The Simpson-Bowles Fiscal Commission will hold their first working group meeting tomorrow. They plan once-a-week meetings on discretionary spending, mandatory spending and tax policy, and then a larger, once-a-month meeting to go over the reports of the working groups. But although the White House promised transparency and full public hearings for all fiscal commission activities, Executive Director (and former DLC head) Bruce Reed told Congressional officials today that the working groups would not be streamed over the Internet or open to the public.
John Conyers (D-MI) in particular has pushed for more transparency from the fiscal commission in two key areas. He wanted full transparency for all meetings, and he wanted the recommendations made public before the midterm elections, to give the public and the candidates for those elections an opportunity to weigh in on them. Conyers has been rebuffed on both counts, actually. Not only will the working groups operate in secret, in contrast to the larger monthly meetings which will be streamed live at FiscalCommission.gov, but Reed also said that the commission will not release their draft recommendations before Election Day.
Understand what we have here. There’s a fiscal commission operating partially in secret, without transcripts or recordings, planning to drop recommendations on Congress in the middle of a lame-duck session, with each leader in the House and Senate promising a vote on the recommendations. Unlike the Conrad-Gregg commission upon which this was modeled, the executive order on the fiscal commission does not mandate a super-majority requirement in each chamber of Congress for passage. It does mandate the need for agreement from 14 of the 18 commission members for passage of any recommendation, but the commission is stacked with people who want to target entitlement spending rather than any balanced proposal.
Even those supposedly defending bedrock programs like Social Security and Medicare on the commission, like the SEIU’s Andy Stern, have expressed a desire to at least open the retirement program to add-on private stock accounts:
“I agree with many Commissioners who have said that all entitlement programs should be on the table. We should include tax entitlements in that conversation… This Commission should examine our country’s entire retirement security system, private and public. Taxpayer dollars are spent in a multitude of ways, not just on Social Security, with the aim of producing retirement security. Yet, many Americans retire
with anything but security. We should include as part of our agenda ideas for strengthening the private parts of the retirement security system, reviewing both the adequacy and the solvency of the Social Security system, and the possibility of universal add-on retirement accounts.
Add-on private accounts are an idea direct from the DLC in the late 1990s, when Bruce Reed, who co-wrote a domestic policy book with Rahm Emanuel, was involved with the group.
We have a commission pre-disposed to those types of ideas, operating partially in secret, foisting recommendations on Congress in December, without a super-majority obstacle to overcome in the House or the Senate (although the filibuster would presumably still be in play should a Democrat actually want to protect people from safety net cuts).
An House aide told me that the commission is deliberately trying to “keep the public from weighing in until the last possible moment.” They aren’t delivering public hearings outside of Washington, claiming that they don’t have a budget, but that could be deliberate as well, because it allows them to have billionaire hedge fund manager Pete Peterson provide the commission with staff and fold the conversation into his deficit mania “America Speaks” tour. It’s quite a public/private partnership going on.
I wonder if anyone will wait outside the door in the Cannon office building tomorrow while the first working group plots to force the middle class to “sacrifice” for the bailouts of the rich and connected. Maybe someone will put a glass up to the door and listen in and get us a rough sketch of what they have planned.




23 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
They must love the spill distraction. Thank you for this post. This is disturbing. This news needs more legs.
They better wind down that war in Iraq pretty fast and get those soldiers and private contractors back home, because after they cut SS and Medicare they’re gonna need ‘em to control the rioting.
Denial= “But Obama is a progressive!”
Anger= “What a f*cking ret*rd Rham is!”
Bargaining= “If I support real progressives in 2010, everything will be OK.”
Depression= “They’re all prostitutes.”
Acceptance= Getting a custodial job at the Goldman Sachs Building to pay for my cat food.
“They must love the spill distraction.”
Not to mention the fund-raising possibilities it has opened up:
DSCC email asks donors to “help Pres. Obama hold BP accountable.”
Disgusting. The whole damn lot of them.
It’s as transparent as the Gulf of Mexico right now and just as oily.
Andy Stern. Why is this guy’s name popping up in neoliberal policy making? Bails on the unions so he must figure there’s more dust to be collected in the Village.
Maybe we should push to get an “Audit the Cat Food Commission” amendment tacked onto the “Audit the Fed” amendment.
Straight-up gangstas…
This so aptly called catfood commission should show any but the most hardwired Obamabot just how corporatist and anti ordinary American Obama is. As I said about Lloyd Blankfein, we need to dump the descriptions of these guys as nice but mistaken, overly cautious, or simply greedy. What they are doing goes far beyond any of that. It is evil. They are making war on us, the hoi polloi, and counting on a colluding media to distract and hide this fact.
Their attitude of us reminds me of the Walrus in Through the Looking Glass
Start a campaign to impeach Obama. Scrounge up some reason and make it clear that his push to eliminate Social Security is the impetus. It may not go anywhere, but it should be out there. The man has pushed the limit. If people don’t start trying to get rid of him because of this, he will think he can do anything he damn well wants, up to and including war with Iran. I’d trust Biden over Obama any day of the week…Obama can take his cult at Kos with him, and they go find some compound in the desert.
we need to dump the descriptions of these guys as nice but mistaken, overly cautious, or simply greedy. What they are doing goes far beyond any of that. It is evil. They are making war on us, the hoi polloi, and counting on a colluding media to distract and hide this fact.
Absolutely. Terminology is very important. These people need to be characterized for what they really are, and those terms need to be repeated as often and in as many venues as possible. Obviously, the application of such descriptions does not comport with the agenda of the MSM, but you take your shots where you can get them. Every little bit…
Andy Stern, Partner in Charge, Social Security Add On Programs, Goldman Sachs; Barack Obama, first sorta black Preznit of Harvard or CEO of the Ford Foundation, first almost black guy at Carlisle, sitting right between Lloyd Blankfein (GS,ret.) and George Bush The Not Drunk.
This is The Way Of The Ford/Harvard warrior.
“…should a Democrat actually want to protect people from safety net cuts.”
LMAO. Funniest thing I’ve read all day. It seems such a bizarrely unreal a situation as to defy imagination. I mean, can anyone really picture how ridiculous a Democrat would look trying to protect the American citizen from corporate/right-wing predation?
Next you’ll be suggesting that a Republican might be pre-disposed to protecting American citizens from such!
maybe because of this
obamarahma is trying his hardest to make w look good. obamarahma is going to have as successful a presidency as w did; he is going to get all the legislation passed that w couldn’t: corp friendly health insurance, ending SS and Medicare operating in any meaningful way, and continuing the reduction of taxes on the wealthy. By the time he is out of office the elevation of the POTUS to unchecked power will be complete and we will be driven into third world status. This is why blackwater,et al were allowed and encouraged to develop.
Of course, none of this will mean much in view of the destruction of the earth by the erupting oil reservoir. By the time they get it capped, the Gulf area will probably be destroyed for some generations; perhaps forever. This will probably give obamarahma more jokes at next year’s correspondents’s dinner (don’t bother to ask me if he should have been down at the Gulf’s edge on that night because my answer is unashamedly YES).
Yes, I’m with stern on the privatization of SS. The recent events, at least since 2008, have shown us what a smart move it would have been to have invested our life savings with the MOTU of wall st. I can’t wait for the cat food commission to give congress their instructions of how to line the pockets of peterson, et al.
“The most transparent Administration in American history” — yeah, right, tell me another one.
Good night and good luck to all who enjoy those Baracken dreams.
I agree with this. A percentage of voters (on both sides of the one-party system) will actually “get” it, but right now, they’re not. Republics are just in knee-jerk hate the Dems just because mode (uniformed and reacting rather than responding), while many Dems are still in the hopeful-becuase- it’s-a-Dem-POTUS-and-Congress mode.
If this percentage, plus some portion of Indies, could get the REAL picture, then I think we could get somewhere. As it now stands, too many are being distracted by the “we hate Congress” meme, which the “media” is pushing all over the place (yet another distraction).
I’ve been pushing this idea out there to anyone that I can. It’s class warfare, for sure, and even the erstwhile “upper middle” class is being royally screwed. No amount of tax breaks for billionaires will save them, either. Voters need to figure out who is really out to get the serfs.
Isn’t there a federal “open meetings act” which allows a lawsuit over this garbage? How can the deliberation on this be closed, secret?
What basis in law is there for this?
I’m just a dumb, state law lawyer but I’ve sued under the state FOIA and know the state Open Meetings Act well. I know there’s a federal equivalent. We got gobs of lawyers on this site, doesn’t someone want to sue and make a name for him or herself?
Any unemployed attorneys with free time on their hands want to do this?
Maybe it’s time to start a FDL Litigation Action group?
Is this any help?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/usc_sec_05_00000552—b000-.html
thanks for receiving those dccc emails so i don’t have to. i couldn’t stomach it.
And I thought I had reached the limits of that sinking, sickening feeling in my stomach creeping into my mouth a little bit.
Thanks for the update David. Yer a hoss.
yes
We need this commission. As much as the left thinks running up debt isn’t a problem, it is. I’m holding my judgement until the final report is published. The truth is that unless we get control of our debt problem, SS, Medicare, and Medicaid will not be able to meet their goals.