Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke is appearing before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission today, and he mainly said in opening remarks that too big to fail must be solved. He believes the new resolution authority will provide the opportunity for regulators to wind down firms without taxpayer resources exposed.
But that’s not nearly the most notable part of his remarks today. No, that gets reserved for Bernanke’s past performance during the housing bubble. He acknowledged the Fed’s failure to crack down on predatory lending, and then absolved his organization from any responsibility for the housing bubble.
Speaking before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission this morning in Washington, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke said if steps could have been taken three years ago to stop the bubble in the economy, which eventually lead to today’s recession, it would not have been a prudent decision to do so.
“Even if monetary policy was not a principal cause of the housing bubble, some have argued that the Fed could have stopped the bubble at an earlier stage by more-aggressive interest rate increases,” he said. “For several reasons, this was not a practical policy option.” [...]
In 2003 and onward, Bernanke said there was no clear consensus about whether the increases in house prices were worrisome. If the Federal Reserve raised interest rates in that time period, the economy would have felt several negative effects to other assets and sectors.
It’s just ridiculous to suggest that there was “no clear consensus” about housing prices. Just look at this chart of housing prices since WWII. For 50-odd years, prices generally fell in a stable range, adjusted for inflation. Then they rose completely off the charts, doubling in value. Only someone who wanted to pretend not to know the damage this would cause the economy when the bubble burst would claim “no consensus.”
As for the Fed’s policy options, yes the blunt instrument of interest rates exists, but because mortgage lenders were dying to get people into these bubble-inflated homes, they broke every rule in the book to fashion lending instruments. And the entity with chief responsibility to stop that was the Federal Reserve. And they didn’t do a damn thing. It’s nice for Bernanke to “acknowledge” this, but he’s essentially saying they abdicated their responsibility. Actual enforcement would have knocked down the bubble significantly. So there’s no conception of the Fed being “powerless” to stop this. They chose not to intervene because it wasn’t profitable for their buddies to intervene.
Alternatively, they could have not encouraged exotic mortgage instruments in public statements. You know, the kind that crashed the bubble.
The fact that Bernanke now stresses regulation as the way to prevent financial crises now, after claiming innocent bystander status on a housing bubble that could have been popped by proper regulation, should make nobody comfortable about the future. Although, a legitimate defender of the people in the role of the consumer protection bureau, which would have jurisdiction over this element of policy, at least would mean less of a reliance on the Ben Bernankes of the world.
UPDATE: Oh yeah, Bernanke also admitted lying to Congress.
He said his testimony before Congress on Sept. 23-24, 2008, which indicated Lehman was permitted to fail because market players had had time to make other arrangements, inadvertently fed “the myth we had a way of saving Lehman.”
Bernanke said he equivocated because he judged at the time that explaining that the Fed couldn’t save Lehman “could have reduced confidence in the system even further,” possibly leading to runs on other financial institutions [...]
As bad as September 2008 was, Bernanke feared he could have made it worse by frankly admitting the Fed had no way of preventing a giant securities firm from unraveling. But he said in retrospect that caution has handed unwarranted ammunition to a large group that contends policymakers let Lehman fail to save face politically.
“I regret not being more straightforward there,” Bernanke said. He said the apparent change in his explanation of Lehman’s failure over the past two years “has supported the mistaken impression we could have done more.”
I’m sure the Justice Department arrest will happen any day now…
UPDATE II: Zach Carter has a great liveblog of the proceedings.



25 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Ben Bernanke is lying his ass off, again. His job in the great scheme of things is to facilitate looting. He has done such a great job at that he got appointed to a second term by the PTB.
This is of course the crux of the matter. This is like giving the keys to the henhouse to the foxes a second time because this time they really mean to protect us chickens…
Oh, and to pre-empt Teddy. Bernanke is a criminal, a financial terrorist. He belongs in jail for the rest of his unnatural life.
Bernanke wasn’t alone. Look at what this impressive roster of right wing fools from Cato and AEI said:
http://economicsofcontempt.blogspot.com/2008/07/official-list-of-punditsexperts-who.html
heres a bit of trivia that i found really really instructive in a couple of ways. walking through a room with a tv in it to get some coffee, i heard part of a CNN broadcast. one of those afternoon talking head shows. they were talking about the most expensive private residence in all of the world being in India now. The owner of the travesty has a 150 car garage. while they chuckled about that someone mentioned that unfortunately, he has 168 cars. thats just perfect. when it comes to mindless consumerism How much is enough? the answer is there is no such thing. probably if the owner of those cars could buy all the world and everyone in it, he would be terribly unsatisfied with nothing left to buy.it s a SICKNESS. not a path to “happiness”. this behavior in India in 2010 is also incredibly worrisome. That kind of living is not 19th century robber barron, its 17th century french empire that runs on gas and electricity, and the world cant support it.
It is possible for a President to remove the Fed Chair for malfeasance and dereliction of duty.
True!
hahahahaha
We must remember that Obama had the opportunity to replace this guy under regular order, and re-appointed him.
Supermax, 23-hour / day lockdown? Or maybe general population in a maximum security facility? Odds on how long he’d last?
My point is: None of this “prison resort” crap. So-called “white collar” criminals need to be treated like what they are, C R I M I N A L S. Nothing else is going to get their attention, period.
Do you ever tire of looking at smug/rich/white men? Can the species evolve?
Yes and (apparently) no.
The way I heard this story, the Fed was prohibited from bailing out Lehman since there was no chance the assets were worth it, i.e it would be illegal (then he really could go to jail.). Not so for AIG. Bernanke and the Fed tried to arrange a deal for someone to take over Lehman but no one else wanted it either. You can call it lying or just as he said: you have to judge whether your comments will make this worse. If you think back to this time you may recall the panic around these events. Hell, even McCain suspended his campaign and rushed off to DC to save the day. Fortunately, he had his cape with him and all was well and we are saved. Now we have a chance to thank the man and elect him to another term. Bring the cape, John.
About the way I see it….thanks ;)
Here’s an excerpt from a Glenn Greenwald blog addressing this issue. Is it any wonder why we cannot move forward and continue to repeat the same mistakes?
On the housing bubble, I think this will also be an argument for the ages. But we were complicit. I know people of even modest means who were thinking they could flip a house and make a tidy profit. Hell, some of the people here are likely thinking the market will come back again and they can get their money out. (I doubt that) Greenspan was raising interest rates but probably not fast enough to stem the tide because he (like everyone else) didn’t see any cause for alarm and because Wall Street did not want higher rates.
you simply cannot paint everything with the same brush. Sounds good, but no, you can’t.
Odd Gibbs would say that since they were telling us how dire it was. Guess he forgot.
But you know I will take some of it back. There are some who should take the blame for the housing bubble, who knew or should have known. Like that ass who ran Countrywide and many in the mortgage industry who were pushing those liar mortgages. Some of those bastards should probably be in jail, maybe a few of their friends at the banks and investment houses who should have known better. And, guess what, the people who took out those liar mortgages who knew they could not pay for them and then wanted to be bailed out too. That guy who ran Lehman was in the thick of this shit. It was a real shit storm.
It was dire when the oligarchy needed 23 trillion in bailouts and federal guarantees, but not so dire when the middle class needed HCR or a Federal job stimulus program.
The mind is one of the first things to go.
I recommend this webpage to anyone consumed with catfood commission and media inflated debt terror. this guy has a “national debt clock” on his page that includes GDP and the net positive debt, instead of just the scary scary debt number in red, clicking ever higher
http://www.optimist123.com/optimist/2005/10/why_debt_doomsd.html
Notice how he side-steps the main points that “many” were making back in 2005: that the Fed, as a principal regulator of banks in the US, should have been screaming blue murder about the criminally lax underwriting standards in place, without which there couldn’t have been a housing bubble. That the Fed’s chairman not only denied the existence of the bubble but actually advised people to choose ARMs over fixed loans when the spread between the two was marginal.
How can this douchebag get away with this even as he insists that the Fed’s bank regulatory powers be expanded?
The past tense of ‘lead’ is ‘led.’ It’s annoying when people who should know better insist on getting the simplest of words confused. It makes me wonder what’s being taught in the classroom.
Sorry. I got off on a grammar tear. As for that lying little stain Bernanke, he and the Federal Reserve knew exactly what was going on; they simply chose to sit back and let it all go down the drain, because God forbid anyone should try to impose a set of rules on Wall Street in the interest of protecting the public from great harm. How many millions of Americans are homeless, or worse, dead because these overgrown children think they and theirs are above the law?
His whole argument is a misdirection, a sleight of hand. Misinformation and disinformation is his stock and trade. Which is how he gained entre into the elites. I suppose he mostly believes his half truths are the whole truth or when he doesn’t that the little white lies serve the common good.
He should be left to ponder those things from a retirement cottage. Jail being out of the question.
Special Salon up with Steven Hill’s policy paper Secure Retirement for All Americans Guaranteeing the American Dream with Expanded Social Security hosted by masaccio
Thank goodness President Obama and his Diet Republicans hung onto Ben Bernanke as Chairman of the Federal Reserve!
Well, here’s a solution: nationalize when it happens and punish holy fuck out of the bankers.