Yesterday, California became the first state in the nation to pass the bills setting up insurance exchanges through the legislature. The exchanges would not come online until 2014, but the state now has four years to codify the rules. An excerpt:
Many aspects of the exchange are mandated under the federal law, so many features of California’s model will be included in those adopted by other states. The exchange is expected to offer insurance through a website that will provide standardized and detailed information about plans, so consumers can compare them. It will have a toll-free number, and will set up a program of live helpers, or navigators, to help explain plans to consumers.
The exchanges aren’t required to be fully up and running until January 2014, when key provisions of the new federal health law kick in, although some exchange operations may start earlier. Following federal requirements, the California exchange will sell insurance in five categories, ranging from rich “platinum”-level benefits to a plan for young people offering catastrophic coverage.
It will also link eligible Californians to federal subsidies that would help pay for their coverage, or to government programs such as Medicaid [...]
The California exchange would be governed by a new board, which will be given robust authority, including the power to selectively contract with insurers to offer plans within the exchange. That provision drew opposition from some health insurers.
I didn’t know about the exchanges providing Medicaid and subsidy options to their customers. Short of auto-enroll, this is an OK option. The Governor is expected to sign the law.
Unfortunately, those exchanges are four years off, and in the meantime, California will see rates continue to skyrocket in the individual market:
California insurance regulators cleared the way Wednesday for Anthem Blue Cross to implement scaled-back rate hikes after a previous increase was canceled amid an uproar over its size.
Anthem said it intends to put the new rates — averaging 14% and as high as 20% — into effect Oct. 1 for nearly 800,000 individual California policyholders.
Regulators also allowed one of Anthem’s nonprofit competitors, Blue Shield of California, to move ahead with rate increases — averaging 19% and as high as 29% — for 250,000 individual policyholders.
You may remember that Anthem BCBS backed off a 39% rate hike after its announcement touched off a fury from politicians and indirectly pushed along the Affordable Care Act. But after the dust settles, Anthem will got at least half of what they wanted out of customers. And of course, that’s just the increase for this year. Mary Feller, a customer quoted in the article, said, “If our insurance keeps going up at this rate, we’ll lose it.”
California doesn’t have much authority – outside of insuring a fairly low 70% medical loss ratio – to stop rate hikes. But a bill in the Legislature, AB2578, would “require insurance companies to justify their rates and seek approval from the Department of Managed Health Care or Department of Insurance whenever they attempt to increase premiums, co-payments, deductibles or other charges,” according to a release from the state progressive group Courage Campaign. They are pushing people to call their representatives in the legislature to enact this bill, which should get a vote in the next two days.
UPDATE: California’s legislature did just pass a mental health parity bill which would force insurers to cover mental illness.





36 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
1) What about Basic Health Plan? California is an ideal place to have a BHP. Big state. Relatively urban. Lots of providers.
2) Regarding AB 1600 mental health “parity”–it’s a boon for people who already have really good insurance. Everyone else is going to have trouble finding a competent mental health provider.
8.4 million Californians lack health coverage as the ranks of the uninsured swell, study finds.
Screw the exchanges, get SB810 passed.
Try to get health insurance for a 17 or 23 year old if they have
1) gotten albuterol two years ago for exercise induced asthma
2) had an infected cornea
3) have acne
At any age,
1) If you are taking lipitor
…
I think what will happen in 2014 is the rates will triple. BHP, single payer, public option, they can’t happen soon enough.
We led the nation in property bubble foolishness, now we’re blazing a new trail in the quest to make health insurance affordable only to the rich. Yes, we can!
And anything that happens in 2014 is relevant now, just how?
Medical care affordable only to the rich has been a 50-60+ year search in the U.S.
Ditto infrastructure, which in the U.S. means gates and fences for rich housing developments.
50-60 year search, but California will FIND it! With Prop 13 we’ve ruined the best public education and infrastructure systems in the land. Now, we tackle health care.
And in related news, today there appears that enough signatures were collected to put Amendment 63 up for vote this November in Colorado.
People hate the mandate; especially without cost controls, or single payer.
Yep. Prop 13 in CA put minority in charge of govt.
PTB captured media decades ago. It’s taken them a bit longer to dismantle ed sys. Prop 13 certainly helped in CA. Attacks on unions and NCLB major factors nationally.
Uninformed & poorly educated proles are much easier to lead around by the nose. Gettin’ there in the U.S. of A.
Sucks that we have to join forces with these wackos. Time to raise some chickens. I hear tell back in grampa’s day you could get an angioplasty for 4 chickens and a lame mule.
Study: Bush Tax Cuts Cost More Than Twice As Much As Dems’ Health-Care Bill
By Susie Madrak
Citizens for Tax Justice point out what I was saying just the other day: We only hear all this crying and moaning about the deficit when it’s something for regular working people, and not a powerful lobby. And of course, the Republican’ts are right out there in front of the Hypocrisy Parade:
And yet, many of the lawmakers who argue that the health care reform legislation is “too costly” are the same lawmakers who supported the Bush tax cuts.
Their own voting record demonstrates that health care reform is not a matter of costs, but a matter of priorities.
It’s difficult to see how the Bush tax cuts could provide us with two and a half times the benefits of health care reform. In 2010, when all the Bush tax cuts are finally phased in, a staggering 52.5 percent of the benefits will go to the richest 5 percent of taxpayers.
President Bush and his supporters argued that these high-income tax cuts would benefit everybody because they would unleash investment that would spark widespread economic prosperity. There seems to be no evidence of this, particularly given the collapse of the economy at the end of the Bush years.
The tax legislation enacted under President George W. Bush from 2001 through 2006 will cost $2.48
trillion over the 2001-2010 period.
This includes the revenue loss of $2.11 trillion that results directly from the Bush tax cuts as well as the $379 billion in additional interest payments on the national debt that we must make since the tax cuts were deficit-financed.
[...] Over the upcoming decade (2010-2019), the costs of the health care proposals approved by three committees in the U.S. House of Representatives are projected to be around $1 trillion. (One committee trimmed the costs of its health care bill below that amount, but an official estimate of the cost reductions was not available at the time of this writing.)
This converter might help you decide how many chicks you need.
Weird, but true. I’m voting against the stupid mandate under the circumstances.
And the Establishment here in CO and elswhere, just won’t understand and will be scratching their heads when CO puts the kibosh on the mandate, and also defeats the “Personhood” amendment. It’s like only half tea-baggish in their eyes.
The real message is people aren’t stupid, and reject dumb choices.
Please give a short excerpt and a link rather than so many paragraphs from another source. Trying to stay on the right side of the law wrt copyright – thanks.
Isn’t a lame mule the Democratic Party mascot? If so expect significant depreciation.
I’d point out that every single bit of medical care in the U. S. is too expensive. Any govt program without cost control will fail just as miserably as all the private medical ‘insurance’ programs are failing now.
In W. Europe, as I understand it, the stakeholders get together & “fix” prices that are both affordable & compensate providers handsomely. I’ve watched medical inflation in the U.S. for 2 decades. I see no other solution. But I also see that the U.S. will NEVER acquiesce to the European model. So, instead, I forecast suffering & early death for the poor and concierge medical care for the rich. How else could the U.S. turn out?
Spot on.
Sad, but true.
That’s more a statement of fact than a forecast.
One key to ‘forecasting’ is a command of the obvious.
Only you’d be surprised how long it takes most people to recognize the obvious, and in the U.S. how most people never do.
I think myths, true believers, wishful thinking, whatever you want to call it, prevents rational approaches to most human problems, in all places in all times. Think the U.S. is probably not unique, but do think hubris of empire exacerbates all the negatives.
I needed 1,019 chickens for my appendectomy. Lucky they’re on sale at Ralphs, especially the Salmonella Specials.
I’ve long believed my only superhero power is “the power to state the obvious”…watch,
“Obama likes to punch hippies.”
I even have a cape somewhere… /s
Why, the electorate is moving right! No, er, um — the left voted for this? Um, well, they just don’t appreciate their socialist president! Low information types, that’s it. What? It was the MORE educated left that opposed the mandate. Uh, hang on…ummm.
Oy. I’d strong arm my neighbors to contribute, but they have only 14. So I don’t know what to do about the other 1,005 that you need.
And your only power to state the obvious accomplishes just what?
Not dissing you. Just saying…
I couldn’t have been more articulate if I’d tried.
Think I’ll have to start a chicken farm in a Republican district. If they don’t like the noise and the smell I’ll just tell them I’m claiming my god given constitutional right to pay for medical services.
on a good day, free bus fare…wait, that’s actually on an ozone action day… Damn, maybe it’s not a superpower but a gypsy curse instead… =)
Yes, they do. I say take away that mandate. Heck, with no jobs we won’t be able to pay anyway. I guess we will all get to go to Insurance prison on some stupid thing like that.
If only Jason Rosenbaum were here to tell me this is impossible, because healthcare reform made sure stuff like this didn’t happen.
Thank you, Nathan. ;-)
You’re welcome. :-)
I agree – the only cost control proposed was the public option – and Obama really did not want that. An annual nation health care budget for a basic care package (you buy ins for better coverage) is required – Medicare with its “this is covered and this is not” approach is an indirect version of this.
And the California exchanges are going to be interesting with no cost control beyond a 70% (not 80% as in the federal law) loss ratio rule. Massachusetts has had exchanges for years – based on the incompetent advice of the non-actuary MIT prof and his proprietary spreadsheets that Obama loves because the ins. co’s told him to love those spreadsheets- and the Exchanges in Mass have done nothing to contain cost.
The Mass Governor in February issued an emergency regulation allowing his administration to reject rate increases by the state’s health insurance companies, and then in April used the authority to reject the insurers’ rate increases, leading to a court battle and a near-freeze in the Massachusetts small-group health insurance market that services about 800,000 residents. A Judge ordered insurers to first to exhaust the existing insurance division appeals process, and then the state’s Division of Insurance appeals board sided with the insurers in June, finding the new rates justified because the appeals board said Mass rates are driven by the clout of the large providers and insurance companies do not have the clout to force the large providers to not raise the cost every year. Pennsylvania has launched an investigation into nine of the state’s biggest health insurance companies and their rate increases, possibly signaling a move toward rate caps in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as well, but with the same result likely. Indeed if it is true that the ins co’s can not demand lower prices (and while I doubt that it is true, I believe it will be found true enough by a court) the companies can claim they must leave Massachusetts or go bankrupt.
BUT BUT BUT………
The health reform bill establishes a mechanism for Health and Human Services to “review” – but not cap – proposed premium increases. If we can not get single payer with a national budget for basic care approach we may be forced to go to HHS caps – and based on the history of public utility regulations, when we down that route there will be new court cases every step of the way on the ideas of “price controls, rebates, bankruptcy potential, Federal authority under the Constitution, etc.”.
Meanwhile re the exchanges being set-up – - – they are nothing more than the current broker’s office conversation and presentation. Not a big deal.
The problem with healthcare in this country has been its cost, and now we see 20% increases in premiums. Medicare for all solves everything, but the pot-bellied, std-ridden, rotted liver elite will have to get the same care as the “lesser people”, so don’t even pray for such fairness.
Fire Obama and all the other Blue Dogs. Tax Cheat Timmy and Mary Landreau. Alan Simpson. Catfood Commission. Forced purchase of private insurance. DOMA?? DADT?? YEMEN???????? Gunatanamo??? Drug Wars?? Larry Summers?? Lieberman caucusing with Dems? Afghanistan??? Iraq??? FOOEY. Buy nothing from Nebraska vendors while Nelson holds a seat.
PPACA requires state exchanges by 2014. What to know in 2010? Underlying complexity will sneak up on the unprepared – http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=2875