When I took to Twitter the other night and mused that Chris Hayes should use some of his time filling in for Rachel Maddow to highlight the failed HAMP program and the forgotten foreclosure crisis, I didn’t think he’d come up with something so focused and cogent. But there it is to your right. Hayes hit the important point – that this is a Treasury program, and they had $50 billion to do basically whatever they wanted to stop foreclosures. The Administration chose this as their method, without any need to hedge because of Republicans or ConservaDems. And what they chose may be, as Chris said, “the single biggest failure of the Obama Administration.”
I knew that some private lenders were engaged in loan modifications as well, but I didn’t know that these alternative programs have actually helped more borrowers than HAMP, which is truly pathetic, considering the resources at the disposal of the federal government. Servicers have performed 800,000 of these alternative modifications in 2010, compared to just 389,183 through HAMP since March 2009. However, these modifications have no government oversight, and are more watered-down than what would be mandated under HAMP, which is why the lenders are opting for them.
Despite a price tag of $50 billion, HAMP has only spent $250 million, or 0.5%. That’s because they almost don’t have the ability to spend it, under the structure of the program. The money goes into rewards for the lenders to modify loans, yet it’s at the lender’s discretion whether or not they choose to make a permanent modification through HAMP. So the lender decides the flow of the money, in a sense, and they’ve by and large determined that the reward from the government isn’t worth it. They’d rather perform alternative modifications with less favorable terms for the borrower.
I suppose you could say that getting 389,000 permanent modifications for the small price of $250 million dollars isn’t a bad return. But a significant number of those borrowers will eventually default, as well as the majority of those securing modifications outside the program. And of course, 389,000 is a drop in the bucket compared to the millions who need help. Many of those interfacing with HAMP come out more indebted at the end. I can’t see how that’s a good use of public money. Basically the programs of foreclosure mitigation, whether public or private, serve only to string along the borrower and extract a few more payments out of them.
As Hayes said in his powerful close, “If the 25 year-old community organizer Obama were around to see HAMP program, I think he’d be disgusted.”





22 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Speaking of default, I noticed this little gem in the latest MHA report:
In other words the rosy delinquency data they’ve been publishing is all wrong.
So, essentially the $50 billion is still just sitting there doing nothing? Incredible…
That’s less than $650 per loan mod including all overhead costs of the program. No wonder the banks look at it as a big nothingburger…
A clear framing of HAMP.
Rather than ‘disgusted’, the word I would use is ‘ashamed’.
This was wholly predictable from the start. In fact, I said this program was designed to fail when it was first rolled out (my remarks were in my local newspaper and on DailyKos where I was excoriated for being an Obama basher). Why? Because Obama made participation VOLUNTARY! Why would the banks voluntarily lose money to help Americans? More to the point, why would a Harvard trained smart-ass like Obama believe they would in the first place? Fact is, Obama knew they wouldn’t. It was all window dressing for the veal pen. This man is disgusting.
Fake progressive program to enrich the banks and at the same time discredit progressive methods. Can we put Geithner in jail already? Pretty please!
Anyway, good coverage on MSNBC. Better than I’d have expected.
We did a modification. We submitted the paperwork three times. The first time I called once a week for three months to make sure they had everything. Each time I was told they did. Then I was rejected for not submitting the correct paperwork. The second time I crossed out something and this made this particular piece of paper invalid. Apparently, I picked the one document that couldn’t have a mark through the text. This mistake required me to submit all of the documents over again. We were approved for the modification but they raised our payment from $1300 to $1550. We were having a hard time making the $1300 payment. We were able to come up with the first of the three required payments before we got the “final” approval. We are staying in the house until they toss us out.
I don’t care anymore.
It’s the homeowners fault that they aren’t multi millionaire bankers. Then Obama would help them.
TBogg is upstairs!
Peter Wehner likes to watch things die from a good safe distance
Another failed O policy. I’m shocked, I tell you, shocked.
Very good piece. He could have added that Obamarahma and Lil’ Timmy fought cramdown as part of personal bankruptcy as well, allowing judges to lower the principle and keep their houses, because the banks were against it.
Nice! I’ve been waiting for this video since I saw your tweet.
This program is symptomatic of one of Obama’s chief failings: his reliance on and infatuation with industry ‘experts’ and insiders. In virtually every instance from health care to financial reform, he essentially taps the foxes to guard the hen-house. His logic appears to be, “Who better than the creators of the mess to fix the mess?” The fatal flaw in that logic and course of action is that those responsible for the mess have not admitted their culpability, seen the error of their ways, or are inclined in the slightest to fundamentally correct the system(s) they’ve completely F’ed up. He is either a fool, unlikely, or complicit, more than likely based on results to date.
I recommend not touching those bare, live wires, eCAHN — or try those anti-shock brakes.
Good on Chris.But the Networks know how to manipulate viewers to watch their programming…..I quite frankly have stopped rewarding MSNBC with my viewership……there is no need to watch a network that is not going to call out the WH & congressional Dem leadership for their incompetence & neglect of ordinary Americans…..by now we all know the GOP is just downright awful….there is no need to keep drilling it into our brains everynight that the GOP is scum,when equally offensive characters(Kent Conrad,Ben Nelson,Chris Dodd etc,etc) exist on the Dem side.
Full disclosure…I don’t watch any of the cable news networks.
Rachel Maddow would not have touched this,she is too busy working for the WH even with all of their ineptitude.
But moreover,Ed Shultz for all his bellyaching about being a progressive probably has not even come around to this…he is a Corporate progressive, same as everyone over at MSNBC.
Maybe this is just a tease….to get viewers to start watching the Network again.Anyway,Good on Chris for highlighting the farce of a mortgage help program.
I think we really need to put the rest any lingering thoughts of Obama as a progressive or even a centrist. Everything he touches reeks of right-wing corporatism and class toadyism. This ruinous redirection of the money to the criminal lending agencies is just so totally typical. I don’t give a shit who runs next time; I’ll never vote for this shyster again.
The miss information here is incredible.
Banks were REQUIRED – It was NOT VOLUNTARY to sign HAMP participation agreements as part of getting TARP funding.
They ignored the directives made up lies, imposed additional requirements and there was nothing that Obama/Treasury could do. There is no HAMP law only a TARP requirement to sign agreements to follow the directives which the banks ignored. And now most have repaid TARP.
Obama/Treasury did massive effort to get compliance from meeting bank heads at the White House to sending in the SWAT teams from Fannie late 2009 to trying to shame them via the required monthly Treasury reports.
Very few internal bank mods are getting done either. The servicers have nothing to gain other than the small incentive by doing HAMP, or internal mods.
The SERVICERS do NOT TAKE ANY FORECLOSURE LOSS!!!! They don’t own the mortgages usually and they make far more money by extending long trials often 12 months, foreclosing, managing the real estate owned and reselling it.
About 80% of First mortgages are guaranteed by the GSE’s (Fannie/Freddie/Ginne. The TAXPAYERS take the loss on foreclosure sales not any banks in most cases.
Banks got bailed out but have every financial interest to NOT do modifications as servicers. Obama has no power to enforce. Only a law from Congress could and of course that would be blocked by the R’s who are very vocal wanting HAMP to fail so than they can falsely blame the administration.
To those of you who blame Obama for the bailout, please read this timeline. Obama wasn’t even elected, much less in office. He did support the bailout, however, because it looked like the whole economy was going to collapse. If there was no bailout, we’d probably all be out of work, sitting at our computers, blaming Obama for not doing something.
- March 11, 2008: The Federal Reserve announces a rescue package to provide up to $200 billion in loans to banks and investment houses and let them put up risky mortgage-backed securities as collateral.
—March 16: The Fed provides a $29 billion loan to JPMorgan Chase & Co. as part of its purchase of investment bank Bear Stearns.
—May 2: The Fed increases the size of its loans to banks and lets them put up less-secure collateral.
—July 11: Federal regulators seize Pasadena, Calif.-based IndyMac, costing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. billions to compensate deposit-holders.
—July 30: President Bush signs a housing bill including $300 billion in new loan authority for the government to back cheaper mortgages for troubled homeowners.
—Sept. 7: The Treasury takes over mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, putting them into a conservatorship and pledging up to $200 billion to back their assets.
—Sept. 16: The Fed injects $85 billion into the failing American International Group, one of the world’s largest insurance companies.
—Sept. 16: The Fed pumps $70 billion more into the nation’s financial system to help ease credit stresses.
—Sept. 19: The Treasury temporarily guarantees money market funds against losses up to $50 billion.
—Sept. 29: The Fed makes an extra $330 billion available to other central banks, boosting to $620 billion the amount available to the Fed through currency “swap” arrangements, where dollars are traded for foreign currencies. It also triples to $225 billion the amount available for short-term loans to U.S. financial institutions.
—Oct. 3: President Bush signs the $700 billion economic bailout package. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson says the money will be used to buy distressed mortgage-related securities from banks.
—Oct. 6: The Fed increases a short-term loan program, saying it is boosting short-term lending to banks to $150 billion. It says that by year’s end, $900 billion in potential overall credit will be outstanding. It also says it will begin paying interest on reserves that banks keep with the Fed in hopes of coaxing banks into keeping more money on deposit at the central bank.
—Oct. 7: The Fed says it will start buying unsecured short-term debt, so-called “commercial paper,” from companies.
—Oct. 8: The Fed cuts its benchmark interest rate a half percentage point, to 1.5 percent. It follows a one-quarter point cut on April 30 and a three-quarter-point reduction on March 18.
—Oct. 8: The Fed agrees to lend AIG $37.8 billion more, bringing total to about $123 billion.
—Oct. 14: The Treasury says it will use $250 billion of the $700 billion bailout to inject capital into the banks, with $125 billion provided to nine of the largest: Bank of America Corp., which received $15 billion; Bank of New York Mellon Corp., $3 billion; Citigroup Inc., $25 billion; Goldman Sachs Group Inc., $10 billion; JPMorgan Chase & Co., $25 billion; Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., $10 billion; Morgan Stanley, $10 billion; State Street Corp., $2 billion; and Wells Fargo & Co., $25 billion. The $10 billion for Merrill has been deferred until its purchase by Bank of America closes.
—Oct. 14: The FDIC says it will temporarily guarantee up to a total of $1.4 trillion in loans between banks.
—Oct. 21: The Fed says it will provide up to $540 billion in financing to provide liquidity for money market mutual funds.
—Oct. 29: The Fed cuts its benchmark interest rate to 1 percent, matching the low point reached in 2003. The rate hasn’t been lower since 1958.
- Nov. 3: The election.
can you say “coup d’etat”?
~~~MODNOTE – no advocating violence~~~
It is not a bug, it is a feature!
StewartM
I don’t know if the loan mods coming from private lenders are that bad. My friend got a loan mod that saves him $500 a month. His interest went down to 3.15%
Reply to mod note: Are you not jumping the gun here by assuming that the writer was advocating a violent coup d’etat. Ever hear of a bloodless coup d’etat?
Some would argue that such an event took place right here less than 10 years ago.