When wondering what will happen in policy in the near term, I don’t think it’s possible to go wrong betting on what Wall Street thinks. And they think Elizabeth Warren will be nominated to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, according to Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post:
Wall Street is preparing for a hurricane starting with the letter E, but it’s not Earl, it’s Elizabeth, as in Warren.
Bankers appear to be resigning themselves to a fate worse than tougher financial regulation: The hard-charging Harvard professor, who oversees TARP funding, seems a near-cinch to be named the nation’s consumer watchdog.
“At this point, it seems pretty clear that she’s going to get the nomination,” said one high-ranking bank official, noting that President Obama, who has been sliding in the polls, could use a Warren nomination as a rallying point.
In the article, sources raise the possibility of a recess appointment in the month before the election, an “October Surprise” of sorts to goose the base. The writer doesn’t seem to know that Treasury, not the President, could make her acting director immediately without Senate action. It also speculates that Michael Barr, seen as Warren’s chief competition for the CFPB post, would more likely take over the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, from which bank lobbyist John Dugan will step down.
Warren and Barr at the two key consumer posts (OCC can invoke pre-emption of state consumer protection laws and has a seat on the systemic risk council) would certainly be a significant upgrade over a bank lobbyist and nobody.
I suppose you can devise some double- and triple-cross, where the Post has an agenda to reverse the Warren boomlet, and are printing this to rouse the opposition, or that banksters are saying this to deflate the base when it doesn’t happen, or something. But I’ve been cautiously optimistic about this because of the political ramifications, and with the midterms looking grim, frankly the White House needs something like a Warren appointment – not just a nomination – to bring some measure of cheer to the base. That doesn’t mean this will absolutely happen. But it’s notable that the banks seem to be mentally preparing themselves for that reality.



37 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
But wait. What transpired at that late night meeting with Axelrod? Did Warren make promises? Was something extracted from her as the price of appointment? Who will win the contest of wills? Stay tuned.
I wouldn’t blame her for flipping them off even if they offer the job to her. Her office would probably be a converted panic room anyway.
Likely nomination but it will be another Obama con-job.
Treasury runs the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau until the nomination is approved – but Obama will not have Tim appoint her as interim head to do that set up and run chore. And after the election Obama will note how hard it will be to get her nomination past the new Senate and she will be dropped in favor of Tim’s prior choice to do the set-up and run until Warren was confirmed. Obama is a sell out to corporations and the rich – and that is not about to change.
So I agree Warren gets the nod – but only for 60 days – and with no authority during that time.
You have to have faith in someone. With all that has transpired in the last 18 months, Warren would be THE standout-standup gal.
If Warren were pressed to allow her position to become toothless, she would decline it, I am quite certain.
I will only believe this when I see it happen. The only way I can see Obama appointing Warren is if Geithner and Bernanke render the office completely nonfunctioning.
I think this is part of the Two-Minutes-Hate sort of programming they give themselves in their bull sessions. They’ve been given every sort of break, but they can’t let go of their eternal victimhood or they lose their drive to succeed, don’t you know.
BJ?
The simplest things seem to take an extraordinarily long time to get done with this administration. Yes, Mr Geithner should have been ‘asked’ to appoint her some time back. It’s not too late. A recess appointment would be unnecessary and not such a blow to the intelligence of what’s left of the base. Why the delay? And what’s with DADT? DOMA? Public Option? The base is pissed. This is not an uninformed and ignorant base. Quite the contrary. Get it done and do it now.
Even if, might I suggest: Too little, too late.
Can someone just tell my why the fuck it takes so long to appoint someone? Of course I want Warren, but shouldn’t the length of time taken to get someone in the damn office be sufficient to prove that our government is completely incompetent?
I think this one is like Dawn Johnson. O doesn’t want the slot to be filled, so he just lets the appointment languish.
Maybe they know they have to appoint her and so they are waiting till just before the election so they’ll get some applause from the professional left?
It’s a testament to the capture of the media by Wall Street that consumer protection for financial products is considered extremist, compared to, say, consumer protection for toasters. I’m wondering how the total cost of appliance fires measures up to the total cost of fraudulent financial products in the last few years.
Judging from the body language between Warren & Geithner at the TARP oversight meetings, I would imagine the relationship is going to be cool if not outright cold.
The topic was HAMP and Geithner’s attitude was condescending.
Geithner has the juice to keep her from accomplishing anything and that will not sit well with her.
She is not afraid to go toe-to-toe. But Geithner is an in-fighter and he knows how to play the game. If Summers can insulate Obama as well as he seems, then Warren may find herself on the dark side of moon Geithner.
From there to Earth Obama is further than she will be able to reach.
I hope this is more than base appeasement.
In the short run it makes no difference if she gets the position. In the long term it makes no difference if she gets the position. You can’t lead if there is nobody to follow.
I have wildly mixed feelings about her. She has displayed the patience and fortitude of a saint despite the relentless humiliations her current job has produced. Mainly in being totally ignored. Playing politely within a system that holds her in total contempt. As I say such is saintly but it seems fruitless to me. Incremental change from within the system is impossible. She would do better in my opinion if she left the Beltway and spoke frankly about the forces working against her, naming names.
Awwe, the poor widdle banksters are all afraid the jig is up.
That breaks my heart.
My question is, as members of The Professional Left, do we get steep discounts on tar and feathers if we buy in bulk?
Great point except judging by some cheap junk I have seen in the stores recently I’m not sure that there is much consumer protection for toasters.
Isn’t the head of the OLC still vacant? I just looked on their website & it’s not apparent one way or the other.
From your keyboard to Obama’s ears!
More Kabuki show, which is sort of like more cowbell. Frankly, I won’t hold my breath, and it’s a d**n shame that the jugglers and clowns in ORahma’s admin continue with these incredibly irresponsible activities at a time when real leadership is required.
Same old, different day. Agree with rapier@15: Warren should leave that “show” behind and reveal exactly how stupid and corrupt it is “behind the curtain.”
Shit Busted we could use some of that spilled Gulf oil and back up a couple of semi’s to one of those Salmonella egg farms and get feathers by the Truck FULL!!
Jon Walker is upstairs!
Florida Supreme Court Rules Against Attempts to Stop Redistricting Reform Ballot Measures
Will never happen, unless the authority of the position or the agency is sufficiently diminished. You’re supposed to think the Dems are really trying to do the right thing (kabuki!) so you might actually go out and vote in November.
That’s it. No story here.
Won’t happen. I guess it’s fun to conjecture about political what-ifs, but Warren won’t get the job. Nothing to see here.
Nominated isn’t confirmed. If she actually does get confirmed I’ll eat my hat.
Which brings in the most Wall St. PAC money: the threat of a Warren nomination, or dropping said nomination?
Cynicism washes down much better with beer.
Interesting question – there is room for Michael Barr at the the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency as that Office acquires the former function of the OTS, but Dugan’s Chief of Staff and Public Affairs since 2005 John Walsh was made acting Comptroller of the Currency on the day Dugan’s 5 year term expired (Aug 14, 2010).
Dugan favored and was a strong advocate for the national banks overseen by his agency – Barr I suspect would be the same. Corporate Obama and Tim would approve Barr’s attitude given the new laws tightening of regulation over at OCC as it takes on the OTC loose regulation reputation, There will be pressure to show that OCC is tougher than OTS now that thrift supervision of holding companies and individual banks is no longer consolidated (Fed will oversee thrift holding companies while the OCC supervises individual thrifts). Pre reform, the OTS did not require specific capital ratios for thrift holding companies but used bank holding company standards as a baseline and varied that “as needed, depending on the type of company”. Likely that post reform and now under OCC the thrift holding companies will have to hold more capital. And OTS was not into being specific on how you calculate Tier 1 capital, so it is likely that will change.
Strongly agree. And, as well, with other commenters above who made the point that, if she gets the job, the “bureau” will have been already gutted.
I tend to agree.
My thoughts turn to Harold Koh, a strong advocate for human rights and international law, who nonetheless swallowed his principles and defended drone attacks as State Dept legal advisor.
My guess is that the White House is trying to exact assurances from Warren that she’ll similarly toe the line (Koh the line?) if appointed. They don’t want another Brooksley Born. She’ll have to promise to be a Brooksley Stillborn.
David Brooksley Stillborn. LOL
would agree with both rapier and onit goes but: Where is Warren’s platform? How does she get herself heard? If she leaves the Beltway, doesn’t she become another Profesional Leftist DFH like the rest of us?
It doesn’t matter what she’s asked to agree to, she can go ahead and promise away. If she’s confirmed, she’s untouchable for 5 years (she can only be fired for cause) and she’ll have broad authority to draft regulations and hire staff.
I agree the five year term gives her time to make policy – but
1. I suspect the nomination will be a con-job that ends post election with Obama dropping her because she is “too hard” to get approved by the Senate.
2. If nominated and approved I suspect she will still not also be made interim head by Tim as is in his right and power to do so – without any Congressional approval being needed. Indeed Tim and Obama’s interim head will fix the initial head count, the initial job responsibilities, pay, and civil service status of those they gives jobs to in that head count – and I am assuming Warren is not made interim head. While removing her after the Senate approves her is tough, it is even tougher to remove folks that already fill the spots in the head count that Tim and Obama have drawn up. Her first budget request will need to include the Tim’s hires. This is the “Obama will gut the bureau before she starts” scenario.
There is a true danger here that they will nominate and let her hang for year like Dawn Johnsen. They get a gift to the progressives yet wall street still has no one watching the coop. They have been pretty stupid on this for awhile now. They are running all over the country touting how valuable this reform is, yet there is no nomination prior to August recess. They signed it in July and it is now September. Just how important is a bill that you can wait for months to appoint a head to get started. If they don’t do it this week, it will lose any of the impetus for Nov. that they desperately need.
Funny. The leftists of firedoglake complain that Obama won’t nominate Warren. Then when it looks like he is going to nominate her, it’s all some grand illusion. There’s no winning with you people. Just admit it, this place is a teagbagger front group created to split and depress the Democratic Party’s base.
LOL – ever hear of “fool me once” ….
try to read up on the Dawn Johnsen nomination
or the pretend consideration of Diane Wood, twice, who is to the left of Kagan.
or see the headline at HuffPo from a piece by David Lightman of McClatchy Newspapers that “Democrats unlikely to repeal tax cuts for the rich” – as the Obama team plants the story that they are forced to give the rich tax cuts because of Dem Senators that will not approve a tax cut for the middle class without tax cuts for the rich. The alternative of forcing an up or down vote on a middleclass tax cut -ONLY – bill – does not occur to Obama – hell, an up or down vote on a middleclass tax cut only bill might embarrass Obama’s GOP friends..
“There’s no winning with you people” – well – “fool me once…….”
Obama’s waited too long and the appointment has eau of ‘responding to pressure’.
What was needed was a quick full-throated commitment to the plight of people who are struggling. What happened was typical sausage making.
Obama was the first pol I’ve voted for, instead of against, in 40 years.
I’m neither a teabagger nor a cynic. But Sherrod did make me a skeptic.
That was deeply disappointing. After that, I came to question every decision the Administration makes in terms of ‘what pols do’ as opposed to ‘what should be done’.
Shakespeare said it best:
“Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds”.