The President’s statement at the Pentagon on September 11 mirrored in many ways his impromptu statement at yesterday’s press conference against Islamophobia and being captured by fear. Let me quote at length (I’ve taken a paragraph out of this, but I’ll return to it).
Our remembrance today also requires a certain reflection. As a nation, and as individuals, we must ask ourselves how best to honor them — those who died, those who sacrificed. How do we preserve their legacy — not just on this day, but every day?
We need not look far for our answer. The perpetrators of this evil act didn’t simply attack America; they attacked the very idea of America itself — all that we stand for and represent in the world. And so the highest honor we can pay those we lost, indeed our greatest weapon in this ongoing war, is to do what our adversaries fear the most — to stay true to who we are, as Americans; to renew our sense of common purpose; to say that we define the character of our country, and we will not let the acts of some small band of murderers who slaughter the innocent and cower in caves distort who we are [...]
They may seek to strike fear in us, but they are no match for our resilience. We do not succumb to fear, nor will we squander the optimism that has always defined us as a people. On a day when others sought to destroy, we have chosen to build, with a National Day of Service and Remembrance that summons the inherent goodness of the American people.
They may seek to exploit our freedoms, but we will not sacrifice the liberties we cherish or hunker down behind walls of suspicion and mistrust. They may wish to drive us apart, but we will not give in to their hatred and prejudice. For Scripture teaches us to “get rid of all bitterness, rage and anger, brawling and slander, along with every form of malice.”
They may seek to spark conflict between different faiths, but as Americans we are not — and never will be — at war with Islam. It was not a religion that attacked us that September day — it was al Qaeda, a sorry band of men which perverts religion. And just as we condemn intolerance and extremism abroad, so will we stay true to our traditions here at home as a diverse and tolerant nation. We champion the rights of every American, including the right to worship as one chooses — as service members and civilians from many faiths do just steps from here, at the very spot where the terrorists struck this building.
It’s all very nice, especially the part about the mosque at the Pentagon (We learned today about the prayer room in the South Tower of the World Trade Center, too). The classiness of Obama’s statement contrasts nicely with the ones of those motivated by cynicism and hatred.
I just wish the part I put in boldface were true. But it’s not. This Administration has carried on a very close continuity with the Bush regime on almost all national security and terrorism issues, very much succumbing to fear and very much sacrificing liberty and very much giving in to their hatred. It’s been the greatest success of bin Laden and Al Qaeda, turning one tragic event into a years-long climb-down of American ideals. We have a rule of law for the executive branch rendered inoperable by the invocation of “state secrets,” with even high crimes like torture and rendition shielded just this week. Tim Rutten of the LA Times quoted James Madison today, who said that “No nation can preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.” And that appears to be the case.
Obama campaigned on the promise to end torture and shut down the gulag, but the infamous prison camp at Guantanamo remains, trials for accused terrorists have yet to be conducted and the “extraordinary renditions” reportedly continue. (We don’t know for sure because they’re done in secret.) Equally troubling, the White House reportedly has authorized U.S. intelligence agencies to kill Anwar Awlaki, an Islamic clergyman turned jihadist who was born and raised in the U.S. and is now hiding in Yemen. The summary execution of a U.S. citizen is something not even Bush and Cheney authorized.
As former CIA Director Michael V. Hayden told the Washington Times this week, differences between the Bush-Cheney White House for which he worked and the Obama administration on these issues essentially are minor.
“You’ve got state secrets, targeted killings, indefinite detention, renditions, the opposition to extending the right of habeas corpus to prisoners,” Hayden said. “Although it is slightly different, Obama has been as aggressive as Bush in defending prerogatives about who he has to inform in Congress for executive covert action.”
That paragraph I left out from the Obama speech at the Pentagon today? “They doubted our will, but as Americans we persevere. Today, in Afghanistan and beyond, we have gone on the offensive and struck major blows against al Qaeda and its allies. We will do what is necessary to protect our country, and we honor all those who serve to keep us safe.” Note especially “we will do what is necessary.” That doesn’t overlap with “what is legal.” And now such attitudes have a bipartisan consensus.
Adam Serwer hopes this will end when Congress re-establishes themselves and reins in the executive branch. Given the broken nature of the Senate and the increasing polarization in US politics I don’t see this happening anytime soon, and neither does he. But it’s worth reflecting on 9/11 not just about what we’ve lost in a physical sense, but what else we’ve lost. Once you start having a debate about things like torture or habeas corpus, from a civil liberties perspective my view is you’ve already lost.





51 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
America’s first black dictator has wicked sense of humor.
“It’s been the greatest success of bin Laden and Al Qaeda, turning one tragic event into a years-long climb-down of American ideals.”
bin Laden predicted that we we would follow this path shortly after the attacks. He was a smarter adversary than we imagined.
He knew that the key to destroying our global influence was to destroy our (and the world’s) image of ourselves.
A natural consequence of being perceived as torturers and abusers of peaceful Muslims is to ignite a global culture war. What will unite Muslims more effectively than the equivalent(in their perception) of a 21st century Crusade?
Someone convinced Bush 43 of the danger of offending billions of Muslims. His declarations of ‘Islam is a peaceful religion’ weren’t based on belief, but rather pragmatism and the confidence that what happened at Gitmo (and the like) would never see the light of day. Foolish boy!
The world is waiting to see us do the right thing. The country has to be set right in its relation to the globe. That implies setting itself right in relation to itself.
What is that?
Do what is necessary to help the suffering. You don’t have to look very far to find that kind of work.
Hold accountable those who perverted our ideals. That kind of work is also easily found.
Drive the moneychangers out of the temple. Most of them hang around Wall Street.
I’m not a Christian but I do have some reverence for my country, at least what I thought it used to be. The difference now and then is that now, those who abuse it don’t even bother to lie.
Please explain: we are paying attention to anything Obama says because?
Force of habit, I guess. He is slowly getting to the Bush stage, where whatever he said you could figure the opposite was true.
I beg to differ:
Obama has always been there.
What a useless waste of talent and ability.
TwoThree words, Barack the One Termer: Patriot Act; GITMOQuestions?
Shorter Obama: Blah, blah, blah. OK, my rube speak is done. Now I can get back to important, serious people, like me.
Obama today:
“And on this day, we recall that at our darkest moment, we summoned a sense of unity and common purpose. We responded to the worst kind of depravity with the best of our humanity. So, each year at this time, we renew our resolve against those who perpetrated this barbaric act of terror and who continue to plot against us – for we will never waver in defense of this nation. We renew our commitment to our troops and all who serve to protect this country, and to their families.”
Randolph Bourne, 1918:
“War is the health of the State. It automatically sets in motion throughout society those irresistible forces for uniformity, for passionate cooperation with the Government in coercing into obedience the minority groups and individuals which lack the larger herd sense. The machinery of government sets and enforces the drastic penalties; the minorities are either intimidated into silence, or brought slowly around by a subtle process of persuasion which may seem to them really to be converting them. Of course, the ideal of perfect loyalty, perfect uniformity is never really attained. The classes upon whom the amateur work of coercion falls are unwearied in their zeal, but often their agitation instead of converting, merely serves to stiffen their resistance. Minorities are rendered sullen, and some intellectual opinion bitter and satirical. But in general, the nation in wartime attains a uniformity of feeling, a hierarchy of values culminating at the undisputed apex of the State ideal, which could not possibly be produced through any other agency than war.” — War Is the Health of the State
Whatever….
Waste of time expectorating meaningless drivel. Not anything remotely like “change I can believe in.” (note: not that I expected anything else).
If bin Laden is still alive, he is no doubt pointing and laughing.
Oh, shut your cakehole and go start a war with Iran, puppet schmuck.
We have become a Police State like our best and only true friend Israel.
You and me against the world. Sometimes it feels like you and me against the world. When all the others have left and gone away, I’m the one that’s here to stay…
-Helen Reddy
How many Senators out of these 100 of our best-and-brightest-millionaire citizen representatives rebuked the President for his harsh (but meaningless)tone with Israel in a letter penned by AIPAC. Wasn’t it 80?
Love your post, David.
One minor quibble… If Obama’s talking about the future in saying “We will not sacrifice liberties”, I fear he may be technically corect.
We’ve so systematically slaughtered our liberties after 9/11 we may have no more surviving for sacrifice.
Really? They look pretty united to me, and not in our favor. Senator Durbin said the senate was owned by the banks, and he ought to know. I’m sure the banks have joint ownership of the Congress with other corporate interests.
But I’m a dinosaur. I remember Wayne Morse and Ernest Greuning, William Fulbright and Bobby Kennedy against Vietnam. The first two paid the price by losing their next election, but we remember them. There was Sam Ervin from North Carolina whose strict construction of the Constitution also made him a liberal hero for his support of civil liberties, his opposition to “no knock” search laws, and the growing intrusions of data banks and lie-detector tests as invasions of privacy, plus his strength on Watergate. And so on.
Whom do we have now — Russ Feingold on a good day?
I’ve suggested that inverting the Capitol dome would make our government much more efficient. That way corporate bribes could be airdropped.
The US demonizes its enemies — “the worst kind of depravity” — because if the truth were recognized, that it is US military activities in Muslim countries that is the real problem, then just think about how the Pentagon’s largesse to all those corporations and communities would have to be scaled back. Wouldn’t be good for politicians’ finances, either. Would need to scale back those two million dollar weddings to a million or so.
What you are missing is that he’s telling the absolute truth but he isn’t counting the rest of us as “we”, just the wealthy and ruling classes.
Book Salon up with Bruce Fein’s American Empire Before the Fall hosted by Glenn Greenwald
Good point. I do like ratfood’s idea @16 to invert the Capital dome for easier money drops. That would be “transparent” at least.
Yeah, and William Fulbright, Ernest Gruening and Wayne Morse did not have to deal with the vitriolic attack of FoxNews, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity et al. But LBJ, despite his considerable political capital, feared right wing opposition to a pullout from Vietnam. Listen to the tapes. Accusations of “traitor” and “unAmerican” are not new and not without some power over the American electorate. Rememer the campaign of 2004. The president gave a statesmanlike speech in the best tradition of American liberalism. He is also a pragmatic politician who will not sacrifice power and hand it to the right wing in the next election.
Quoting that other great American patriot spokesperson, Paul Revere:
Too much talk
And not enuf action
Do you know anybody
Gettin satisfaction?
Everybody wonders
‘Bout the crowd reaction
And the world gets worser
By a very small fraction
Red or yellow
Black or white?
Are you left-handed
Or are you right?
When you open your eyes
Can you see the light?
Do you wake up screamin
In the middle of the ni-yi-yi-yight?
Of course he did: it’s about the one thing that he does really well. The problem was that it was full of lies (also something of a tradition of his).
The President looks lost compared to the events of 9/11/01. Watching many of the 9/11 remembrances today, I am struck by the image of our President and how much he looks completely at a loss for what to say and what to do.
‘Zactly.
Agree: often Obama gives a great speech. And so: what is the point? Not to sound rude, but… I’ve taken to saying: I believe nothing of what Obama says; I only believe what he does. It’s down to that for me.
So our “highest honor” is to not change? To “stay true” to the political values of 2001? That would have been good to hear in, say, 2008.
(Not that anyone who was paying attention and not swooning like a schoolgirl couldn’t tell.)
But the most revealingly frightening part of this speech is this, which needs to be read with the understanding he’s speaking for, and to, the existing oligarchy:
“‘Change’? I meant you needed to change. Not me. *laughs*“
“I am struck by the image of our President and how much he looks completely at a loss for what to say and what to do.”
I’m not here to start some meaningless argument, but does anyone know who Obama is, or perhaps more importantly now, was – other than a mere hope for change the country could believe in?
Sealed birth certificate; Sealed college records; Total experience: Community Organizer, short term senator; strong armed by his Chicago connections whenever he faltered during his presidential election campaign; strong armed by the unions, and all other entities he railed against in public, thruout his presidency; so beaten midway thru his first term, is now relegated to spewing mindless circular arguments to the point we know less about him today than we did 2 years ago – and the tragedy for him and the country is that now few believe or trust him.
From my perspective, as a conservative, Obama had eight years to implement his entire (progressive) agenda and the country would have slept thru it. However, perhaps due to his belief he was infallible, went too hard to the right too quickly. And this caused the country to take notice and see they did not like, or understand, what was happening. Unfortunately for you, Obama quickly became a politician.
BTW, before you take off on me, I am not a birther. IMO, given the fact that much of our political landscape is controlled by foreigners or foreign governments, so what? If a governor is not required to be a natural born U.S. citizen, why the POTUS? College performance? Irrelevant to me. However, as an engineer, I am always suspicious of data be hidden from pier review, that’s all.
snip
Right.
Emphasis added.
To be fair, one should probably add “that we know of” to the end of that last sentence. I’m sure Cheney at least contemplated it.
I’m pretty sure that was not what you meant, but it happens to be precisely true.
(Not that I expect you to understand that, but thanks anyway for a good laugh.)
I guess the wingnuts whether of the right or left will always feel betrayed by the president they elected. For to them nothing less than ideological purity in action is acceptable. The president has been true to his word in so many of his campaign promises–universal health care, financial services reform, investments in clean energy technology, orderly withdrawl from Iraq. I am sure he would have closed Guantanamo if the obstacles to be overcome were not so difficult. No state has agreed to take the Guantanamo inmates. Issues that Republicans can exploit as wedge issues in the next campaign are major booby traps. Witness immigration reform. Let’s judge this president at the end of his first term. Will he succeed in getting Congress to pass a decent immigration reform law, ending Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, extricating the U.S. from Afghanistan? Will he temper the excesses of the major corporations through legislation and regulation?
Spoken like true Obamabot!
Have you no sense of decency?
This President is a liar, a psychopath, and a war criminal. He needs to resign NOW for the good of the country
AND
He needs to spend the rest of his life in prison.
Mary is upstairs!
A Way Towards The Rule of Law – An Answer to Cap’n Jack
We have “universal health care” now? Must have missed that one.
States have no authority to say who the US government puts where in its federal prison system. None.
Sorry, but I believe every political office holder ought to be accountable every day for what he or she does.
Sorry, but I said exactly what I meant with the disclaimer that from my perspective, as a conservative…
I fully understand this would not be an accurate statement from most members here – just stating an opinion from the other side.
I strongly suspect that you haven’t even managed to read what you wrote correctly (which continues to amuse). Try paying better attention.
Scarecrow is upstairs!
Stimulus Is Not a Bad Word and John M. Keynes Was Smarter than John Boehner
“I guess the wingnuts whether of the right or left will always feel betrayed by the president they elected. For to them nothing less than ideological purity in action is acceptable. The president has been true to his word in so many of his campaign promises…”
With regards to feeling betrayed, I think that may be true only if you believe any president can fulfill all your positions. I campaigned heavily for Bush during both his elections. Totally pleased with his performance? Of course not. But, given my age and the fact I was very young during the cold war, I will always be grateful to him simply because I felt my family was safe during his 8 years in office. However, I stepped back from my party in 2008 after the religious right took over in SW Ohio. Christian? Yes I am and I hold many Christian values. But I also understand the extremes of any position are usually a danger to the message and the good of all.
I don’t know how you can say you were not betrayed and at the same time claim Obama was true to his word in so many campaign promises – unless you accept his compromised water down policies as being true to his word.
“Will he succeed in getting Congress to pass a decent immigration reform law…”
How can he do that now? He has drawn his line in the sand by saying he will not enforce border security because he could not then get comprehensive reform. The Republicans say they won’t sign on to any comprehensive reform until the borders are secured. Seems to me two stupid sides claiming distrust of the other while the real reason is Democrats want the voter base and Republicans realize this – so who are the winners and losers here?
Plainly stated: It’s a pretty original display of hypocrisy to ride the wave of Obama-disaffection in here to beat your chest, and to do so with a straight face after saying “I campaigned heavily for Bush during both his elections.”.
We did some conversing during the Scott Brown election mess, and back then, you showed some scruples. Where did they go?
Edit: perhaps temerity is a better word.
Point taken and my apologies – I did read it, just didn’t see it
I’ll go back to my side now – totally embarrassed!
I visit this site to understand your point of view and, on occasion, offer my opinion. I always post with the disclaimer that I am a conservative and I try to be respectful of your position, regardless if I agree or not. So if I say something that appears disingenuous, then please afford me the courtesy of explaining why.
Being curious how firedoglake received Obama’s speech today, I came here only to discover further disappointment and frustration. I understand that and I sympathize with you, stating reasons that if he were my candidate, what would have caused me concern – justifiable in your opinion or not. I understood the assault from my sealed records comment, which I attempted to offer you the reasons why these would and would not be important issues to me. And, from my perspective, Obama is being manipulated by forces that are in contrast to the campaign promises made which resulted in his election win. It wasn’t so much about Obama than the fact I would have questioned the depth of the man from the beginning.
Of course I am baised, but feel I display it with honesty and fairness. On my side, I constantly rail against John Boehner, who happens to be in my district. IMO, it would not be a wise selection if the Republicans won control and appointed this man as Speaker. And as I stated earlier, I stepped back from my party for the reason I believe I do have scruples – I was no longer recognizing the Republican party as it ceased to represent my conservative beliefs – the religious right, John McCain and I could go on and on.
All that is appreciated. Conscientious Conservatives – we see very, very few around here – are no less valuable than Liberals to the process.
but
You can’t wear their tinfoil and simultaneously dismiss their whackadoo theories.
I mean, come on…
Edit: still – tell us how you view the GOP’s prospects for the Senate balance.
“tell us how you view the GOP’s prospects for the Senate balance.”
I should respond that I’d take a RED over a BLUE, given the current state of affairs. But I fear the Tea Party, for all the energy I believe it has provided to my base, has fielded candidates where I prefer an incumbent PURPLE over a solid RED.
I would be satisfied with Portman, Toomey, Fiorina, Rand and Rubio. I don’t look for Rand, Rubio or Fiorina to follow lockstep, and I don’t know that I’d want them too. I’d take PURPLE Castle over the airhead O’Donnell. Here I must confess my disappointment with DeMint coming out of nowhere to endorse this candidate. If he likes her now, why didn’t he like her a month ago when she was somewhat less an embarrassment? Unfortunately, I have to pull for Angle simply due to my disdain for Reid! I really like Miller in Alaska since he will likely be a stalwart for conservatism.
Overall, I believe the Republican party has a fresh, young and diverse selection of impressive candidates for the congress, senate and governorships.
I guess i didn’t directly answer your question about the balance in the Senate – but likely gave you plenty of material to question my sanity.
I temper the current message of an impending Tsunami, but I think it entirely possible for Republicans to pick up 5, and perhaps 6 seats.
Purely self-serving here, I’d like to see control of the House change, but not the Senate. The Senate is too broken to repair in time for the 2012 elections to be effective. And we have some RINOS who haven’t absorbed the message and feel they are protected until 2012 – Lindsey Graham is way too devious for either side and has to go!
Pat Tillman was assassinated on orders from on high.
May I say – what you wrote was incredibly insightful, and I am very moved by your response. I couldn’t agree with you more on how this country views itself. We have become what we set out to destroy, and it appears that no one even realizes it.
Americans have become experts in soundbites and patriotic rhetoric, but the actions are contrary to what most of us say we stand for.
Thank you for your statement. It’s good to know that there are still intelligent people living in this country.
I actually don’t disagree with most of what you’ve said. I do wonder why conservatives need to cling to the birth certificate mythology. I can understand the astroturf need to attack Obama’s legitimacy but it’s really unnecessary given his other problems on the economy and inability to connect with all too many voters. It’s really not very good for the country to be trying to make the President appear to be not President. Not patriot dontchaknow.
I think we’ve put Israel to shame as far as being a Police State. We are the police of the world.
We can’t fix our own problems, but we think everyone should follow in our footsteps. Why would they want to do that?
We send our youth off to war to secure the worlds supply of oil for the oil tycoons and dominate the planet via militaristic avenues
We incarcerate more of our citizens than any other first world country.
We disrespect our troops by either denying them the care and assistance they need upon their return, or subjecting them to subpar medical treatment
Corporations and the wealthy class have been running this country since the days of massive deregulation under Reagan. Our so-called government have been submitting to the will of big business for decades.
Individual rights have been stripped under the Patriot Act
Women have no reproductive rights
There is no national unity – racism and hate crimes is at an all-time high, and our political affiliations have divided and defined us in absolute terms
People are being thrown out of their homes because of unethical banking practices
Our education system is being hijacked by the religious right
The ridiculous “War on Drugs” has been draining the nation’s coffers for decades, and has not proven to make even a dent in curtailing the nations drug problems
There are no civil rights for LGBT communities
With all these reasons – nations should be lining up to be like us!! How about we throw out the “United” and just keep the “States of America”
“I do wonder why conservatives need to cling to the birth certificate mythology”
Likely for the same reason most group mentalities find it necessary to cling to something - and often anything
Kerry’s Swift Boats, Bush’s National Guard, 911 deniers, Palin. I don’t understand either.