Overnight, the explosion at the Massey Energy mine in Raleigh County, West Virginia has gone from six dead to 25 dead, making it the worst mining disaster in over two decades. With only 200 employees, one out of every eight working at the site died in the explosion. And more are feared dead.
A huge underground explosion blamed on methane gas killed 25 coal miners in the worst U.S. mining disaster in more than two decades. Four others were missing Tuesday, their chances of survival dimming as rescuers were held back by poison gases that accumulated near the blast site, about 1.5 miles into the complex.
Rescuers prepared to drill three shafts going down over 1,000 feet each to release methane and carbon monoxide that chased them from the mine after the blast Monday afternoon, Gov. Joe Manchin said.
The explosion rocked Massey Energy Co.’s sprawling Upper Big Branch mine, about 30 miles south of Charleston, which has a history of violations for not properly ventilating the highly combustible methane, safety officials said.
Yes, a history of violations. Federal regulators at the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) fined Massey Energy over $382,000 in the last year alone for violations at Upper Big Branch, including the very ventilation plan that caused this terrible accident. A look at the MSHA violation site for Upper Big Branch shows that the most recent violation was cited yesterday – yes, yesterday – and have been assessed on an almost weekly basis. Clearly the company saw the fines as part of the cost of doing business. There have been three fatalities at the mine in the past twelve years, but never anything like this.
Massey Energy’s CEO Don Blankenship has a clear record of valuing profit over safety:
This tragedy is the latest deadly disaster to involve coal baron Don Blankenship’s Massey Energy. In 2006, two miners died in a fire at Aracoma Mine after Blankenship personally waived company policy and told mine managers to ignore rules and “run coal.”
Blankenship’s name also may be familiar to judicial watchers; he was involved in a case of buying a judge on the state Supreme Court to overturn a $50 million dollar ruling against his mining operation. He was seen vacationing with a Supreme Court judge in Monte Carlo before the ruling came out.
There were a record-low 34 deaths last year from mining, but this incident is a reminder of the hazards of that work environment, and the need for penalties that change behavior on the part of the coal barons. The MSHA is a division of OSHA, where as a blogger fellow for Brave New Films I’ve been writing about the Protecting America’s Workers Act for a campaign called 16 Deaths Per Day. Yesterday’s tragic incident shows the need for real initiatives protecting worker’s health.
UPDATE: Here’s a sample video about worker safety available at the 16 Deaths Per Day website.





75 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Massey is busy spreading more money around the courts and politicians.
Prison time.
It’s not like the miners were idiots or didn’t know the conditions had been cited as unsafe. There’s a history they must’ve been fully aware of. So, why did they choose to ignore it all? Were they slaves to wages?
On the other hand, the moguls could use this event to leverage surface mining. Perhaps the citations were in aid of that cause. What actually happened may not be what it seems.
I do hope that the 4 missing miners can be found alive.
Wasn’t he the guy who killed a bunch of miners in Utah doing retreat mining, (that the Bush DOE approved)? Whether he was or not, I can’t help but notice that nobody got prosecuted over that. Labor has become a commodity in this country. An expendable one.
Rest in peace all the hardworking folks who perished in this tragedy. Heartfelt condolences to the family members and the stricken community that’s left behind. My thoughts go out to the people who have to reenter that mine at some point in the future. Truly grim.
I’m thinking of Christy this morning and remembering the moving tribute that she wrote after the Sago mine disaster. It was my first visit to the lake. I miss her and hope she’s well. This will cut deep.
That was a different company.
Blaming the victims now? How abominable. Thank you Mr. Blankenship.
Different company then. Different administration. Same disregard for the employees.
You’ve missed my point, completely.
These coal barons won’t be happy until they are less regulated than their Chinese counterparts.
unfortunately, many people work at jobs that are unsafe and potentially fatal or debilitating. many people also join the military for the same reason: devastating poverty.
massey’s mining operations need to be shut down, then collect the money he owes in fines, then indict him and put him in jail.
this underscores our need for safe alternative energy sources instead of ones that kill and injure the workers and the environment.
Maybe. It’s certainly possible but you seemed to be blaming the workers for ignoring Massey’s safety record and continuing to work there in spite of their history. What part did I miss?
Agreed.
Time to rethink nuclear.
How many people die every year from coal mining ontop of the amount of damage done from all the pollution?
How many die from nuclear power?
I agree with you Margaret but then maybe alank does not understand. When one is from another planet one may not be aware of such quaint customs as eating to survive.
Speaking of big energy, Despite record profits last year, Exxon paid no income taxes at all. In fact, they scored a 1.1 BILLION dollar tax “benefit”. I wonder how much of that they spent denying climate change. meet the new boss. Same as the old boss….
People from privilege will never get that sometimes other people have to do EXTREMELY dangerous and unpleasant things to support their food habit.
Plus, how many die from coal pollution? Coal is deadly.
You don’t give the miners any credit of possessing intelligence. My point was they do have intelligence and would know the conditions of the mines more than anyone else. My view is that they didn’t see a problem. Underground mining operations are a thing of the past as far as the Blankenships are concerned. The fewer the better. They want to surface mine everything.
people die and get cancers all around where uranium is mined. uranium is needed for nuclear power.
but the most important issues of nuclear are
1. the radioactivity of the waste and no safe way to contain it
2. the safety of the power plants themselves and the potential for accidents
That’s exactly what I got out of the comment at #3. Maybe alank could clarify?
EDIT: Sorry, I see it at #20. And exactly how are miners supposed to “see” the methane gas? And yes, they may be “slaves” to their wages. Who among us isn’t?
I don’t have a problem with nuclear power. The problem I have lies in the fact that these same kind of people will be the ones in charge. Cutting corners, ignoring regulations and safety and bribing officials to look the other way when they get caught. Seriously. If it can be done safely, then I’m for it but they have demonstrated over and over their one concern is money and they are more than willing to gamble other peoples’ lives in pursuit of increasing profit.
How do you figure that??? I give them plenty of marks for intelligence. I give YOU zero marks for ever having to choose between eating and being safe but unemployed.
I’m going with: Miners are intelligent. They know the problems. And they go to work in the mines for a way to feed themselves and their families and hope the problems won’t happen while they’re down in the mine.
Coal pollution kills 30,000 people per year:
http://www.ecomall.com/greenshopping/cleanair.htm
thanks, i’m not in favor of coal mining, i just think nuclear is potentially even more dangerous.
i’m in favor of wind and solar as energy sources over either coal or nuclear.
I read a novel that I think was based on this case. I thought it might have been a Michael Crichton book, but cannot find it online, so I may be mistaken.
That’s a really cheap shot.
Lord have mercy!
How do you figure that’s a “cheap shot”? It’s the way it is. People don’t climb 80 foot ladders with heavy baskets to pick dates because it’s fun, people don’t work in trenches in the mud because it’s their calling, people don’t prostitute themselves because it is fulfilling a life’s ambition, people don’t work in coal mines because they went to college to study it. People do these things because it’s what they know and they must do them to feed themselves and their families and have no other real options. Too often pointing out safety concerns or refusing to work under those conditions means not only being unemployed but being unemployable. Defending whistleblowing is expensive and the companies always have more resources and the ability to win by attrition. Anybody who doesn’t know these things has never been poor. Period. The wise speak only of that which they know and you made yourself sound like a fool. Not me.
Sorry to burst your Magic Fairy dust “Nuke” bubble but that industry has a comparable record of corruption and malfeasance. Weld inspection data falsification, training and maintenance issues, and yes, related deaths. Even Rickover’s vaunted Nuclear Navy has been a mess in the last decade.
These problems are related to the business culture, not the fuel.
At Chernobyl, probably 250, 000. More if you count in extra induced cancer deaths. Nuclear accidents aren’t that rare and when they’re catastrophic, they kill even more than the twenty five miners who died in WVa yesterday. The long term damage is worse than that from coal. And the risks from the necessary long term storage – there is no meaningful “safe disposal” – of longer term high level radiological waste – spent reactor fuel, mostly – are insane. Some of that stuff has a half life of 250,000 years.
This is no paean to coal: coal blows as a fuel and it kills miners and it kills people who have to breathe its breakdown byproducts. But “rethinking nuclear” is bullshit. The safety problems are immediate and significant and the long term disposal problems are impossible. I usually hear it from environmental professionals who need work and have never been able to make inroads with the coal industry and want to work for nuke utilities like Exelon. It may be the only major idea for power generation that’s actually worse than coal, when you cost in all the real risks and the secondary expenses.
yes. I’m sure lots of folks here are thinking of Christy. she always did such a great job conveying to us all how these tragedies affect all West Virginians and cuts deeply indeed.
p.s. to all: isn’t The National Prayer Breakfast sponsored by The Family ?
Uranium is in fact not needed. Uranium was needed a logn time ago.
But it’s the future, and we have things like Thorium we can use in reactors now.
Thorium reactors have no deadly waste.
Sure safety is an issue, but so it is at coal power plants also
Good morning. Yes it is The Family that sponsers the National Prayer Breakfast.
We had a small experimental reactor in the little rural village where I grew up (pop. 2000). It had been built by DOE/DoD in 1948 and was operated by the Rural Electric Association (which then became the RCPA, then UPA and then finally morphed into Great River Energy), a small Electric Co-Op.
They secondary cooling system dumped straight into the Mississippi River.
There had been talk for years that it was leaking radioactivity but DOE and the Utility consistently denied it going so far as to say that the reactor wasn’t capable of producing the types of elements that it was accused of leaking.
Us locals, well, we just made sure we stayed up stream.
Then in 1973, a student from the University of Minnesota, hearing about the suspicions drove to the discharge tube on the river and took samples. Analyzed the samples and then published his report.
The Elk River Reactor suffered a primary heat exchanger to secondary heat exchanger cooling leak resulting in significant radioactive elements being discharged directly into the Mississippi. Check out the location, yep 30 miles upstream from Minneapolis and St Paul who (along with many other smaller communities) rely solely on the Mississippi River for their municipal drinking water. They bad.
Within a very short period, months. The entire reactor (which was several hundred feet in the ground) was removed along with huge amounts of soil. Train car after train car after train car. Train after Train after Train.
Turns out, radioactivity has an affect on metal. It pulls electrons out of the metal causing the metal (such as used in cooling system piping) to become brittle.
Who would have known
(sorry for the length. Couldn’t figure out how to tell the story with fewer words)
You want me to take into account a Russian accident from the 80′s?
Mmk let’s count how many death have taken place in russia over the centuries due to coal mining.
The rest of your arguments are meaningless when compared to modern nuclear technology. Again, we don’t use Uranium anymore, this is the future. We have running water and Thorium and other great things.
Wiki.
I’m sorry but a reactor built in the 40′s is your example?
I’m not comapring coal mining technology that was used in the 40′s how is this even close to a fair comparison.
It’s not, you know it’s not. You’re just terrified of the nuclear boogey man.
I must say it’s a disturbing trend Is ee on this site. No one even dare consider nuclear, because some nasty stuff happened a long time ago with it and the waste which is less of a problem now a days.
I’m not saying it’s a perfect solution. For that we need Fusion. But Coal is destroying our enviornment and lives. Whereas nuclear has been runnign safely in France for…well a long time now.
I shouldn’t say Thorium has no deadly waste. But comparatively it has very very little
This from Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV):
WHITESVILLE, WV — U.S. Rep. Nick J. Rahall (D-WV) released the following statement this morning on location at Massey Energy’s Performance Coal Company’s Upper Big Branch mine:
“West Virginia is in mourning today. Twenty-five of its hard-working, courageous miners have been lost and we are bound together with their families, friends, neighbors, and coworkers in grief, while we continue to hope and pray for survivors.
I want to know why this tragedy happened; there will be a thorough investigation. We will seek answers about the cause of this disaster. We will look for inadequacies in the law and enforcement practices, and I will work to fix any we find. We will scrutinize the health and safety violations at this mine to see whether the law was circumvented and miners precious lives were willfully put at risk, and there will be accountability.”
Rahall, if I remember correctly, was the author of the MINER Act a couple of years ago. That legislation was said to have been a milestone in mine safety.
Nuclear power has taken on a new legitimacy now that “He who walks on water” has endorsed the idea by giving B$8 to Westinghouse. He is too young to remember Chernobyl being only 27 at the time and full of himself at Harvard. The fact is that there is still nowhere to dump the filthy fuel, the present nukes are falling apart, have frequent “accidents” that discharge dangerous radiation and is the most expensive energy generation we have.
Excuse me? My Family Lives there you heartless p$*#(%K.
It was shut down in 1973.
Guess what, the same condition applies to ALL reactors in the US. ALL reactors have had to be refitted or shut down due to the same cause. And the refitting has to occur on a periodic basis, based on a best guess schedule.
We now have a ‘newer’ reactor that suffers from the same ‘problem’ 10 miles upstream of us.
I have a minor in Physics that goes along with my EE. If you wish to debate, game on.
Is that the ‘C’ street dysfunctional family?
Game on then, you’ve already lost.
Have been Retrofitted. We found a problem, we fixed it.
you think there’s never been any problem with coal plants? Did I really need to go dig up the articles from this very site about coal sludge and yellow water and all that fun stuff associated with coal.
Is nuclear dangerous? Sure if it’s not used properly.
Is coal dangerous? Yes..always, no matter how good you are at extracting it or burning it. There is no way to make it safe, it will ALWAYS be damaging.
You can’t say that about nuclear, therefor nuclear > coal.
FYI – This morning’s event was NOT the National Prayer Breakfast sponsored by The Family – that event was held 2/4/10. still googling to find out which specific event POTUS was attending this morning
Like I said up front. My family lives there, sandwiched between two reactors on the river.
And the problem has NOT been fixed. The reactors are required to go thru a periodic refitting on a schedule that is purely a guess.
The designers of modern day reactors did not foresee the problem, were not even able to diagnose until they had pieces of the failed cooling system.
There is no ‘Fix’ for the problem. Get yourself some education.
[edited by mod]
My family and those that live on the river are not to be used as Guinea Pigs by you or anyone else.
So now you’re attempting to say that open pit coal mining (as is done in Wyoming) is inherently dangerous?
Please Pray for the Souls of the deceased, family members, for the safety of the missing miners and their rescuers. I had relatives who had to go down in the mines everyday to work and most would not go if it weren’t for the fact they had to feed their families. We have the technology and expertise to prevent these types of accidents. Everyone should hammer (E-Mail, letters, phone calls), the Regulatory Agency, Corporations, Industry Leaders and UMWA, to demand Real Reform for the Safety and Health of these employees. Just remember you could not turn on your computer, electric lights, etc., if not for these fine employees and for the valuable service they provide to our nation and its people. These people should not have to pay in Blood for keeping the lights burning.
Yes I feel very bad for your family.
I also feel bad for the families fo those that die in :
coal mining accidents
Coal waste cancers
Eating contaminated foods from coal waste
I also feel bad for the families fo whole towns that have had to evacuate because coal mining has contaminated their water supplies.
This isn’t a contest of who’s family got shafted the most dude. And this constant begging for me to “be nice” shows a lack of argument on your part. If you want to seriously discuss nuclear power you can’t go to the “poor me” card as it has no berring here.
Is it sad? Yes, and it sucks I’m sorry. But that doesn’t change the realities.
I’m sorry your issue is that they are forced to go thru regular inspections? Or that there’s no real logic you can see about the schedule? Sure make them monthly checks, I’m OK with that.
Again, they thought of everything with coal? You know for a fact they didn’t. We’re humans, not gods.
And the coal families aren’t guinea pigs, they’re being put in danger by things that we know will kill them, not things that might kill them.
Yep.
Even if it doesn’t directly kill people, and I’m not sure you can make that statement.
But even if it doesn’t directly kill it will eventually. Coal waste and sludge and all the other by products will kill just as much as nuclear waste will.
And then there’s the actual burning it, but hey why take greenhouse gasses into account.
Coal is bad and nasty- yes
Nuclear power is bad and dangerous – yes
Both forms of energy production are bad as is oil.
Hydro power – clean and renewable and safe
Solar power – ditto
Wind – ditto
So brainiacs get off your he said she said bull and get on with finding ways to make clean renewable energy the norm.
Hydro is in fact not safe. Damming rivers causes all sorts of eccological impacts.
Why do you think there’s a whoel Dam busters movement among the greens?
Solar is clean and safe yes, but it not sufficient for our energy needs yet.
Same goes for Wind.
The only real solution is Fusion. But we’re not there yet. Nuclear has the added benefit of once we do have working fusion reactors the same infrastructure can be used.
Never used the poor me. Initially you disregarded my argument, said it was ‘along time ago’. Great Argument.
And when did I become the apologist for West Virginia Coal? Never did, but nice try. Oops you missed.
Nuclear Sucks (and this from a guy, as a kid that loved to go into the Reactor, that loves theoretical nuclear physics). There so many ways to use wind and solar. Coal pollutes and Nuclear, given the opportunity will kill.
What do you say to the million or so in the Minneapolis/St Paul area that consumed isotopes with every glass of water for years?
Oh sorry, We didn’t know. We’re not God, but simply human. Exactly
The MSHA was a scandal under Bush. Part of that scandal was that fines even when they were assessed were seldom collected. I’m wondering if that has changed under the Obama Administration. That’s a question I would like someone to ask the MSHA.
I know hydro is not safe, why, there have been thousands of people drowned this century alone…….
Think Bay of Fundy
That’s exactly what I say.
I agree there are a ton of ways to use wind and solar. But there is not a way to get all our power from wind and solar yet.
We’re going to need somethign else. You can’t just ignore that and you are.
Or to those of us that live within the sound of the disaster sirens from the Seabrook Nuclear Disaster
http://chamisa.freeshell.org/dam.htm
Not all damage is direct. Damming changes the eccology of places in ways we can’t even fully understand yet.
I am told by recollection about Rahall and the MINER Act was faulty.
Rahall championed the legislation in the House, but the original legislation was authored in the Senate. Rahall said the MINER Act could have been, and should have been, stronger, but that it was a worthwhile compromise under the circumstances.
I say the same thing.
And this is someone who lives near the Brookhaven reactor.
Yes and at one time, the same Electric Co-Op operated Reactors in Washington State also …
Build Baby Build
Bastards.
This is part of what is in Don Blankenship’s wiki:
And this is the SCOTUS decision in Caperton v. Massey which found that the W. Virginia Supreme Court justice should have recused himself.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/08pdf/08-22.pdf
I don’t know how the case was finally settled but it was reversed and remanded by SCOTUS. This is BTW the case where in a fit of pique Justice Roberts in a dissent came up with a list of 40 reasons why this type of corruption, refusal to recuse, should be tolerated.
I think it’s time (well past time actually) for criminal prosecutions of Massey and Blankenship.
Americans will never understand what really needs to be done. We need to quit living in homes that are so large. We need to insulate better. We need to create solar where we can. Wind and solar have problems but it is nothing compared to coal and nuclear. We need to modify our consumer driven culture and understand the drain that we have become on the resources of the planet. Greed is driving us into the ground, not need.
A theme of the original post is the lack of adherence to regulations and business decisions taking precedence over lives. It’s nice that you have read all the glossy brochures on nuclear power and yes it will have to be a part of any short term solution to our energy needs. But before you decide to become head cheerleader I suggest you attempt to qualify under (NRC 10CFR Part 55), gain a position with Bechtel, Babcock & Wilcox, or GE and gain some accurate knowledge of real life operations and the business decision making process.
The folks in the nuclear industry are no better or worse than the folks at Massey. The results of a similar failure are much more catastrophic though.
Oh, and Fusion? Really? In our children’s lifetime? Your name isn’t Stanley Pons by any chance is it?
The miners are intelligent and they are making their living in a dangerous profession but are the corporate owners and upper management intelligent?? I don’t think placing human beings in danger signals intelligence. An intelligent owner is one who goes beyond the minimal government regulations to safeguard humans from mine dangers like methane fires and also provides each miner with the common technology that track their movements while working underground.
Rumsfeld started a war and sent soldiers into ground fighting without proper armor. It was a criminal action fragrantly disregarding the value of human life saying “you fight with what you got.” I see no difference between that and mine millionaires like Blankenship.
Could Massey Energy Co. perhaps be charged with murder?
Croak!
I wonder why they weren’t collecting the methane in this coal mines. Coal seam gas is a salable energy resource.
No but I prefer Robert Bussard anyway
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1996321846673788606
And how long did you work there sir?
Did at any point I say nuclear power was completely safe? What do you think I’m Arnold Vinnick or some other characeture for you to lampoon?
Of course nuclear power has issues with safety. So does everything else that’s viable.
If we accept that coal plants are dangerous, and we accept that nuclear plants are dangerous, why not go for the one that creates 0 polution?
“And how long did you work there sir?”
Well let’s see: First qualified to stand nuc watch on warships back in the early seventies. Engineering Degree in the early eighties. Associated with Bechtel, Babcock, the INEL and through them, CH2MH, GE and Fluor. Job-shopping used to be fun and profitable.
But with statements like “why not go for the one that creates 0 polution?” it doesn’t take much in the way of credentials to see your ass is showing.