I’m here in the press area at the California Democratic Party convention at the LA Convention Center downtown. Speakers today include Nancy Pelosi, as well as the top of the California ticket in November: Barbara Boxer and Jerry Brown.
The mood of the conventioneers is a little somnambulent, IMO. You have to understand that California political culture makes the US Congress seem like a model of efficiency. And Democrats are staring down the barrel of Meg Whitman’s $150 million dollar barrage of spending this fall.
It doesn’t have to be this way. From a demographic standpoint, California Democrats should be celebrating their position. They have a clear path to a 2/3 majority in the state Senate with two Republicans leaving Democratic-leaning districts in the Central Valley. The state Assembly, where Democrats successfully gained three seats in 2008, would get a 2/3 majority of their own by replicating that feat in November. This would finally break the Sacramento gridlock and allow the leadership to pass a budget and raise revenue. With the Republican Governor at historic lows – literally the lowest approval rating in the history of the state – winning the Governor’s seat back and even approaching 2/3 in one or both chambers should be in the cards. And there are eight Republican-held Congressional seats where Barack Obama won in 2008, with good Democratic challengers in half of them.
But recognize that Democrats have basically whiffed on two straight wave elections in this state, and this time the political environment won’t be nearly as favorable. The state party has been characterized by fiscal mismanagement (I’ve heard the last regime left a state party Treasury heavily in the red with cash on hand less than what I have in my wallet right now), an unwillingness to aggressively challenge Republicans throughout the state and really a disastrous lack of support in winnable races. Democratic challengers have basically had to fend for themselves, and sometimes work against a state party structure actively invested in their defeat. That’s not hyperbole – Don Perata, the former state Senate President Pro Tem, actually said he would knock on doors for Republican Abel Maldonado in 2008, and muscled every serious Democratic challenger out of the race.
These days, former Congressman and longtime California pol John Burton is the state party chair, and he is deeply invested in Barbara Boxer, his protégé, winning in November, and will basically turn the party into her satellite re-election campaign. He does see the value in using initiatives like the cannabis legalization law to drive youth turnout, but considering how bumbling the state party has been in recent years, I don’t think there’s any reason for confidence that they will provide the resources necessary to compete up and down the ticket.
As for Jerry Brown, he’s scheduled to emerge from his underground location and address the convention today, actually making himself visible for practically the first time in 2010, when his rival Meg Whitman has been blanketing the airwaves. Brown is dirt cheap and actually thinks not spending money to promote himself is something of a virtue. He also believes that not making one statement about what he would do in office is savvy political strategy. Giving Californians absolutely no motivation to turn out in November is deadly when all the key liberal constituencies coincide with drop-off voters. Brown is making Phil Angelides’ 2006 gubernatorial campaign look brilliant.
Ultimately, California Democrats have suffered through a severe failure of leadership, with nobody offering a vision of how to deal with the state’s struggling future. There’s a structural revenue gap in perpetuity. Republicans have a minority veto over fixing the problem. The worst prison system in the country is in the hands of a federal magistrate. Over 1 in 8 Californians are unemployed. Housing prices have crashed. Despite all this pain, Democrats have given no indication that they have an idea how to fix this. The state party wants to pass an initiative reducing the 2/3 requirement for passing a budget but not taxes, which would give Democrats all the responsibility for the pain of cutting spending and none of the benefit of actually dealing with the problem. Even if somebody was arguing for a progressive vision of government, they certainly don’t have any media outlet available to get out their message. The press area is one table long here at the convention, for a state of 38 million people, and it’s not crowded.
We’re in deep, deep trouble in this state, and I don’t get a sense even from the partisans in this room that they think they can reverse the trend.



25 Comments



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
A depressing read David. Sad that California the leadership of a great progressive wanting to restore the state to its progressive roots that once gave us the best public college system in the world.
You and other bloggers are the California political media nowadays, David. Looking forward to your further reports!
the housing market on the peninsular jumped more than 100K in March. so not all bad…we are ahead in the game… at least for now…
how many are zombie-d out on the “we passed health care” f’king nonsense?
the democrats of washington here in my relatively ballard affluent part of seattle have a lot of go alongs get alongs / read outta the right playbook toadies – it is sad how some of the toadies
- are busy and do what lots of us do … just listen to what is most available and repeat it as if it is ours,
- listen and repeat and think about it a bit and actually believe it a bit,
- are actual DLC f’king assholes.
like I said, I live in relatively affluent ballard – go along get along koolaid is sprinkled in the water in these kind of zip codes.
rmm.
That’s going to leave a mark.
LOL
As one who left the Democratic Party years ago…I say perhaps this is the start of something new. (Sometimes letting go of the need to stay within the “tribe” or “clan” takes a while. The good news: Those who have the courage to leave the “safety” and “security” of the “family”…that’s where most innovation/evolution comes from.)
So, a toast! (I’m not being glib; I actually see this as movement forward.)
P.S. As a former Californian, I actually agreed with Boxer on much of her thinking…alas, she has morphed into another Obam-O-Bot and AIPAC shill.
Sadly the Democratic party looks like an organization without a positive vision of the future to sell to people.
In retrospect, this is all so predictable. When the country was ready to expel Republicans after 8 years of Bush failures and theft, the best the Democratic party could come up with was two conservative candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Obama has proved far more conservative and corporatist than any of us thought possible but with him we have seen exposed just how zombified the Democratic politicians have become. We have seen it in the importance of the Blue Dogs. In the choice of bad, corporatist Democrats like Gilibrand in New York (who won) and Coakley in Massachusetts (who lost). We have seen it in the complete involution of the ridiculous House progressive Caucus, the House and Senate leadership, and in so many supposedly stalwart “liberals”. We saw it happen to Kucinich, even the independent Bernie Sanders, and before them Feingold, Franken, Durbin, Leahy, Pelosi, and so many many others.
We see either conservatives that they try to force down our throats or those who run as liberals and then do nothing more than go along to get along once elected. California looks like more of the same, a Democratic party without ideas or energy, backing a bunch of vapid retreads and idiots like Boxer and Brown.
All this does is show yet again why progressives who haven’t broken with the Democrats should, and why those of us who have broken with Democrats should stay as clear of them as possible. Neither Democrats or Republicans have any answers. They are both the problem. The lesser of two evils argument doesn’t function anymore. We will sink with either.
Obama had better be polishing those hopey-changey speeches because November is coming fast and it’s going to be hard to sell anything.
This discussion leaves me conflicted. The Meg Whitman money deluge is giving her high name recognition. Is it also making people sick of her? The constant Whitman media assault via TV and radio is maddening.
Election campaigns are way too long in California (and elsewhere in the U.S.). Is Jerry Brown making a serious mistake by holding his fire? Will it be too late if he starts major campaigning only five or six months before the general election? For most candidates the answer would be yes, but Jerry Brown is not an unknown. In fact, he could easily suffer from overexposure, like he did in the 70s.
If we are sick of Whitman when fall rolls around, Brown could exploit it by reminding us how much better things were back when he was governor — and that he has better skills to run the state than wannabe Whitman. Is that what Jerry is planning?
This is not so much a prediction as it is a hope that there is actually a plan out there somewhere.
I just started to read Street’s book on Obama, again. It’s so depressing, I may have to put it aside again. But Street had O dead-to-rights. Figured out how conservative he was, figured out how owned he was by the corps, esp Wall St., every jot & tittle. And the book was written before he won the election.
I lived in CA for many years. The Dems out there destroyed the state. I don’t expect it will ever recover. CA Dems are different than the rest of us (think Nancy Pelosi for example).
Why do you say the Dems destroyed the state? Just curious.
In Fresno County we just flipped from red to blue in voter registrations. Radanovich is also not running for re election. Whether or not the people who registered actually vote is a whole other ballgame.
You’ve forgotten Ronny and Deukmejian and Pete Wilson ran the state for most of the years between Pat Brown and Ahnold – that’s 30 years of Rs and about 10 years of Ds. And the only solution the Rs ever had for problems was ‘cut taxes’.
Based on one conversation I’ve had with a friend who isn’t really political, yes, Whitman’s constant advertising IS turning people off. BUT being turned off isnb’t being turned on and that’s where the Dem’s lack big time.
Thanks DavidD for the insights; kinda amazing that there’s so little ‘press’; update us when you can about Winograd and Harman.
Maybe there is virtue in not blanketing the state with bullshit ads. Let Whitman show her moneyed hand long enough to hang herself. But who knows what Brown will do. He is a strange bird. I wonder if he still sleeps on the floor?
Yeah started the process of rewarding the Rich and taking away from the rest of us… Fuck Ronnie he was a despicable person who busted unions, threw the Mentally ill out of the hospitals onto the streets, destroyed the educational system, cut funding for infrastructure and much much more damage!!
If anything he should be demonized…. sneaky Pete was ju8st as bad…. think Enron debacle that his deregulation of electricity did to the citizens of California!! As for Deukmejian he was just more of the same cut taxes for the rich cut spending for everything else that the middle class and poor needed… Republicans are complete and utter rich thieves!!
OWW Oww can I hold the rope??? Meg is just another two faced Repuke who thinks she can BUY the Governorship!! I just hope the people see her for what she really is… A SHILL for the Corporatist!! The People WILL lose under her leadership..
[Mod Note: And let's not go any further down this path please.]
I wonder how much Jerry is worth.
I wouldn’t go so far as to say that Dems “ruined” CA, and I, too, would be curious why one poster here claims that. That said, I surely also don’t see CA Dems in a great light, either. Republics have definitely left their mark on this state, and it’s not a good one, either.
When Gray Davis (a more aptly named person I’ll never know) was (mostly unfairly) kicked out of the Governorship some years ago, everyone went nuts for Ahhhnold and thought he was the bee’s knees or something. I guess we could’ve done worse than Ahhhnold bc he is somewhat of a social liberal. But he didn’t any better job than what Gray Davis was doing, which is pretty much what Davis said at the time: good luck with that!
Davis got kicked out for actually, imo, doing his job. There is legislation that permits rolling back the annual car tax to higher levels if the state budget goes into the red. I was definitely in favor of increasing the annual auto fee, even though it is somewhat regressive. But the biggest whiners were the Republics who shrieked about how unfair it would be to them personally bc they all owned (at that time) giant, expensive new SUVs. The older your car is, the less you pay in fees. But Republics want it all: they want the “right” to buy their new expensive cars but not pay the fees.
If Davis had been allowed to do what was legally viable and raise the auto fee, CA wouldn’t be in the sorry, sorry bankrupt state that it’s in now. And yet, to this day, gawd forbid that we raise that #@$* fee. It’s ridiculous. Davis has laughed about it some, after the fact, which I don’t blame him for.
That said, the state of the Dem party in CA is really pathetic, but not much different than anywhere else. I have some minor respect for Jerry Brown, but as the author points out, Brown has been illusive and scarce to the point of silliness.
Meg Whitman has made herself into a big old pest with her incessant advertising, and there is plenty of Whitman fatigue. So, yeah, ok, Brown can wait a bit before going on a full court press campaign. But hiding under a rock somewhere and doing nothing at all right now is NOT a good strategy, either. It just ends up making Brown look old and tired with absolutely no interest or energy in what’s going on.
And we all know that, no matter how bored everyone becomes with Meg’s campaign, Republics will reliably go out and vote for her. I constantly hear people say: well, we need someone with business experience to run things. As if that’s the panacea, be-all, end-all. FWIW, Ahhhnold is/was in many ways a very successful businessman, and he’s not been able to do very much in Sacramento… and he’s pretty conciliatory. I can’t see Meg doing any better, frankly, and her answer to everything is the usual: cut taxes.
Meh. Thanks for the post. Unsurprised but saddened to learn about your experience there. I was wondering how it was going.
Too lazy to google it, but not even close to the league of Megster. He’s always been a sort of monk, and I doubt he has that much.
Why didn’t the dems have someone else to run for governor? Didn’t they give it some thought before hand? No one else wanted to run?
I’ve lived here my entire life, and I’ve been an elected member of the central committee in my county for more than a decade. I don’t know who that individual would be. So many of the districts have been gerrymandered to death practically. Getting rid of the 2/3 bullshit to pass budgets would help. It’s such a mess, we desperately need a no nonsense individual with more ideas than tax cutting idiots.