So a flurry of activity signifying nothing on the Elizabeth Warren/CFPB front. Fox News thought they heard that she would get the interim appointment. Then they retracted it. White House spokesman Bill Burton would only say that she’s “in the mix” for the job. Enough plugged-in reporters have speculated that she could get an interim appointment to manage the agency through Treasury, or get the nomination, that clearly Burton is right. Or, nothing could happen. We don’t know and it’s getting ponderous reporting the scraps of information out there.
What’s more fascinating is the fact that Chris Dodd, whose name sits at the head of the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill, doesn’t seem to know the intricacies of the law that bears his name:
News reports yesterday generated speculation that the Obama administration will offer Elizabeth Warren a so-called “interim appointment” to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The authority for the Treasury Department to grant an interim appointment — distinct from a “recess appointment” — comes from the financial reform law itself.
In dismissing the rumor last night, though, Senate Banking Committee Chair Chris Dodd — who authored the law — claimed he’d never heard of the interim appointment power.
“I don’t know what it is. I never heard of it before,” said a flabbergasted Dodd to TPMDC. “It’s kind of unique isn’t it?”
That’s kind of absurd, is what it is. The law very clearly gives authority to the Treasury Department to set up the Consumer Financial Protection Agency. The law states it pretty clearly (search for “Subtitle F–Transfer of Functions and Personnel; Transitional Provisions”). So long as Treasury is running the CFPB, the Secretary of the Treasury can run the agency. And, he can delegate to someone with interim authority over the agency. It would have been simple for Dodd to move to start out the CFPB inside the Federal Reserve, and we wouldn’t have this issue.
The dirty secret is that drafters write these laws to conform them to the necessary legalese – the Senators outline the broad points. So it’s not unusual for Dodd not to know what’s in his bill. But the consumer protection piece was pretty fundamental, and if it starts at Treasury, it stands to reason that they can have whoever they want to run things on an interim basis, unless it gets written into the law that the interim director needs Senate confirmation. This is just inattentiveness to the legislative process on the part of Dodd.
Again, my ideal preference would be for an interim appointment and a nomination simultaneously, and to have the nomination battle in the next few months. The public supports the financial bill more than anything Congress has recently done, and this strong signal of appointing a fighter for the middle class is good politics. Making sure she can actually do the job is good policy, and the combination appointment/nomination serves that goal in two ways. One, Warren can actually start regulating immediately. Two, it defuses the normal technique for Senate Republicans, to just delay confirmation forever. Because delay means nothing if Warren is already on the job.
UPDATE: Tim Fernholz mentioned that Eric Stein is currently heading up CFPB’s transition team. Stein is the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Consumer Protection, and a former senior Vice President with the Center for Responsible Lending.
UPDATE II: Wow, Dodd’s just outright lying now.
Outgoing Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) warned Tuesday that an interim appointment of Elizabeth Warren to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau “jeopardizes the existence” of the nascent agency.
“This is a big job, an important job, and it needs to be — you’ve got to build the support for that institutionally or the next Congress – and none of us know what the outcome’s going to be politically — you could gut this before it even gets off the ground. If you don’t have someone running it early on, it jeopardizes the existence of the consumer protection bureau,” he said. Asked how Congress would gut it, he said: “Money. Take away the money. That’s how you always do it.”
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has independent funding. To gut it you’d have to gut the Federal Reserve. Dodd repeatedly stressed the independent funding of the CFPB during the Dodd-Frank debate. He claims that “They can change the funding source and kill it… That can change with an amendment” is no different than basically anything in the law today. The GOP could change the law forcing every American to tithe half their salaries to Goldman Sachs with an amendment. Who cares? Defunding is obviously a concern for everything, but I fail to understand the logic of not appointing the right person for a job due to that threat. It’s like saying “don’t poke the bear.” The bear’s awake.




33 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Like a carrot in front of a donkey.
Warren deserves better. I half hope she bolts.
How come we keep getting last night’s diary’s. Day late and a dollar short. Why there’s no one here? Not like I’m working here or anything.
Nevertheless, Fuck Dodd. What’s he doin’? Making another Shower Video?
Q: What does Chris Dodd wear on a hot date with a banker?
A: Depends
who got paid gov’t funds to draft this bill? was it done the same as having that wellpoint person write the ‘health care reform’ bill?
dodd is lying trying to suck up to his future employers since he is going to have to hold a real job.
Well, if no one is speaking, I’ll go OT and say that I’m watching Chris Whatisname on KO. He’s much better playing himself, rather than the trying to play Rachel while he was filling in for her a little while back. Didn’t work. Maybe too many coffees. Maybe other stuff.
Dodd has gone off the deep end and/or somebody (likely with very deep pockets) has really gotten to him. Jeebus.
Graham Cracker and Milk for you.
Maybe it’s because he has a “D” after his name, and so we watch him more closely… but if Dodd isn’t the best (or worst) example of Senate-to-Lobbyist fandance we have ever seen, I don’t know who is.
Or, maybe Jane was, like, So Go Dodd, earlier. She was, and you know it.
I beg your pardon?
Perfect you. Conscience? Memory?
I’m not sure what you were talking about, but if you want to find some lockstep people, you will have to look elsewhere.
Perhaps you are talking about another issue that Dodd favored Progressives with.
Clearly. Perhaps.
Lockstep, baby.
to me he is showing his true colors. all of his lies back when & his impassioned speeches in the Senate were nothing but a rouse. He is bought and paid for by the MOTU! He & his family just bought into heaven on earth….
Glad to hear some simple truth here. I agree.
i certainly do not know what your intention was when you wrote that but it came across as demeaning my comment as nothing more than a snack for kids.
You win. I’m going to make dinner and get ready for a class I’m going to. Thanks for the luv.
Of course it is.
That picture looks like he thinking that if Warren gets appointed and can actually have some regulatory effect on banks his whole future is going down the drain.
The caption: “How in the world could this have gotten so fucked up?”
Eli is upstairs!
Primary Results Liveblogging
The defunding question
Unless all of the funding for the CFPA is self-executing, and that means all the money for all operating expenses, including salaries, the danger would be that the 2011 Republican House (if such it will be) could, all by itself, defund the agency by refusing to authorize an appropriation to cover any non-self-executing funding it needs.
Sure, to get rid of the obligations created by any law, including the one that created the CFPA, you need the same thing you needed to pass that law, assent of both chambers plus the president, or >2/3 in both chambers. But there is this other approach, that the Rs are publically discussing as a means to get rid of the ACA, of just denying any annual authorization the agency or govt official needs to operate. You only need a majority of the House to insure that no money is appropriated for a given purpose. Even if Dodd is wrong on the details of how the CFPA is funded, and it has no non-self-executing funds that would make this approach possible, I think he’s right in thinking that the Rs would target the whole agency, or just Warren, for this tactic, if they could.
I’m not sure that this has ever been done, and therefore I am not clear on what happens when a govt function or office continues as an obligation, because the law creating it has not been repealed, but the Congress fails to appropriate money to meet that obligation. The administration would presumably try to redirect money from other sources to meet the otherwise unfunded obligation. That’s where the fun begins, at least form the teabagger perspective. At last they’ll have some at least arguably real overreach by the Kenyan usurper to froth about.
Under Timmeh? Really?
What the hell are you talking about?
The defunding question
Unless all of the funding for the CFPA is self-executing, and that means all the money for all operating expenses, including salaries, the danger would be that the 2011 Republican House (if such it will be) could, all by itself, defund the agency by refusing to authorize an appropriation to cover any non-self-executing funding it needs.
I’m sorry gtommkins, but you should’ve read the law before confusing readers with your answer to the “defunding question”. The CFPA is funded by the Federal Reserve (which makes its own money and doesn’t ever need a congressional appropriation). Even an interim director would be funded by the Fed.
SEC. 1017. FUNDING; PENALTIES AND FINES.
(a) Transfer of Funds From Board Of Governors-
(1) IN GENERAL- Each year (or quarter of such year), beginning on the designated transfer date, and each quarter thereafter, the Board of Governors shall transfer to the Bureau from the combined earnings of the Federal Reserve System, the amount determined by the Director to be reasonably necessary to carry out the authorities of the Bureau under Federal consumer financial law, taking into account such other sums made available to the Bureau from the preceding year (or quarter of such year).
(2) FUNDING CAP-
(A) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding paragraph (1), and in accordance with this paragraph, the amount that shall be transferred to the Bureau in each fiscal year shall not exceed a fixed percentage of the total operating expenses of the Federal Reserve System, as reported in the Annual Report, 2009, of the Board of Governors, equal to–
(i) 10 percent of such expenses in fiscal year 2011;
(ii) 11 percent of such expenses in fiscal year 2012; and
(iii) 12 percent of such expenses in fiscal year 2013, and in each year thereafter.
(B) ADJUSTMENT OF AMOUNT- The dollar amount referred to in subparagraph (A)(iii) shall be adjusted annually, using the percent increase, if any, in the employment cost index for total compensation for State and local government workers published by the Federal Government, or the successor index thereto, for the 12-month period ending on September 30 of the year preceding the transfer.
(C) REVIEWABILITY- Notwithstanding any other provision in this title, the funds derived from the Federal Reserve System pursuant to this subsection shall not be subject to review by the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate.
(3) TRANSITION PERIOD- Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and until the designated transfer date, the Board of Governors shall transfer to the Bureau the amount estimated by the Secretary needed to carry out the authorities granted to the Bureau under Federal consumer financial law, from the date of enactment of this Act until the designated transfer date.
I agree.
This post’s presumption that Dodd is either stupid or, later in the Update, lying, is disingenuous. He’s doing the bidding of his prospective employers. It is very clear. Why are we not asking him who he’ll work for in 2011?
The big news tonight is that the democrats just held on to a Senate seat. The polls show Chris Coons beating O’Donnell by the same 11 point margin by which Castle would have beaten him.
That may move around some, but Delaware is a pretty solid blue state, and by the time Coons and the democrats get done with O’Donnell and her crusade against hairy palms, she’ll be ready for history’s footnote file cabinet.
As for Obama, he’s still busy dangling Elizabeth Warren in front of progressives like he was a canine owner trying to get poochie to roll over and make nice, and then he’ll get a dog-yummy.
As the ‘Chicks said: “I’m not ready to make nice.”
Put Warren in the job; tell Chris Dodd to STFU; leave the Bureau she needs to head, with all of it’s teeth still sharp and intact, and then, Mr. Centrist: Maybe we’ll give YOU a dog-yummy. :o)
“I half hope she bolts.”
Agreed. Especially if they put her in and then water down the regs at the bureau she’s heading.
My fantasy conversation:
O.: “Well, Elizabeth, you’re the choice.”
Warren: “Thank you, Sir. I’ll do my best, as long as you haven’t neutered the bureau like some stray tomcat. If you do that, then my resignation will be on your desk within the hour, undoubtedly ending any chance you have at holding onto much support from the progressive democrats who were so instrumental at helping you gain the White House. Still want me?”
She is apparently a tenacious and capable infighter, something I would not have guessed. But the longer she fights for the chair, the longer she gives them to tread water. I want her to disavow that effort, but I’m afraid she is so tenacious that she may not yet see it for what it is.
“Why are we not asking who he’ll work for in 2011?”
An excellent question. I expect the answer is: Dodd, himself, doesn’t know…since it’s a good bet that after November 2nd, Barack Obama is going to be one of the lamest lame-duck preznints we’ve had, in a long, long, time, and Dodd is already hedging his bets.
I mean, how many times have you seen a Senator directly farting in the face of a president who came in with an 18(?) seat majority in the upper chamber?
It’s a yardstick for measuring how little respect and clout Obama has among his own party. It’s not just that Dodd is pandering to his favorite K-street palm-greasers: he’s doing what the republicans are doing, which is, filling a HUGE power vacuum left by this shockingly inept and unprincipled president.
It’s certain that Dodd perceives that the chances of Obama being a one-termer are increasing by the week, and is already taking steps to distance himself from him. After the mid-terms, I think we’re going to see a lot more of it, especially from people who are flirting with the idea of making a run at him in 2012.
“The longer she fights for the chair, the longer she gives them to tread water.”
Spot on.
But it’s also getting to the point that Obama needs her to help him mend some really shitty fences with progressives, more than she needs him.
I hope she understands THAT. :o)
Right. The only thing we have to cling to here is her integrity, and I consider that unimpeachable.
If she gets the chair, it will only be on terms she finds acceptable, and Geithner cannot withstand the scrutiny that will bring.
She should bow out right now.
:-(
I’m still wondering what any of demi’s posts mean, especially in this thread…
I’m going to go out on a limb and guess you’ll come back to this thread.
When you do, we should talk off thread. I’m betting you know how to reach me.