Over 25,000 ballots remain uncounted in the Alaska Republican primary for US Senate, where Tea Party candidate Joe Miller leads Sen. Lisa Murkowski by about 1,688 votes. That makes it at least possible for Murkowski to overtake Miller. Conflicting reports show that those uncounted ballots would either hurt or help Murkowski’s bid, depending on who you believe.
The possibility exists for a three-way race, if Miller (or for that matter, if Murkowski) prevails. Sitka Mayor Scott McAdams will be the Democratic candidate, but Murkowski could run a write in campaign or take the Libertarian Party ballot line to get into the race. Polls show she would be competitive if she did so. However, the Libertarian Party in Alaska appears to have closed the door on one of these options.
The Executive Committee of the Alaska Libertarian Party held an emergency meeting yesterday to discuss the contested primary results in the Republican Senate primary. All 5 board members met in an undisclosed location in northeast Anchorage to hammer out a decision as to how to move forward [...]
On Sunday morning, over coffee and donuts, the ExComm voted unanimously, 5 to 0 to deny the Senator the ballot line. There was no malice intended. ALP Chair Kohlhaas has repeatedly stated that she is a nice lady, and the ALP was flattered by the offer.
Now, the bigger question to me is whether the ALP would give their position to Miller, if Murkowski won out. You can see in the fuller post why that would almost certainly happen.
Without a ballot line, Murkowski would have to run as a write-in candidate, a long shot at best, although she does have decent favorables in the state.
It looks to me like McAdams and Miller will end up in the general election battle. The only question is whether Murkowski joins them as the Republican nominee, a write-in, or not at all.




9 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I didn’t realize Miller was a West Point grad. That makes it hard for Murkowski to win the largely military absentee vote. In 2008 there were 7700 military ballots.
So, the horse race is that if it’s Murkowski vs. McAdams, Murk wins. What’s the horse race of Miller vs. McAdams, or a 3-way race?
Polling from Kos’s new pollster, PPP:
Scott McAdams (D): 39
Joe Miller (R): 47
Undecided: 14
Scott McAdams (D): 22
Joe Miller (R): 38
Lisa Murkowski (L-inc): 34
Undecided: 6
Scott McAdams (D): 28
Lisa Murkowski (R-inc): 60
Undecided: 12
(MoE: ±2.7%)
Looks like McAdams does best straight-up against Miller without Lisa in the race. Of course, it’s early days and there’s no winner yet in the GOP race, so who knows?
Also: it’s Alaska, Jake.
So McAdams loses no matter what. Thanks.
I have always wondered, and I hope someone can give me the answer: in a write-in, does the person’s name have to be spelled perfectly correct? What if someone wrote in, for example, “Lisa Merkowski” instead of “Murkowski.” One could argue that it’s obvious who the voter intended, but then again, somewhere out there, there could also be a “Lisa Merkowski,” someone not running for office. This would be more important, I would think, in a national race– say if someone wanted to write in Elizabeth Warren instead of voting for evil or lesser evil.
It probably has some variation state to state but I’d wager that in most states, the write-in name has to be spelled correctly to be counted.
Gee. If they would count the votes it would change the whole discussion. Did they hire people from Minnesota?
McAdams has low name recognition. And considering Kerry got either 43 or 45%, I think there is a lot of upside for McAdams even in a 3-way race.