<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Krugman on Warren</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:41:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: b2020</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/#comment-45357</link>
		<dc:creator>b2020</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 21:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=10088#comment-45357</guid>
		<description>&quot;remedy gap&quot;

Yeah, because we are cheap, and torture does not matter! Yay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;remedy gap&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, because we are cheap, and torture does not matter! Yay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buttercup</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/#comment-45106</link>
		<dc:creator>buttercup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=10088#comment-45106</guid>
		<description>I heard recently that Michael Bloomberg may run as an independent in 2012.  Would he be any better than Obombo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard recently that Michael Bloomberg may run as an independent in 2012.  Would he be any better than Obombo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flatulus</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/#comment-45093</link>
		<dc:creator>flatulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=10088#comment-45093</guid>
		<description>Not in my home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not in my home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mason</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/#comment-45092</link>
		<dc:creator>Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=10088#comment-45092</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He can’t “recess appoint” someone when Congress is not yet in recess. Wanna criticize Obama? Fine. I’ll help you but let’s not get silly about it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re right, of course. I wasn&#039;t even thinking of a recess appointment when I wrote my comment. I was thinking that he should have already selected her as in &quot;nominated&quot; her, or ordered Geithner to appoint her.

Whether the operative word is &quot;select,&quot; &quot;choose,&quot; &quot;nominate,&quot; or &quot;appoint,&quot; I believe he is absolutely opposed to her running the agency and he won&#039;t do any of those things. Even if I&#039;m wrong and he ends up &quot;selecting,&quot; &quot;choosing,&quot; &quot;nominating,&quot; or &quot;appointing,&quot; her, I still won&#039;t support him because he is the wrong man for his job.

Thanks for pointing out my error and giving me an opportunity to clarify my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He can’t “recess appoint” someone when Congress is not yet in recess. Wanna criticize Obama? Fine. I’ll help you but let’s not get silly about it.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re right, of course. I wasn&#8217;t even thinking of a recess appointment when I wrote my comment. I was thinking that he should have already selected her as in &#8220;nominated&#8221; her, or ordered Geithner to appoint her.</p>
<p>Whether the operative word is &#8220;select,&#8221; &#8220;choose,&#8221; &#8220;nominate,&#8221; or &#8220;appoint,&#8221; I believe he is absolutely opposed to her running the agency and he won&#8217;t do any of those things. Even if I&#8217;m wrong and he ends up &#8220;selecting,&#8221; &#8220;choosing,&#8221; &#8220;nominating,&#8221; or &#8220;appointing,&#8221; her, I still won&#8217;t support him because he is the wrong man for his job.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out my error and giving me an opportunity to clarify my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jodo</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/#comment-45091</link>
		<dc:creator>jodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=10088#comment-45091</guid>
		<description>I think the appointment of Warren is way beyond something Obama would do and would be completely out of character for him. I seriously doubt it would happen. I hope I&#039;m wrong, but at this point I don&#039;t see Obama changing his stripes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the appointment of Warren is way beyond something Obama would do and would be completely out of character for him. I seriously doubt it would happen. I hope I&#8217;m wrong, but at this point I don&#8217;t see Obama changing his stripes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altara</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/#comment-45090</link>
		<dc:creator>altara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=10088#comment-45090</guid>
		<description>Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Two recent news items highlight the need for this bureau and for a strong person to lead it. One is an account of attempts to stop payment on a check. The bank imposes a $30 fee and then $30 each subsequent six-month period to keep it in effect. The other report shows how some insurance  make survivors under military policies believe that they are getting the money while the insurer keeps the funds and earns good return on  it.

So let&#039;s get the agency started with the best person to lead it, Elizabeth Warren. Filibuster threat? Obama should make them try.  The charge that she is an activist? Exactly what we need - an activist working on the side of consumers.

homer  www.altara.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer Financial Protection Bureau</p>
<p>Two recent news items highlight the need for this bureau and for a strong person to lead it. One is an account of attempts to stop payment on a check. The bank imposes a $30 fee and then $30 each subsequent six-month period to keep it in effect. The other report shows how some insurance  make survivors under military policies believe that they are getting the money while the insurer keeps the funds and earns good return on  it.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s get the agency started with the best person to lead it, Elizabeth Warren. Filibuster threat? Obama should make them try.  The charge that she is an activist? Exactly what we need &#8211; an activist working on the side of consumers.</p>
<p>homer  <a href="http://www.altara.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.altara.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlofhuntingdon</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/#comment-45083</link>
		<dc:creator>earlofhuntingdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=10088#comment-45083</guid>
		<description>True, and this administration will sabotage pro-consumer initiatives and decisions Warren tries to implement, claiming the &quot;votes&quot; or the support isn&#039;t there for them, though without telling us that that lack of support starts in the White House.  But I&#039;ll take one good appointment at a time.  

We need not only Warren in a top slot, but the network she would lead, who will do that job tomorrow and the day after.  Not getting such people appointed and in place, not giving them experience - perhaps the most consistent top priority for the Bushites (Liz Cheney, Kavanaugh, Sampson, Goodling, ad nauseum) - is itself a significant rightward slant on Obama&#039;s part, because it entrenches the Bush people and the far right policies they pursued, which are still in place.  

Obama&#039;s failure to get his own team in place, mid-level to senior judges and agency official (the courts, OLC) - his failure to claim ownership of their characters, backgrounds and promise - and his failure get them doing things differently, I would rank as among his top three failures.  He may think that in failing to do that, he has successfully hidden the parts of him that contradict his campaign persona.  The truth is, his failure to make and fight for those appointments already does that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, and this administration will sabotage pro-consumer initiatives and decisions Warren tries to implement, claiming the &#8220;votes&#8221; or the support isn&#8217;t there for them, though without telling us that that lack of support starts in the White House.  But I&#8217;ll take one good appointment at a time.  </p>
<p>We need not only Warren in a top slot, but the network she would lead, who will do that job tomorrow and the day after.  Not getting such people appointed and in place, not giving them experience &#8211; perhaps the most consistent top priority for the Bushites (Liz Cheney, Kavanaugh, Sampson, Goodling, ad nauseum) &#8211; is itself a significant rightward slant on Obama&#8217;s part, because it entrenches the Bush people and the far right policies they pursued, which are still in place.  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s failure to get his own team in place, mid-level to senior judges and agency official (the courts, OLC) &#8211; his failure to claim ownership of their characters, backgrounds and promise &#8211; and his failure get them doing things differently, I would rank as among his top three failures.  He may think that in failing to do that, he has successfully hidden the parts of him that contradict his campaign persona.  The truth is, his failure to make and fight for those appointments already does that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlofhuntingdon</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/#comment-45082</link>
		<dc:creator>earlofhuntingdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=10088#comment-45082</guid>
		<description>Most likely, he and Rahm plan to blame the DFH&#039;s for any falling off of support in November, let alone should the GOP retake control of the House.  It will be his excuse to tack farther right, what he seems to want to do naturally, but equally naturally, he will be reluctant to do until he can find an excuse outside himself for doing it.  Didn&#039;t Bush, too, claim he was going to bring adult behavior back to the White House?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most likely, he and Rahm plan to blame the DFH&#8217;s for any falling off of support in November, let alone should the GOP retake control of the House.  It will be his excuse to tack farther right, what he seems to want to do naturally, but equally naturally, he will be reluctant to do until he can find an excuse outside himself for doing it.  Didn&#8217;t Bush, too, claim he was going to bring adult behavior back to the White House?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrythedirtyhippy</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/#comment-45081</link>
		<dc:creator>larrythedirtyhippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=10088#comment-45081</guid>
		<description>I think that if she is nominated it will be with her ovaries in a jar.  When bush got chritsy whitman for epa he not only ended her political (maybe rival) career, he got her to roll over and finally take the heat for the 9-11 clean-up obscenity.  IMO, whitman left not because she screwed up (which she did), but because she got tired of being forced into lethargy (not that she brought all that much to the epa in the first place...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that if she is nominated it will be with her ovaries in a jar.  When bush got chritsy whitman for epa he not only ended her political (maybe rival) career, he got her to roll over and finally take the heat for the 9-11 clean-up obscenity.  IMO, whitman left not because she screwed up (which she did), but because she got tired of being forced into lethargy (not that she brought all that much to the epa in the first place&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spocko</title>
		<link>http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/30/krugman-on-warren/#comment-45079</link>
		<dc:creator>spocko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=10088#comment-45079</guid>
		<description>I hear you. And thank you for letting me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you. And thank you for letting me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.212 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-14 06:51:12 -->

