This video from Alabama’s John Wathen, taken at the site of the BP oil disaster, shows the massive scope of the oil slick. “For the first time in my environmental career, I find myself using the word hopeless,” Wathen said, despairing. “We can’t stop this. There’s no way to prevent this from hitting our shorelines… the Gulf appears to be bleeding.”
In the midst of this unfolding nightmare, two Senators will release a “climate change” bill that potentially expands the practice of offshore drilling. But it will include new protections allowing states to cancel out domestic production that could impact their shores.
The energy and climate bill Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.) will unveil Wednesday will give states the right to veto offshore oil drilling in a neighboring state, according to sources briefed on the plan.
The two senators, who are going ahead and introducing the bill without their longtime ally GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.), have tweaked the bill in a few ways to address concerns raised by the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. It requires an Interior Department study to determine which states could be economically and environmentally affected by a spill.
Those affected states would then be able to veto drilling by passing a law. Those states that are able to go ahead with drilling will retain 37 percent of the federal revenue generated by that activity.
Yes, it’s the return of the “opt-out,” last seen during the health care debate as a convenient way for Congress to punt contentious issues back to the states. But I doubt that even this will satisfy opponents of new drilling, who have been emboldened by the BP spill. In two Senate committees today, anti-drilling Senators fulminated about the disaster. And Florida’s Bill Nelson certainly doesn’t sound conciliatory:
Word is climate bill might let rigs in Florida’s no-drill zone. If Sens. Kerry, Lieberman are following me on Twitter: that’s a non starter.
That said, the states may take care of this kind of opt-out opportunity favorably, from the environmentalist perspective. Charlie Crist will enact a special session which could lead to a constitutional amendment from the people on the future of offshore drilling.
“There is no stronger place to put it,” Crist said. “The constitution is the bedrock of our democracy and our governance in Florida. It’s appropriate for the people to have the opportunity to make this call.”
Sixty percent of voters would have to approve such a ban for it to take effect.
The session would also focus on energy alternatives, the governor said.
But anti-drilling advocates seem poised to foreclose all options for new drilling off American shores, and pro-drilling conservatives probably won’t go for this restriction, either. So I cannot believe that this threads the needle and helps passage at all.
Juliet Eilperin has a fuller rendering of the contents of the climate and energy bill from Kerry and Lieberman here. We’ll have a longer analysis once the bill is released tomorrow.
UPDATE: Joe Lieberman says expanded drilling is in the bill:
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) said in an interview that the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill raises serious concerns about the safety of offshore energy production. Still, he said the climate bill that is set for rollout at a 1:30 p.m. EDT press conference tomorrow with Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) reflects their long-standing plans to grow the domestic supply of oil.
“Yes, there will be a drilling provision in it,” Lieberman said. “We’ve stuck with what we’ve had. We’ve made one slight alteration. And we expect we’ll make some more alterations as this goes on based on what we’ve learned, particularly from [Interior Secretary Ken] Salazar’s 30-day review about what more could be done to protect the safety.”
Meanwhile, Harry Reid isn’t interested on doing much with this bill until after the Memorial Day recess.




40 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Can there be any longer any doubt who own congress? We are in the middle of an epic and unprecedented disaster, made entirely by greed and this so called “climate bill” calls for more of the same.
A real climate bill would ban offshore drilling altogether.
It’s got that revolting little weasel’s name on it? It’s gotta be crap.
Yes it would. But then those oil and coal donations would dry up.
Please the GOP and Blue Dogs both don’t want this bill adding more fuel to the fire. Both sides want think the oil spill will be fixed by then and with high unemployment oil jobs will save them.
This climate bill is about to become an Oil/Nuclear/green jobs bill.
Obama seems intent on being the transitional leader nobody is satisfied with who by surrendering to preserve the peace makes things worse. Think Neville Chamberlain think Millard Filmore
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millard_Fillmore
Wow, after Memorial day there could be 40 million gallons in the gulf @ 25,000 barrels a day X 41 days.
Then the fat lady does sing a sad song.
This is NOT a case where wishful thinking will make it better.
Sounds like Bill will ride this issue through the election the Memorial day delay assumes that the spill is fixed.
However Bill will point out his state will suffer because of other states drilling oil. Bill will point out that the oil companies can’t and won’t compensate his state for its economic losses.
When harm out weighs benefit does oil drilling make sense?
Yup, which is why I’m glad to see Harry Reid’s willing to sit on this sucker until after Memorial Day. He can read the polls — he knows full well that support for offshore drilling is dropping with each passing day that the Horizon oil volcano belches up gunk, and the one thing that’s most likely to stop the eruption is the relief well that won’t be ready until August, by which time the crud will almost certainly have hooked into the Loop Current and be halfway up the Eastern Seaboard.
The longer the Lieberman bill is held up, the more likely we are to be able to get a better bill.
A spill like we’re seeing in the Gulf would be quite a mess if it happened along the eastern seaboard.
But hey — an opt-out provision for states will protect them, right?
After all, if Maryland opts out and a Virginia offshore well goes rogue, that opt-out provision will keep the oil away from the Maryland coast.
Right?
Adding offshore drilling to the climate bill is nothing more than an attempt to appease the wing nuts in Congress.
It would be many years before any oil found offshore would make it to the market and find it’s way into our gas tanks.
By the time this oil is found and pumped out demand will have increased dramatically and this little bit of oil wouldn’t amount to a drop in the bucket.
Any reasonable climate bill will make a serious attempt to reduce demand for oil ,and won’t call for more drilling
OT haven’t been around the Lake much lately.
Does any one know the winning slogan for the Name That Pot contest ?
Ken Salazar should be under investigation by the Justice Department for using a loophole so that BP did not have to pass an environmental review. Do we have investigators anymore? Do we need a new version of Nader’s Raiders? I think so. And they need really cool long coats or cool hats like “The Untouchables.” Make fighting crime sexy again. Works in the movies.
Seconded
I liked it when John Wathen said it was time for the government to step up to the plate and admit they are responsible for this disaster. It sounds like the only thing anyone can do now is try to mitigate the damage.
Gee, Obama, do you suppose maybe you could fit in a prime time press conference between your closed-door meetings with “savvy” Oil, Wall Street, and Defense industry businessmen?
To say nothing about the rest of the Gulf Stream states and, of course, Canada all of which are heavy fish producing and tourist meccas. Why the hell we are drilling at all without taking into account the devastation caused to the environment is beyond my simple brain. Maybe it something to do with greed….I don’t know.
I hate to use this stupid word, but here I go: Bingo!
Interesting point, billybugs@10. Can you write a diary about this?
Totally irresponsible to be voting on offshore drilling during this time of catastrophe.
The entire language/policy development on offshore drilling needs to be pulled from the bill until we know the impact of the GC spill. The state opt-out is crap. Let’s make sure the states that opt out can collect ALL LOSSES from those states that opt-in and have a spill destroying non-participating state coasts.
Opt out. What a joke. Like the oil knows what states “opt out”.
If they want to vote for offshore now, pull it from the bill and make it a separate vote so we know who to go after for the drilling policy.
I don’t think offshore drilling in and of itself is a totally bad thing. We are stuck with oil for now and there is no way to replace it in the near term. I think we as a nation should be striving toward that goal with something like the Apollo Project kind of motivation.
However, the real problem here from airplanes crashing, automobiles mechanical design and software defects causing scores of fatalities, coal mines blowing up or collapsing, and now offshore platform exploding. All of these things have something very much in common: DEREGULATION
This has allowed the foxes to guard the hen houses with predictable results. Even where there is some regulation the penalties are laughable enough to be routinely ignored by every industry segment. This is where blame is best lain.
It’s entering the gulf stream, your wish is granted the East Coast is in for an oily treat there is no stopping this now other than a new heaven and new earth.( and a new attitude)
Who the hell oriinated this opt-out damn nonsense? They should be dropped from an aircraft in the middle of the ocean.
I can’t opt out of laws I don’t like, so why the hell do some people get to?
I spill a glass of milk. A 1,000,000 gallons a day is a oil blow out and it’s picking up speed, wait till it erodes the riser that’s limiting the damage while it holds.
New post up top…
Why are we still considering drilling for oil?
Demand ,plain and simple. Americans don’t want to give up those big gas guzzler vehicles. Watching KO last night I saw a commercial for a 550 HP Caddy ,I have to ask: who the hell needs a car with 550 HP? The very next commercial was for a GMC pick-up with a 6 plus litre engine. Great for pulling stumps I guess ,but how many people actually use a truck that way.
As long as Americans keep buying and driving vehicles that get single digit gas mileage the oil companies will keep pumping the shit out of the ground
“dropped from an aircraft”
Into the middle of the slick of course !
lifting the moratorium is a non-starter.
And does the offshore portion have all the strict regulatory measures Norway has in the North Sea Offshore Area?
I bet “No.”
Yes, the magical force field implemented by the Opt-Out will save them! (Or not.)
Yet another reason to sit on this thing and get a better bill ready to push after the Memorial Day recess.
“Opt out” is a convenient way to not have to make the hard decisions on the environment, but we can’t afford offshore drilling no matter who opts in or out. If only all states would opt out. What we need is a strong bill to combat climate change–offshore drilling is a distraction from the real problems going on. I wrote more about this if you’re interested at http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/05/06/clean-energy-and-the-oil-spill-3-facts-you-may-not-know-10575/
Most thoughtful, well-considered and timely commentary, brycecovert.
Thank you.
DW
Obama’s wars are the ultimate gas guzzlers.
Opt-out?
When can Louisiana opt-out of the Gulf?
Add to that the decision about what constitutes a “neighboring” state would be made by the extremely anti-sanity anti-environmental interior department Salazar. And then the state would have to pass a law. Does not sound promising to me.
Also, this bill guts the Environmental Protection Agency. It would be very bad to pass it for that reason alone even if good things were in the bill, but what we have in it is Nuclear, “Clean” coal, Offshore drilling and other assorted vileness.
There is no up side to this bill. It’s a disaster creating more impending disasters.
We don’t need to wait to know the impact. If this well gushing doesn’t fuck the whole gulf up and more, then one of them will. It’s enough to see what’s happening now to say, “No, this pig won’t fly.”
What moratorium? 27 new permits have been given out for offshore drilling since the gusher started. Obama said there was a moratorium, but that is not what’s actually been happening.
Words = Moratorium.
Actions = Offshore drilling as usual.
The 1908 Model T Ford got an estimated 25 mpg. Fast forward 100 years. According to the EPA, the average mpg for all cars was 21. What is wrong with this picture. Everything. Technological advances have been repressed for decades because of crony capitalism.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/050711carmileageaveragempg
One of the best solutions, at the present time, for alternative fuel is growing industrial hemp. The US is the only nation I know of that prohibits its growth. You can thank W, Randolph Hearst and Dupont for this. Hearst Paper Manufacturing, a division of Kimberly Clark, stood to lose billions if hemp were used to make paper rather than wood. In 1937 Dupont developed plastics using oil and coal. They stood to lose up to 80% of their business if hemp were industrialized. I think everyone here knows what happened next. Do you know that in the state of Virginia, from 1763 to 1769, it was illegal NOT to grow hemp.
http://www.alternet.org/environment/140739/help_save_the_earth,_time_to_subsitute_hemp_for_oil/
I agree with you. I am supplying “reasonable language” to force pulling the offshore drilling from the bill. Their folks do read here.
Excellent article. I wonder why I’m the first comment as it looks like the article was posted on May 6.
Offshore drilling is not a single monolithic enterprise.
There is a world of difference between jack up rigs operating in a few hundred feet of water and deepwater operations like Horizon operating in 5000 feet of water.
There are over 600 production platforms in the Gulf with their feet on the floor, most of which have been in place for 20 or 30 years and survived numerous hurricanes without a major incident.
The difference in technology required to drill at 300 feet vs. 5000 feet is like the difference between a piper cub and the space shuttle.
If the opposition to drilling is going to meet with any success, they need to recognize this distinction and act accordingly.
Sadly, that’s the best news I’ve seen yet surrounding this disaster.
Thanks for the explanation in layman’s terms . .
I wouldn’t bet on it, Energy is a thorny issue because people are made Rich from it and the saying goes don’t mess with a person’s money.
Whats puzzling is these Oil Companies are busy calling themselves “Energy Companies” but they make “tiny” investments in alternative energies?
BP the so-called “Green” Oil Company just spilled untold millions of gallons of oil in the Gulf and we’re suppose to believe they are “Green”, sure they own a company that makes Solar Panels but big deal, they cut spending in Alternative Energy last quarter…
The “Green” details of this climate bill are going to be hashed out by committee. Wwait a second, haven’t we seen this movie before? This is how the Health Care Reform bill got written…