Today, two senior Al Qaeda in Iraq leaders, Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, were killed in a raid on their compound in Salaheddin Province. US intelligence and military forces assisted in the operation.
Vice President Biden appeared at a White House press conference to call the deaths “a “potentially devastating blow” to the insurgency there. The commander of US forces in Iraq, Ray Odierno, reinforced that.
But is the threat of the insurgency the greatest looming problem facing Iraq? It doesn’t seem so. This iteration of Al Qaeda in Iraq hasn’t been much of the factor in the country in years. What does threaten stability in Iraq is the depredations of the ruling party, creating secret prisons for torturing Sunnis and trying to overturn election results voted on by the people. Al Qaeda in Iraq is really a second-order problem at this point, in my opinion.
This development allows Biden and the White House to justify leaving Iraq before that sectarian situation resolves itself. We’ve decided that we’ve won in Iraq, and the death of the two Al Qaeda leaders represents a good data point in that decision. So while Iraqi security forces may have proved themselves somewhat worthy in tracking down and killing these insurgents, the real value of the raid is to let the US military extricate itself from the country. This is desired by the government in Iraq as well, so they’re happy to see this highlighted.
As we have little control over the subsequent events in post-election Iraq, I welcome it as well. But let’s not pretend that this incident has much meaning.
UPDATE: Biden’s full statement.



23 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I’m disappointed by the VeeP. There will be new leadership shortly, no corners turned here except maybe four of them, taking us right back to the same place.
I read the Joe’s full statement. If our troops were only in a support role, why was one of them killed? How many Iraqi security personnel were killed or injured?
What, no AQI #3 was involved? Unpossible.
Haven’t we killed this guy before?
“Potentially devastating”
Gotta love the Obama consistency here – even when it comes to killing people, the sell job to the public is the message of “hope.”
I never believed the “al-Qaeda in Iraq” lie. Juan Cole accurately said the “group” has nothing to do with the 9/11 al-Qaeda, assuming such an Iraqi “iteration” actually existed.
Isn’t recycling supposed to be a good thing?
Al Qaeda wasn’t in Iraq until the US invaded and “toppled” Saddam. Al Qaeda never had a prayer at getting a piece of the political pie in Iraq until the US invaded Iraq. Why else would Al Qaeda still be in Iraq?
Recall that it was Biden that suggested that Iraq be broken up into autonomous zones. Biden really is an assclown extraordinaire.
It won’t matter if all of Al Qaeda was wiped out. There are sufficient numbers of other “Terrorist Outfits” and recruits. After what the US has wrought in Iraq and Afghanistan with the “collateral damage” – the destruction of lives and property, the lack of food and water, the displacement of people and the night raids, the potential recruits are too numerous to contemplate.
How many times have we gone around this corner already?
Breaking Iraq into autonomous zones isn’t really that strange an idea – the country was created by drawing lines on a map without regard for the groups living there. Like the former Yugoslavia, what kept it together and relatively peaceful was a strong ruler.
Strong-arm ruler, more like. Biden is a berk.
Aunt Toby is upstairs!
Late Night: This Is News?
Sad to understand that it’s that which gives the US oligarchy such hope.
Sadder still to know that’s the plan for here.
We’re still pretending Al Qaeda exists?
Don’t forget; it was Biden, on Larry King Live, a couple of weeks ago, who was saying that 90,000 troops are going to be home from Iraq by the end of the summer.
With Obama surging in Afghanistan why shouldn’t we have his administration spokesmen channelling Rice, Cheyney, and Rumsfeld about how well things are going?
killed in a copter crash.
Glenn Greenwald had an interesting perspective on the killing of Al Qaeda leaders.
Article: The Joys of Airstrikes and Anonymity
I’m old, and my memory may be failing, but haven’t we killed this guy, like, several times? Tough to be the #2 terrorist in ANY country these days, ’cause we kill one a week.
We must have reached the soporific end game (yawn) were we just recycle the same names, as the effort and trouble to invent new ones long ago jumped the shark. (yawn) Man, this is some lazy crazy empire. Gimmy another round barkeep.
I don’t know if this will be a corner-turner, but I predict the next 6 months will be crucial in determining Iraq’s future!
They’ve killed #2 and #3 again. I want to know. Where is #6?
This is going to sound REALLLLLY stupid but…
Can’t they just promote the number 2?
Is our strategy “Hope the #2 guy doesn’t realize he’s #1 and take over where his boss left off?
Dammit Kennedy was shot! Well with our number 1 gone we HAVE to surrender to the soviets!
And we turned the corner? How many times have they turned corners. Haven’t they been turning corners for years and are just circling the same block?