama = Sham Wow!
As far as I know, that is its purpose, and the executives have an obligation to the owners to do these kinds of things.
That’s exactly why some things, above all, health care, should not be operated for profit.
All of the abuses stem from that.
That’s right. Obama is nothing more than a brand that was marketed and sold to the people desperate for real change.
Absolutely, which is why it was criminal to now entrench the for profit insurance industry in our health care forever. Because all those supporting this POS and saying fix it later because we have to accept this now as all we can get forget to tell you the rest. The rest is that we’re likely never going to have D majorities like we had this time, and now the insurance industry will have grown stronger and richer to buy/bribe/strong arm to prevent future “fixes”.
That’s ok though. All those supporters own this. ALL of it. They should wear it proudly. And be the first in line to accept the complaints of Joe Q Public in 5-7 years when they’ve figured this out.
Excellent piece of analysis. It shows Sebelius is in bed with AHIP, setting up the conditions whereby insurance rates can go up using the justification provided by her open letter to the third party and fourth wall in this bit of drama. Brilliant move, to start things off in this bonanza crafted by Obama and friends in high places.
And didn’t we all see this coming? Where in all that verbiage was any enforceable price regulation? Oh, I’m shocked, shocked!
If insurance rates go up by 50% or more over the next four years, then that will raise the cost level so much that 1) more will be sent on subsidies than planned and also fewer people will choose to be covered rather than simply paying the mandate-associated penalty, thus lowering the number of people covered. They’ll never cover their 32 million additional people and will be lucky to cover an additional 20 million.
Did Sebelius and Obama really think they struck a deal with “honorable people” when they signed their pact with AHIP, the drug manufacturers and insurance companies?
They gave these folks everything they wanted, in exchange for a promise not to advertise against the bill [as if!!] and to donate to Democrats and not Republicans.
So I guess now they’re shocked, SHOCKED that their New Friends aren’t “offering” anything beyond the strict parameters of what their deal covered, and aren’t acting “in good faith” about this?
The only silver lining I can see is that this exposes both the insurance companies [for the greedy, lying bastards they are] and the Obama administration [for the greedy (for power and "success"), lying bastards they are].
If there were anyone out there in the MSM or blogosphere [other than FDL] to report this, maybe progress could ensue.
Hey Obama, Baucus, Emanuel, et. al, are you paying attention. Who didn’t know this would happen. No sooner did the ink dry on this bill did the insurance industry try to maneuver around the law. But here’s the real problem, as they intimated, premuims will rise proportionately with the costs they assume to cover people with pre-existing conditions. These vampires will not give up their fix for profits, and this bill does nothing to stop them. At what point will Obama and the Democratic leadership finally get it, that these people will lie to their faces. These people have every intention of continuing to screw the American people.
The insurance industry cannot help themselves. Their never satisfied greed piling higher and higher will rapidly make the case even stronger for a public option or medicare for all that despite all their lobbying, it will be a matter of potlical survival for our legislators to be forced to vote for it. They continue to make the case for a public component on a daily basis as they work against the consumer with their one goal being greater and greater profits.
As Marx said, and I paraphrase, the seeds of destruction of capitalism are within itself. Step by step, by their own actions (i.e., greed, endless quest for profit), they will create the condition for a single-payer, socially subsidized health care system. How fast that happens depends on how militantly and careless they pursue their objective of making money on the backs of sick people, and how well the progressives can persuade the citizens and how much pressure they can exert on the political leaders to do the inevitable.
“If insurance rates go up by 50% or more over the next four years,”
You will have single payer before that happens.
What restrictions are going to stop this in 2014?
There’s a modified community rating piece in the exchanges, that prevent insurers from charging individuals more for reasons of medical history or gender (only age and smoking can be considered). In addition, there are premium levels as a percentage of income, above which the individual would get a hardship exemption from the mandate. They can also qualify for subsidies, so that premium increases would fall on government to pick up, since the subsidies allow for only a portion of income to come directly out of the pocket of the individual. So 2014 will be a different picture, although some have claimed that it won’t be necessarily affordable either.
That’s because everything you just listed there does nothing to contain/control premium prices. If they can’t raise it specifically on those for medical history/gender reasons, then they can raise everyone’s to make up for it. And the rest is merely who pays for it, not controlling the cost at all.
I’m still waiting to hear about cost controls in this bill too. As far as I can tell, the only cost control I could figure out was the exchanges, in that they’re supposed to control prices through the magic of competition. This in an industry that has an anit-trust exemption. Color me skeptical.
Yeah, me too.
There are no built in cost controls only regulations, and the insurance industry has 4 years to work on watering them down.
If they want to charge fairly, how about charging per child, or per family member greater than 4 or 5? I had one child, and it always pissed me off that my premiums were the same as others’ with 2 or 5 or 8 children.
The federal plan doesn’t even break it out that far – there is ‘employee only’ and ‘employee plus family’, even where that family is only a spouse.
Another piece of crap dressing found on this turkey. Drafted badly, hurried through, no wonder this turned out as it did.
As I said before the bill passed; The Dem’s broke it, they bought it.
It will not matter HOW they spin it, the public are going to blame the Democrats for anything that goes wrong in health care. I don’t care if you had Ploufe, Begala, FDR and Joe Hill running your spin operation; the Democrats will get the blame for any thing that goes wrong that is even remotely due to the HCR bill.
(or not even due to it)
When you don’t actually set out to reform health care in the first place, you are going to get some bad things happen.
All around, a lose/lose/lose situation–especially now that the afterglow has worn off.
Look, the for-profit insurance industry is only following the law. They are required to maximize near-term profits for their shareholders, otherwise they can be sued by same. If there is any “criminality” it might be in the extreme levels of compensation for the executives, but those levels of compensation can be challenged by the shareholders, who must convene and challenge them if they can. Of course, the laws are certainly not written to facilitate actions by the vast majority of shareholders, but ultimately they are the owners of the companies, and must control them in the absence of effective government regulation.
The reality is that money and power float, and great efforts need to be continually made to force them back down to do the best for the most people. It is ultimately our fault that we have both trusted our elected officials and corporate heads to do what is right by us instead of being constantly vigilant. Politics and management attract people who like to amass wealth and power, and who like to control us. It is up to us to get off our butts and give these crooked politicians and greedy executives the smack-downs they deserve. Get up now, call your legislators and tell them to stop the greed, call advertisers who advertise on shows you disagree with and let them know you will boycott them until they pull the ads. Boycott companies who are bad actors, and call them to let them know you are doing it. Move your money from rapacious banks to local banks and credit unions. Do it now!
Time for SINGLE PAYER
Corporate arrogance has no limits it seems. Looks like the Dems won’t get a break from the health care fight.