Lindsey Graham has decided to withdraw his support for the climate bill he has worked on for months because of the timing of when that bill would come to the Senate. Graham has also been working on an immigration reform proposal with Chuck Schumer, but thinks that issue, which appears to be moving to the top of the priority list after Wall Street reform, has been politicized. The row threatens both priorities.
The climate bill had a planned rollout of Monday, but that has been indefinitely delayed:
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), who is crafting the bill with Graham and Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), announced what he called a temporary postponement and said he remained committed to action this year on a sweeping climate and energy measure.
“We all believe that this year is our best and perhaps last chance for Congress to pass a comprehensive approach. We believe that we had reached such an agreement and were excited to announce it on Monday, but regrettably external issues have arisen that force us to postpone only temporarily,” Kerry said in a statement Saturday.
Graham, who actually said “Am I going to write every bill in this Congress?” in response to this, thinks that the push for immigration reform is an election-year gambit and that the bill is being rushed with no legislative language. But that’s not entirely true; Graham has been working for months on an immigration bill with Schumer, and what’s more the McCain-Kennedy language from four years ago provides the basic framework for a bill.
The climate bill, on the other hand, has legislative language that oil companies support and Greenpeace opposes. The bill would exempt agriculture and, seemingly, oil producers from the carbon cap, and would pre-empt both the EPA and state and local laws that regulate carbon emissions. It’s a harmful bill and dropping it is no great loss. The EPA can and should step into the breach.
Graham probably isn’t wrong that immigration is being rushed ahead of energy for a variety of reasons, some of them politically related. But let’s face it – the energy bill didn’t exactly have a slam-dunk 80 votes in hand or anything. And the concessions were so ridiculous that even its core supporters would have bolted. As for immigration, everyone knows the basic contours of that debate, and if Republicans want to vote against the Latino community one more time, Democrats don’t have to respect their willingness to hide it. In addition, Graham just last month challenged the President to write the immigration bill and get co-sponsors. Now, when the White House appears to be doing that, he gets all bent out of shape.
In response, Harry Reid said that both priorities are important and that he hopes to move both this year.
“Immigration and energy reform are equally vital to our economic and national security and have been ignored for far too long. As I have said, I am committed to trying to enact comprehensive clean energy legislation this session of Congress. Doing so will require strong bipartisan support and energy could be next if it’s ready. I have also said we will try to pass comprehensive immigration reform. This too will require bipartisan support and significant committee work that has not yet begun.
“I appreciate the work of Senator Graham on both of these issues and understand the tremendous pressure he is under from members of his own party not to work with us on either measure. But I will not allow him to play one issue off of another, and neither will the American people. They expect us to do both, and they will not accept the notion that trying to act on one is an excuse for not acting on the other.”
I think Graham was dying for a reason to kill these bills where he was the “sensible Republican moderate” on them. This has been his pose for some time, to show to Washington that he’s willing to work across the aisle, but to never actually do it.
In addition, why key issues that even Graham acknowledges are crucial have to take a number to go to the floor of the Senate, with no one allowed to cut the line, is beyond me.




40 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
So, Graham gets to “pull a Lieberman” and kill legislation that the President wants killed. That way, Obama can say, “not my fault, I tried”, like when Joe put the knife in the public option.
Graham, the latest addition to the line-up of revolving villians.
Why would anyone in their right mind “work for months” with a Republican on any legislation? For that matter, why would anyone work for 5 minutes with a Republican on any legislation? That is plainly insane behavior. And why is anyone at all surprised that after working for months with a Republican, he suddenly bolts from the process and declares he will filibuster? That’s what Republicans do. That’s just the way they roll.
Why you ask. See medicinecat above.
Cui bono don’t you know.
The President should want killed the utter garbage Graham was devising. So should everyone committed to mitigating climate change. The EPA process is light years better, and both the EPA Administrator and Carol Browner in the White House have committed to using it if the legislative process breaks down. We should welcome that.
Not everything fits into your box.
My guess is that Graham would not have voted for the bill no matter what. He now gets to stamp his high-heeled shoes and play the victim. Big diva.
protip: the president isn’t progressive
Just another symptom of the disease of bipartisanship.
From Jeff Seshol’s book, Supreme Power, on FDR and the Supreme Court:
And as the book unfolds, within four years, with the most breathtaking period of judicial activist lawmaking, the conservative block on the Supreme Court had declared large parts of the New Deal unconstitutional. They had already laid the foundation for the proposition that corporate property interests overrule human/public interests — rules that would today translate to “corporations are protected citizens,” rather than their looters.
The people we have in our government today are shameless WATBs. Lindsey and his fellow Senators don’t know how to chew gum, let alone walk at the same time. And if the response is, “the procedures don’t allow us to move faster,” then who is to blame for that but themselves?
We can’t heap enough scorn on these pathetic, mendacious, cynical pipsqueaks.
Lindsey’s role is to make sure climate change legislation does NOT change the suicidal trajectory of climate change, that health care legislation doesn’t reform health care and immigration reform doesn’t treat immigrants as human beings and that jobs bills don’t do much to dent unemployment. If Lindsey Graham is unhappy, something has gone right.
I am really hoping the Immigration debate & bill can make some progress.
It may be alittle frightening to see some of the ‘Baggers reaction. We can work toward a civil and informed discussion.
This sounds like a “climate bill” we can do without, anyway.
protip:
you’re talking to people who knew that year before last.
protip: the president isn’t progressive?
Say it again, louder. They didn’t hear you the first 50 times.
I would love to see Todd-Whitman come out vocal and well-informed. W treated her shamelessly…She could get alot of attention, IMO
Anti-immigrant Teabagger style conservative group of erstwhile immigrants is going ballistic on the gayness of Graham Cracker:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/20/lindsey-graham-gay-conser_n_544554.html
You forgot financial “reform” that will be nothing more than a wink and a nod to the fat cats. Mr. Bipartisan and his DOJ feel that the banksters are to big too jail.
Senator Graham just got outed by a GOPer the guy is of course going to run to the Right to reestablish his Righty Cred not that I think it will help him but no we can’t expect him to cooperate with us now.
Unless we can convince him to Come Out?
Don’t farms grow plants that remove carbon? Or are we using so many chemicals our farms are carbon producers?
If I understand you correctly, you mean essentially what Digby said.
When of course it worked the entirely opposite way.
Senator Kerry says he had a strong climate bill ready to announce on Monday. He must be lying. Idiot.
Wait Counter Counter Propaganda we say Lindsey is being blackmailed by the GOP and threatened with a Tea Bagger Challenge from the GOP ultra conservatives backing the Tea Baggers.
Lindsey is afraid of being McCained or Cristed.
Crist is also rumored to be gay and is facing a Tea Bagger challenge. McCain is also facing a Tea Bagger challenge and is considered weak on immigration and yes the Baggers got him to fold it does seem the Tea Baggers are targeting people.
They don’t want Obama to have any wins.
Pretty cheap shot, don’t you think, re “drama queen” in view of Graham’s being outed last week? A bit insensitive.
In what Right wing Fantasy has Rahm ever shown anyone but Democrats threats or blackmail? Heck this White House is George Bush’s third term but our side is Blackmailing Lindsey on a bill that chances are the Left won’t be happy with when we hear the details?
“A bit insensitive” is when Graham votes anti-gay all the time. No one cares if he’s gay. We care that he’s a hypocrite.
Frankly, I don’t think so.
I’m way out and proud and quite sensitive. I will say that Graham as a public and political figure is up for all criticism, including the cheap shots.
Works that way for Democrats. Just saying.
No his side outed him the rumors were always there but now that its out there Lindsey has to respond because well people are talking about it publicly now.
All I’m saying is that Graham is being blackmailed by the right BECAUSE of his gayness to act more RIGHT WING then Graham wants to.
Graham, that queer. Probably cruises boys in public toilets. He should try reaming a couple of girls for a change, from behind. Set him straight. Woof. Colbert, ma man. Where’s TBogg. This pass your smell test for humor.
Several things to note here:
1. Graham has taken an enormous political risk by backing the climate bill. He wants it for some reasons with which I don’t agree, and his vision is way too offshore oil- and nuclear-friendly, but I don’t question his sincerity.
2. The immigration bill isn’t ready — it hasn’t gone through committee work, while the climate bill has gotten through as many committees as it’s going to get through. So, logically, the climate bill should come first. ThinkProgress has a good analysis of the whisper campaign by immigration forces.
3. Graham wanted strong reassurance from Reid and the Administration that the climate bill would be placed first, but instead Reid gave a very weak assurance, and the administration (through Summers) punted.
4. There’s some speculation that Schumer is behind this, hoping to affect Reid’s status as majority leader and/or reelection chances. I don’t know.
5. The bill is far from perfect — I have not yet decided if I will support it — but EPA regulation is not an effective Plan B, so liberals need to stop expecting the EPA to be some sort of white knight to save the day after the climate bill falls apart. The choices are:
– this bill
– a better bill through a worse Congress
– a much better bill at a much worse time, e.g., after half of Miami is gone.
I’m agreeing with you I just found the GOP’s idea that we were blackmailing Graham ridiculous. I think the GOP is pressuring their Gays Crist and Lindsey.
Are you gay and out? And read my comments.
I’ve read yours on previous threads today and come ON, you must certainly find that this is a place that values diverse opinions. There is no monolith here.
.
In the back of my mind I think I recall that someone has a carbon tax rather than – or in addition to – carbon trading.
Was that the Kerry Bill – or am I just wishing too hard?
sigh …….
“Or are we using so many chemicals our farms are carbon producers?”
Can you say, “Corn ethanol?”
Imagine you’re a young gay man, not yet out, of whatever political persuasion. Please watch that Colbert clip again. Over 1.5 million people watch the show every night, a good number of them overseas.
come on d-day – this is a DNC headline –
‘poor noble selfless defenders of virgins, mom & apple pie betrayed by mean meanie and perfidious mean meanie meanness’
the reason legislation is going nowhere, unless it sucks, is that there either sell outs calling themselves Democratic Senators, OR, politically pathetic sacks of shit calling themselves Democratic Senators.
let’s stop blaming lying, stealing fascist toady fucks for being stealing, lying fascist toady fucks. bambi’s mummy is dead, the sun rises in the east and sets in the west cuz the earth spins, and lying stealing despicable fascist toady fucks are what they are.
rmm.
Here is the statement made by Greenpeace regarding the climate change bill:
Greenpeace Statement on Pending Climate Bill
It outlines specific elements they want changed or they won’t support the bill.
You can yell fuck you in their ear all day and these politicorporatists wont hear a word. You can forget about financial reform. The rules have to change BEFORE they change the game.
Miss Lindsay certainly is in a snit, ah do declare!
There’s a bit missing from your post. It seems Sen. Kerry was all set to announce the climate legislation on Monday. The announcement was postponed by Leader Reid. Your post seems to say that the announcement was delayed by the withdrawal of Sen. Graham’s support. However, that wasn’t the order of what occurred. Reid cancelled the announcement and indefinitely postponed the bill. Apparently that ticked off Graham, who then withdrew his support – really a moot point since the bill is now in limbo anyway. Reid says he’s open to pursuing both climate and immigration reform at the same time? Unlikely.
My question is why did Reid decide to postpone? Sounds like a knee-jerk reaction by someone to the Arizona immigration law and recent media coverage. Being dragged around by the media circus doesn’t sound like a good way to govern to me, which is why I’m not a big fan of Reid.
So rather than waste time on Graham, why not look at the real question on this climate bill, which is Reid’s decision to postpone – the latest deliberate effort to snatch defect from the jaws of victory?
My question exactly. Sounds like some knee-jerk reaction to the dumbitude in AZ. Great leadership by Reid, per usual.
Don’t know whether Graham had a “right” to be miffed or not; have serious doubts that this climate bill would’ve gotten anything right. But still… interesting to watch this three card monte show that’s going on now.
Hate ‘em all, though. Lying thugs. We’re cooked is all I can think.