President Obama holds a press conference today at 11am ET. I’ll monitor it here. The press event is supposed to focus on the economy, though that isn’t sexy enough for the media as some dude with a handlebar moustache burning Korans, so that will probably take precedence. And then the media will wonder why the President isn’t “focusing on the economy.”
…The presser is taking place in the East Room. Obama is expected to announce in remarks before taking questions the appointment of Austan Goolsbee as the head of the Council of Economic Advisers.
Obama starts out by criticizing the previous Administration for cutting taxes for millionaires and billionaires, ignoring regulations and leading us to a financial crisis and a deep recession.
Obama walks the tightrope, says even though we’re growing again, progress has been painfully slow. Measures announced this week designed to accelerate job growth in the short term, and produce a foundation for growth in the long term.
He briefly describes the three pieces – making permanent the R&D tax credit, write-offs for business capital expenditures, and a 6-year plan for infrastructure with front-loaded money. Also touts the small business bill, which is virtually assured to pass after George Voinovich announced his support yesterday.
Obama cites the Voinovich shift, and his statement, “We don’t have time to play games.” Obama says he couldn’t agree more. “We weren’t sent to Washington to think about our jobs, we were sent to think about theirs.”
Now announcing Austan Goolsbee’s promotion to the head of the Council of Economic Advisers.
…Brief remarks about September 11. Obama will be at the Pentagon, Biden in NYC. “Tomorrow’s a national day of service and remembrance.”
Questions begin. First question on the midterms and whether it’s a referendum on the economy.
Obama restates the question. If the election is about the policies that will move us forward versus the policies that would move us into a mess, he thinks the Dems will do well. Basically reiterates the state of the economy under Bush. Again says that job growth in the 2000s was the slowest for a recovery since WWII.
Now it’s just the usual “we’re moving forward but we’re not there yet.” Says “we lost four million jobs in the six months before I was sworn in.” Good to actually look backwards here, though I’m missing the word “Republicans.”
…People are frustrated and people are angry. Since I’m the President and Dems control Congress, it’s understandable that people are saying “What have you done?” Actually says “Republicans,” i.e. “The Republicans are offering the same policies that got us into this mess.”
…Brings up taxes unprompted. “I am prepared to sign a bill this month that ensure middle class families get tax relief.” We can give permanent tax relief to 97% of families. Says that families making above that would still get tax relief on the first $250K. Republicans are holding that hostage because they want to give $100,000 to every millionaire. They want to spend $700 billion on that, and economists say it’s the worst way to stimulate the economy.
…Next question. “Is there room for middle ground,” like temporary extension of tax cuts? Obama: certainly there’s room for discussion. On small business bill, he “doesn’t understand” why the bill wasn’t passed two months ago. On the high-income tax cuts, my position is let’s get done what we all agree on. Let’s work on making middle-class tax cuts permanent. We can have a discussion on giving $100K to millionaires. There are a lot better ways of spending that money. Why would we borrow money to help people who don’t need help? We’ve got an area of agreement, let’s do that this month. We could give every American certainty and tax relief up to $250,000 a year. Nice use of “certainty” there.
…Obama again avoids calling for a veto. Says again, let’s give certainty to families out there having a tough time.
Next question: Chip Reid. Why did you wait until campaign season for the business tax cuts? On the stimulus part, why won’t anyone say the word? Is that because stimulus is unpopular?
Obama goes back to beginning of term. We put in place of an economic plan which 95% of economists say saved us from a Depression. This notion that we waited until now, just on the small business issue alone, we cut taxes on them eight times in 18 months (so why will tax cut #9 work? -ed.)
Proposals we put forward are historically ones that have bipartisan support.
Obama admits that the infrastructure piece is basically just a re-tooled and front-loaded highway bill.
Says what we did previously worked, but we just have a long way to go. Chip Reid asks “so this is a second stimulus?” Obama says everything we’ve tried to do is designed to stimulate growth and jobs in the economy. Isn’t that what I should be doing? I assume that’s what the Republicans think we should do. I will try to keep on this as long as I’m President.
Next question on naming a head of the CFPB. Is Elizabeth Warren still a candidate? Obama: This is a great opportunity to talk about the CFPB. An independent agency whose sole job is to protect families in their financial transactions. Briefly describes CFPB and benefits for consumers. This agency has the capacity to really provide families protection that has been lacking for too long. I’ve known Warren since law school. I have been in conversations with her. It’s only been a couple months. This is a big task standing up this agency. It was her idea. I should have an announcement soon.
Concerned about her Senate confirmation? I’m concerned about all Senate confirmations these days. If I hire a dog catcher… I’ve got people who were voted out of committee unanimously and I can’t get a vote on. Judges, homeland security. Determined minority in the Senate insists on a 60-vote filibuster on everyone, even if after we break the filibuster, they get 90 votes. They’re just playing games. It’s time to stop.
Chuck Todd asks, “how have you changed Washington?” Obviously not a lot, after that dumbass question. Obama answers it by mentioning policies he’s signed into law.
“If you’re asking why I haven’t been able to create a greater spirit of cooperation in Washington, I think that’s fair… I’m as frustrated as anyone by it.” Says Republican leaders made a decision to sit on the sidelines. “We got a lot of resistance very early.” When you take on tough issues, there’s a lot of money at stake, you end up having a lot of big fights and it’s messy and frustrating.
I could have not taken on those issues. Could have let health care go. Could have let Wall Street reform go. “I don’t think that’s the kind of leadership that the American people would want from their President.”
Anne Kornblut goes there on American resentment rising against Islam. Obama: when country is anxious generally, fears can surface, suspicions and divisions can surface. That plays a role. I admired President Bush for saying we were not at war with Islam after 9/11. We were at war with terrorists who perverted Islam. Proud of country rallying around that idea. Americans standing together. We should take pride in that. I think it’s important now for the majority of the American people to hang onto that thing that is best in us: belief in religious tolerance. Al Qaeda has killed more Muslims than anyone. We have to be careful that we don’t turn on each other. We are one nation under God and we may call that God different names but we are one nation. As someone who relies heavily on my Christian faith (I’m a Christian!!!!), I am mindful of the fact that others share other faiths. I want to make sure this country retains that sense of purpose. We can remind ourselves of that tomorrow.
Haaretz question: on Middle East peace talks. If they fail at an early stage, will Administration disengage? Obama: Abbas and Netanyahu were here last week. They came with a sense of purpose and seriousness and cordiality that exceeded a lot of people’s expectations (yes, but the reporter’s question was about what happened after that meeting). Clinton will be flying to the Middle East next week for next meeting on Sept. 14-15. We’ve brought the parties together to recognize that the path for Israeli security and Palestinian sovereignty can only be met through negotiations. Lots of people in the region want to undermine it.
We understood it was a risk to open these discussions. But it was a risk worth taking. It’s in everyone’s interest to arrive at a peace deal. The two parties need each other, but that doesn’t mean it’s going to work. We can facilitate and encourage them arriving at a solution. Ultimately, it’s up to them. I remain hopeful but this is going to be tough.
If these talks break down, we’re going to keep on trying. A deal would help us deal with the dynamic in the region. Not doing this just to feel good. Will help secure America.
Jake Tapper: Were you concerned about elevating the pastor in Florida by having Robert Gates call him? Then, on health care, CMS reported that the cost curve is bending up (no it isn’t) and Dems aren’t talking about it.
Obama: I’ll repeat what I said about the pastor in Florida. Burning the sacred texts of someone else’s religion is contrary to what this nation stands for. Hope this guy prays on it and refrains from doing it. We saw today riots in Afghanistan that threaten men and women in uniform. We have an obligation to send a clear message that this threatened action put soldiers in harm’s way (so did putting soldier’s in harm’s way). This endangered our troops. I hardly think “we’re the ones who elevated this story.” (dig at the media)
With respect to health care, bending the cost curve is hard to do. We’ve got hundreds of thousands of doctors and providers and insurers. We took every idea out there to reduce or slow the growth of the cost of health care (uh, no). Our goal is to slowly bring down those costs. Also 31 million people who aren’t getting health insurance will start getting it. Implementation so far has been smooth. Kids under 26 can stay on parent’s policy, children can’t be denied coverage for pre-existing condition, no rescissions. Four million small businesses eligible for 35% tax break for purchasing health care.
Slaps down Tapper’s idiocy. “We didn’t think we would cover 30 million people for free.” Whatever you think about health care, Tapper’s being intentionally obtuse here.
House Dems running against health care? Obama: We’re in a political season, every candidate has their own district and their own message. In an environment with 9.5% unemployment people will make the best argument they can, try to align with polls. That’s how political races work.
Question on fighting poverty in black community, and Cobell and Pigford II. Obama: these relate to settlements surrounding historic discrimination against black farmers. It is a fair and just settlement. We think it’s important for Congress to fund it, we’re going to continue to make it a priority. Obama says he got his start working on South Side of Chicago. Constantly thinking about creating ladders to move into the middle class. Most important anti-poverty effort is making sure economy is growing and creating jobs. Bigger than any program or transfer payment.
…We want broad-based job growth and business expansion. We’re up against tough headwinds. My central focus. We can do targeted things to help communities in need. We should improve school systems in low-income communities.
Touts Race to the Top, says it’s based on “proven ideas.” (Really?) Higher education is important too, and touts student loan reform. Poor kids will benefit the most from that.
Question on Afghanistan: How can you lecture Hamid Karzai on corruption when they’re on the US payroll? Also should Netanyahu extend the settlement moratorium.
Obama: I want to remind people why we’re in Afghanistan the day before September 11. We want to dismantle Al Qaeda and that Afghanistan is never used as a base for attacks. Afghanistan also the second-poorest country in the world. Multi-ethnic population that mistrusts each other. Illiteracy at 70%. No tradition of strong central government. We said that after 7 years of drift, we’re going to work with government to train Afghan security forces. We will promote a political settlement in the region. We will encourage government to provide services to its people. And we’ll try to reduce corruption. We’ve made progress on some of those fronts. Example on corruption: four years ago 11 judges indicted for corruption, this year 86. Afghan efforts have gone after police commanders, businessmen. But we’re a long way from where we need to be on that.
(He’s completely ignoring the question.)
We’re going to keep putting pressure on Karzai. Won’t happen overnight. Some of our folks on the ground have made compromises with folks engaged in corruption. We’ve got to make sure we’re not sending a mixed message. I’ve told national security team to be consistent. We don’t want to give a wink and a nod. Actions have to match up. Challenging environment “in which to do that.” (hm.)
On Netanyahu. The potential lapse of the settlement moratorium will be a major bone of contention. Palestinians were skeptical at first, but moratorium has been significant. Now they want it to continue. I’ve said to Netanyahu that, since talks are moving forward in constructive way, it makes sense to extend moratorium. Politics for Netanyahu are difficult. Members of coalition don’t want to continue it. Abbas must show Israeli public that he’s serious and constructive in these talks to make politics for Netanyahu easier.
Both sides need to think about how to make the other succeed.
Ann Compton question: why are plotters still awaiting trial? Why has that stalled? Gitmo still open? Civilian trial? Obama: we have succeeded on a lot of campaign promises, we have fallen short on Guantanamo. It’s not for lack of trying, it’s because politics are difficult. I believe American justice system is strong enough for this. We should be able to convict and lock up terrorists. We’ve done it before. We’ve got terrorists in maximum security prisons all over the country. This issue has generated a lot of political rhetoric. This country is resilient. We can’t be frightened by a handful of people trying to do us harm, especially when we captured them. There are also circumstances where a military tribunal may be appropriate. For example, we may have captured them in theater, may not have the chain of evidence. But we know they’re guilty (????). So military commissions may be appropriate if it meets highest standards of due process.
(That’s gobbledygook)
I think KSM trial needs to happen. This is going to have to be on a bipartisan basis. Should move forward in a way consistent with due process, Constitution, image in the world as a country caring about rule of law. Al Qaeda still cites Gitmo as a recruiting tool. We can use various mechanisms of our justice system to prosecute these folks.
Ed Henry question. Will we ever catch bin Laden? Isn’t this a failure of not capturing him (unbelievable)? Obama: I think capturing or killing bin Laden and Zawahiri would be very important to our national security. We’ve successfully ramped up the pressure on Al Qaeda in ways that has made it harder for them to operate. Bin Laden and Zawahiri have gone deeper underground. We have people thinking about this day and night. Followup: Do we have another generation of this terror threat? Obama: Always going to be the potential of a small group of individuals, if they are willing to die, of killing others. That threat is there. People shouldn’t live in fear, but it’s a reality of today’s world. I think we’ve greatly improved homeland security. America’s strength comes in part from its resilience. We shouldn’t lose who we are and overreact. It doesn’t have to distort us or dominate our foreign policy (very dissonant there).
Final question on the damn mosque at Ground Zero (ugh) and Koran burning (ugh ugh). Obama: Koran burning threat has made life difficult for troops overseas. On Park51, this country stands for the proposition that all men and women are created equal, and they have certain inalienable rights, and one of them is the right to worship freely. You should be able to build mosque on the site like any other house of worship. I recognize pain of 9/11, met with families. But we are not at war against Islam, we are at war against terrorist groups that have distorted Islam to engage in destructive acts. We must be clear about that. We need all the allies we can get. The folks most interested in war between the West and Islam are Al Qaeda. Fortunately the overwhelming majority of Muslims are peace-loving and interested in the same things as us. They have rejected this violent ideology for the most part. We want to be clear about the enemy. Tiny minority of people.
We’ve got millions of Muslim-Americans in this country. They’re our friends and co-workers. When we start acting like their religion is offensive, what are we saying to them? I have Muslims fighting in Afghanistan, putting their lives on the line for us. They are Americans and we honor their service. They should understand that we don’t differentiate between them and us. It’s just us.



71 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Doesn’t matter what Obummer says. I’ve heard his “song” many times before. Wake me only when Obummer does something. That’s the only thing to believe. Actions speak much louder than any words.
I really wish there were a way to not have the vid start automatically.
Obama stumbled onto the correct answer to “is this a stimulus.”
Paraphrase: “My job is to stimulate jobs and the economy; that’s what everything we do is for. I’ll keep trying to stimulate jobs and the economy. Why aren’t the Republicans helping?”
I can just see the eyerolls when Chuck Todd asks a question. What an empty suit!
Mister President, can you explain why US civilian employment has steadily decreased since you became president with a total of three million jobs lost?
steadily? really?
Anne Kornblum: Why nine years after 9/11, why is hatred against Muslims worse?
O: Period of tough times exacerbates anxieties. He most admired Bush for saying we’re not at war with Islam; but against the terrorists, and I was proud that we rallyied around that. Americans stand together. We should take great pride in that. Now it’s important to hang on to things best in us: Religious tolerance, clarity about al Qaeda. We should avoide turning on each other; we are one nation, under god, different names for god, but we remain one nation. As someone who relies heavily on my Christian faith . . . I am respectful of those with other beliefs, and we are fighting together. Want to make sure American retains that sense of purpose.
A couple of months? Give me a break.
It’s not as if Obama was surprised by a SCOTUS justice who dropped dead with a heart attack. “Gosh, it was so sudden . . . our condolences to the family . . . we’ll have to take some time to think about a replacement.”
This office is one that Warren has pushed for years to get created. This office is one that Congress spent more than a couple of months talking about. This office is one that has been on the WH radar for quite a while, so to say “it’s only been a couple of months” fools only those who haven’t been paying attention.
O: wrt to the pastor, repeat from couple days ago. Burning sacred text of another’s religion is contrary to what nation was founded on. I hope he prays and decides not to. But as CinC, we have riots in Kabul, they put our people in harm’s ways and is recruitment for AQ. Danger is that others here will think this is a way to get attention. They endanger our troops; you don’t play games with that. In the age of internet, this can hurt us.
True patriots aren’t supposed to be paying attention.
Bullshit to english translation: I am not going to answer your question but here is an answer to the question I wanted you to ask.
See my post @1. Heard this song before. Load of bah-loney. Won’t hire Warren, just like Barry refused to hire Dawn Johnson. They’re more or less true progressives on the side of the “small people.” Barry’s just not into the “small people.” Only Republicans need apply for jobs with Obama.
I guess he learned that from Bible Spice! Again: what IS the difference between Obama and the Queen of BabbleOn? Not much.
No, Obama, charter schools and standardized tests are not the answer to the problems in our education system.
The honorable pastor is but another planted distraction to keep everyone from asking the right questions about what happened nine years ago.
“Prosperity is just around the corner.”
Croak!
Helene Cooper: How can we lecture Karzai on corruption when so many are on CIA payroll?
O. We’re in midst of very difficult project. We’re there because AQ launched attack from Afghanistan. We have to dismantle AQ and make sure Afgh is never used again as base. But Afghan is one of poorest countries; illiteracy; multi-ethnic; no strong central government; So after seven years of drift, not even training their forces, we’re now traing their forces, promote political settlement to reduce violence, encourage a government that can deliver services for its people, and help them stand up against corruption. We’ve made progress. 4 years ago, 11 judges were indicted for corruption; this year, 86 indicted. We’re going after policy commanders, business, but we’re a long way fromwhere we need to be. I’ve told Karzai his people have to trust him; make sure corruption is reduced. We’ll keep putting pressure on him. Where our folks have made compromises with corruption, we’re reviewing that and have to avoid sending mixed messages. So let’s be consistent; don’t be seen as giving wink and a nod on corruption. But this is a challenging environment.
Obama’s “reform” of public schools is as harmful as Bush’s No Child Left Behind. It really angers me. Charter schools have been proven to be no better than public schools, yet the drive is to flush as much public money down that profiteering hole as possible.
As for performance, decent wages and adequate resources will provide higher quality education, not some gimmicky ranking system in place to scapegoat teachers.
Re Goolsbee and the R&D credit he has criticized in the past, he’s taken hits for Obama before. He had to take a walk for a while from the Obama campaign because he was caught reassuring the Canadians that Obama really didn’t mean what he was saying about reopening negotiations on NAFTA. As we all know, Obama did in fact early on ditch reopening NAFTA, breaking his promise to labor.
Goolsbee is another neoliberal. He has a few tweaks some of the other members of Team Obama don’t have but at core he is very much more of the same. His selection puts someone even less liberal than Romer in at the CEA.
Absolutely, I am not sure what is more pathetic the Washington Press Corp’s refusal to point out an absolute lie, or Obama’s policies.
Good point. “Steadily decreased” civilian employment is incorrect. It should be simply “decreased.” US civilian employment decreased by 4.4m during 2009, from 142.2m to 137.8m, then rebounded to 139.2m (seasonally adjusted) by August 2010.
Karzai is the focus of corruption in Afghanistan. We are propping up another tinpot dictator who has zero support among the population at large. As for AQ, AQ is in Pakistan not Afghanistan. Obama is just recycling his same old same old here. He doesn’t have a reason for having an army in Afghanistan so he just keeps repeating AQ, AQ, AQ like it was some kind of magic incantation.
David did he really just say that?
In fact, these are the polar opposite to a cure for our problems. They ARE, however, a way to keep the population stupid and dependent while at the same time giving big business a chance to make more money off of the masses. Obama, Republican Lite.
Yep, talks cheap.
Why won’t the press ask–
Mr. President, wouldn’t it be more prudent and fair to raise taxes significantly on the 1 percenters in order to create jobs and cut the deficit?
Goolsbee is Skull and Bones so there’s still nothing changed with the oligarchy. Except maybe he earned his admission to Yale, I don’t think he was a legacy.
The emperor’s citizens may end up homeless, with so much money going overseas.
Thanks by the way for the liveblogging. Obama is saying nothing new on anything. That’s probably the take home here. Two months before the election, the economy sliding south, Afghanistan going to hell, his big initiative healthcare disliked roundly by everybody, Obama has got nothing. His Administration is running on fumes. It looks like he will stay the corporatist course to the bitter end.
Why would anyone bother to listen/
The only difference between this guy (for whom I voted twice) and
Annanias is that Obama is still breathing….an oversight of history,
no doubt.
Reading the part of Obama saying that 97% of people will get a tax cut and the rich will get a tax cut as well on the first $250k, made me wonder, why don’t we say that 100% of americans will get a tax cut under this plan? Sounds like a better slogan to me, “Everyone gets a tax cut on their first $250k”
There was a story recently (can’t remember where) that most school teachers spend as much as $500 out of their own pockets for classroom necessities. Something is very, very wrong in education-land.
Also, a friend sent me this link the other day. An interesting take on schools as holding cells for kids… and on how differently nerds and jocks and cheerleaders operate in that system.
a partisan cream job
“Obama starts out by criticizing the previous Administration for cutting taxes for millionaires and billionaires, ignoring regulations and leading us to a financial crisis and a deep recession.”
sure, that is part of it. but, if he were honest, he would also point to clinton and the rubinites (of which several he employs) as other parties responsible for the financial clusterfuck, as they all worked to help gut the financial regulations that were so vital.
and by whistling right past that issue obama indicates that his admin has no inclination to actually address some of the systemic issues–which might make him more able to compete for wall st campaign money, but less likely to right our economic ship.
my better half is a teacher and you can believe its true. now throw in the supply drives that schools have during the year where they ask / tell people to bring in paper and other supplies and it should be clear that we have totally failed in how we fund education.
I would have never voted for the guy in front and center of the press conference,ever.
Yep. I’m surprised they haven’t dug Uncle Milton’s corpse up and put on display at the WH.
That’s a rather insulting comparison.
Can’t get your link, it sounds like a good story.
Boxturtle (press won’t ask the right questions. Obama would answer a different question if they did)
Obama touts two major accomplishments: Health Care Reform and Fin Reg. (Both are turkies).
Had Obama had any two pieces of Progressive Policy to present, Democrats would sail to victory.
Mr. Bipartisanship, Joe Lieberman’s student in the Senate, and Ronald Reagan fan, Obama has one major accomplishment to his credit:
He revitalized a Republican Party that Dubya and Rove had nearly destroyed.
Emptywheel has a fresh cross-post available: Cap’n Jack’s Crackerjack Logic!
I agree – he is already on board giving the rich a tax cut on the first $250,000 of their income – so it is indeed a tax cut for everyone.
But I have learned how to listen to Obama – and this time he signaled to the GOP that he would cave on the tax cut for the rich by STARTING his comment by saying that there was room to negotiate on the tax cut for the rich = no line in the sand = shades of “I support a public option”.
Goolsbee is going to be the head of Obama’s economic team? I’ve got goose bumps.
agreed, 100%
the admin revitalized the GOP, while, at the same time, dispirited progressives…
Obama in 2013 just before a new President (Clinton) is sworn in:
“I am sorry that my Presidency has been a failure. If it were not for Bush, I could have been great. But, you have to look at what I’ve done. If not for my actions, we would have failed even worse. We only allowed the country to go somewhat in the tank as opposed to most of the way–without our policies. As time goes on, I am sure that historians will credit me as one of the great Presidents because we only let things go to hell in small handbasket instead of the big one that it could have gone into. Without Republicans, I could have been the greatest President since Lincoln”
Both parties are to blame for the economy. It’s total BS to believe either one of them.
“Obama walks the tightrope.”
That’s the problem, Dave. He’s been walking it ever since he came in, when it was actually a 2×12 sitting one inch above the floor. The maddening irony of it is that by doing it then, he’s guaranteed that now he really is on a rope, and metaphorically, it’s stretched across the Grand Canyon in 60 mph winds.
Some progressive bloggers are even lunatic enough to be waving the big ju-ju fear doll of impeachment, if the repubs should take the Senate. Barack Obama has resuscitated the GOP like no one else could have. They LOVE having him on the tightrope. Why not? He’s about to become the lamest lameduck preznint in a long, long, time.
Earlier this week Obama supposedly drew a line in the sand about not extending tax cuts for the wealthy. This is his M.O. Same, same on every issue.
Exactly.
“He revitalized a republican party that dubya and Rove nearly destroyed.”
Hammer. Nail. Bang.
Hackworth gets the Norman Mailer “No More Bullshit!” award for the month.
I wish I had stuck with Clinton instead of going with Obama.
What was I thinking?
Meh: much as I predicted @1. Same old, different day. Waste of time. Nothing to see here, kids, move along now.
Of the possibility of impeachment:
Poster on Digby’s Hullaballoo:
“I’ll take my chances with Biden. Can we just make the hearings quick?”
Which is exactly how I feel.
Unfortunately, the republicans aren’t stupid enough to get rid of their saviour. Plus, why would they want to give Biden even the chance for a fresh political start?
Obama has done something that many thought were impossible. He revitalised a political party that was, honestly, dead. Instead of capitalising on the GOP’s demise, they helped them back up and threw the progressives under the bus. Now they’re in deep danger of losing Congress, and Mr. Bipartisan is looking like he’s going to be impeached by the GOP and endlessly investigated.
Heck of a job, Obama/Rahm.
The so-called middle and upper classes have been resoundngly convinced (somehow; I’m not sure exactly; don’t have kids, so not clear to me) that sending one’s children to public school is somehow “nasty” and “bad.” I live in an area with good public schools (so I’m told, but I think so), but I have friends who aren’t that well off, but they skrimp to send their kids either to charter or catholic (not necessarily catholic, either) schools bc the believe that the pub schools are “bad” and – more’s the pity – that the kids attending pub schools are “dirty.” guh
Most of these people have been convinced that it’s “unfair” for them to have to pay taxes to support the dirty, bad public school system. I can only guess that someone (of the Koch brother ilk) is pushing this meme. For sure, someone (likely a conservative) is making $$$$$ offa the charter schools (not exactly sure re Catholic schools).
Usually the public school teachers are better educated (often with Masters degrees) and have to do a certain amount of continuing ed. Not so much with the private schools, so it’s questionable how “great” the private schools are in comparison (other than segregating wealther students from those gosh-darned dirty kids.
A lot of people feel that way. Obama is not going to have the progressives at his back the way Clinton did in 1998.
No sh*t.
I loathe the idea of impeachment bc I think it’s a monumental WASTE of MY tax dollars, which will result in a big fat nothing. Plus needless to say Republics will doubly waste time & money with endless subpoenas over “nothing” issues that will just gin up their conservative base. They certainly will NOT investigate the issues that could – and perhaps should – be investigated such torture, etc.
I’m totally unclear on the concept of what D’s hoped to accomplish other than to hand the gov’t back to so-called “Republicans.” IF that was their goal, then, in that case, they have been wildly successful. Thanks for nothing.
Great post and so true.
No huge fan of Clinton, and I didn’t vote for him the second time. But Clinton at least ran his Admin when the nation was doing well, and he accomplished a few progressive goals. Plus, maybe I’m forgetting, but I don’t recall him (or Rahm) being so dismissive of progressives. correct me if I’m wrong (I know that I intensely disliked a lot of his policies, though). When the Clintons attempted HCR, they at least appeared to be trying to do something that would help the “small” people.
As a staunch conservative, kudos for your honesty.
Not so fast he’s holding the bush cheney torture trump card including photos.
Any impeachment talk unleashes eric pitbull torture prosecutor holder on the republicians.
Right! I call it “Nixon’s rule” In his first Inaugural “Tricky Dick”, said “Don’t listen to anything I say ( I didn’t from that moment on) instead, watch what I do ( I did that and spent 4 yrs. in the streets.) Same is true today. They all speak with a “forked tongue.” So far Obama has walked away from almost everything he’s said so he has little if any credibility left with the left. Nobody trusts his sudden conversion again to being a Progressive 2 mos. before the election. We all know the drill.
There is. If you’re using Firefox, add the NoScript extension. By default, it turns off scripts for Flash and other video formats.
Thanks for acknowledging it. If I may say so, I think you’ll find this blog more honest than almost any other you visit (of whichever political persausion). That’s my opinion, of course, but that’s why I happen to be … whatever you want to label it: progressive, liberal, leftie… because we strive for honesty and to stick with facts and reality.
No made up fantasies manufactured by the media, thanks.
Is THAT what BHO’s doing? Hard to tell, imo. From where I sit, just looks like a lot of hot air signifying nothing. same ooooolllllddd… (sort of snark; sort of not).
I’ve been saying for months now, that if Obama’s approval numbers were low enough; that if they got into the 30′s, that it would be 50-50 that Hillary would find that irresistable and would bail out of State to run against him in 2012.
But her problem is twofold. The Obama diehards (and I was one of the happiest, when he won, and won big…) would be enraged, and the people like myself, who, during the nomination fight, were disgusted at her sucking up to the right wing and at her refusal to eat her support for Bush’s invasion of Iraq until she saw that it was ruining her chances, aren’t going to forget her praising of McCain as she dissed Obama, etc, etc,…if anything, she’s a worse political hack than is Obama.
It also doesn’t help that she’s a rubber stamp for AIPAC and Israel.
Having said that, I don’t know if she can stay on the reservation at State, if, as I believe will happen in 2012, Obama is looking like a political humpty-dumpty sitting on the fence, and democrats are starting to come out of the woodwork to make a run at him. It’ll be tough to get past her going awol from the influential position he gave her.
One other possibility: Obama might take a look around in 2012 and see that by running again, he’s about to finish off any chance the democrats have of holding onto a vestige of power. If that happens, he might just pass on a second term voluntarily.
I think two things are certain: The political landscape is going to go through some serious changes in about 6 weeks, and by mid-2012, it’s not going to be recognizable from what it is now.
“I’m surprised they haven’t dug up Uncle Miltie’s corpse and put it on display at the White House.”
That’s funny! :o)
The trickle-down shit just keeps trickling down, doesn’t it?
Of course, we’re gonna see some gravitational effect on Obama and his merry “centrists” in about 6 weeks, too.
Fire stations close down. Detroit burns. Obama proposes small business tax credits. We are saved.
Not.
I agree with your conclusion but got a laugh – a sad laugh – at your comment that Hillary appeared to you to be “sucking up to the right wing” – and that she refused “to eat her support for Bush’s” Iraq policy
Guess I have not noticed the Obama in office rejecting Bush on Iraq – and on domestic issues I’m afraid center-left Hillary would seem like a swing to socialism after the suck up to the right and corporate and rich Obama.
We agree she is political – political hack if you like, but praising an old friend as having good human characteristics – McCain – as she pointed out that Obama might not be real in his left of Hillary campaign positions – well that does not – to me – disqualify her for 2012. I do not see her as a rubber stamp for AIPAC and Israel, any more than Obama is – indeed I doubt there would be talks today without her – albeit I expect the Palestinians to walk up to a agreement and then torch it with “right of return must mean land and not compensation”.
In any case, I expect her to take Gates place as Sec. of Defense – and that may keep her on the team – but if Democrats are starting to come out of the woodwork to make a run at him, I am sure she will join the pack.
The Warren question and answer was a dance around that disappointed – again.
Indeed nothing in response, and no direct question on the question of an interim head. No appointment is necessary for an interim head that is replaced by the nominated head once that person is approved by the Senate. And indeed the interim head will set the direction and hire the personnel – and that will be hard to change by anyone after them.
I suspect the delay is to wait for a GOP Congress because I believe (I may be wrong) that there was the standard informal agreement to have new regulations reviewed by the two appropriations committees – I do not recall any formal Congressional veto and the agency budget is protected as it is defined as simply a percentage of the Federal Reserve’s budget.
And post a GOP takeover of Congress there can be a GOP special bill next year to over-turn regulations as in what they filed with no hope of passing over the EPA regulations this summer. All in all I believe that Obama is just telling the rich and corporate that he is not going after them with regulations on the Wall Street Banks – and is telling them this by delaying the start up of the agency until the GOP has control of the House.
All I know; it would be good to have someone with some balls in there.
Our President is all about himself–I don’t think he would give a tinker’s damn about finishing off the Democratic party if he could perceive some benefit for his “legacy” (translation: his prospects for a lucrative career at some lofty institute filled with the people he feels really matter, and guess what, folks, that ain’t you or me).