US scientists put out a new estimate last night of the flow rate of the BP oil disaster, and determined that almost five million barrels, or 200,000,000 gallons, of oil released out of the busted Macondo well since the explosion on April 20.
The scientific teams estimate that 53,000 barrels of oil per day were leaking from BP’s well immediately preceding its closure via the capping stack.
Recent measurements and modeling also show that, as a result of depletion of the hydrocarbon reservoir, the daily flow rate decreased over the 87 days prior to the well’s closure. Based on these measurements and modeling, the scientific teams estimate that, at the beginning of the spill, 62,000 barrels of oil per day were leaking from the well.
Overall, the scientific teams estimate that approximately 4.9 million barrels of oil have been released from the well. Not all of this oil and gas flowed into the ocean; containment activities conducted by BP under U.S. direction captured approximately 800,000 barrels of oil prior to the capping of the well.
This is over ten times the initial estimates of flow rate from BP at the outset of the disaster. And given the expected ruling of “gross negligence” leading to a $4,300 per barrel fine on BP, that comes to a total of about $21.2 billion in fines, just for the violations of the Clean Water Act, and not counting the punitive awards, cleanup costs, and other penalties the company will be forced to pay.
For those who think that the fine may be too great, given the magic disappearing oil and the relative bounce-back of the Gulf, here’s a reminder that any new substance introduced into a fragile ecosystem can end up disrupting the balance and destroying some marine life:
There’s a destructive liquid flowing into the Gulf of Mexico — and it’s not oil.
It’s the muddy freshwater of the Mississippi River, which has been released from southern Louisiana’s vast levee system and into estuaries in greater quantities than usual. The goal has been to use the rush of freshwater to keep sticky oil from reaching the sandy shores of the state.
The tactic has proved moderately successful in some areas, but the extra freshwater creates lower-than-normal salinity levels in Barataria Bay and Breton Sound, which flank the southeast portion of Louisiana that juts out into the gulf.
Some biologists are worried. Mass oyster deaths have been reported in those two areas, early evidence suggesting that the freshwater could be shaking up a delicate ecosystem and a struggling seafood industry — both already threatened by the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history.
Those fines, at the root, must act as a deterrent. And $21 billion dollars, or BP’s entire profit for the calendar year 2008, may do the trick.




41 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I keep seeing a new BP ad on this site. Will taking money from BP be affecting the FDL coverage?
Considering it’s the first I’ve heard of it, no.
BP management across the board should be barred from the business. So much hubris.
All of a sudden no one can seem to find all that much oil spill. It seems the estimates were way over stated.
Still, the riff raff are swarming in to get a piece of that $20 billion dollar pie. One couple drove all the way from Idaho to Louisiana. Once in Louisiana they bought gear that a shrimper would have (nets, etc) and then went to claim “their share” of the cash. A reporter asked them why their nets appeared to be brand new and never had gotten wet. These people were too dumb to lie. But by that time they had their money.
That’s a lot of oil, to be sure. But it’s only one quarter of U.S. DAILY consumption.
This is what I understand, this site gets revenue from its ads. You buy a package of ads, and have no control over which ones rotate through. To make money for this site click on the ad. There is no reason to think the FDL coverage will change or be affected by any of the biases of any of the ads.
That’s how it is and boyo, so many people have asked about this and there have been numerous explanations. Nuff said?
Yeah, no.
It’s a given that BP’s entire management team should be beaten with a cactus. But I think Barry will give BP that stern “we need to look forward not back” talking to reserved for bankers, oil men, old white war-mongers. Accountability is reserved for teachers, union members, etc.
[modnote: please no fantasy violence.]
Got a link for that?
Your evidence of “swarming” riff raff is 1 couple? Aren’t you missing Rush or Sean?
It sure will be nice when the schools reopen and all the fifth graders in the country will be kept busy.
I’ll be really surprised if BP ever pays anything.
Indeed!
People like tinman don’t need links. They’ve got anecdotes.
Did you see this?
I didn’t see that particular piece but I knew they’ve been dragging their oily feet.
The scientists haven’t really had their say yet. Most of those on Cable are BP shills like that Ed Overton. There was one yesterday however that pointed out that the scientists cannot do the studies to determine extent and effects because BP,the Coast Guard, NOAA and EPA won’t give them access.
This is a semi-informative article. Link Here.
Give this administrations attitude,
that will be negotiated down to a promise not to do it again for 5 years.
Especially not the ones who have been bought off by BP.
Which will be broken in a few months time, again with no consequences. I’ve been walking around in a deep funk because this catastrophe hasn’t changed peoples’ opinions on our oil/carbon fuels addiction.
As I said on Jim White’s earlier thread, I spent a good deal of time over the last few days with a friend who is a rig boss. The same type as Deep Water Horizon. He is very dospleased with the dissinformation being put out and the way the whole sorry affair is being handled. We watched a CNN piece together and he was astounded by the sillyness.
I use anecdotes all the time, but, I also have a heart. I’m pretty sure.
There’s nothing wrong with anecdotes but extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs, not a story that some radio jockey related. And notice especially this last line:
These “people” were apparently able to get paid immediately according to the story while back here in realityland, thousands of legitimate claims are going without action. The whole story is unlikely.
Oh, I agree. But there are some who come here just to whack off. Don’t you think? Ya just gotta shake yer head and s.c.r.o.l.l.
And, may I add, my stories usually have an underlying message. :)
Whatcha doin’ today?
Waving to demi & Margaret ☺ ☺ ☺
How is your morning going ladies??
I applied for seven jobs today and so for have got two more lined up to apply for tomorrow when I get to a fax machine. Other than that, not much. You? :)
Waving back. Good morning! :)
Tinman’s stories do too. “Liberals suck and are always wrong”. Your underlying messages are much more honest and uplifting and without rancor. :)
Nahant and Margaret.
Life here is grand. I’m getting ready to go have coffee with a girlfriend and then when I get back to the house my son and I are going to finish a project outside. We have sand, pea pebbles and irregular shaped paving stones. I’d prefer to have grass growing out there, but you know, the four legged family member does his business there and it’s not so good for grass. Besides, it looks really neat and tidy, zennish southwestern and doesn’t require watering. I try to go with what works, not what my druthers necessarily are.
See y’all laters.
You’re so sweet. And, good on you for continuing with your job search. ((Tenacious Peg!!!))
I’ve always said that show me somebody with a lawn in southern California and I’ll show you somebody with a landscaper. Enjoy your day!
I am not surprised. The collaboration between Gov and BP has made reporting a sham. As a scientist I am also astounded by the silliness and outraged at the lack of access for serious science.
Good luck Margaret. I have fingers and toes crossed for you.
The ad links to this wonderful site:
http://www.youtube.com/BP
and this:
http://twitter.com/BP_America
Best wishes on the Job hunter Peg… Been there done that… I applied for hundreds of jobs(IT) here in Silicon Valley and in 4 years got all of two 2 interviews… Took up consulting using Craig’s list!! But since was forced to start SS… Sure glad it was there I hope it will be there for my kids and grand kids when it is their turn…
Thank you St Ronnie for screwing the other 90% of us and taking care of the Fat Rich Bastards instead!!
Pictures at eleven demi?
Thanks for the wishes all. I’m trying to maintain my hope but the climate is not encouraging.
Something to keep in mind with this blowout is you need to factor in the natural gas. Probably at least 60% of the total flow was gas. Due to the cold water and great pressures a lot of that never made it to the surface but fell back on the seafloor in the form of clathrates. What will be the environmental impact of these?
As for the oil, it has been dispersed. That is different from being biodegraded. It means it is still there in the water column. Even if some is biodegraded, the question is into what and will it and what is not biodegraded be toxic and move up the food change? Ditto for the dispersant itself.
Thanks for the insight. That’s the real story that the “nooz” will never tell. It’s all: nothing to see here, folks; oil’s all gone; move along now.
Yes, let’s keep that $21 billion in perspective. While it sounds gargantuan, and it is enough to break or to swallow most companies many times over, in BP’s case, it amounts to about a single year’s profits. It may be enough to cause BP concern, to change its managers, perhaps even its practices; but it is not remotely enough to put BP out of business or into bankruptcy.
If BP goes into bankruptcy, it will be a strategic move to threaten the US or to put its resources out of reach, not because BP was obligated to because the amount it owed exceeded its assets, its cash flow or its ability to pay its debts as they came due.
And $21 billion is likely to be only a start whenit comes to cleaning up the Gulf and repairing the lives and livelihoods of those damaged by this massive pollution.
I have no confidence that the interests of the American People are being assiduously looked after by the Administrations team. They seem much more aligned with BP, than American interests.
Maybe I think that because they have deferred to BP in all information matters. It just seems to me that a competent manager would have implemented an independent source for information by now.
And that judging seafood by smell evaluation has the same credibility as when our government told us it was OK to breathe the NYC air on 9/11. We are routinely misled by our government against our own interests.