Luis Gutierrez, a fairly good weathervane for the mood of Latino voters, tells The Hill that he wants an immigration bill or he would tell his community to sit out the midterm elections:
Some Democrats have felt little urgency in pursuing the controversial issue, partly because they see no risk that Hispanic voters will bolt the party for the GOP. But Gutierrez says they are missing the real political consequence of inaction.
“We can stay home,” Gutierrez said in an interview with The Hill. “We can say, ‘You know what? There is a third option: We can refuse to participate.’ ”
For Gutierrez, a former cab driver first elected to represent Chicago in 1992, the shift from close Obama ally to ornery critic has been stark. The lawmaker was one of the former Illinois senator’s earliest campaign supporters, and — as Gutierrez is quick to note — he stuck by Obama even as many Hispanic leaders rallied around Hillary Rodham Clinton in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary.
When Gutierrez talks about his old Chicago neighbor, he speaks of “anger, disillusionment, dissatisfaction” and “betrayal.” He says Obama has failed to keep his campaign commitment to immigration reform, and he decries what he calls an “enforcement-only” policy in which the administration has deported more undocumented immigrants than in the final year of the George W. Bush administration.
I know a lot of people are baffled by the intensity of the opposition from traditional allies of the White House. We see this in the LGBT community as well. I would remind those who fail to understand all this that the President didn’t have to make these kind of promises. He was extremely specific on these issues, and his failure to move on them at all – in fact, on the immigration front he has taken the nation backward by putting punitive restrictions on undocumented and even legal immigrants in the health care bill and continuing workplace raids at a higher rate than his predecessor – is bound to disappoint those with a large stake in them.
The White House wants to tell these people that they have nowhere else to go – one look at John McCain’s far-right border security plan and you know that Republicans aren’t going to capitalize on this discontent. But Republicans never made an immigration reform or an LGBT rights supporter a promise. It’s completely natural for there to be anger over the lack of movement, and no matter how much the President wants the critics to go away, they won’t. He could have been “realistic and pragmatic” during the campaign, since those are such virtuous traits, we’re always told, but he wasn’t. He gaves names and dates. And he has failed on those measures.
I predict more acts of civil disobedience and events designed to bring public pressure. We know that immigration reform supporters will march on May 1. If this upsets the President, that nominal supporters would threaten Democratic majorities, he shouldn’t have told them that they are the change they’ve been waiting for.
There’s video of Gutierrez’ interview here. It’s pretty powerful.




8 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
He says Obama has failed to keep his campaign commitment to–
(Fill in the blank)
Thanks David
This is an issue where I am un-knowledgeable, ignorant and quite frankly haven’t formed an opinion yet.
Like most citizens here my ancestors were immigrants. 12 generations on one side, 3 on the other.
Part of my thinking is that since my great grandparents applied and waited their turn to immigrate here, why do others receive the ‘right’ to butt in, in front of so many others in the line.
While it’s true a live in a very northern european settled portion of the US, my children have very good friends that are 1st generation immigrants, not from europe.
What are some of the issues/problems and proposed solutions?
that’s funny dave. Fairly soon maybe we can ask if anyone knows of one that he has delivered on.
They should join the crowd waiting on follow through with all the other campaign promises… just don’t do it in Arizona.
And for those people who say there is no place else to go… maybe it is better to have an enemy you know than a supposed ‘friend’ who you don’t know is going to run away or knife you in the back. Just saying..
I’m not all that happy about playing the curmudgeon, but I do recall a rather strong statement coming out of the good congressman’s office on 3/12/10 saying he was a No on HCR, but was a Yes just 9 days later
now if anyone wants to point me to substantial changes to the bill’s language, I’ll be happy to be wrong
Yesterday, I saw a Phoenix Police Office stop and put the driver in handcuffs. Of course, the law enforcement official utilized his “reasonable cause” provision, and yet, the Constitution requires the standard for “probable cause”, and this pretty much explains that fiasco that has been Immigration Reform. Moreover, without Congress raising the limit on the number of “naturalizations” that can take place, all the palaver, is among friends and political allies, and yet, does nothing to improve the possibilities for Immigration Reform.
I am reminded of the joke here in my Sonoran Desert. Back in the days before historical revisionism among the Republicans was so blatant, and when the border definition of our Southern Border was to be determined, the Republicans hired a team of drunken surveyors to lay down the approximate line from the Gulf of Mexico and to the Pacific Ocean. Unbeknown to the Republicans as the “employer”, the surveyors found and heard all about the “good beer” in Yuma, Arizona. And thus, we have the crooked border, from Texas to California. And what pissed off the Republicans even worse, is that America was to have a seaport on the Sea of Cortez, and which is between the mainland and the Baja. And to this day, the Republicans, especially Senators Kyl and McCain “go large” on border security in order to divert and deflect the historically failed Republican policies for not having a seaport in the Sonoran Desert. I suppose that if they had found their Moby Dick, the Brown Folks would have eaten their lunch.
The reality is that Kyl and McCain continue to demonstrate their self-hate and in doing so, are creating even more genuflectors as the Altar of Border Security. As such, it’s beyond rational behavior.
Consequently, a University of Arizona professor had an op-ed piece published in which he ‘connected’ loose nukes with drug cartels. Thus, the “above the fold” propaganda has gotten so deep, that asking a Chicano to sit out the next election and which would undermine my fellow Democrats, can easily be accomplished, and only for the asking. Gutierrez is indeed correct. And equally important, is to know that when the Immigration Reform portfolio for the White House, was turned over to Schumer, despite Gutierrez’s historical effort, Gutierrez was indeed slighted, and done by Obama, personally. To date, Obama has yet to apologize to Gutierrez and to us here in the Sonoran Desert. And being designated a “wedge issue” among the Democratic cognoscenti, does not sit well with me, as well. Hey, I may not be “much” but I sure has hell am far better than the usual chopped liver.
Jaango
My understanding is that President Polk (a Democrat) asked that it be based upon a map from 1782 (in 1847 during treaty negotiations with the Mexican President at the end of the Mexican-American War).
There are so many things that rightfully belong in the laps of the Repubs, don’t think that border can be.
Immigration reform is a working class issue. More so even than card check. Any real reform will be opposed by the chamber. So Obama and his band of whores in the Senate will do nothing meaningful. I am hoping Obama will be so hated by 2012 that he chooses not to run.