When the House Speaker got involved in the foreclosure fraud mess and called for investigations of the lending industry, the media took notice. And this is becoming a bipartisan affair. The Justice Department announced that they’re looking into the matter. Democratic Senators like Robert Menendez and Al Franken have continued to put on the pressure. In addition to Democratic officials in Maryland, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican, ordered the suspension of all foreclosures in his state, a huge move. And take a look at the comment from John Boehner’s spokesman on this situation:
Michael Steel, a spokesman for House Minority Leader Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio), said, “At a time when economic uncertainty and unemployment are putting great pressure on homeowners and the housing market, it is imperative that we get all of the facts about this situation, and quickly.”
I think we’re close to politicians calling for a nationwide foreclosure moratorium, including in non-judicial foreclosure states. The AFL-CIO is already there. One analyst told WaPo “Right now, there’s no question we’re headed into a moratorium period.”
The tipping point could be California, the largest state in the union but also one where a judicial sign-off is not required for foreclosures. But one state lawmaker thinks he’s found a formula to get a moratorium called.
Attorney General Jerry Brown has already asked Ally Financial and JPMorgan Chase to suspend their foreclosure operations, but neither lender has responded to Brown’s request, and the foreclosures have continued. (If you know of one, contact the AG’s office here). Brown can easily say that the companies are refusing to comply, and he could institute an injunction. But the state regulatory agencies have a role to play here as well.
Assemblyman Ted Lieu (D), who ran in the Democratic primary for Attorney General this year, and who has been the leader in the state legislature on the foreclosure issue, yesterday sent letters to the Department of Financial Institutions and the Department of Corporations, who between them regulate all the top mortgage lenders in the state. He requested that they use their power to institute a mandatory foreclosure moratorium for failure to comply with two state laws.
SB 1137, passed in 2008 with Lieu as a co-author, requires lenders to meet or call the homeowner and talk to them and advise them of ways to avoid foreclosure before any eviction. The lender then has to declare this in writing. In addition, the California Foreclosure Prevention Act requires lenders to certify that they have a modification program in place for the borrower to access, or the regulatory agency can implement a 90-day foreclosure moratorium.
“An aggressive commissioner could go to, say, BofA, and say ‘I don’t believe you’re following through, so I’m imposing a moratorium unless you prove to me you’re taking these steps,’” said Lieu in an interview with FDL News. While the authority in the Foreclosure Prevention Act is clear, with respect to SB 1137, the Attorney General could file what is known as a 17.200, an unfair business practice claim. “Even a DA could possibly do it,” said Lieu. “And the remedy could be a moratorium, or to pay huge damages that would make it an effective moratorium.”
Lieu cautioned that both of these steps aren’t easy, and would require some fortitude on the part of the regulator. “But otherwise you have a meaningless law if there’s no remedy for it,” Lieu said.
Lieu said that the problems with the foreclosure documentation reminded him of the problems with false documentation in the subprime mortgage market in the run-up to the crisis. “What ran through my mind is, the more things change… But the other thing this shows, we’ve been in this foreclosure crisis for a number of years, and the banks haven’t hired enough capacity to get the job done,” Lieu concluded. He hoped that this could be the stick to get the lenders back to the negotiating table to avoid foreclosures by offering realistic modifications to the borrowers. The enormous potential liability of the lenders if they cannot get judges to move foreclosures could become a powerful motivator. Otherwise, millions of homes would remain in limbo.
The industry fears a moratorium, because of the effect it would have on the overall housing market, chilling people from buying foreclosure properties because of questions about the title ownership. “My view is, who bears the burden for that,” Lieu insisted. “The lenders made a lot money going through that process, and they should face consequences. If that makes them have enormous difficulty, so be it.”




29 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Great post, David. Thank you for all your hard work.
This is just so overwhelming (the foreclosure crisis). Thank you for sorting through all of it and spelling it out for us.
Yes! Keep riding this all the way to the midterms!
You could add Kentucky and Mississippi to your list of significant class action lawsuits against foreclosure fraud. Yves Smith posted links to the Scribd feeds for those two complaints yesterday.
Those consequences should and must include criminal sanctions and psison time.
Amazing. Republiscum are being hammered for abuses of their own making before an election, and they can’t hide behind “state secrets.”
Note the difference in the Democratic and Republican responses.
Franken, Pelosi et al are going in with guns a-blazin’, whereas Boehner’s flack is saying that they need more facts before they act (which of course will be sometime around the Twelfth of Never).
Make that “prison” time. Haste makes waste.
Good point, but the “reality” of the ersatz “libertarian” Rethug-world is that gov’t should just keep out of all of this and let the vaunted market-place “take care of it.” If there’s a mess, and the banksters are raking in the big bucks leaving homeowners out on the sidewalk: why Glenn Beck will be cued to blame it all on the evil, lousy, lazy, slacker homeowner who MUST have deserved to be kicked out on the street because, of course, the banks and corporations would never do anything wrong.
It never ceases to amaze me how stupid the Republicans are about this stuff, but then again, someone’s making money out of peddling this crap to credulous T-partiers.
I say: Go Jerry Brown! Go Pelosi! Go after those criminals in the banks!
Here’s an opportunity for Boehner’s opponent to run a 30 second ad asking why doesn’t Boehner state his position on this issue.
You know, a foreclosure moratorium just might devastate the housing market, because the only way any buyer will risk involvement in this mess is if prices come WAY down beyond where they are now. We could see cash sales for pennies on the dollar. I might even buy a house myself. :-)
And all those securitized mortgages? Not worth the paper they’re printed on. The banks will get hammered.
This is huge what happens to the value of Home Loan Paper? Can Obama do this before the Election if he can this changes everything! How long would the Moratorium be? How much would this help raise home prices?
Thats bull the value of home loan paper is there worry. If nobody is selling foreclosed properties then the value of every home still for sale goes up. The banks have been selling at a loss for a year now anything that raises home prices helps them.
Either home prices go up, the economy starts working or the banks can see the value of their home loans go down further once the market says the words Japanese lost decade and means it.
Great work, DD, and do you have any idea what this implies for homeowners’ associations? Who pays the dues if no one owns the home? and without papers, no one owns the home.
I note that GOP buzzword is “economic uncertainty” and they blame it on HRC. That is, business owners can’t hire because they can’t plan because they don’t know what to budget for benefits and blah blah blah. It’s stupid. I also think “economic uncertainty” is a conveniently vague way to avoid saying Zombie Wall Street Apocalypse.
How difficult would it be in trust deed States to require the Trustee to produce, as part of it’s service on the Trustor, a true copy of the Trust Deed. No copy no foreclosure.
Maybe I’m not understanding everything, but I think the issue is that with any paperwork required, the actors involved are taking shortcuts, and for govt to enforce any and all requirements already on the books is rather problematic. The banks are the robbers at this point. Who hauls them in? I may overstate, but just making a point.
I’m in California and haven’t seen this bill. Does anyone know if a moratorium on foreclosures were to come, can I stop making my mortgage payments without fear of getting kicked out of my home? Is it only for those already in the foreclosure process (did I miss the boat?)?
There wasn’t any fraud involved in my loan and I can afford to continue making my payments, but the value of my home has dropped and not making mortgage payments would be a huge help to me.
Yeah, injunctions are the way to go. As I mentioned here last December in the context of healthcare reform (hey whatever happened to that).
There are a couple of tools that regulators can use that get results…
1. big daily fines (“big” as in sufficient to get the code violators attention– a $1000 a day seems to work for city code inspectors while the EPA’s $25,000 a day fines for Clean Water Act violations may be too low).
2. Quickly go into court for injunctions for the small stuff— inaccurate recordkeeping, say, so when you go into court for the big stuff, its not for breaking the law per se but for hitting the violator and its managers personally for their contempt of court by violating the simple recordkeeping injuction. During World War II, the Office of Price Administration got around the weak criminal penalties by such a use of injunctions.
Great reporting, DD! I am anticipating your next update…
I am not sure this is where wisdom lies.
In the 80′s during the farm crisis a moratorium was placed on foreclosures. It ended up exacerbating and prolonging the crisis.
Beware of the law of unintended consequences.
To points:
The first is ‘What goes around comes around.’
The second is how this will impact the economy: ‘Oh shit.’ Until this mess is cleaned up, there will be a lot of people who will not be able to sell their homes. This will be gridlock like we haven’t seen since Lehman went down.
Lieu said that the problems with the foreclosure documentation reminded him of the problems with false documentation in the subprime mortgage market in the run-up to the crisis. “What ran through my mind is, the more things change… But the other thing this shows, we’ve been in this foreclosure crisis for a number of years, and the banks haven’t hired enough capacity to get the job done,” Lieu concluded.
Fer crissakes with all the free Zero% money Ben’s been giving out the last 2 years you’d think these greedy nitwits would help get the unemployment numbers down. We are led by incredibly stupid people.
What if everyone stopped paying their mortgage? (salivates at the thought of mass middle class civil disobedience)
Dave– Re: Texas AG Greg Abbott’s “order” – it’s really more of a request. Keep in mind, Texas is a non-judicial foreclosure state;
the terms of foreclosing without a filiing in court are written into the contract.
Even though Abbott’s letter to the mortgage companies demands they cease foreclosures, there’s a big question whether the AG has any authority to “order” a moratorium, so it’s framed as a request. And, as this article notes, the big boys have either ignored it, or declined to comply.
There is, after all, an election coming up soon – I fear this is just grandstanding, with no teeth behind it.
Still, if Abbott chooses to use his bully pulpit for jawboning, it could have an effect. I hope so, but will not hold my breath.
I actually liked “pisson” time just as much.
The fraud & forgery is not on the deeds, it’s on the notes. The notes were supposed to be lawfully assigned to the RMBS trusts, but were not. The forgery & counterfeiting are to conceal that failure of assignment and to “retroactively” create a proper assignment. The RMBS trusts are hollowed out by the loss of those notes. Coupla’ good quants could tell us the extent of financial losses in the RMBS trusts.
It’s like John said @9:
Baloney.
Is there any chance in all this for the folks who are already out of their homes to get some relief on their credit reports?
Just realize that Congress unanimously passed a law legalizing the very fraudulent practices the Banksters used to perpetrate these foreclosures.
Its on OBama’s desk and waiting to be signed into law:
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/75382
Deeds of Trust are usually filed in the Real Property Records of the County in which the property is located. IF they are not filed, then no other creditor has effective notice of the record.
Title companies will not find “unfiled” deeds. And effectively, in every state, chain of title is established solely on the basis of what is filed in the real property records of the county. So, the failure to file an updated Deed of Trust after assigment means that the new holder of the note cannot establish chain of title.
If a junior lienholder, like a Homeowners Association, were to foreclose on the property, it is only required to give notice of the foreclosure to all Lienholders of Record and the Homeowner. If a lienholder of record no longer has the property, but assigned it to a lender that now does not have a proper record of that filed with the county, then the “true” lender will never receive notice of the foreclosure.
What does that mean? It means that once the period for Redemption expires, the “True” lender may be left without any collateral. THAT depends on the state and other things like how long it takes for the “true” lender to finally realize its mistake. There’s a mechanism known as “Adverse Possession.”