John Boehner (R-OH), in what is being billed as a major speech, will call for the firing of Barack Obama’s economic team today, and an end to the Administration’s economic policies. He will not offer up anything yet as an alternative, except the buzzwords of “getting America back to work.” But I must admit that this is a pretty smart move.
“Pres. Obama should ask for — and accept — the resignations of the remaining members of his economic team, starting with Secretary [Tim] Geithner and Larry Summers, the head of the National Economic Council,” Boehner plans to say, according to prepared remarks.
“We do not have the luxury of waiting months for the president to pick scapegoats for his failing ‘stimulus’ policies,” Boehner will say. “We’ve tried 19 months of government-as-community organizer. It hasn’t worked. Our fresh start needs to begin now.”
Boehner will also promise a real economic agenda from the GOP, which has been criticized for failing to lay out a governing plan. America Speaking Out, a group launched in May and run out of Boehner’s office, will produce this year’s version of a Contract with America after months of what Boehner and Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who heads the effort, have called a listening tour.
“This listening effort will culminate next month with the release of a clear and positive governing agenda focused on getting people working again,” Boehner plans to say.
Boehner and company can promise “new ideas” for the next millennium, I’m sure they’ll come out spelled “T-A-X C-U-T-S.” (In fact, he’ll call in this speech for an extension of all of the Bush tax cuts.) And Boehner will reportedly praise a few Republican Governors for balancing budgets, which they couldn’t have done without federal stimulus money. But calling out Geithner and Summers by name makes a lot of sense. Because he won’t get much of an argument from anyone other than partisan hacks.
Boehner is, as Democratic operatives have pointed out, an imperfect messenger for open, transparent government. This was the guy who passed out tobacco industry campaign checks on the floor of the House. The DNC has already put out a Web ad to that effect. And yet, while his reasoning for dismissing Geithner and Summers is, to put it mildly, wacky, he’s clearly hitting a nerve that will resonate beyond his base. And when you can do that, you’ve succeeded.
UPDATE: One thing that never gets pointed out: Boehner is calling for the extension of the tax cuts to stimulate economic growth and create jobs. But the tax cuts he’s talking about are in place NOW. They have been for a decade, incidentally the worst decade for job creation since the Depression. This just illustrates the flim-flam Boehner’s trying to sell in the name of getting millionaires a tax break.
UPDATE II: Here’s the speech. Basically pabulum, but the call for firing Geithner and Summers will be the headline.
UPDATE III: Joe Biden provided a response to this today, which wasn’t bad. But it sidestepped the Geithner/Summers part.




63 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Somebody should mention that even a blind pig will find an acorn on occasion.
Boxturtle (If you think Boehner is bad, wait’ll you meet Portman)
Well, now that we know what everyone’s favorite hyperthyroid Oompa Loompa is going to say, there’s no need for him to actually say it, is there?
That, sir, is the truly mind-blowing part of this discussion, the part that absolutely no one is talking about (& I read a lot of blogs/news). Where’s the bit about the insanity of doing the same thing again & again expecting different results?
Thanks why I would never vote from a Republican (voting made easy: always
vote against a Repub)
Simple and works…
Whose surprised? Expecting anything but more of the same from Gopers is ridiculous. As for Summers and Geithner it’s not a bad idea.
BOehNER is right but for the wrong reason.
When will Ohio secede? When’s he going to announce that?
My perverted respect for these lying stealing motherf’kers just grew, again.
“l’audace, l’audace, toujours l’audace”
You GOTTA give them credit –
IF THE DIM-0-FUCKS ARE:
1. so incompetent at messaging that they can’t beat this shit,
2. so incompetent at tactics that they can’t beat this shit,
3. so incompetent at strategy that they can’t beat this shit,
4. so sold out that #1-3 don’t matter,
WHY shouldn’t the lying stealing fascists win?
THE PROBLEM ain’t bone-head and his freaking lies, or his stealing, or his buddies lying and stealing,
THE PROBLEM is the worthless sacks of shit on “our” side who can’t beat get the government off the backs of the people … oops!
wrong slogan! wrong decade! wrong evil doer!
rmm.
The sad part of this is I have no arguments to offer in opposition to firing Summers and Geithner. Probably should have done it months ago.
But agreeing with Boehner suggests that hell is freezing over as we speak.
Obama could say, okay I will fire those fuckers, then end the wars, then let the tax breaks expire, then rebuild infrastructure, then legalize pot, then expand Medicare, then take possession of the big banks who took bail out money.
I know. I just got out of the shower and feel like I need another. Agreeing with Boehner = ewwwww!
I’ll just sit here and hold my breath until that happens.
:^)
Second that.
“Boehner will also promise a real economic agenda from the GOP, ”
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss…Anyone taking wagers on the GOP economic platform changing even one iota?
Elizabeth Warren for Secretary of the Treasury!!
Tax cuts for the rich! Tax cuts for the rich! AWWWWWK!
right church, wrong eeeew !
no, thought I heard the ice cracking when Bat Shit Crazy Geller called out Gaffney for his inappropriateness at teh hallowed ground
you watch, they’ll get them
Who’s being post-partisan now? That’s a policy everyone could get behind.
I agree.
re: Bush tax cuts circa 1/09-
“REP. BOEHNER: I’ve got my doubts whether they’ll be bold enough to do that. They may wait till next year. But raising taxes on anyone in an ailing economy is wrong. And the fact is, is that the upper income people they talk about, 75 percent of them are small business people who pay ordinary income tax rates. And to tax small business, the engine of job growth in America, is, is really just not a very good idea.”
1/25/09 Meet The Press – Boehner and Summers http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28841300/
I believe Boehner also said “watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat” or maybe it was “percentages out of my butt”, I don’t recall. I surely know a TON of small business owners in the top one percent, don’t you? /s
Well, you are right about Little Timmy and the Ferret needing to go, but I for one do not want Agent Orange “getting behind” me with $1.2 T in yachts and useless debt.
Perhaps it would have helped if I’d added a grinning or snark indicator.
I knew what you meant, I just wanted to be graphic in the repercussions :-).
Obama probably coordinated this with Boehner.
Assures that these losers will be safe. All of ‘em.
Interesting to get a glimpse of kabuki planning and execution.
Okey doke.
Ugh: do not want to agree with TanMan Boner evah about anything!
Boner is undoudtedly right in this one instance but for all the wrong reasons. More tax cuts for the rich comin’ at us for sure.
Teh bigots don’t have a problem with the strip clubs around the WTC site.
Ouch. Good one.
This is another kabuki fight. Boehner may oppose Obama and his economics team but both have the same corporatist agenda.
His approval ratings would go sky high. But that would upset his precious Republicans and Blue Dogs, so, no, he won’t do that.
When the Republican minority leader says something liberals can agree on, something’s seriously wrong.
Geithner and Summers should have been fired a long time ago. Boehner’s right, period. Of course, it’s all politics for him to say it, but it’s good politics, because Obama’s economic team sucks, period. It’s impossible to defend them on anything.
The WH is finalizing plans to dig up Milton Friedman and install his rotting corpse in Summers’ office after firing him. Might as well have the godfather of neoliberalism enshrined in a fitting manner.
Rahm will have none of it! Oh and Obama won’t either.
I’d bet Geithner and Summers would have better luck reanimating Friedman than they will with the economy.
priceless
Like I said over at TalkLeft, it pains me to no end to know that Boehner agrees with me on this, and I know that we are approaching it from completely different points of view. But Larry and Timmeh need to go (though to be fair, it isn’t all on them. They do have a boss.)
As was said above, Boehner is right…but for the wrong reasons.
Your solution is so elegant as to be worthy of a PhD in economics. What is wrong with these bone heads? I beginning to think evolution passed by Washington.
Boehner says fire Geithner and Summer?
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Exactly. This is so Obama WON’T fire Geithner so as not to appear that Democrats are caving to the Republicans. It’s how issues are handled now: they are contrived to become political impasses in which the non-corporate agenda will always lack the votes or political capital or confirmability, etc.
Obama should do this REAL QUICK and take the issue away from the Republicans before the election., “mK, Boner, they’re gone, what’s your plan?” I’d like toi see the look on the orange’s face if that happened!
Team Obama is much more likely to keep the Bush tax cuts than dump Geithner and Summers. Sort of twofer. If the Tan One asks Obama to take a hammer to Social Security he might start looking like a DLC strategist. As for why Geithner is worse than Bush holdover Bernanke or Geithner’s predecessor Hank Paulson, that’s probably just team spirit at work.
Boehner is putting himself in a win / win politically. If they leave it was his idea, if they stay they will continue to give Republican light economic advice to Obama – dooming him to fail economically and politically.
It is too late for a progressive economic plan to begin to fix the economy before the midterms, so Obama can’t fire these clowns and put in somebody useful, besides nobody with the slightest idea of how the economy works could be approved with the current crop of corrupt Senators (or those running either.)
I wrote a year or more ago that if Obama were to fire Summers and Geithner it would be after the midterms and probably up to mid-2011. My reasoning was that Obama would stick with them through the 2010 elections because piecemeal fixes would keep the economy going through them. Also dumping them just before the election would be to hurt the Democrats unnecessarily, although this doesn’t seem to be much of an Obama priority anymore. The 2012 election cycle begins in late 2011 so Obama will, if he is going to, switch out S and G before then. Plus with Treasury you have to figure in time to work a confirmation. I used to think it was likely that Obama would fire these bozos at some point, if only to save himself. But I have to say it is looking more like he has tied his fortunes completely to the looting class and will stick by their agents Summers and Geithner to the bitter end.
Geithner in that Treasury meeting with bloggers, showing once again how far this administration is from promoting any sort of non-right-wing policy. If you have to increase taxes, to “balance” the cuts to Medicare and Social Security? Why, of course you go for the most regressive tax possible.
Geithner did make some minor disclosures (like saying he wasn’t supposed to talk about Fed policy, then doing just that, hinting that the catfood commission might recommend changes in taxes, which in context might mean more consumption taxes, as in a VAT).
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/08/some-econobloggers-visit-the-treasury.html
Replacing either one would require a talent search to either find a D that is copacetic or to reach across the isle where there are hordes of Rs that would stick with the plan. Gruber might be available for the Summers slot. My guess is that Obama is very happy with these bozos and sees nothing in their performance that he would like to see changed.
Hugh, do you really think he will rid himself of those meddlesome influences? I get the sense that he’s quite happy with them.
Yes, the only reason this works or is a good move as suggested by David is that Democrats generally agree with it.
It makes sense on an all around basis irrespective of who said it.
Anyone with common sense has already called for their firing.
Every time he opens his mouth, Boehner makes me so embarrassed to be living in Ohio.
Well, like I said, I wrote about this over a year ago. I thought that Obama would be more pragmatic if his political life were on the line, but he has shown more and more that he is what I now have come to describe as a Blue Dog status quo corporatist. Someone like that is going to be perfectly happy with them. The kicker is that next year the economy could go down hard. The question then will be what is a hardline ideologue to do?
and that is a good question
Biden came out in support of Geithner and Summers so it’s time to include him in the list of those that must go. It’s time for them to go!
Does this mean they used the good crayons?
I resemble that remark!
These two screw ups never should have been appointed. No change president would even have considered them for any position.
After the way he has lived up to the promises he made to get elected who’d believe him?
This was the beauty of Boehner’s move. After his statement, Democrats HAVE to defend Geither and Summers and that’s not popular or wise or smart or sensible.
I mean, I would very much tip my hat to a Democrat who came up with a similar move against the GOP. I think it’s one of the best political moves of that last 20 years (referring to only single event or statement type moves).
Whether you like or hate Boehner, it was brilliant.
ALL of this…meaning every single thing that has transpired since Obama took office, was already “basked in the cake” when GW left office. Those at the top of the pyramid (Rockefeller) planned ALL of this. Every single piece.
Seeker; I don’t think it’s sad. I think it’s kind of crazy-funny.
I want Geithner and Summers fired, too. Geithner, in particular, we’ve been hammering on for months now. Just because Boner wants him gone, or is SAYING that he wants him gone, that doesn’t mean we should switch to supporting him.
Y’know, all of this insanity, or most of it, would have been avoided if Obama had come in; cleaned house of the old bushheads and NOT larded his administration with Clinton retreads, but instead would have picked some good, young, bravehearts to help him mount the salvage operation, in no-fucking-uncertain terms.
Now, we have this moral vacuum; a mad-hatter tea-party (pun intended) where Obama’s goddamn “centrist” reticence to do the right and badly-needed thing, has left everything in a muddle.
Poor Boner; reduced to bitching about the man who has loyally toted the hod for Wall Street. How wierd can it get?
Its like Eugene McCarthy said– most wrecks happen in the middle of the road. Obama has somehow found the sweet spot where he’s hammered by liberals and conservatives alike.
Where the rubber meets the road (he he), is who do you replace Geithner and Summers with? I’m a MMT fan, so I’d love to see Warren Mosler working for The Man, but he’d be too far out of the box for Obama to contemplate hiring. Of economists with political connections (he was a House staffer back in the day), Jamie Galbraith has been ahead of the curve since before the TARP bailout. He was up on the Hill with Dean Baker (another solid guy) during the TARP debate lobbying against it. The world would be a better place if Gailbraith replaced Summers. Since Treasury invariably goes to a corporate CEO or Wall Street banker, the pickings are slimmer. I guess Leo Hindery has the right enemies for the job. As David Sirota wrote last year:
And that’s the big story here: Leo Hindery, one of the few business leaders to use his wealth to challenge deregulation, corporate trade deals and anti-worker policies was blacklisted by the Obama administration well before the Daschle flap ever happened – and he was blacklisted because he dared to clash with the same Wall Street Democrats whose corporate-backed policies destroyed the economy
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=11343
Last week, Hindery unloaded on Geithner:
I don’t expect Mr. Geithner to create the millions of jobs we need today in order to again be fully employed — as Harry Truman would have said, that’s the President’s job, plus Congress’. But we and countless others committed to a fully employed economy do expect him as Treasury Secretary to completely understand the issue and embrace its importance and to frame effective, U.S. advantaged solutions for the President…And since he doesn’t seem to be able to do any of this, I agree with Mr. Sloan that he should resign — immediately.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leo-hindery-jr/treasury-secretary-geithn_b_684565.html
If you’ve yet to see the recently published SMITH-TRG presentation, ‘Re-energizing America’ which includes the ANIMUS Plan a.k.a. 2011 – U.S. Jobs Creation Plan, you should. You can view at http://business.wesrch.com/pdfBU1O8D7IOQYXB or go to http://www.smith-trg.com/createjobs.html