We have a $180 billion dollar jobs bill likely to get a vote this week. Very few people know about it. But labor has made it a litmus test.
What’s in the bill? This was originally imagined as a “tax extenders” bill, and those expired tax breaks from the end of 2009, like the R&D credit, remain. The bill also extends to the end of the year key safety net provisions like unemployment insurance and the 65% COBRA subsidy from the stimulus package. There’s $25 billion in Medicaid funding for the states. The summer youth jobs program pushed by the Congressional Black Caucus got in here as well. There’s also a five-year extension of the “doc fix,” ensuring Medicare reimbursement rates don’t plunge (that costs $65 billion). And funding will increase for infrastructure projects through another round of the Build America Bonds program and other tax credits.
So basically, everything that’s been discussed over the last few months got mixed together into this bill. And some Democrats wanted to at least partially pay for this, so they got some tax loopholes closed:
So, what about the closing tax loopholes part? This is good. Really good.
Significant parts of the bill would be paid for by eliminating the tax incentives that encourage companies to ship American jobs overseas. The bill would prevent corporations from using current U.S. foreign tax credit rules to subsidize their foreign activities, and close a host of corporate tax loopholes that allow companies to avoid paying U.S. taxes through a variety of foreign tax credit schemes.
But here’s the best part. You know how working folks are required to pay regular income and employment taxes? Even if you are unemployed you likely have to pay the regular income tax on your unemployment insurance payments. But wealthy investment fund managers don’t. No siree. The fees they “earn” are taxed as so-called “carried interest”, a tax loophole that allows their income to be taxed at only 15 percent, as if it were capital gains.
Super-rich hedge fund managers, private equity fund managers and other high-flying Wall Street traders pay a much lower tax rate than working people do — even if you’re on unemployment! And taxpayers are left holding the bag for an estimated $2 billion a year in lost revenues due to this one loophole.
Well, they helped bring down the economy while making out like bandits — and now it’s high time they paid their fair share. This jobs bill would close their “carried interest” tax loophole.
This only partially covers the $180 billion price tag, which has made some Blue Dogs and fly-by-night fiscal conservatives nervous. But the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities says that deficit concerns should not get in the way:
Concerns that the package is too large or that it should not be enacted unless it is fully paid for are misplaced. The bill includes three important but strictly temporary measures that will stimulate additional demand for goods and services and create jobs while the recovery is still struggling to gain traction; they are not permanent measures that add to the long-term budget deficit [...]
The impact of this jobs bill on the economy is strongly positive in the near term, while the impact on our long-term fiscal problem is insignificant.
Extending UI and COBRA, along with fiscal relief for the states, are targeted, temporary measures which increase demand in the short term, and offsetting the whole bill would essentially defeat the purpose. This is about as much of a “jobs bill” as we’ll get for the rest of the year, which is why labor has jumped aboard so strongly. Richard Trumka’s statement on this is nothing short of aggressive:
If you’re not for this bill, you’re not for jobs. Period.
And please, no more excuses about the budget deficit—unless and until you’re willing to make Wall Street pay its fair share to bring down the deficit. The people who are always saying “no” to jobs because of the deficit are often the same people who voted to squander our hard-earned budget surpluses so they could shower undeserved tax breaks on rich people during the Bush years. Apparently, spending money on rich people is perfectly okay, but investing in jobs for working class Americans sets off alarm bells.
Labor has basically made this bill central to their endorsement process for members of Congress.
In the midst of an unemployment crisis, measures like this are sorely needed, and we’ll see if Congress has enough sense to realize that this week.




25 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Oooh, Pete Peterson is not going to like this one bit!
Small beer, with unemployment at 10 percent plus.
I’ll be surprised if the senators from HF (Hedge Fund) vote for this, no matter what Schumer sez now.
GREAT CATCH, thanks.
From the Wall Street Journal video below, the guy on the right AGREES with hedge fund managers paying MORE!
News Hub: Congress Targets Private Equity Pay 5/21/2010 4:58:37 PM
The House is expected to approve the long-debated “carried interest” provision with a vote moving to the Senate in the coming week. The new law threatens to more than double the taxes on the largest chunk of private-equity hedge-fund managers’ earnings. WSJ’s Peter Lattman previews his piece for tomorrow’s paper.
This legislation is another example of strong substantial agreement on BOTH sides. I hope someone tells Rahm.
All that matters is how much hedge fund managers contribute to Schumer’s campaign and what kind of job they’re going to provide for Dodd next year.
Oh they will vote for it,then pat themselves on the back. Like little Jack Horner and say “What a good boy/girl am I” After anything that will do any good for Main St. is stripped out of the bill in committee.
The only thing worse for Main St. than Democrats are Republicans, and the Dems are feeding us to the republicans like slop to hogs.
It won’t be long until the poor are living in tents or cardboard shacks along side the huge piles of garbage as they do in India.
The poor will be much easier to ignore that way.
Who are they? We need a list. We need to know who’s bought by whom big business, religion, and which big business or religion.
Big oil has no interest in Cap and trade but banks, hedgefunds love it.
Maybe we could make pokemon type cards for kids?
What’s the basis for this statement? I’m not saying it’s wrong, but where can I find a stat to back it up?
See my 5.
The explanation was in the next sentence.
Then there’s this thing called teh google. Here’s one reference. I’ve only scanned the beginning, but it should do.
Good start but lets create more jobs. I want the GOP to argue less jobs in an election.
We need BP to pay the fishermen more and so far I haven’t heard about them paying for lost tourist jobs. If BP pays its off budget.
If they don’t pay we can talk about taking away all their drilling platform’s. We can nationalize all their gas stations.
We can point out that of every country that has nationalized their oil only Russia has reprivatized and that was only after a huge economic collapse.
We can up the stakes on BP on the GOP on jobs and by being strong get the Emotional Choice voters they like strong action from leaders.
Why is Capital Gains taxed at the same rate Wallmart workers get taxed at? Are the poor poor hedgefund managers having to go on welfare to provide for their family?/s
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Corporate_Welfare/WalMart_Welfare.html
How about we insist that oil and food prices be added in when they calculate inflation? If your rich you don’t notice but for those living paycheck to paycheck its the difference between healthy meals for kids or ramen noodles for a week.
I want the Right to Life GOPers to argue against kids who are already alive this election. I want them to scream Abortion and for us to reply you won’t take care of the kids who are already alive!
Who are they?
http://www.opensecrets.org
http://maplight.org/
You need to read Dickens. Hang them.
Jon Walker has a fresh cross-post already in progress: Health Care Law Loses Support: People Can’t Stay Excited About a Plan Taking Effect in 2014
The truth is that American labor unions, like angry Greek pensioners, have become de facto arms of the State. They are the rabid vanguard of a collapsing system, using violence and intimidation to make it clear those not favorably connected to the political power structure will be sacrificed to preserve it, for as long as possible.
The Obama Adminstration’s objective is to transfer your wealth to the SEIU and other powerful collective organizations, to fund their lavish benefits. Obama even bought a car company as a gift to the United Auto Workers. The American taxpayer has pumped over $17 billion into GMAC, so it can continue to provide the UAW with wages and benefits far beyond anything those taxpayers enjoy… a wealth transfer hidden behind shell games and media manipulation.
This system has nothing to do with the people “behind you.” It’s all about satisfying people who already have gold-plated retirement plans and Cadillac health care, in exchange for their political support. Some of the most ridiculous benefit plans belong to government employee unions, which means the government is taxing the hell out of the private sector to pay itself to vote for itself. Vast sums are also plowed into subsidies for well-connected businesses, and welfare programs which have dangerously eroded the human capital we prize as our most precious resource.
Obama has been a big recipient of BP cash.
Indie wrote -”…continue to provide the UAW with wages and benefits far beyond anything those taxpayers enjoy.”
And it is not a good thing for American workers to make a solid middle class wage because why???? This is what all companies should strive for. The fact that some morons fall for the “we don’t have it, why should they?” just says a lot about our educational system’s lack in teaching people how to think logically as well as all the politicos trend to keep division up amoung the people of the USA.
May I add one more thing, Indie? My husband is a UAW worker and he has given up BOTH hips, his neck and one knee to the job. Yup, 4 surgeries (replacements), all due to what he does to make a decent middle income living. Talk to most UAW workers and you will hear the same thing – they pay for their benefits with body parts.
God, how I wish it were Obama’s goal to hand over wealth to the labor unions! Unfortunately, he’s run away from something as fair and common sense as EFCA and into the arms of his corporate benefactors.
What is your goal, Indie troll?
More…class war?
Teabaggers on FDL? If you were actually informed on labor issues, Mr. Indie, you would know that at one time, in the 1960s, about one out of three American workers were members of unions. As a result of that, middle-class parents could afford to send their kids to college and many other things that rich people take for granted. And very few politicians had the temerity to mess with union leaders.
These days, however, union membership is down to about 12% of the workforce and the middle class is being rapidly destroyed. Indie’s nonsensical anti-union tirade ignores the reality of the situation. But hey, what would you expect from a Teabagger.
It is important to carefully monitor and adjust your medications if you wish to enjoy good mental health.
What gets me is that if you didn’t give it any thought you might come to believe that the reason the tea baggers protest so much is that any changes affecting the upper two percent or the super wealthy would hurt them too. But it wouldn’t. They aren’t super rich themselves. So, I’m left wondering why they make such an effort to speak for people who don’t need their help and probably wouldn’t associate with them. The way I see it, if I earned $20,000 a year and you taxed me at 17% it would hurt me more than if you taxed someone who made fifteen million at 30%. They would still walk off with quite a few million. They have nothing to bitch about. So, if on top of that they had to pay 40% on let’s say a four million dollar bonus then, still, just in bonus money alone, they would make more than 50% of the population earns. Seriously, if you want to drink from the cow’s tit then you have to give it a handful of grass once in a while. And this habit of sending our jobs overseas because over there they only earn twenty dollars a day has to stop. The only real way for us to really get out of this financial mess is for us to have consumers with money in their pockets. Stop rigging the game so that the only ones who make money are the upper corporate officials and their cronies. Loyalty is a door that swings both ways. I would buy american even if it cost a few more dollars, if I could find made in America more often.
Regardless of labor being a defacto arm of The Fascist State, this legislation is likely the BEST we can get for now (given Obama won’t go FDR GALT on WPA like govt created jobs and never will) to do the MOST good for the greatest amount.
I’ll take the legislation, given we can’t get better, and I’ll take labor’s help in enacting the legislation.
David, Thank you for covering this subject.
I scour FDL everyday looking for this news. Can you tell me if the “Jobs Bill” intends to fund Tier 5, (6, 7, etc.,) of Unemployment Benefits? Many of us are praying for this funding in order to hold onto our homes.