The FCC officially approved the opening of a vast amount of unused spectrum for broadband Internet, potentially creating a fast “super-WiFi” network.
The change in available airwaves, which were freed up by the conversion of television signals from analog to digital, constitutes the first significant block of spectrum made available for unlicensed use by the F.C.C. in 20 years.
It was a victory that did not come easily, or quickly, however. The F.C.C. first approved a similar measure in 2008, but the technical requirements for unlicensed devices drew objections from 17 companies or groups on both sides of the issue, forcing the commission to redraft its proposal [...]
Supporters of the measure hope the airwaves will be used for stronger and faster wireless networks — known as “super Wi-Fi” because of the signals’ ability to pass more easily through obstacles — and for use in providing Internet access to rural areas.
“Today’s order finally sets the stage for the next generation of wireless technologies to emerge and is an important victory for Internet users across the country,” Richard Whitt, telecommunications and media counsel in Google’s Washington office, said in a posting on the company’s public policy blog.
Of course, now that we have the next generation of wireless technologies, Google and the telecoms will do their best to control and monetize them. Not only have they persuaded gullible tea partiers to join the cause, taking advantage of baseless fears about government takeovers of the Internet (strike government and replace with corporate and you’re on to something), but they’re getting help from prominent Democrats as well:
Full consensus may not be the end game of an effort by House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (Calif.) as he crafts a bill on net neutrality, according to House aides involved in the process.
Waxman may move forward with a bill that does not get full agreement from all sides in the debate but that seems to have enough support to pass the House, three aides said.
As Congressional staffers weigh input from public interest groups and cable, phone, and Internet companies, their consideration has in part turned to whether moving without the approval of certain major stakeholders would sink the bill, the aides said.
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, who could end the entire discussion by reclassifying broadband as the telecommunications it clearly is, and regulating the Internet under the guidelines he presumes to support, instead said “I admire and I appreciate the effort and I hope it succeeds… I am pleased Chairman Waxman and the other members involved are making a real effort to make progress on these issues.”
While just a week ago, Waxman announced public support for net neutrality, the negotiations he’s administering could lead to a worse “solution” than the Google-Verizon deal.
So it’s great that we are using this white space spectrum to make the architecture of the Internet stronger, but we should be disturbed by these new efforts to turn it into a toll road.





16 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
And it needs to be mentioned that we -the taxpayers/citizens OWN these airwaves,they are only leased to companies. And as the leaseholders, we DO have the right to set the obligations of the lessee’s, not the other way around.
“So it’s great that we are using this white space spectrum to make the architecture of the Internet stronger, but we should be disturbed by these new efforts to turn it into a toll road.”
They get paid to much hush money by corporate USA to fight for principle and policy. Will we have to pony up for this? Yes to reduce transparancy.
OT Robert Reich on Dem failure http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/the-super-rich-get-richer_b_737792.html
We also have the obligation to make use of that right and not to allow it to be given away to concentrations of wealth or power … and, especially, not behind closed doors.
The purpose of the airways is information, unfettered and useful, not propaganda, not bombast, not the ‘shaping” of opinion, not the selling of our nation, and, most decidedly, not the coarsening of our society.
We shall soon discover whether “we” actually DO have such rights, and, to make such rights truly meaningful, the “power” to actively and actually participate in decisions regarding the use of those airways.
History does not suggest that “we” will have much affect … unless we seriously insist upon it, ubetchaiam.
DW
We own but they steal our assests and deal them to the highest donators. Hope I am wrong but 30 years of enriching the whining rich say otherwise.
The economy is broke how much is Obama going to charge them? A 10% fee on all net ads for 50 years would bring in a bunch of cash. Tax high speed internet porn…damm!
Why under a free market economy the government gives away the people’s wealth to the rich for almost free?
I’m a little confused. It happens from time to time. You said Waxman is working for net neutrality (someone here recently was dissing Waxman about his take on this), but you want to have us be concerned about the toll road, which of course we should be. Do you think Waxman’s part of the toll road?
Thank you in advance for your response.
I’m betting internet stocks will rise on this news this might be Obama’s secret save the economy plan but much like crappy cell phone service in America the free markets will screw it up waste money on competing tech that does not work with their competitors tech, refuse to share signal in areas they control and when all is said and done other countries will do the job better and cheaper.
Chris in Paris at America blog raves about French cell phone, cable tv, internet speed and cheapness.
I am betting this is a flash in the pan as far as a stockmarket high it won’t last till november.
Demi, yes, Waxman is selling us and the internet out to the telecoms, as David has been posting about for a week or so. I don’t have his last linky on this, but just FDL search his name . . . as always, he’s done great work capturing the issues and players.
David, thanks for this update, and keeping us informed.
It’s time to give Waxman another earful from us retards.
Bastards are privatizing profits and socializing losses again.
‘Kin elected offals, each and every one. And Geno and the FCC, too.
Thank you, Larue. Nice to know I’m not talking to myself.
What a bunch of crappy news we hear anyway. That clip that’s rolling of NJ Christy is disgusting. I saw your diary. My heart hurts too.
PS, on edit, Ed just called Christy a cold hearted fat slob. Oh, my.
They have been doing it almost from the founding of the country. All for the few developing and profiting from the resources. It’s called privatization.
Tea Party Patriots do not, and will not, take corporate money for anything.
[edited by mod].
Well said but Dems don’t give a damn about the people……both political parties intent is to make us,the people,subservient to Corporations.
Corporate America serves their own interests at the pleasure, and with permission of, the guys who make the laws. See, that would be the guys in Congress. So… tell me again, why are we trusting them with all that power?
Are you planning on designing the technology necessary to use the new spectrum? And paying all the money for marketing, R&D, maintenance, etc.?
We may own the airwaves, but I’m not aware of taxpayers ever forking over money for those things, let alone a public, tax-funded ISP…