Whose oil is it under the ground? Who “owns” that oil? In Alaska they decided the oil belongs to the People of the state and that the People will benefit if it is extracted. When the oil was discovered they created as part of their Constitution to establish the Alaska Permanent Fund, which collects at least 25% of the proceeds from companies that drill, and use that money for the People of the state for current and all future generations. This means the fund is set up so that after the oil is gone it will continue to benefit the People of Alaska. The fund pays a dividend to Alaska residents each year. They don’t pay taxes, their resources are managed so they get a check, $3,269 per person in 2008, $1,305 in 2009.
That’s Alaska. Under President Bush’s management, our country’s resources were treated very differently,
New projections, buried in the Interior Department’s just-published budget plan, anticipate that the government will let companies pump about $65 billion worth of oil and natural gas from federal territory over the next five years without paying any royalties to the government.
Now, a story in the NY Times today, As Oil Industry Fights a Tax, It Reaps Billions From Subsidies,
When the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform set off the worst oil spill at sea in American history, it was flying the flag of the Marshall Islands. Registering there allowed the rig’s owner to significantly reduce its American taxes.
. . . At the same time, BP was reaping sizable tax benefits from leasing the rig. According to a letter sent in June to the Senate Finance Committee, the company used a tax break for the oil industry to write off 70 percent of the rent for Deepwater Horizon — a deduction of more than $225,000 a day since the lease began.
It isn’t just the little tax breaks here and there, it’s the whole thing,
… an examination of the American tax code indicates that oil production is among the most heavily subsidized businesses, with tax breaks available at virtually every stage of the exploration and extraction process.
According to the most recent study by the Congressional Budget Office, released in 2005, capital investments like oil field leases and drilling equipment are taxed at an effective rate of 9 percent, significantly lower than the overall rate of 25 percent for businesses in general and lower than virtually any other industry.
It isn’t “anti-business” to ask that these huge monopolistic corporations pay their fair share, it is about fairness and giving other businesses a chance. Imagine trying to compete with this rigged system, if you are an alternative energy startup.
There is much more at the link, and a discussion of the various tax breaks and other government assistance given to giant oil companies.
It isn’t just that we’re letting these companies take public resources without compensating We, the People for it. It isn’t just that they leave behind terrible externalized costs like pollution, climate change, spill cleanups, etc. These companies are also polluting science and our democracy. Here is what I mean:
Inside Koch’s Climate Denial Machine,
Who’s behind a multi-million dollar campaign to seed doubt about climate change? It’s not just Exxon and Chevron—it’s also Koch Industries, an oil and gas giant that most people have never heard of, according to a new report from Greenpeace. Koch’s extensive funding of anti-climate work makes it the “financial kingpin of climate science denial and clean energy opposition,” says Greenpeace.
Exxon Still Sponsoring Deniers,
ExxonMobil is still funding groups that deny climate change, despite claiming last year that it had stopped doing so.
Hundreds and hundreds of other articles about this.
And not just climate denial. Oil companies have joined tobacco companies and Wall Street funding the right in general. Under Bush it may have even had government help, not just tax breaks.
We, the People are supposed to be in charge of our resources, our laws, and through those laws even in charge of the companies that operate in our country.




13 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I’m sure that Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles will be right on the case.
Because everything is on the table™.
Great article. This is one you will NEVER EVER see in a newspaper or on television which are owned by large corporations.
Thanks Dave!
Sarah Palin did that….she actually made them pay the divident…here in Texas we are expected to clean up after this company made a huge mess and killed our fish…Bush is just/was sooo great!
Please don’t mention Simpson, Bowles, Conrad, Gregg, Rivlin or any of the rest of the “Give SS to the Wall Street SS Commission.”
fabulous reporting Dave.
and hey, I thought it was Deficit Summer ! – U. S. Senate votes to allow Extractionists to keep $35B in subsidies
tragic that I correctly guessed all 21 of the so called Democrats
Book Salon up at the Mothership with Alexander Zaitchik’s Common Nonsense: Glenn Beck and the Triumph of Ignorance hosted by Sara Robinson
The thing about deepwater drilling is that there was significant incentive to pursue this in 1995, even though there was no practical way to extract oil and transport it to refineries, at the time. Yet BP built Atlantis and BHP Billiton built out deepwater transport systems. Here’s the landmark event that launched deepwater exploration and production, from Geotimes:
Atlantis is considered by the Food and Water Watch and certain Congresscritters consider the Atlantis platform a far greater menace to the gulf than the current runaway spill.
As you note, the payment to Alaskans went down $1900 from 2008 to 2009. Sarah Palin signed an agreement, while her husband worked for the oil industry, that changed the methodology for establishing the annual payment. According to reports, she changed the payment measure, from being based on a % of the GROSS revenue, to that of a % of the NET. How can we verify that the 2009 payment is based on the NET proceeds?? This was another win, win for BIG OIL and a loss for the people of Alaska. I think Alaska needs to be subject to an AUDIT post haste and the Interior Department needs to review not only OIL subsidies but OIL royalties that are supposed to be collected. In addition, I would like to know if all the lease payments have been made timely?
Sorry to disappoint you, but the permanent fund was created way, way after oil had been discovered. It was the work of Jay Hammond, a republican, who felt that it was the only way the people of Alaska would realize anything from the oil dollars. The legislature had gone on a pork barrel orgy, spending money on every crazy idea their cronies had, and not much to roads and schools, stuff everyone needs. Sarah Palin had nothing to do with it, other than collecting her check every year.
So, how much do these oil company subsidies cost U.S. taxpayers at the pump every time a U.S. taxpayer fills up?
This skimming of U.S. taxpayer money by oil companies through subsidies amounts to a hidden gax tax added to each gallon of gas pumped. Unlike U.S. taxpayer money going to farm subsidies, this involves making it possible (at U.S. taxpayer expense) for oil companies to make even bigger profits than the huge profits they are already making. What gives?
Well, I’m sure we all feel bad about this:
BP eyes stake sale as spill cost tops $3 billion
LINK.
If some other corp is successful in hostile takeover or whatever, would they have to assume BP’s oil gusher liability, and would they then spin the liability off into some small corporate compartment or other which will then just die on the vine? Or . . ?
We the People fucked again by corporate slime in legalized crime!
How much more do we pay big oil because of Bushie/Palin policies?
Well, in the 2000 presidential race Bush claimed we’d all be stuck paying $2/gallon for gasoline if Gore was elected.
You figure we pay $2.60/gal or more, so $0.60/gal for every single gallon pumped in the last 10 years. That’s a lot.