Nancy Pelosi responded strongly to last night’s news that Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen of the Joint Chiefs want no changes to the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy until their one-year review is complete. Fine, Pelosi said, we’ll make no changes in Congress as long as the President immediately authorizes an end to the discharging of gay and lesbian soldiers. Here is her short statement:
“We all look forward to the report on the review of the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy by the Defense Department. In the meantime, the Administration should immediately place a moratorium on dismissals under this policy until the review has been completed and Congress has acted.”
This essentially calls the Administration’s bluff. The President has said he supports ending the policy. So does the Defense Secretary. So does the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Pelosi reminds them, and everyone else, that they have the power to end the consequences of the policy right now without further action from Congress. So while we wait, for some reason, for this review, we can stop discriminating against people for their sexual orientation, with the stroke of a pen.
Previously, Pelosi promised a floor vote in the House on the policy by the end of the year. Patrick Murphy (D-PA), the Iraq war vet who has been carrying the standalone bill on this, has 192 co-sponsors and claims to have the necessary votes for passage.
Obviously, as the Congresswoman from San Francisco, Pelosi is serving a large portion of her constituents by taking this position. But as the Speaker of the House, her words take on greater significance. And she basically told the White House to put up or shut up.
Within 3-4 weeks, we should see a defense authorization bill out of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Chairman Carl Levin may choose to include a moratorium of discharges under the policy, or its full repeal, inside that bill.





13 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Good.
As I’ve stated before, I know there were gays and lesbians serving with me in the USAF back in the mid/late seventies into the early eighties. Most of them got along fine with no problems (up until the point they ran into some body who was either uber-religious or just didn’t like them).
But they mostly served honorably and well, doing their jobs just like the rest of us.
Agencies not in compliance with the Constitution and the laws of the Land should have funding withheld until they achieve compliance. But that’s just me.
Historians will not look kindly on the footdraggers here.
This is what comes of having a SecDef from the opposite party, in my view. It releases the Speaker from possible constraints on criticism.
Not-much-shorter Nancy: “Studying whether this policy works, gentlemen? Sure, take your time, but the mere fact of the study shows you should suspend.”
Fer dawgs sakes this is taking a long time. The modern world, and I include many parts of the USofA, has moved so far past our corporulers…..ugh…
With our country in really bad shape in so many ways, why does the Congress and the Administration get all lathered up about gays and choice? Could they please just work on some of the real problems and leave us alone.
There is NO altruism in the corridors of power. Reversing DADT (or other forms of discrimination) lacks a clear profit incentive. That is why it is taking so long.
Pelosi could have come out and called for repeal to be included. Levin could put repeal in the authorization bill. If it’s not there, then it is because the Democrats and Obama don’t want it there. With the Obama Administration opposed through their surrogate Gates, Nancy waffling, I would say the odds are low that Levin will move on his own.
Essentialy this is what’s happened with Dan Choi. He’s gya. He’s been cited
for doing so. Yet no action has been taken against him. He has been called back for duty, to which he has complied. But he has also been demonstrating against DADT practically non-stop.
I like Nancy. I’m glad she said this. But wake me when there’s action. Until then it’s just theater. Whoever said there’s no profit motive in this is right. And not enough of the public cares to make it an issue that will move votes one way or another.
Good idea – Coupla years late but still a good idea…
Yeah, right. I remember Nancy calling the administration’s bluff on the public option. Then she folded like a wet paper bag.
Gee, ya think maybe she’s running for re-election?