I have nothing but unqualified praise for this trial balloon from the White House:
The White House is considering appointing Elizabeth Warren as interim head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, bypassing a likely Senate confirmation battle, according to sources.
Under the Dodd-Frank regulatory reform law signed July 21, the Treasury Department has the power to appoint a temporary head of the new agency until a permanent one is nominated and confirmed.
By naming Warren interim head, the White House would sidestep — for now — a likely fight over her nomination. Obama can still choose to formally nominate Warren sometime next year, or select another candidate if she becomes too polarizing.
Warren supporters are urging the White House to make the appointment quickly, which would give the Harvard professor time and authority to get the new agency running.
“We would like the appointment fast-tracked because of the need to establish the bureau and set standards for the industry,” said David Berenbaum, chief program officer for the National Community Reinvestment Coalition.
As the story notes, this is written into the Dodd-Frank law. Treasury gets to set up the CFPB before it transitions into the Federal Reserve, and the interim director of the agency they name can get started right away without Senate confirmation. And he or she can hold the office indefinitely, or until the President gets a nominee confirmed for the post.
I don’t expect Warren to just become a permanent interim director. But with her in place and making the rules for the various industries to follow, she would have less of a problem with confirmation if nominated. I wouldn’t read too much into the “if she becomes too polarizing” phrase in the excerpt – this is coming from American Banker, after all. Similarly, the only people warning against an interim appointment, with vague claims about it carrying baggage and undercutting her effectiveness, are industry lobbyists and former Republican aides.
What’s more, the White House has basically encouraged this speculation. An anonymous source told the Huffington Post that this possibility was under consideration.
Warren could serve until Obama nominates a permanent director — a nomination he’s not required to make, meaning that Warren could serve indefinitely with the full powers of the director. Obama could follow the interim nomination by later naming Warren as the permanent director, giving the Senate an opportunity to debate her selection. The ability of the administration to nominate an acting director indefinitely, avoiding a lengthy confirmation battle, was first reported by HuffPost’s Shahien Nasiripour in July. American Banker is also reporting that Warren is under consideration for the interim position. White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage tells us: “Elizabeth Warren has been a stalwart voice for American consumers and families and she was the architect of the idea that became the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The President will have more to say about the agency and its mission soon.”
This is a solid idea from a White House that seems to know they have nothing to lose by this appointment. They’ve been pounding on Republican obstruction of Presidential nominees for so long, they could hardly want for ammunition if the GOP decided to whine about being cut out of the process. Plus, the appointment of Don Berwick to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services caused barely a ripple of controversy. There’s just no good reason not to do this. I’m glad they’re moving in that direction.
UPDATE: Sewell Chan at the NYT confirms. To be clear, it seems this interim appointment would mainly be operative until Treasury transfers the CFPB to the Fed, which would be July 2012 at the latest. I think the best option is a simultaneous nomination and interim appointment to put pressure on the GOP for confirmation.




103 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Home Work assignment: Compare and Contrast FDR’s appointment of Frances Perkins to his cabinet with the weazle-in-chief’s actions with respect to Elizabeth Warren and the CFPB. Try not to cuss.
Appointing Elizabeth Warren as Interim CFPB Director is a very very good trial balloon. The sooner the better, especially before Nov. 2nd. She’s the best choice for the job.
Don’t bet on it, but if it does come to pass my position is too damn little too damn late.
Oh get real. Warren has as much chance as Dawn Johnson.
epistemic closure
Huh?
hahaha
school daze!
The White House just walked this back………
“White House officials denied reports Monday that the Obama administration is considering naming Elizabeth Warren the interim director of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency to avoid a tough nomination fight on the Senate floor.
And Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), a key negotiator on the reform bill that created the position, told reporters Monday that he “absolutely” believed that any person President Barack Obama names to the position – Warren or not – should go through the full Senate confirmation process.”
You needs you some Digby as regards “epistemic closure.”
Actually it coming from American Banker probably means its true as it is the banks who control the Obama administration. I could very easily see how Obama puts her in temporarily for the purpose of exciting the base only to then go and can her after the election is over…saying that she’s too polarizing to be permanently confirmed with the new Congress. If they’re going to put her in for PR reasons, they’ve probably already got her being canned press release written, which they’ll release that press release as well as Warren at the beginning of next year.
Link: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/42116.html
This is basically what they do. But a lot of the things they walk back end up happening. So we’ll see.
“[An] intellectual world in which the only trustworthy sources of information are those within your movement.” http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/the-great-epistemic-closure-debate
At least, I’m guessing David’s not referencing the actual philosophical principle, which is little too existential for my taste. “I’m holding a stick, and if I know that, then I know I’m not just dreaming I’m holding a stick. But, I can’t know that I’m _not_ dreaming, because even if I were, everything would still be the same.”
The stench of Kenyan anti-colonialism hangs heavy over Wall Street.
How could financial innovators be expected to innovate under such a heavy hand of creeping socialism?
But seriously, I’ll believe this when it happens, if then.
I seem to have been censored.
Nite all.
This is indeed good news… if it really happens. I confess, I am surprised by this news. I had not expected it.
Hm? If I had to take a guess, I think he was just suggesting you broaden your sources of information.
BHO=empty suit
Obama Says No to Installing Solar Panels on the White House
Edited on Mon Sep-13-10 04:53 PM by Nathanael
To the disappointment of environmental activists, the Obama administration has declined to put solar panels on the White House roof.
The organization 350.org, founded by Bill McKibben, has led a campaign to have Barack Obama re-install a set of solar panels which were originally installed on the White House by Jimmy Carter in 1979. The panels are obviously outdated but, according to the campaign, would serve as a symbol of the U.S. government’s commitment to a new energy future.
Rachel and Keith are in full pep rally mode. Scary Republicans who, if they get the keys, will return to their old ways that crashed the economy.
Obama teases with Warren. Like with Health Care Reform and his successful defeat of the Public Option, Lieberman plays the cock blocker within the Party who must be appeased (Trickledown – Tax Cuts for The Rich).
Progressives are expected to believe in Santa Claus, but he never comes.
Well, The Rethugs couldn’t screw us on Social Security, but Obama and these Democrats are determinedly hell bent to screw us on Social Security.
Sorry to hear that. Take care.
Spoken like a true ideological purist.
Ah, ah. Honey don’t. If you’re not sure who you are speaking to, I suggest, you don’t go there. Just a suggestion.
David, the real question should be “how many and which positions has Geithner already filled with his cronies at CFPB while Act 1 of this Kabuki has been playing out?”
The answer to that may well determine if the good Professor Warren will ultimately be confirmed, and more important how effective she may be.
what happened?
Ecan at 14 says she was censored.
You’re here. Live. Check #14. I’ve just noticed some neg vibes today. Could be projection. Could be I picked up on some vibes.
Just saying. Duck! Duck! Goose!
Don’t get scared. Get Back. To where you once belonged.
As much as I would like this to happen, I don’t think this trial balloon is going to fly. The statutory authority to hire an interim director is vague enough that Republicans will cry foul. If Obama was going to go this route he should have just done a recess appointment.
Plus, it’s Obama. I mean, come on…
oh thats weird………….cripes we havent even disscussed guillotines,or tar and feathers…………..g
the man is feckless…………..imo of course
Act 1 ended when they put the agency under the auspices of Bernanke’s Fed – like a mouse in the coils of a boa constrictor. This is another act.
You make a good point.
Echan will be missed her acerbic wit
What I was trying to say is sometimes a mod or the head liner guy, or Jane comes down on the thread….and then everybody runs. Like, they’re scared or something. Just me, prolly.
VERY sorry to hear that.
Wonder what’s up…
He’s certainly not ballsy.
and the Kabuki is so poor…………the players i mean,Short Ride,OrangeuTAN,ChrisimaCrook Dodd…………..dull,dull,dull
http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/no-closure-in-the-epistemic-closure-debate/
She didn’t like having her comment characterized as epistemic closure.
maybe,they receeded after minister Warrens speech at the Inaugural
This is something I intend to examine.
oh,i get it……..well you know opinions like Ass——
I’ve just always been questioning of those with authority. And, when folks get pissy, it always tells me something.
((eCAHN)))
and i still love GG…rotating villians….Kabuki theatre without the makeup
As usual, I do not know what you are talking about.
Must have bipartisanship. It’s what we all clamored for when we voted en masse to get rid of Republicans in 2008. That’s waht all the papers say anyway – that we absolutlely crave bipartisanship, I mean.
That’s why I love Joe Lieberman so much. I didn’t need any Public Option. I love my annual rate hikes for health insurance that provides decreasing “coverage” and increased co-pays.
she has taught me alot!
“I have nothing but unqualified praise for this trial balloon…”
Not me. The option the balloon talks about, of dumping Warren next year, if she “becomes too polarizing”, is just one more Obama cop-out to Wall Street and the repubs.
Obama has sat on his “centrist” ass for his 21 months in office. He’s pandered to the GOP like he was it’s mother…and if anyone thinks that things aren’t “polarized” from all that “reaching out” to the assholes, then they haven’t been paying attention.
If Warren isn’t polarizing things; and more than they are now, then she won’t be doing her damn job. To put it another way:
Anyone with two synapses to rub together knows that the repubs will rip her, no matter if she’s playing Wall Street’s game to the hilt. She might as well do the right thing and take some regulatory stands put something resembling at least a small leash on our Babbit-elites, since she’s going to catch hell, anyway.
And Obama, long months ago, should have arrived at the same conclusion.
Now, it’s probably too late for him.
That may be, in which case it’s hard to blame her, but still doesn’t explain her being censored.
Of course I’m not entitled to an explanation, and don’t expect one. Just saying I’m sorry to hear about it. Hope she returns tomorrow.
well ,everybody has an opinion,and one should not take umbrage,that clear it up any?
It’s all fine and well to dump on Obama here. Woo Hoo. Dude! Like it never happened here before. But, I think we should stand up for each other. But, then, I’m a crazy christian idiolist.
That’s right. Well Put.
this is a community,and as such,your correcto
Do we know for sure that she doesn’t have the votes to be confirmed or is this another Obama way of throwing the blame?
Maybe he wants to help the party’s beleagured election chances by throwing a bone to the base by appointing her interim but doesn’t want her there long term and will thus feel free to nominate someone else after the elections??? Couldn’t he appoint a regular one say in January?? I guess I’m saying that just because she’s appointed as a temp, doesn’t mean he has to wait for her temp term to expire, correct? He could temporarily appoint her for the benefit of the elections, then afterward appoint whoever it is he really wants??
Just thinking out loud here.
eCAHN is brilliant and I don’t care if she knows I said so. Sincerely.
I am not judging this. It is just what I observed at comments 4, 6 and 14.
It seems she probably made a comment between 6 and 14 that was quarantined.
As you know, I generaly disagree with her, but respect her intellect and knowledge of economics.
I believe I am. Sometimes it works for me here, sometimes not.
You! Hugs.
Dylan: Spoken like a true-believer fantasist and Obama-protector…
He’s “leading” democrats into what is shaping up to be one of the biggest and fastest reversals of political power in our history.
If you want to reward and protect he and the jellyfish herd for doing that, go right ahead, but I believe the same american electorate that gave him that 365 to 173 doubling of John McCain, and which hired him to mount the salvage operation after 8 years of Bush and the GOP’s savage idiocy, is about to start the process of firing him.
You guys still trying to cover for him can wave the big ju-ju-fear-dolls about Palin and the rest of the asshats until your arms fall off, but I don’t think it will work; too many good progressives who worked to get him elected with those big majorities are disgusted at what he’s doing.
You may not believe in reality, but reality believes in you. See you at the post-mortem on Nov. 3rd.
more snake oil,from the SO salespersons
Why is Elizabeth Warren such a pariah to the White House? Because she is a threat to the fascist financial institutions that manage Obama. The fact that she may be the most qualified and currently not the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau speaks loudly enough to be crystal clear. The fascists are running our government. What are our options?
she is,and funny too….many talents methinks
There are an awful lot of very smart folks here. That’s why it’s such a great site IMO. It’s not just the bloggers that are great. The commenters here almost daily impress me with their brilliance. I feel like a sponge when I come here and want to soak all up I can. *g*
Yes, thank you.
Interim? Just until after the elections, huh?
me too!and everybody is possessed of an opinion,makes great horse races….the pols on the otherhand teh suketh
You broke 2K followers!
Congratulations man.
good eve!
ditto and ditto’d…fingers and toes crossed for her quick return, this site isn’t the same without her.
well guess ill toddle off early tonite…..good eve pups
Are you in a good mood?
Interim, maybe. Unless McConnell disagrees vehemently.
Sadly! Smile, as you’re going to sleep. Love you!
I figured you would David, your work has been first rate from the beginning.
niters.
I’m always in a good mood.
Good evening and good night. :)
Does that mean that Timmeh is confident he has fucked up the CFPB enough to cobweb Warren? Let’s hope this is another sterling performance for him, say, like Indonesia.
I must check my filters, in that case.
Hamlet was 5 acts IIRC, and it only ended well for Norway. We shall see.
You’re messing me with me, right, girlfriend? You’re not trying to mess with my head?
Obama may pick her, but the question is, what will she do if they quietly spay and neuter the regulatory capabilities of the bureau?
I mean, Obama is WAY in bad cess with the progressive wing of the party. He’s desperate to change that, and for some time now a lot of us were viewing Warren as a line in the sand…whose refusal to hire, he’d better not cross. But he’s shown precious little willingness to put a real collar on Wall Street…even a small one. If he picks her, that’ll be a step in the right direction; I just want to make sure there’s not a sly step back in the other direction.
Cool.
I was in a good mood once…
Just coincidentally it happened to be after my *cough* lone *cough* experiment with teh grass.
I’m sure it was just a coincidence.
Nope. Being honest. Any mood that isn’t dead is a good mood.
Yeah, I guess. It’s all aspects. And, all relative.
On edit, I usually have a higher bar, however.
“Just thinkin’ out loud here…”
It’s good thinking.
Lily Tomlin, a couple of decades ago:
“No matter how cynical you get, you can’t keep up.” :o)
watertiger is upstairs!
Late Night: The Triumph of the Willfully Ignorant
Huh, yeah, I’ve been saying for some time now that today cynicism equals realism.
Of course, that’s about as
realcynical as one could be, I guess. :)Lucy, thanks for that bucket of ice water on the…celebrations. :o)
And Dodd’s adamant statement about Warren having to go through the full Senate confirmation process left a little something out:
Would he (and Obama!) want her to go through the holy confirmation process before the swearing-in of the new Senators, or after?
Enquiring fans of Warren would like to know.
I should add: The democrats’ compulsive genuflecting in front of the graven idol of proper procedural policy is touching…especially given that the republicans so delight in lying like rugs and doing anything they can to crap on honest, reasonable, debate.
I happen to think that that’s one reason why we’re going to get our political butts handed to us in about 6 weeks.
“Obama says no to installing solar panels on the White House.”
Another little robin…chirping about the corporate spring that seems to be the permanent climate at 1600 Pennsy Ave.
That seems logical, but logic doesnt rule DC. The corporations via money do. If Warren we appointed this way and actually pushed back against the megabanks, I assume they would increase their influence on their lackeys, ordering them to make it clear she will not be confirmed.
And by delaying a confimation vote, the corporations get whats seemed to work well in their favor: time to spread their money and influence around.
This could be a shrewd political move by the whitehouse where you get to seem to support her throwing some meat to the “progressives”, but in reality you assure her future nomination dead, leaving her not enough time to make changes that couldnt be easily undermined by whichever corporate lackey is confirmed and takes her place.
Obama praised St. Ronald Reagan for suggesting that Ketchup is an appropriate vegetable for school lunches. Reagan had a way of getting things done. Not that Obama agreed with it! He backpedaled.
Keeping those goddamn solar panels off the roof of the White House that Reagan had removed serves as further homage to the Saint.
I am your oily servant. – Obama, to big oil, “Clean” Coal and Nukes
WH must be groping around pretty hard to have put this out there.
Bad WH, bad WH! Should have done this MONTHS ago – too late now to change November.
If you geniuses at the WH keep going like this, you’re going to get tossed under the bus by the American people.
Fantastic news – but I will believe it when I see it.
I hope you’re right David.
Warren would be perfect for this job. She’s smart, educated in the area, and would get the opportunity to staff the Dept, and get things up and running in a proper manner. Last thing we need is for another Agency like the MMS, FDA, EPA, or any number of the others that are supposed to look out for our good, but don’t.
Not to mention what a HUGE morale booster she would be for the base.
I’m not so much an Obama-protector as I am a Democratic Party-protector.
Cooled you right down, eh! Sorry. :)
I know they are political “fucking retards” in the WH, but you’d think they’d want to give us some reason to vote for them.
Not to mention that she’s perfect for the job in every way.
But….we are dealing with our faux-Dem President, so we’ll see.
What do you mean? Did I break some kind of unspoken FDL Commenter Club rule?
You did not.
Carry on.
/~~~
It’s the Public Option ploy all over again. They float her up to get us interested. Sorry, Barry were onto you Dude. We know she’ll never get the post, your flunkies just want to see if were paying attention.
This is a great idea, both the politics and the policy. So, of course, we can expect a smoking hole in the ground, when all is said and done.
Anything short of a full-throated, brass knuckles White House push to get her confirmed by the legislature is BS. These progressive legislative paths that Dday always writes about almost always involve some form of delay and NEVER work out. Sorry, Dday, I wish they would, but they just don’t. I admit it, I’ve got possible-path-to-legislative-victory fatigue. I think I started developing it when the 11th possible path for the public option emerged. Pardon my cyncism, I apologize for it, but there comes a point when it’s time to accept the reality that the Democrats are in opposition to progressive policy and progressive leaders.
The administration needs Elizabeth Warren temporarily, they don’t want her to lead CFPB because the banks don’t want her, so they’re going to make her temporary. She’ll have a short-lived position and in that time she’ll be demonized by industry and the White House will remain silent. Her interim tenure will expire and the WH will put an industry friendly lobbyist in the position under the justification that Edwards is too controversial to be confirmed. If they really wanted her to lead the agency, then they’d come out with both barrels blasting and advocate for her today.
Oops, I meant Warren, not Edwards. I shouldn’t post late at night.
I was gonna post, but you’ve said it all.
If Warren doesn’t get the job, Obama’s lost me. I don’t think I’m alone in this.
“I’m not so much an Obama protector as I am a democratic party protector.”
And you think calling someone who is critical, and ACCURATELY critical, of Obama’s bush-lite politics, as he drags us into the political outhouse, an “ideological purist”, is protecting the democratic party?
The american people are sick unto nausea of political hacks and bullshitters. Especially, someone who ran and won big on the idea of real change, and then turned out to be another minion of the conservative fatcats whose philosophy and agenda have nearly ruined us.
In fact, I would say from your comments, and those of others who insist that progressives have some kind moral obligation to lay off of Obama, that the the only thing you’re protecting is the status quo…
Which is precisely why we’re going to get shellacked in 6 weeks.