Handing over the “bipartisan opposition” talking point to Republicans, Ben Nelson just voted against the motion to proceed on the Wall Street reform bill, almost certainly dooming its passage for today. Democrats were probably working for this outcome in the short term, thinking that putting Republicans on the side of the big banks was a positive scenario. But Nelson, who had been quiet leading up to the vote, kind of gummed up their narrative by voting no.
More as the vote gets finalized…
…Bob Corker, Olympia Snowe, Chuck Grassley and Susan Collins, seen as possible votes to flip, all voted no. But Richard Burr, a Republican in a tough election in North Carolina, just voted yes. Still, without Nelson I don’t think the Democrats will have the votes today. Burr got to walk because Nelson gave him the out.
…So what happens now? Well, the Democrats preferred this outcome – it drew some battle lines. They’ll spend the next few days pounding on the Republicans for being tools of Wall Street. The Republicans will respond with their own bill, which will probably be a Fannie and Freddie-fest. And there will be much yelling and screaming on cable news.
I could see Democrats putting this up to a vote every few days until someone else on the Republican side breaks.
But on the substance, we don’t know if the Democrats will allow what amounts to an open rule, with a lot of amendments put up for a vote. Russ Feingold is calling for that:
“But while I support opening debate on that measure, I will not support any predetermined amending process, or as one senator described it, a ‘template’ for floor consideration that effectively puts the fix in for some negotiated final product. Congress’ recent history on regulating the financial sector is not a proud one. For the last 30 years, Congress has consistently given in to the wishes of Wall Street banks and voted to weaken essential safeguards. And as has been the case in so many areas, members of both political parties in Washington are to blame. Legislation that paved the way for the creation of massive Wall Street entities and removed essential protections for our economy – including the Riegle-Neal Act and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act – passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. Congress needs to get it right this time, and finally enact tough reforms to prevent Wall Street from driving our economy into the ditch again. I will not vote to end debate on this bill unless and until it meets that goal.”
UPDATE: I could have sworn I heard Burr vote Aye, but I could be wrong. It’s irrelevant at this point, as Nelson’s no vote means that the Democrats would come up short either way.
UPDATE II: OK, Burr did not vote yes. The final vote was 57-41, with all Democrats voting yes but Ben Nelson and Reid (for procedural reasons, so he can bring it up again).




24 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
“Well, the Democrats preferred this outcome” – D.D.
I agree, because I believe that Republican obstructionism allows nothing useful to happen while providing an election-year scapegoat for making nothing useful happen.
Here’s Nelson’s bribe list.
What I like is all the Democratic indignation at the GOP saying the bill continued bailouts and too big to fail, and then we find an NPR reporter, Adam Davidson, and Gretchen Morgenson of the NY Times filing separate reports saying experts say the same thing.
The Dem’s are not fooling anyone. And once again, they have a bill that both sides of the issue don’t like.
Thank goodness this bill got stopped so that real reform with teeth can be made.
I want an all night 24 filibuster.
Neither are the Republicans.
I wonder how bad it really is that the latest fake reform bill put out by Democrats was filibustered. Remember: the Dems do not pass reform, only the toothless illusion of it.
“Thank goodness this bill got stopped so that real reform with teeth can be made.”
It won’t. Read Feingold’s statement. This show of opposition is so that both parties can mutually assure that nothing undesirable gets done to the thieves who pay them.
It’s just more protection for the banks, i.e. “open bank assistance” is the new term for bailout.
You may be right.
Well, it gives Warren Buffet more time to get his way. He wants to amend the bill to say he doesn’t have to post collateral on his outstanding swaps. He has spent tons of money lobbying on this.
The provision, sought by Berkshire and pushed by Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson in the Senate Agriculture Committee, would largely exempt existing derivatives contracts from the proposed rules.
I’m sure the fact that Berkshire Hathaway was the top contributor to Nelson from 2000-2010 is a complete coincidence.
So, given that reforming the financial system was a massively important task, that just failed in the Senate because of mindless obstructionism, overtly, and because the filibuster therefore also let the majority off the hook going against the big money interests in the issue, covertly, isn’t it time to get rid of the filibuster yet?
Well, the Democrats preferred this outcome – it drew some battle lines.
It also serves to kill the WH’s real fear — amendments that would produce real reform.
I’m pretty sure with just a minor edit [see below], you would find this phrase works for every issue that comes up, so you can just copy it to a macro and save some typing in the future.
And Leiberman.
Ben Nelson is with us on everything but the Warren.
Keep the GOP filibustering for a week or two! Let the people know that the GOP is tying up government over and again by publicizing this latest one, a cause no one is for…no banking reform.
Apparently the GOP actually has a bill it wants to support. Unless they stop an actual ’round the clock filibuster and allow debate, how can they get their bill on the floor?
Put it to them!!
It looks like Blanche Lincoln’s “far more strict” version of derivative regulation has been incorporated into Dodd’s bill….. I know that she doesn’t get much love here at FDL so…I’d like to give credit to MS Lincoln for making Financial Reform stronger. Her committee accomplished this by shining daylight on JP Morgan/Chase’s “hundreds of millions…maybe billions” of earnings via cloak & dagger trading using “financial weapons of mass destruction”…OK, I won’t wait for the Lincoln applause so maybe we can just chalk it up to the “we’ll Primary her ass!..” FDL strategy. Once again, there’s no progress without Progressives.
Every time the DNC sends me a request for a donation I send them back a copy of Jon Walker’s post about the DNC thanking Ben Nelson with a half million dollars for screwing up health care. Now I’ll be sending a copy of this one along, too. They get it back in their postage paid envelope.
I go along with hychka, if they want to fibibuster, let them actually filibuster!
Here’s my guess on events:
Dems bash Repubs for “protecting” Wall St.
Nelson gets sweetheart deal for Buffet.
Repubs bash Dems for bailouts.
Obama finally steps in, uses bully pulpit, gets “reform” bill passed except “reform” bill doesn’t do a bleeping thing to fix the problem.
Obama and Dems do victory dance. Repubs vow to repeal if voted back in power.
Where have we seen this before?
I’m so old I can remember when claiming that all the members in one party and ONE member of the other party constituted “bipartisan opposition” would get you laughed out of the room or off Meet the Press or whatever conversation you were in.
Where is Fannie and Freddie in all of this? Totally Absent. Where is the audit of the Fed? Why isn’t Glass-Steagell, that protected the American people from the corruption of the banks for 50 years – not being discussed.
Our government is corrupt. Dodd, who wrote the bill, received $10,000,000 from the financial industry between 2005 and 2010. Does this administration think the American people believe this thief.
When I see this administration get rid of Geithner, Summers, Bernake, Rubin and all of their banker cohorts – maybe I’ll believe them. Until then – the government is allowing bankers to loot the middle class into oblivion. We’re ALL going to be debt-slaves to the governing elite if we don’t vote all of these criminals out.
Gerald Celente on the Goldman Sachs deal:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4liqB5sGd_U&feature=player_embedded
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article/comments/view?f=/n/a/2010/04/26/national/w043849D01.DTL#ixzz0mGyYAAWk
I Totally agree with “Vendome” This is all just for political gain. To gain our vote to be factual. NOT GONNA HAPPEN HERE ! They are all a bunch of liars, proven time and time again by the 2008 elections. Promises, Promises and then more Promises. “HOPE AND CHANGE” “CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN” ………………..TOTAL CRAP! No not getting my my vote, NOT gonna happen, Will not fool me again.
Sadly, Vendome is absolutely correct.