We finally have clarity from the Defense Department and the Joint Chiefs on the repeal of the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy: they oppose it this year until the Pentagon’s study is completed.
Today Defense Secretary Robert Gates sent House Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton (D-MO) a letter (in response to an inquiry from Skelton) telling him that he doesn’t want Congress to take any action at all on DADT this year. From the letter obtained by ThinkProgress:
I believe in the strongest possible terms that the Department must, prior to any legislative action, be allowed the opportunity to conduct a thorough, objective, and systematic assessment of the impact of such a policy change; develop an attentive comprehensive implementation plan, and provide the President and the Congress with the results of this effort in order to ensure that this step is taken in the most informed and effective matter. [...]
Therefore, I strongly oppose any legislation that seeks to change this policy prior to the completion of this vital assessment process.
This is actually bigger than just opposing repeal. Gates oppose any change to the policy before the study is done. That would appear to include any moratorium or stop-loss measure.
It’s a virtual certainty that Skelton, who isn’t on board with repeal anyway, will now use this to oppose altering the policy. And so we won’t see anything happen this year. But the idea that it becomes any easier to change it next year, after major losses in Congress for the Democrats, is absurd. And surely Gates and Mullen know that.
Furthermore, the one-year study time only put repeal out of reach for this Congress because it didn’t start until the beginning of 2010. If the Pentagon got to work immediately, they would have been well set-up to make policy changes in conjunction with this year’s defense authorization bill.
That certainly looks like it was by design, regardless of Gates and Mullen’s personal statements favoring repeal. The Defense Department set an arbitrary date out of reach of this Congress, prior to which DADT couldn’t be touched. Given the way Congress worships the military, they’ll comply. And then in the next Congress, everyone will shrug their shoulders and say “we don’t have the votes.” And that’s how discrimination continues in the US military.
UPDATE: Kirsten Gillibrand, who has led on this issue in the Senate, disagrees in a statement with Mullen and Gates:
“I respectfully disagree with Secretary Gates and Admiral Mullen. Congress should not sit on their hands.
“Now is the time for Congress to show strong leadership and repeal this disastrous policy. ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ is wrong for our national security and inconsistent with the moral foundation upon which our country was founded.
“When we repeal this policy – and we will repeal this policy – we will strengthen America – both militarily and morally.”




44 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
unjust is unjust. stupid is stupid. what part of that do they have to study? jesus christ on a saltine, where is a leader when you need one?
Shameful. What’s the matter with these wimps. If some homophobic soldier comes crying, “I’m afraid of that gay guy” — well, I’d just say, “Grow the fuck up, you wimp.”
I’m quite the archetypal peace-nik, and friends often ask me “Why so fierce about DADT since you’re such a dove?”
My answer is:
Look, once one accepts the idea of a Gay Warrior as legitimate, there’s nothing else that’s taboo. The stereotypes from that point on, fail.
Blame Obama. This letter is meant to get him — and the Democrats — off the hook.
they oppose it this year until the Pentagon’s study is completed.
I’m probably a simpleton here, but what in the hell is there to “study?”
“Let’s see…how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?”
Just pull the plug, already.
This is how it’s done. They drag their feet and say we need another study, then we’ll think about it. Then the DNC sends out a bunch of fundraising letters and the sheeple get angry and mindlessly donate to the Democrats and vote for them.
Time to stop the cycle.
My problem with DADT is that it sends a message that something is wrong with gay people. And that harms ALL gay people. The dominant straight culture is obsessed with stigmatizing gay people. I’m gay, and like all gay people, my life has been constrained by this incessant stigmatization. It must stop.
And they drag their feet even more by not even starting the study — it’s my understanding that starting the DADT study is way behind schedule.
Shameful. I’m assuming the President signed off. He should be the one making this statement, given the promises he’s made. Doesn’t even appear to be a strategy.
It’s about power. When you’re equal, you have to share. When you’re unequal, you don’t.
Yes. Power. Power and status.
WTF? This was a done deal. It was supposed to go into effect on Oct 1, 2010.
I don’t believe for a second that this news was made public without the knowledge and approval of Obama.
Are Democrats trying to lose Congress?
Gay Warriors have been around since antiquity. The Greek warriors were often lovers during the Trojan War.
But you’re right, having this role accepted in modern American society would be a big step forward.
Isn’t that what the British did? It should be that simple.
Sorry Knox, this was never a done deal. Ever.
I have 100 links to prove, but I really don’t think they’re necessary.
I’m not gay and neither are my children, but we all have gay friends and co-workers and we find this bill stigmatizes ALL of us! I don’t want my country stigmatizing people. I am not complicit! (And I send ObamaRahma a note or two every day just to let them know that I am STILL not complicit.) Shame on them.
Turkeys.
My apologizes to turkeys.
That was the impression I got when Barney Frank said it would be part of the 2011 budget. He seemed to think it was a done deal. Anyway, making many believe it would be done on Oct 1 and then not making it happen about a month before election day can’t be smart politics.
While I understand that Congress needs to get involved, an executive order to put an initial kibosh on the thing would take…what…about 1/2 hour? That would include drafting, typing, signature, and issuing the order. Hell, that would leave enough time for the Prez to grab a sandwich and a beer afterward.
Oh..and in answer to your question at #12: Um…yes?
Horseshit. Pure fuckin’ horseshit.
Not this year, not next year, never.
Fuck you, you homophobic muthafuckers.
Suppose, though, that Obama is playing to his ‘natural constituency’ — the religious right?!
Jason Rosenbaum is upstairs!
FBI investigating Massey Energy for bribery
There are tons of Barney statements out of both sides of his mouth, so it’s understandable that the last one you knew about would be the one that stuck in your mind. He’s not the one to watch.
It’s Brian Bond, the Whitehouse liason to the GLBT community.
Of course, silent on the issue.
I’m not sure I understand your sentiment… *g*
Actually, Congress didn’t need to get involved. And by that, I mean that the repeal of DADT did not have to be subjected to a standalone vote, as it does now. DADT is policy; not law. The repeal could have happened the same way the policy was implemented: via language in the Defense Appropriations Bill. That’s what Frank was referring to. And it would be much easier to pass repeal by putting it in this bill — it would take 60 No votes to take it out. But the White House refused to do it. So now DADT repeal has get passed by both houses, on its own.
I stand corrected. Thanks.
Actually the politics on this are quite understandable. This way the Democrats can use this as a fundraising ploy to pick people’s pockets based on lies. They’re counting on the GayTM to line up behind the candidates based on their mirage promises while they use boogeyman scare tactics.
Well, I beg to differ.
I run with a big ol’ homo crowd here in Denver, and the one’s that aren’t captured by OFA (I would say about 80% of us ain’t in love with, or beholden to OFA) are all “Nope. No money, no how.”
Includes HRC.
Could be different other cities/geographies, but that’s my local experience.
David Dayen is, again, upstairs!
Major League Baseball Players Association Strongly Criticizes Arizona Immigration Law
We don’t differ. I’m just saying that’s how things have been done in the past and that they’re probably counting on a repeat of just using the GayTM for cash and votes and then not delivering. The results in MA show that they can’t just promise voters mirages and continue to get away with it.
Some of us called this from the beginning when Gates first announced that he needed a commission to “study” implementation. There was simply no need for such a commission. I mean how hard is it to say this is no longer a reason for separation. A one page memo would have sufficed. It was an obvious stall and attempt to kick the issue down the road until a more conservative Congress could kill it entirely.
Once these tools have passed to the next realm they will relent in their opposition or at least no one in this one will know about it.
Why I haven’t seen you in a … age. Nice to see that things are going well for you.
Eli is upstairs!
Only Straight White Men Can Be Judges.
Personally, were I a young man in, say, the Navy, I’d prefer it if every man in sight were gay.
Shore leave! Ladies, here I come!
This is so incredibly childish and stupid, I have to wonder about the military brass. They seem a bit homophobic. Perhaps it’s the boots…
Why does all of this nonsense remind me of a Mel Brooks movie?
No one could have anticipated that this could have happened under a GOP defense secretary. And a Promise-Breaker of a president, who will receive no more support from me for anything, ever.
Fuck him. Joe Wilson was right: YOU LIE
Much nicer phrase than lying sack of …
Speaking as someone who worked for high-ranking military officials at a slightly lower tier than the Chairman, I agree with all of the comments thus far.
- The Working Group is months behind schedule. As a former Governor would say, you betcha. The Navy, fearing that a repeal was imminent, approved women on subs (with the tacit blessing of Mullen, a former CNO). This is deliberate; it is meant to tie the Navy up in red tape, so they can legitimately say they can’t implement it because they’re busy.
- It was never supposed to be repealed in the first place. They say being in the military makes you a skeptic. From day one, I knew that the entire strategy would be three-fold:
1) vocalize your support (which they both did, in Congress)
2) pledge to support a repeal at the conclusion of a “study” (strategically calcualted to last from the day of the announcement, to well past the midterms)
3) appoint an administration lackey and a team player to lead the review. The team player is given operational control; the administration lackey is the minder.
Said team player? None other than GEN Ham. And look at his last assignment — how curious:
Guess who was the Director of the Joint Staff then — the integrator du jour who was going to bring the Joint Staff into the 21st century?
And handpicked to lead that effort by Chairman Mullen himself?
Stan McChrystal.
The people who are really in charge (McChrystal is the underboss, Petraeus is the don) know exactly what they’re doing. By the time the review is finished, we’ll be well into 2011.
That’s the point. No Democratic majority, no repeal.
The real people in charge (McChrystal is merely a capo, Petraeus is the underboss, Keane and McCaffrey play the role of consigliere and Vickers is the don) know exactly what they’re doing. By the time the review (which has some legitimate questions, such as housing and military benefits) is completed, we’re well into 2011. And months after the midterms.
No Democratic majority, no repeal.
That’s the objective.
As we figured, this was just a fig leaf to shut the LGBT community up. This administration has no intention of taking on this issue, well, maybe not until next year, or the next year. Not until the political climate in Washington gets better, which will be, well never.
Gay ‘Warriors’ are only ‘taboo’ to religious bigots. Gay people have been in the military for as long as there have been humans fighting.
It seems like we don’t have a Commander In Chief. I will volunteer to solve this problem. Make a phone call to all our allies with openly gay active duty in combat zones…start with Great Britain, Germany, Israel, France, the Netherlands, Australia, Canada.. take notes and have them send you their implementation plans. I have heard the longest was 6 months. Choose the best ideas from the plans. You can have repeal and successful implementation BEFORE the mid term elections… probably even BEFORE August recess is over so you have a couple of month BEFORE nov to show that it is no big deal. Unless,of course, the other Iceland volcano blows during the fall – then it will be the gays’ fault.
There is nothing to be gained by waiting. Do it NOW!
See? Now Pelosi pulls the trigger…
“But you can’t do that,” says DoD. “We’re not finished with our review!”