Sometimes, if the facts are clear, if the people band together an yell loud enough, sometimes, just sometimes, you can get the powers that be to reconsider an unjust act. Not overturn, yet, but reconsider. Ain’t America grand?
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said early Wednesday that his department will reconsider the ouster of an employee who resigned over alleged race comments.
His statement came after civil rights leaders said they were “snookered” into believing a conservative website’s charges of racism against employee Shirley Sherrod were true.
Vilsack said that he will “conduct a thorough review and consider additional facts” about his decision to ask Sherrod to resign.
Let me conduct your thorough review, Secretary Vilsack. Watch this tape. Or read the transcript. Or, if you want to throw in “additional facts,” this woman’s history. I think you could wrap up the review in about 45 minutes.
The country is embarrassed by this incident. Whether it proves that Americans are, as Eric Holder said, a nation of cowards when it comes to race, or whether it just proves the existence of an executive branch full of cowards, permanently ensconced in a defensive crouch, the implications are similarly dire for American political discourse. News cycles can be measured in half-seconds and volume these days, and the winning of mornings matters more than any effort to ameliorate conditions in the midst of an historically awful recession. What hurts is how good people get caught in the crossfire. Shirley Sherrod didn’t ask for attention. She committed the crime of telling a personal anecdote, one that was honest about her evolution to a fighter for justice and not race. Clearly that makes her unfit to work in the civil service.
This all feels very decadent to me. We have bigger challenges than at any time since the 1930s, and we’re spending time interpreting two-decade parables from an NAACP banquet. The biggest times of media bread and circus over the past couple decades have been now, and during the Clinton Administration. Whatever do those two eras share in common?
All hail the stupid.




118 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
This is not a minor incident and it is part of a much more serious problem facing progressives and all of our political discourse. The problem is the power and impact of the right wing smear machine to distort and distract from the important issues of the day. As long as the Drudges and Breitbarts of this world are able to interject their poison into our national discourse we will always be playing defensive. The Shirly Sherrod affair is a rare opportunity to effectively bring this evil rightwing tactic into the light of day. A tactic the Public and Media seem to be unaware of. Yes this is an ugly distraction but unless we DO something about it, it will be a cronic tool of the right to divert every one’s attention from the important issues of the day.
Obama couldn’t abandon her fast enough, could he?
I some how don’t understand how you think it was Obama, who is on vacation did this. Based on the time line I’d bet it was Rham-bo who started the knee jerking and possibly BO who interceded with Vilsak making him reconsider her firing.
This administration is going to need a bigger bus for throwing people under. There’s no more room under the one they’ve been using.
LOL of course…..anything bad that happens is due to Rahm (devil) and anything good that happens is due to Obama (god).
I bet you’re a christian.
The cossacks work for the czar. Obama could end this today. The Administration would rather blame Vilsack than take ownership.
Did anyone see Breitbart on TV today saying it was not Shirley but the NAACP audience that he was trying to make a point about? He claims (now) that he is just trying to show that the NAACP crowd is racist b/c they supposedly applaud when she says she did not want to help the white farmer. This is b/c people are saying the TP is a racist bunch. So he is just trying to show that the racism is two-way.
On edit: what a jerk.
I don’t know if Sherrod was hired as an appointee or as a career employee, but under either circumstance, it looks like her firing was illegal:
http://www.mspb.org/Federal-employee-termination-procedures.html
If she was a regular employee rather than an employee, her firing looks clearly illegal.
I predict that Ms Sherrod will be offered her job back after she is offered a better one outside of government. All deftly manipulated by the WH.
sick,sick MOFOs
THEY MADE HER,pull off the road,and resign on her BLACKBERRY…Rhampolean?????
I think progressives can learn a lot from Shirley Sherrod. She exemplifies the wonderful African American women who contributed so much substance and really spirituality to the Civil Rights movement. The moral authority that drives that movement is dignity, forgiveness and redemption.Shirley Sherrod is one woman who would not lay under the bus. As with Rosa Parks she is demonstrating her credentials to a seat on the bus.
Many words have been written on this blog about what it will take to develop and sustain a movement. You have to believe in it and with dignity practice it..
The VERY SKEEEEEEEEEEERD…Vischy Dems…sickening
I think it’s that one. In fairness though, it should be pointed out that Sherrod is saying that the White House called her yesterday and pressured her to resign but the White House is saying that it was all Vilsack’s doing. Profiles in courage… I know who I believe and her initials aren’t BHO.
um, isn’t that a bit harsh?
and regardless, wtf does the commenter’s religion have to do with anything?
Breitbart also hinted that he doesn’t believe the woman “purporting” to be Mrs. Spooner isn’t actually Mrs. Spooner. Seriously, how batsh*t crazy do these people have to be before the media stops paying attention to them?
Vilsack should be sacked. He is gullible (believing something from the right-wing smear machine? C’mon.), rash (no investigation, no nothing), disrespectful of the employees in his agency who have significant responsibility as this story illustrates, and so on. Just everything you’d want in a person at the top of an important federal agency.
I agree with mreddieb’s assessment of the situation. Blaming White House operatives doesn’t always equal a reactionary defense of Obama. TPM was reporting a rumor that Vilsack got a call early this morning from Obama, telling him to reconsider. That has to be treated as a rumor though as it hasn’t been confirmed. Just what the White House does is ultimately Obama’s responsibility doesn’t mean that it’s always directly his doing.
this could be a victory. sort of a “at long last, have you no shame moment” for the media and dimocratic leaders on gooper fantastical charges, even videos.
I aint holding my breath, but I think media–fox excluded–will take note.
& George let him run on & on. Before that segment, Sherrod was interviewed and asked if she would return to USDA if asked. She was very hesitant, & I doubt this savvy woman would.
“That has to be treated as a rumor though as it hasn’t been confirmed.”
National Public Radio, and on the half hour, Minnesota Public Radio have been reporting it for the last hour. Probably the same NPR source. Apparently Vilsack and Obama had a late night call last night.
Thanks. Yep, only a late night call would reasonably explain Vilsack contacting the press last night at 2:00am to say he was reconsidering.
And so should whichever White House operative pressured him to fire her.
“… and asked if she would return to USDA if asked .. ”
I surely wouldn’t go back to the same job but I might take Vilsack’s. :)
Nice to see some people can think for themselves :)
A few months ago, I was pilloried over at the Great Orange Satan for a diary that was titled “President Obama is a coward”. I took a real ass whipping for that, which is understandable. My title was a cheap attempt to make a point – that this administration has little stomach for confrontation.
I admit that I unfairly called the President out for this but as the old sage says ‘the buck stops here’. Regardless of who started this, whether it was Rahm or some punk staffer, the President takes the heat.
This travesty shows beyond a doubt that the White House cares what Fox News thinks of them. They really care. When we speak – crickets.
The rub: President Obama and his staff care more about the opinions of Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly and the rest of the goons at Fox then the Progressives that got him elected.
Because christians are dumb enough to blame the devil when “bad” things happen even though their god created the devil in the first place.
Vilsack needs to resign. If this is an example of his judgment, he is an inept boob….and it gives rise to the question about his believing the lies FOX NEWS (National Enquirer) initiates. He is too gullible to hold the position. ***Don’t buy from Nebraska businesses while Nelson is their senator…help bring it’s unemployment rate closer to the US average.***
Ding, ding!
You know, whether or not Breitbart ends up the focus of a criminal investigation, there are many tactics to discourage this type of behavior.
“I’m sorry Mr. Breitbart, you’ll have to come with me. Your name seems to appear on my no-fly list. It could take weeks or months to clear this up.”
“Mr. Breitbart, I’m Mr. Smith from the Internal Revenue Service. We’ve got a few questions we’d like to ask you.”
“Mr. Breitbart, I’m Special Agent Sherrod from the FBI Task Force on Child Pornography. We’re going to need your computer, sir.”
Give it a rest, Vilsack. You knew where the tape came from and therefore KNEW that it unreliable. YOU should resign for being so oblivious.
“This travesty shows beyond a doubt that the White House cares what Fox News thinks of them. They really care. When we speak – crickets.
The rub: President Obama and his staff care more about the opinions of Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly and the rest of the goons at Fox then the Progressives that got him elected.”
I suspect we need to know what communications NAACP had with Department of Agriculture and/or WH when NAACP believed the edited tape was legit. I don’t think we know that yet.
I think we need to take Shirley Sherrod seriously when she says that this was all pulled into an ongoing public ping pong game between Faux News, Limbaugh, Beck, Breitbart — and the NAACP. The right wanted to do to NAACP what they did to Acorn.
If Obama can’t stand up to Blightfart how can he stand up to Osama bin Laden?
Good Morning David and Firedogs -
bread and circus indeed, Mr Dayen
Vilsack released some statement as this was blowing up yesterday, detailing his slam dunk rationale and the dept’s steps in this firing – that should be fairly difficult to walk back.
anecdotal observation: noticed otherwise staunch WH defenders (eg, Oliver Willis) finally went off on this yesterday, calling POTUS “cowardly” . just wondering why now ?, why not Van Jones or ACORN ?
Indeed. The buck stops with Obama. Although he isn’t the author of all of the actions of his administration, he is ultimately responsible for them. Which is why I believe he didn’t know anything about this until well after the fact and why I think whichever crony called for Sherrod’s firing should be fired along with Vilsack. Clean house Obama. Clean house or own this.
We’ve seen a lot of things come out of this Administration that were less than satisfying, but this sequence of events is just shocking to me. I voted for what looked like a smart, gutsy African-American; what I got for my trouble is a bunch of people who haven’t the courage to stand up to anyone. Where is the ANGER over all this that should be directed at the sources of this slander? Where is the ANGER over how she was treated by her managers? Who else is going to be fired over all this?
A good woman has been defamed. If the President doesn’t pull something brilliant out of his hat on this one, I’ll have to agree with Stirling that this government is just a bunch of natural-born third-raters and sycophants that can’t come up with the goods, even when the situation is quite obvious for all to see.
Do I seem shrill?
Why not Dawn Johnsen? This administration is gutless. The whole lot of them apparently.
read this
http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/opinion/29herbert.html&OQ=_rQ3D1Q26refQ3Dbobherbert&OP=3c85d4c6Q2FQ25bK@Q251mQ3BQ3DQ51mmQ3FEQ25EnAnQ25nZQ25EaQ25m9Q3CLQ3CmLQ25EaDKQ51@KQ51Q3FGDQ3FjQ5C
It seems to me that the real story here is Vilsack’s unseemly eagerness for a Sistah Souljah moment to make him look “Presidential”.
Speaking for myself, I think your reaction seems appropriate as opposed to shrill. :)
Angry and outraged villagers are called to the aid of the shepherds of left and right, seeking to protect them from the ‘big, bad, wolf’ that is racism.
Racism is a charge that is thrown about too quickly and too casually, exploited for partisan advantage.
Has the race card been so overplayed that it no longer has much of an effect on how Americans think or act?
I think a lot of people don’t take it very seriously anymore.
In response to the exposed tactics of Journolist and charges leveled against the Tea Party.
Reasonable people can conclude that ‘opinion journalism’ is the preferred modus operandi of today’s journalism establishment and that favoring political advocacy over objective reporting has diminished the credibility of the media as independent conduits for delivering and defining ‘truth.’
Everyone has an agenda. It’s just no longer hidden.
btw – Breibart still has his post in it’s original form up on his site – no “updates”, no nothin’
The NCAAP and the Adminstration made a mistake. No question. The Adminsitration, actually Obama, needs to apologize publicly to Sherrod and ask her to take her job back.
But, the real story here is the on going cynical use of race by those on the right and their media partners. This incident was not a mistake on their part, but part of on an evil strategy to tear this country apart along racial lines. This is what needs to be exposed and condemned.
Now we clearly see what Martin Luther King meant by “the content of their character”. Andrew Breitbart, the people at Fox news, indeed all conservatives, no matter their dissembling, are racists, liars, cowards and traitors. They despise American equality, freedom and justice. Whatever they may say in the future, all should start with this knowledge of their character, and weigh their words accordingly.
If Shirley Sherrod is to be reinstated, isn’t the Obama Administration going to have to get Andrew Breitbart to sign off on the move?
Evidently, he’s the one calling the shots and is behind the Administration’s handling of this matter.
Stupid doesnt even begin to describe these slimy fucks.
For me this puts this administration on loathe status…
So pathetic…so cynical and inept. Cowardly. Disgusting.
These people have no business being in a position of power. This nation needs leaders not political hacks. Good God.
Yes.
A tactic the Public
and Mediaseem to be unaware of.‘Tis a lovely fantasy that the Media does not know perfectly well their culpability in furthering the sleazy smear of the rightwing hate merchants.
Chuck Todd disabused us all of that fanciful notion this morning talking about this story. His dismay was that the White House bought the story. That the media did troubled him not at all. Hey, they do all the time.
A sorry spectacle indeed for the millionaire sheep media.
You’ll get no argument from me. How much better this country would be even in this short time if he had stood up and taken it to the obstructionists, whatever side of the aisle they’re on.
An even fresher David Dayen post is already in progress: “Dream Team” at OLC Dismantled, as Marty Lederman Leaves Executive Branch
bwaaaahaaaaahaaaaaa
everyone’s favorite hand picked weasel Jim Messina, is on the record praising the firing and USDA’s response time
link
See my 47
MSNBC where the adults arrive for work at 6:00pm. Trouble is, they’re completely absent everywhere else.
Very well said, with the correct amount of moral outrage, something I doubt I will ever see from Sanstesticles and the pack of cowards he hired.
It’s hard to tell where Rahm ends and Obama begins.
Exactly. Me, too.
Just to put this in context…today the big event was the Rose Garden signing of the Financial and Banking Services Act. Big milestone.
Tomorrow or Friday, Obama will get the extension of Unemployment Insurance Act, and he will sign that. Both are Democratic Congress and Obama accomplishments, and they will not step on that message. He may get his Supreme Court Nominee through by Friday too. Congress wants to leave town and go home and do campaigning. Obama wants to send them home with a few accomplishments.
Over the weekend, the Shirley Sherrod matter will work itself out, not sure how, but the major player will be the NAACP, and what it wants to do. They have time to decide whether they want to persue a case of defamation of Character of the NAACP and Shirley Sherrod, or whether they will settle for whatever. They have time to decide how they want to address it. As I see it,they ought to let the emotions settle, look at the evidence and legal arguments favoring their position, and if the odds of winning a case are on the up side, file a case.
When opportunity knocks, get off the damn couch and answer the door. Our leaders are afraid of what’s on the other side.
Political discourse in the U.S. is a joke. What is allowed is a very narrow range from the extreme right to the center. Rarely if ever are leftist analysis and alternatives presented. For example, this a.m. I heard that in the Cincinnati radio market there is 36 hours DAILY of right wing talk, from Rush, Hannity, Medvev et al. Progressive voices heard in that market daily totals 1 hour. Americans are fed propaganda and indoctrination and think it’s discourse.
I think that you are completely ignoring the journolist controversy. You are advocating for purely political reasons.
You choose to ignore and defend those on the left who would seek to smear opposition to candidate Obama’s association with Rev. Wright to protect his political future, or the knee-jerk reation of the administration in response to the Cambridge incident, or those who would exaggerate and fabricate claim’s of being called the ‘n’ word and being spat upon to discredit opposition to HCR, or the words of the leaders of the New Black Panther Party.
The louder you yell ‘racism’ at one side, while choosing to ignore the actions on your side of the political spectrum diminish your credibility.
And what about the roles of MSNBC and journolist in “furthering the sleazy smear” of the leftwing hate merchants?
Conspiring to label as ‘racist’ any random conservative who objected to the sermons of Rev. Wright and Obama’s association with him, the writers and pundits of the left are culpable as well.
The President’s knee-jerk reaction in calling out the Cambridge police department for having ‘acted stupidly’ before examining the facts should make him culpable as well.
And what of the unsubstantiated claims of members of Congress being called the ‘n’ word and the exaggeration of charges that a member was ‘spat upon’ by those opposed to HCR?
From where I sit, the left and right share responsibility for allowing the serious charge of racism to be tossed about casually and condoned as a reasonable tactic for responding to/deflecting criticism.
I’ll ask you the same question I asked another commenter earlier: Have you listened to or watched the 2 sermons and the appearance at the National Press Club of Dr Rev Wright in their entirety?
It would be good management practice, not to say good politics, to rehire Ms. Sherrod – and give her a promotion. Rahm or Vilsack might agree, with the intent of buying her silence by way of secrecy terms in a settlement agreement. The more obvious reason to do it is to admit to an incredulous public that the administration is human, it made a mistake, and its job is to put it right. That’s the mature, adult, responsible process – so dismissively absent under the oh-so-Christian George Bush – that Obama claimed he would bring back to the Beltway.
It seems clear that there’s a history between Mr. Vilsack or his direct reports and Ms. Sherrod. It also seems clear – apart from abjectly kowtowing whenever the Reichwing smear machine gets moving (does it ever stop?) – that what most have offended Beltwayers was not claims of racism. DC remains full of that.
What makes Ms. Sherrod so heroic in that true, human-scale way is what the establishment found so reflexively offensive in her speech: She was right; poverty is the enemy. Long term opportunism and destructive, discriminatory treatment by government and others in power is the enemy. They are the enemy of opportunity and of economic self-sufficiency, which in the real world (outside the cocoon of an Ayn Rand story) mean nothing without social responsibility.
I do not disagree. But you did not address my point about the left ‘whistling past the graveyard’ of the exposed jounolist threads.
Do you condone the tactic of leveling random accusation of ‘racism’ at any conservative who at the time of the Rev. Wright controversy, in order to protect the political future of then candidate Obama?
Do you condone the knee jerk reaction of the media and the President to call out the Cambridge police department for ‘acting stupidly’ when in reality both parties could have acted differently to diffuse the situation?
Do you condone the unsubstantiated charges by some members of Congress that they were called the ‘n’ word and spat upon to smear opponents of HCR?
Is this not a case of ‘as you sow, so you shall reap’?
Left and right both may be criticized when race is exploited for political purposes.
However it is the right that practices racism and panders to those who practice it..
Rahm and Barred rock, did you guys think that she had attacked Isreal or something? Don’t worry about facts, just make sure you quick draw when your told.
Indie is working out of a boiler room in some right wing libertarian belief tank. Doesn’t have the time to read “the rest of the story.”
You seem to disapprove of telling the truth when it exposes right wing racism and filthy tactics?
Yes. I find much of what he says objectionable. But I know many share his views. I do not feel that his views advance tolerance and understanding. This is my opinion.
My point is that we toss about the charge of racism way to casually as a means to silence critics, and I believe that these attempts by Breitbart to ask the left ‘how does it feel now that it is being done to you?’ are as lame and ineffective as the tactics of journolist and others to protect the President and his policies from criticism.
Both left and right are exposed and diminished by the ‘advocacy’ journalism that has now replaced ‘objective’ journalism.
That is your opinion, but one that I do not share.
I know the rest of the story. This woman and the NAACP have been used as pawns in a game being played out by ‘advocacy’ journalists that has been ignited by the exposed jounolist threads. Breitbart’s motives are to use the same tactics on his perceived political/idoleogical opponents that he feels his side has endured throughout the 2008 campaign and current administration.
Is it effective? I don’t think so. But it sure gets the bases of both parties all in a lather.
I know you’ll not be surprised to find that I agree with Dr Rev Wright on almost all of his views.
And it’s the right that gets – by far – the most air time on tv and the radio. Pull the other, if anyone’s going to start talking about the “liberal” media. That’s a complete lie and not close to the truth. Liberal viewpoints get very little media exposure. Righties love to scream about Keith Olberman & Rachel Maddow, but how much time are they on the tv? 2 hours per day v. how many hours and hours and hours and hours of ongoing rightwing newscasting on Fox, CNN, the radio and elsewhere?
The left has its issues with race, too, but spare me the arguments of false equivalency and strawman b.s. from the right. There is no equivalency between the 2.
Breitbart has been proven over and over and over to engage in lying, criminal behavior and other dubious tactics. Just bc he’s gotten away with it doesn’t make it correct or laudable. He’s a sleeze who’s been permitted to get away with character assassination one too many times.
The chickens come home to roost on this scurrilous attack on Sherrod, but I agree that the bigger target is the NAACP. The right is in its usual “take no prisoners” mode, plus endlessly victimizing themselves bc they love the TP members to feel constantly under attack. There is no boogeyman except what RushGlenn decide to feed out to the mob to believe.
But BHO takes the heat on this one. Whether he was on vacay or not, this is knee-jerk reaction, not leadership. It’s crap and continues a pattern of behavior that this Admin has made a clear choice to engage in. Vilsack should get the sack, too. Really incredible how this Admin has displayed not only a lack of moral courage, but leadership, ethics, following the labor laws, and finally just downhome common sense. So stupid on so many levels that I’m, once again, beyond disgust both with the rightwing wing spoogebuckets, like Breitbart, of this world, as well as with this pathetic excuse for an Adminstration. ICK.
There is no proof, no audio tape, no video tape. Who is practicing racism and pandering to it in that instance. Those who wish to silence opposition from Tea Party activists and sympathizers, that’s who.
From either side, it is counterproductive and the charge of racism will soon lose all creditability.
We should all take great care in leveling the charge of racism.
I think the left has issues with class but not so much, if any, with race. You don’t find the left defending racist institutions as you do on the right.
This was what I believe Mrs. Shrrrod was speaking on, how racial issues, almost from the beginning, have been the smokescreen for class and economics injustice.
Eyewitness accounts and the accounts of the congresscritters involved are not good enough? Gotta have the audio or video or it didn’t happen? Horseshit.
I respect your opinion.
The real debate/concern here is about the changing role of journalism and how it is working to divide us even more than we already are.
I also feel that for good, or bad, depending on your viewpoint, this will harm Obama and the Democrats.
The public is looking for ways to forget it voted for Obama. A narrative of fraud and deception is building. People who don’t want to admit they voted for Obama have an appetite for believing they were tricked into doing so. Laying blame at the feet of a media they increasingly distrust will be very attractive.
I don’t think it’s healthy, or desirable, for the public to let itself off the hook so easily. America must fully understand the Obama mistake to ensure it is never repeated.
Go over to HP and Rahm’s comment posse is blaming Fox News and the Repugs for Obamarahma’s spinelessness. This much is true, if Fux hadn’t set him up we wouldn’t have such a nice example of how O is not moral and thus not qualified to be president.
I’m done with this thread hijacker.
John Lewis does not lie. There are videos of the spitting.
Racism is the presenting issue, the mousetrap Breitbart – and his patrons – used to manipulate an inherently fearful and insecure regime. It worked. Ms. Sherrod’s story, however, is something else entirely:
Precisely.
To my knowledge the ‘congresscritter’ have backed away from those statements.
Without ‘proof’ there should, for all, remain a ‘reasonable doubt’ or do you not believe in ‘justice for all.’?
It is a serious thing to call someone a racist and to see it done for purely partisan, political reasons, to deflect criticism and diminish critics with legitimate concerns, it should trouble us all.
The man was speaking very emotionally and John Lewis has backed away from his previous statements.
I agree. But this mousetrap has been constructed on the left as well to diminish the Tea Party to manipulate a fearful and insecure Democrat party that is panicking about the upcoming elections and the plunging popularity of the President’s policies.
Context! For We, But Not For Thee
It is laughable to question the racism inherent in the conservative philosophy and the practices of many of its proponents. The Tea Party movement is demonstrably one of the rawest examples of the fascism and racism when their principles are carried to their logical ends.
They desperately wish to be taken seriously and enter into public discourse. To seriously debate them only gives what they most want, respect for their callous and mean views of humanity and the world we live in.
I concede to you there, but some on the right perceive the left to be racist, in that leftist will defend what some conservatives view to be reverse racism against whites (aka, Rev Wright, for ex). I don’t see it that way, myself, but conservatives do.
So that’s why I said that… more about the “reverse racism” argument. In general, I don’t see much, if any, left support for overtly racist (against minorities) institutions.
There have always been racists and extremists, but in these days, the rightwing media has made a fetish over giving the most extreme of extremist racists and bigots the center stage and has treated these people as if what they espose is a “worthwhile” viewpoint.
Not so long ago, the Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan (or whatever the title is) was known to exist, but the media didn’t fawn all over him and present his organization’s point of view and tactics as “mainstream” and worthy of consideration. Now that’s done daily, hourly, by the minute. And leftists are scolded that if we don’t take these bigoted points of view “seriously,” then it is we (the leftists) who are actually induling in “racism.”
It has been an inexorable, and sickening, shift in our nation’s discourse, but I can *see* why some Tea Party people feel “hurt” when they are called out for being “racisits.” I honestly don’t think the Tea Party people *understand* anymore what racism really is. RushGlenn (funded by David Koch) have lied them into submission, singing the siren song that being abject racists is “ok” and their “right.” Disgusting. But there you have it. And then there’s all the false equivalencies about Rev Wright and ACORN… and so on and so forth.
IMO the right’s attention to “reverse racism” is more a reflection of their deep seated paranoid fears characteristic of all oppressors.
I didn’t see a lot of defense among anyone of some of the Rev. Wright rhetoric once it became public. Personally I think that was also a case of a lot taken out of context and a lack of representation of liberation theology. But he does seem overly emotional and a loose canon politically.
If EVER there is one incident representative of the effect the real Obama/Emanuel ‘team’ has had on the the Democratic party and the country, this is it.
To bend over backwards, to suck up to the Right in every way possible by even shunning cabinet positions and Supreme Court nominations to all but the most Right-leaning of candidates, you end up with a shitload of paranoid Congressmen and officials continuing the same one track mind-set of incestual appeasement.
But for the NAACP, of all groups, to act without the facts shows the stunning degree of cowardice and cronyism now infecting the last strongholds of democracy in America.
Shirley Sherrod and Howard Dean are just a few of many the good people taken down since Obama and Emanuel took over the Democratic party and Congress.
And that’s why I’m not sure if I want to save their asses this fall.
Emanuel works for Obama, and this isn’t even the second time Rahm’s done something like this. If Rahm’s still on the job, there isn’t much reason to think Obama doesn’t support him. You also have to ponder why Vilsack would pull the trigger on firing someone, which is usually an act fraught with legal peril, and yet be so deliberate about reconsidering his position. Either he’s an idiot Obama shouldn’t have hired in the first place, or all is not quite as it seems, and the behind-the-scenes anonymous e-mails and phone calls to credulous reporters are still going on.
And yes, I’m prepared to believe Vilsack’s an idiot. That still doesn’t explain why Cheryl Cook told Sherrod that the White House was pressuring her.
Well, paranoid fears, but also a way of justifying what they’re doing. As in, well IF you think that I’m racist, then what about Rev Wright? blah blah blah. As if 2 wrongs make a “right.” Or to put it another way: let’s just say hypothetically that Rev Wright was a sickenly disgusting outspoken white racist. Ok. But how does that extend to justifying whites being racist against blacks? It doesn’t. But in the conservative world, that’s part of their argument for their own racist behavior (I’ve heard said that way by conservatives that I know, so I’m not just making it up).
Isn’t it a shame that her wonderful, teachable story is lost in the race-baiting wars. What I learned from Shirley Sherrod was, it doesn’t matter what color you are, poor people need help and protection from the “haves”. You know, the simple lesson. The class war no one wants to talk about.
On that we are in complete agreement.
After the ACORN hoax, why does anyone believe Breitbart and Faux News? And why did the NAACP and the Obama administration believe this new smear?
Yes, I understand you are referring to the primitive tactic of setting up false equivilencies as a defense for the unspeakable and the trivial. And the news media falls for it every time.
Ding ding ding!!! And we have a winner!
At the end of this long, dreary, dismal day, the REAL hidden issue here is NOT actually about “race” at all. It is about CLASS. The dog forbid that anyone – white or black – should help a poor person – white or black.
When I heard this execrable story yesterday I knew it was mostly about race and Breitbart trying to get back at the left bc of that crummy jerk being tossed out of the Tea Party (and Palin, course, defended that fool). But part of this sad, pathetic story is also about class and the class war. Indeed.
Well, the news media searches it out in order to fetishize it as a means of distracting the rubes, uh, citizens. And why not? It works rather well, does it not. And Mr. Peterson is still trying to pick your pocket and mine, is he not?
Speaking of false equivalence; see Blur Texan up top.
It’s a feature, not a glitch. They want you to be distracted with all this talk about race and that poor lady loosing her job.
Worked like a charm, didn’t it?
Meanwhile, the man behind the curtain is trying to rip you off.
Well, as the saying goes: “No good deed goes unpunished” Anyone with actual principles who wants to get work in government should remember it.
Yes, it is what was lost in all this. There are too many people who want to shout “racist” at the drop of a noun. Thanks partly to that rhetorical overreach, there are too many who are happy to claim that there’s no racism at all. The truth is a lot more nuanced, and part of that truth is that the poor of various ethnic groups have a lot more in common with each other than they do with the rich.
A class war is easier to win when only one side fights it, while it smoothly reassures the other side that it has nothing to fear.
The purported Tea Party, as an organized arm of Fox and the GOP, diminishes itself. Some of its members may have legitimate beefs, and fears stoked by an opportunistic leadership; they are being led down the garden path by other members that belong to the Brooks Brothers riot squad. That’s the dynamic that Ms. Sherrod has worked hard to learn about and expose.
What is you proposal?
Hear! Hear! Talking Stick, you are right. I’v efelt so beat down by cynics, liars, plutocrats and cowards that I’ve almost felt ashamed of my own idealism. It’s up to us to keep alive ideas of dignity and courage and goodness, in the spirit of Shirley Sherrod and all the fine ladies and gentlemen who came before her.
I don’t think any of those things are likely to happen to Breitbart
You, however…
Thank you. I take hope from the fact of how her authenticity came shining through.
Idealism is a winner. In the shallowness of all the manipulations we forget. But once it walks on stage things change.
“Do you condone the tactic of leveling random accusation of ‘racism’ at any conservative who at the time of the Rev. Wright controversy, in order to protect the political future of then candidate Obama?”
My reaction to the Wright Affair — well not exactly one that denotes anything other than my own interests and background. You see, I spent ten years in the Civil Rights movement in the 1960′s, in the Religion and Race part of it, and while I don’t remember him exactly, probably met Wright around the Theology Center at the U of Chicago in the late 60′s or early 70′s. That’s my particular context.
Initially twas glad to see Wright being discussed. His Church is one of the Success Stories for doing a synthesis of Liberation Theology with Progressive and Liberal Protestant traditions, in a multi-class setting in a large Urban Area. Wright’s particular variety of Liberation Theology is best described, and compared with other varieties, in the writings of Martin Marty — mostly in Christian Century of which he is long time editor. (Marty was Wright’s Doctoral mentor.) Anyhow it was a plus for me that Obama had chosen Wright’s UCC church, and somewhat before the whole Wright thing broke in the media, I spent part of an evening listening to a couple of Wright Sermons then posted on the net. Given perhaps a nundred sermons to pick from, I didn’t select any of the “flame” ones apparently, because listening, I had a quite different impression of the guy as a Black Theologian and a successful organizer of a large liberal church. I respect his grand synthesis of Black Culture inside the UCC, which is rooted in New England Puritanism, one of the great abolitionist denominations, and the only White Church to stick with reconstruction in the South after it became unfashionable, and actually breath life into a solid Black Denomination out of that part of the Protestant tradition. Andy Young is a generation ahead of Wright — he too is UCC. Before Young hooked up with Martin Luther King, about 1956, he was doing just the sort of stuff Wright was doing 20 years later in Chicago, but on a smaller scale in South Carolina. He had put together a literacy program focused on passing South Carolina’s voting literacy test, with laid back UCC preaching, and used the UN Declaration of Human Rights as his centerpiece. He even got Eleanor Roosevelt to stop by and see his little church with a dirt floor, where he mixed up Theology, Human Rights, and reading well enough to pass the literacy test and vote. So what I saw in Wright was just that he was taking the next step, and doing it 20-30 years later. The whole flap-doodle didn’t change my mind about him, Chris Matthews can distort like hell, and all I thought about as I watched the Wright Issue explode, was that I was damn glad some of those critters were not around in the first years of Martin’s ministry.
But I understand why Obama had to cut him off. Obama is a politician and a damn good one, he had a hell of a lot invested in his campaign by the time the Wright Crisis broke, and the only thing to do was cut off the relationship. Sadly American Political Campaigns do not allow for nuanced messages, you have to package the candidate’s personality, and lightly sketch the platform. Successful campaigns cost millions, and people don’t invest in candidates who don’t more or less conform to political style. You can hardly teach lessons in Black Protestant Theology and Religion and its nuances during a campaign — Wright tried to insert his agenda into the campaign, and Obama had to divorce him in public. Simple as that.
Is there Racism around and about these days? Sure. Anyone who worked in the Civil Rights movement in the 1960′s, (in the streets, as well as in the churches both white and black), knows all about racist beliefs and attitudes, and understands how it motivates behavior. The fact that the movement of which I was apart passed the 64 Civil Rights Bill, and the Voting Rights Bill, the Housing Bill, and all the Great Society Programs didn’t totally erase all our American Racist Baggage. It is still there, but at least today if it infringes on someone elses’s rights or opportunity, it is illegal. Back when things matured in the 60′s, it was not only legal, but in some parts, required. In polite company, one doesn’t do racist slurs. I was part of that movement, some of my friends went to Jail, two of my friends were killed, — but many of the attitudes are still out there. It took many generations to build American Racism — and it will take more than two to rid ourselves of the rot.
Is that enough of an answer?
Shirley Sherrod should run for president as a progressive. I would vote for her, and if she won it would be great to finally have a president who understands what life as a black person in America is like.
This story says to me that Obama doesn’t value someone like Shirley Sherrod who wants to make peace between the races; otherwise, he wouldn’t have had her fired. This means that Obama would rather have white plebs and black plebs fighting with each other. Because if the fighting were to stop between these two racial groups of plebs, then they may indeed come together and unite as a single peaceful force, enabling them to harness a larger portion of wealth and power from the plutocrats, both black and white alike. And if this were to happen, Obama would have a harder time sucking up to the plutocrats, thus greatly reducing his chances of walking away from the White House in 2-6 years as a very rich plutocrat himself.
This story also says to me that Obama places more value on lying than he does on telling the truth; otherwise, he wouldn’t have had someone like Shirley Sherrod fired for telling the truth. This may explain why he broke most of his campaign promises to the plebs, both black and white alike, which enables him to lie his way into the White House. If Obama never broke any of his campaign promises, then this would hinder his ability to use the office of the presidency to make himself rich by helping make the plutocrats even richer.
So I think this story is more about Obama’s greed than it is about his cowardice.
With credentials like yours, I don’t know how I dare take you on, but what
the hell…
First of all, I don’t remember Wright trying to insert his anything. Obama
reflexively turned on him, and he responded (I thought appropriately). What would happen if a candidate, confronted with that kind of smear by
association, dealt with the smear, rather than severing (sacrificing) the association?
Did I take you to a party once?
Did anyone ever tell you how beautiful you are when you’re angry?
Thank you for your eloquent description of the liberation theology and the works of these great pastors including Rev.Wright. I personally appreciate your giving us the impressive history of the UCC because it is part of my genetic endowment. The church seems to get little recognition for that great movement into the south during reconstruction establishing not only the churches but the schools and colleges.
I also agreed at the time and now with the need to make the distance from Rev. Wright. Indeed Obama could not for his own political life or the country permit the Wright agenda to be imposed.
I expressed earlier on another thread and do now the opinion that Obama doesn’t have a clue as to the kind of African American experience Shirley Sherrod has lived and Sara refers to.
My post at 112 was intended for you.
“First of all, I don’t remember Wright trying to insert his anything. Obama
reflexively turned on him, and he responded (I thought appropriately). What would happen if a candidate, confronted with that kind of smear by
association, dealt with the smear, rather than severing (sacrificing) the association?”
Wright made two appearances after the Crisis broke. He spoke in Detroit, and followed that up with the National Press Conference appearance which was on C-Span. Both presentations contain elements of Wright’s Theology as he applied it to politics which simply do not translate into a successful campaign for public office. As I said, Barack Obama is a Politician, and politicians have to have last call on their own platform.
In different contexts, let’s look at other Politicians who have cut off and out someone they respected. When FDR was elected Governor of New York in 1928, in the same election where Al Smith had lost even the state of New York in the Presidential race, FDR had to cut Smith out of the picture, even though they had been political allies since 1912 when FDR entered the Legislature. FDR had to prove he was his own man, had his own platform, and most critically, had the physical ability to BE GOVERNOR. So he let all Smith’s staff go, Brought in his own State Commissioners, cleaned out the State Democratic Party Offices of Smith’s men, and sponsored his own. He wasn’t babysitting the office for a term, as Smith rather expected — moreover, he was probably running for President himself in 1932, and had to lay his own base and remove Smith’s. Thus in 1930 he made war on the Democratic National Committee, to rid it of Smith’s loyalists…most of them quickly became Republicans…and with Louie Howe, put in FDR men. It was pretty ruthless, but sometimes that is necessary in politics. If New Yorker political types wanted something from FDR, after he became Governor you dealt with FDR’s people.
A similar event took place during the 1952 campaign for President. Eisenhower had to campaign in Wisconsin, which was in the throes of it’s love affair with Joe McCarthy. McCarthy was making an ass of himself calling George Marshall both a Communist and a Fellow Traveler on alternate days, and Ike had to decide whether to mention the point that he owed his entire military command to George Marshall. Ike initially put nice words about Marshall in his prepared speech text, but then dropped them on delivery, probably realizing that the nuance of aspects of the Marshall Plan would be lost on Wisconsin Republicans who had sold their souls to Joe McCarthy. Ike figured that in the White House, he could arrange the political death of McCarthy, (which he did during the Army-McCarthy Hearings), and Marshall had enough respect for decent strategy that he would accept Ike’s skipping the words of praise in Wisconsin. Cunning, yes. Strictly honest with Wisconsin Voters — hell no. Good Politics? Yea.
I hardly think that being an accidental victim of a flap-doodle is a qualification for running for President, but saying that is not taking anything away from Shirley Sherrod. Yesterday I started receiving E-Mail about this case from my College Alumni list-serve, Sherrod is not my generation, so I don’t know her, but like me she is an Antiochian. She has an MSW with a specialization in Community Organization. What other Women might you know who are also Antiochians? Well, Ellie Holmes Norton, the DC Representative is one — Coretta Scott King was another. Small little college’s motto taken from the first President’s first graduation speech — “Be Ashamed to Die till you have Won some Victory for Humanity.” (Horace Mann, 1859). I think Shirley Sherrod won her victory in the last 48 hours.
Yeah…but do you know the capital of North Dakota?
Jesus! I knew I was biting off more than I could chew.
I think it’s the way your eyes flash…
Anyone with at least a junior high school education knows that unless you FULLY READ a person’s WHOLE STORY or listen carefully to THEIR ENTIRE SPEECH, you will NOT be able to give an accurate response about that person’s statements. Taking statements OUT OF CONTEXT and then inaccurately posting or blabbing them to others is nothing more than SLANDER!
Therefore, Andrew Breitbart & FOX News should both be sued from here to Saturn by both the NAACP & Shirley Sherrod for SLANDER, because the woman never said anything that warranted her termination of employment at the USDA. She simply spoke in detail of how she learned that the problems of poor farmers over 24-yrs ago was about the rich against the poor, NOT the Whites against the Blacks!
It’s painstakingly clear that Breitbart’s only intent was to seek REVENGE against the NAACP & everyone else who stood tall against the Tea Party’s head Mark Williams for making derogatory statements in a satirical, fictional letter to Abraham Lincoln over “colored people” that contained constant, racially insulting remarks on Blacks & other people of color. But Ms.Sherrod’s speech was never anything like Mark William’s racist mess. It was about the lessons she learned a quarter century ago, on how people who need help should be treated, regardless of their race; and how they should ALL be given the assistance they need & deserve.
It thoroughly disgusts me to see, in the year 2010, that despicably racist politicians have become so obsessively desperate to stop the progress of people-of-color in the workforce as well as in political circles, that they will literally slander& rob the hell out of us to get their corrupt deeds accomplished. Michael Moore details it very well in his movie “Capitalism:A Love Story.”
Although an apology from Mr. Williams wouldn’t be sincere & thus shouldn’t be demanded, Ms. Sherrod does deserve not only her job back, but Punitive & Compensatory Damages for Slander from Andrew Breitbart as well. That kind of lawsuit would set an example to help stop this nasty little habit of taking the statements of people-of-color out-of-context, especially since our President Barack Obama decided to run for the Presidency over 2-years ago & has repeatedly been the victim of the same mess ever since.